[Fedora-packaging] Re: About my proposal of moving the stage to expand gem files
Jeroen van Meeuwen
kanarip at kanarip.com
Sat Jul 4 03:59:14 UTC 2009
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:32:49 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka
<mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> wrote:
> Hello, all:
> Two weeks ago I wrote the proposal to move the stage to expand
> rubygem files from %install to %prep as:
> I would appreciate it if you would write some opinion for my proposal
> on fedora-packaging mailing list.
In my opinion, the guidelines requiring the use of the .gem instead of the
.zip/.tar.gz is the root cause of the problem.
If only we are allowed to use the .zip/.tar.gz, then in most cases we could
extract the .zip/.tar.gz in %prep, apply patches in %prep, build the .gem
in %build (if needed), do additional compiling in %build, and properly
install in %install.
I've never really understood the requirement to use the .gem anyway, so
maybe that's what I'm missing.
More information about the Fedora-packaging