[Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines for using darcs based sources in packages

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Fri Jan 9 10:56:39 UTC 2009

On Wed January 7 2009, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> 2009/1/7 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>:

> > 2) %darcs doesn't seem to be a good choice for macro name if it's
> > intended for use in the Haskell Guidelines.  Perhaps this shouldn't be
> > part of the the Haskell Guidelines?
> Like i said before, please rename it.  %darcs is a temporary name
> only, and i was looking for comments and suggestions. Would
> %darcs_timestamp be acceptable?

The current Naming Guidelines[0] use %{alphatag} for this value.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090109/c23d1270/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list