[Fedora-packaging] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
dgregor at redhat.com
Tue Jul 28 13:52:59 UTC 2009
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:02 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/28/2009 12:49 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > On 07/27/2009 03:55 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> >>> ca da eo es et gl hu id nb nl nn pt pt_BR sk sr sv tr zh_CN zh_TW
> >> Wouldn't it be best just to make 'filesystem' own the whole directory
> >> structure, and make the other packages just own the pages?
> > I'm inclined to agree with this. Does anyone think this is a bad idea?
> IIRC, we discussed this topic several years ago and already agreed up
> it, then :)
> IIRC², the only problem left had been agreeing upon which "languages to
> carry" and how let this "extended filesystem" interact with rpm
Will the list of languages to carry be explicitly defined, or will it
just be the set of all languages that have one or man pages in the group
of @everything packages for that Fedora release?
> [Problem: ATM, these lang-subdirs are installed by individual packages,
> i.e. most users only see a subset of "all languages". With an "extended
> filesystem" people would see all of them, with most of them being empty.
> %ghosting them?]
> Fedora-packaging mailing list
> Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
More information about the Fedora-packaging