[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Executable example scripts in docs



Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:19:30 +0100, Ralf wrote:

Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:50:44 +0100, Ralf wrote:

 > Such a warning is good, because it can happen that doc files are +x by
 > mistake. Since executable scripts are easier to execute accidentally
 > than non-executable scripts, making them -x is safer.
Only if you have them in $PATH.
Also in current dir
*nix newbie lesson #1: Do not have '.' in $PATH.

Do you still meet people who add '.' to $PATH?
Seemingly you - It's the point behind your sentence above.

Also check it out in a graphical file browser compared to +x.
And? Where is the problem?

Ralf


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]