[Fedora-packaging] Is "ascii" a valid package name?
limb at jcomserv.net
Mon Oct 19 16:49:19 UTC 2009
Martin Gieseking wrote:
> according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988#c14
> packages shouldn't get names that are general terms like "parser" or
> "smtp". If this is actually the case, "ascii" is probably an
> inappropriate name too.
> Should the package requested in
> therefore be prefixed or renamed even if "ascii" is the upstream name?
> Or is it OK as is, after all?
> Fedora-packaging mailing list
> Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
I vote rename. I've not looked at the review, and I've no idea what the
package does. And googling it might be tricky.
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
More information about the Fedora-packaging