[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Inactive mantainers?



On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 20:16 +0100, Luca Foppiano wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 19:01 -0400, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> 
> > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477938
> 
> > Lennart is usually pretty busy. Try to ping him in the bugzilla ticket
> > once or twice more. 
> 
> I'll try in this way.
> 
> > (There's no known fix, only workaround if I
> > understand correctly, right?)
> 
> To be sure I don't know if this is a bug or just need a workaround, I
> need mantainer because maybe he know better the situation...

If you're unsure about this, I'm quite sure someone at
fedora-devel-list@ will be able to advise.

> > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483380
> > 
> > This seems to be trivial to address. In case you can do it yourself, it
> > would help if you attached a patch. If you can't, ask someone (I think I
> > could do that for you).
> 
> You mean, spec file patch?

Exactly.

> > I think there used to be a procedure that would allow one to file a CVS
> > admin request to change package's ACL in case maintainer doesn't respond
> > to bugzilla and mail for some time, but I can't find it anymore. That
> > would be interesting for you if you are a fedora packager (I am lazy to
> > check).
> 
> I'm not a fedora packager, I don't know...I can try to package it by
> myself, ask for request...but after?

I, or someone else with commit rights, can commit it then. Feel free to
ask for help if you have trouble making the new package and need help.

-- 
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak v3 sk>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]