[Fedora-packaging] License reference for additional, non-essential example files of a package

[Federico Hernandez]

Hi!

The upstream project has some additional, non essential files (in this case
vim syntax files which the upstream project "make install"s under the
docdir). How should these reference to a license information? Do they have
to include a license information? I ask as Bram Moolenaar has asked the
upstream project to not have any license reference in the syntax files (the
upstream project has submitted them to be included in the vim distribution).
Would a reference to the license in a corresponding README file be enough?

/Federico
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090706/e9e0c8b2/attachment.htm>