[Fedora-packaging] Re: I wish to package some CC licensed content ...

Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 21:34:10 UTC 2009

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 février 2009 à 13:14 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :
>> I think Bill Nottingham really hit the nail on the head here with why 
>> content should be a separate repo. It's generally unlikely to be tied to 
>> a particular Fedora release, ergo putting it in a version-release repo 
>> would lead to a lot of unnecessary duplication.
> Because our packaging guidelines do not ever change, and rpm has
> fossilized, right?

Careful Nicolas... the dripping sarcasm isn't as noticeable in text as 
it would be in voice.

Lyos Gemini Norezel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090220/a7971a01/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Lyos_GeminiNorezel.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 443 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090220/a7971a01/attachment.vcf>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list