[Fedora-packaging] Is "ascii" a valid package name?

[Jochen Schmitt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:57:47 +0200, you wrote:

>Is Fedora supposed to be a "hardly useful" packages cult which adopts 
>any package?  Provided the quality of certain packages and how certain 
>reviews are being performed, at least I can't deny this thought.

There was a request on

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList

and because it's a tiny package you may not need a lot of time
for maintainmence.

For the naming discussion, because Debian use the same name as
upstream and Debeian has more packages as Fedora, I see no
problem to use the upstream package name for it.

At least, of course I have wrote a mail to upstream fo suggest a
rename of this package. But until now I haven't got any response.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.10.0 (Build 500)
Charset: us-ascii

wj8DBQFK4JM8T2AHK6txfgwRAu7NAKCfelOj71rj885HYl1zjXs5RzyK7QCgo+nv
wnG80SByeLABizVzKk4YYfA=
=d3G1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----