[Fedora-packaging] Packaging clarification regarding bash-completion scripts

Michel Salim michel.sylvan at gmail.com
Mon Feb 23 20:43:49 UTC 2009

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
> Michel Salim wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi>
>> wrote:
>>> FYI, apart from some general common sense packaging guidelines, I
>>> wouldn't
>>> invest too much time into this at the moment.  We're working on some
>>> changes
>>> to the bash completion dir structure and probably the mechanism with
>>> which
>>> individual completions are enabled upstream, it'll hopefully be included
>>> in
>>> not too distant future releases.
>> Ah, right. Thanks.
> Provided what Ville said, if I were you, let your package own
> /etc/bash_completion.d/ ;)
Indeed, that's what I did. Bugs filed against darcs
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487012) and mercurial
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487015) as well.


miʃel salim  •  http://hircus.jaiku.com/
IUCS         •  msalim at cs.indiana.edu
Fedora       •  salimma at fedoraproject.org
MacPorts     •  hircus at macports.org

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list