[Fedora-packaging] Is "ascii" a valid package name?
limb at jcomserv.net
Mon Oct 19 17:29:28 UTC 2009
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/19/2009 06:34 PM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
>> according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988#c14
>> packages shouldn't get names that are general terms like "parser" or
>> "smtp". If this is actually the case, "ascii" is probably an
>> inappropriate name too.
>> Should the package requested in
>> therefore be prefixed or renamed even if "ascii" is the upstream name?
>> Or is it OK as is, after all?
> Well, Debian has this package under it's original name.
> However, IMO, the better question would be: Why should Fedora ship it?
> Fedora-packaging mailing list
> Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
I think it's functions are aptly handled by Google. That said, there
might be offline uses, etc. Besides, we have a whole SIG centered
around packages of dubious utility.
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
More information about the Fedora-packaging