[Fedora-packaging] code vs. content
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Fri Nov 20 19:11:02 UTC 2009
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:02:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones <rjones at redhat.com> writes:
> RWMJ> So I feel unfortunately this is a bad case.
> Except that it's actually a spectacularly good case, because it
> perfectly illustrates the problem. Someone thinks this is a good
> package and wants it in Fedora. (Either that or they're actively
> trolling us to see what crap they can push through the review process.)
> It doesn't violate any guidelines. You happen to not like the content.
> Does that means the package stays out? I don't personally want to be
> the quality czar, but I also don't want to see people pushing their
> vacation photos into Fedora.
No, I still think it's a bad case.
Consider the cosmos screensaver that we carry:
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/backgrounds/cosmos
Those are some really beautiful NASA photographs, and I don't think
anyone would object to the 3.9 MB consumed by those lovely pictures,
particularly if you are in any way interested by space technology or
I think if these were really beautiful pictures of London, no one
would object to 2.6 MB. But because it's a bunch of rather crap
pictures, it makes a bad case for what I think could potentially be a
> Isn't there already a screensaver that will work from a directory of
> pictures? Isn't that good enough to cover all of these cases without us
> actually having to carry a bunch of pictures?
A directory of pictures isn't a hand-chosen set of great photographs
that get installed from a single yum command.
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
More information about the Fedora-packaging