[Fedora-packaging] Is "ascii" a valid package name?
Jochen at herr-schmitt.de
Thu Oct 22 17:15:24 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:57:47 +0200, you wrote:
>Is Fedora supposed to be a "hardly useful" packages cult which adopts
>any package? Provided the quality of certain packages and how certain
>reviews are being performed, at least I can't deny this thought.
There was a request on
and because it's a tiny package you may not need a lot of time
For the naming discussion, because Debian use the same name as
upstream and Debeian has more packages as Fedora, I see no
problem to use the upstream package name for it.
At least, of course I have wrote a mail to upstream fo suggest a
rename of this package. But until now I haven't got any response.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.10.0 (Build 500)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Fedora-packaging