[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Perl Question


Wouldn't BuildRequires: be pretty much the same thing as doing a manual yum install of the package, then building the spec file?


On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Paul Howarth <paul city-fan org> wrote:
Conner Finlay wrote:
Hello list,

I have searched Google high and low, but I have not found an answer. I have a spec file that requires some perl modules, ie Net::IP, XML::Simple, etc. For all but one there is an RPM available for it. In the SPEC file I have them as Requires: perl(Net::IP) and the spec file builds fine(rpmbuild -ba -v) but when I go to install the RPM it complains about the missing perl modules. If I do a `yum install perl-xyz` and rebuild the SPEC file, it will not complain about the missing perl modules. How can I have the SPEC file download/install the perl modules/packages? If it is easier, I can also post the SPEC file itself.

If you use yum to install the rpm you've built, it will resolve the dependencies and install them too.

When you specify "Requires: foo", this means that your package needs "foo" on the system to run, but not necessarily to build, so rpm enforces this when you try to install the package. If you want "foo" available at build time (perhaps to run a test suite), you specify that as "BuildRequires: foo", and rpm-build will insist you have "foo" when you try to build the package.


Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging redhat com

Conner Finlay

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]