[Fedora-packaging] Review Guidelines missing entry

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On 06/12/2009 02:37 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le vendredi 12 juin 2009 à 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : 
>> I just noticed that although checking for static libraries is listed on:
>>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
>>
>> Checking for Bundled libraries isn't:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
>>
>> I'm going to add that as it's just a clarification rather than a change
>> in Guidelines.  If someone objects, holler and I can revert until the
>> next FPC meeting.
> 
> Since adding a line to check for fonts and apply corresponding
> guidelines was refused on the ground that the review check list is
> already too long, and reviewers should know packaging guidelines, I
> object to this addition.
> 
We don't have any of the Application Specific Guidelines listed there so
not listing a font checklist item is consistent:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Application_Specific_Guidelines

Change reverted until the FPC Meeting.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090612/b1f5b3a5/attachment.sig>