[Fedora-packaging] Re: Putting the new GConf Schema Guidelines into effect

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On 06/13/2009 02:12 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> There is no reason that for the magic implementation to be different if
> it's called implicitelly instead of explicitelly.
> 
> Using file triggers won't make the thing that adds code to the spec
> magically better or more reliable.

I think you're missing what's being discussed here.  We're talking about
whether to macroize the Requires lines or not.  Nothing about file
triggers in this leaf of the discussion.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090613/a27fa502/attachment.sig>