[Fedora-packaging] Ownership of %{sugaractivitydir}

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 20:33:33 UTC 2009

On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 09:23:13AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> The spec template in the Sugar packaging guidelines
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SugarActivityGuidelines)
> indicates that the package should not own %{sugaractivitydir} (which
> evaluates to /usr/share/sugar/activities).  Unfortunately, this means
> nothing in the filesystem owns that directory because sugar itself
> doesn't own it for some reason.
> I would suggest that the simplest way to fix it would be to have the
> sugar package own that directory, but alternately we could fix the sugar
> packaging guidelines and fix up all of the activity packages.
I asked dgilmore (since he wrote the Sugar Activity Guidelines).  He took a
look and said:
[12:02:51] <dgilmore> abadger1999: sugar should own it and for some reason
it looks like we never added it

I've opened a bug to have that corrected:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20091103/6c9305c5/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list