[Fedora-packaging] "Explicit requires" and "requiring =?iso-8859-1?q?base=09package?="
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Wed Sep 2 19:54:53 UTC 2009
On Wednesday 02 September 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
> rpm may have implicit dependencies on
> base pkgs (from -devel ones) but these often aren't enough to ensure
> things "just work". This falls under the "except when ... necessary"
> section of the Explict_Requires guideline, imo.
That's fine, I don't have that strong opinions on it.
But Explicit Requires also says "When explicit library Requires are necessary,
there should be a spec file comment justifying it." So in other words,
libfoo-devel's explicit dependency on libfoo would need such a comment. I
don't think that's the intent. This could be improved by saying
"When explicit library Requires are necessary, there should be a spec file
comment justifying it, except in cases that fall under the Requiring Base
More information about the Fedora-packaging