[Fedora-packaging] Confused by non-numeric version in release guideline
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Wed Jan 14 00:00:47 UTC 2009
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:53:58AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> In my personal descending order of preference I would do one of these:
> Version: 0
> Release: 1.rNNN
For the moment I've used:
Ignore the Version number for now - I can change that to just be '0'
later if necessary.
How about the Release number: Isn't it more correct to use 0.<n>.r<mm>
instead of <n>.r<mm>? (I mean, in case upstream decides to use 0 or
0.1 as a real version number later on?)
This is the package:
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
More information about the Fedora-packaging