From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 1 13:45:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167205] Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509011345.j81DjOcd027825@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167205 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |EasyFix ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2005-09-01 09:45 EST ------- I had time to look for it and got it, Warren: My build system has /usr/share/ scripts, which is prefered, if no other directory is specified. The directory / usr/share/scripts is used by some irssi (rpm) packages for example for sharing public irssi perl scripts. I think, it really should hurt absolutely nobody, if we define /usr/bin for the scripts in the perl spec file to avoid the auto-detection of perl's configure script. The following change solves the problem in a very sane way for me, could this patch applied to CVS/Rawhide, please?! Marking this bug as EasyFix: ------ --- perl.spec 2005-08-29 00:56:18.000000000 +0200 +++ perl.spec.rsc 2005-09-01 15:42:42.000000000 +0200 @@ -312,7 +312,8 @@ -Dd_gethostent_r_proto -Ud_endhostent_r_proto -Ud_sethostent_r_proto \ -Ud_endprotoent_r_proto -Ud_setprotoent_r_proto \ -Ud_endservent_r_proto -Ud_setservent_r_proto \ - -Dinc_version_list='%{perlmodcompat}' + -Dinc_version_list='%{perlmodcompat}' \ + -Dscriptdir='%{_bindir}' make ------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 2 00:06:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167205] Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509020006.j82064t9004629@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167205 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-01 20:05 EST ------- I don't understand perl very well and I don't have time to investigate this anytime soon, so I hope Ville or JPO or others on fedora-perl-devel-list can confirm this is the proper thing to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 2 16:58:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167205] Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509021658.j82Gwhdo015705@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167205 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2005-09-02 12:58 EST ------- Those scripts have always been in /usr/bin in the past, so I'd agree that patch is the right thing to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Fri Sep 2 17:24:05 2005 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:24:05 -0500 Subject: Data::UUID problem Message-ID: <20050902172405.GA21289@osiris.silug.org> I'm trying to build a package for Data::UUID. Something, possibly the from_string() function, apparently isn't 64-bit clean. ("make test" fails on x86_64 but works fine on i386.) Unfortunately, I can't see an obvious problem. Well, I can't figure out what's going on in the code really either... :-) Anyway, if there's anyone on this list that might be able to help me figure this out, I'd really appreciate it. The author doesn't seem to be terribly responsive. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 2 21:47:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 17:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167471] New: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167471 Summary: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Compress-Zlib/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Compress-Zlib AssignedTo: jorton at redhat.com ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com I'm attaching a patch that applies perfectly to rawhide and FC-4 that updates perl-Compress-Zlib to the latest version, 1.37. (The latest source is at http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PM/PMQS/Compress-Zlib-1.37.tar.gz and builds perfectly.) The latest amavisd-new is failing to start, complaining about wanting Compress::Zlib >= 1.35. Presumably this is because of some of the fixes in 1.35. Ideally I'd like to see an update to FC-3 and above so I can build amavisd-new for all of them once it is accepted into Extras, but an update for at least FC-4 (where I do most of my testing, and what most of my clients are running) and rawhide would be greatly appreciated. The following is the changelog for the last 3 versions of Compress::Zlib: 1.37 - 12 August 2005 * Change to t/03examples.t for VMS from Abe Timmerman 1.36 - 3 August 2005 * Renamed zlib-src-1.2.3 to zlib-src to help VMS * Fixed Makefile.PL for VMS * Fixed t/03examples.t for VMS * Added a couple of notes about incompatibility with Unix compress. 1.35 - 16 July 2005 * Updated zlib source to 1.2.3 * Fixed problem with where two calls to gzclose would hang the debugger. See https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=13789 * Added code from Alexey Tourbin to use XSLoader when available, and DynaLoader otherwise. * Documented that the compress & uncompress functions were not the same as the Unix utilities of the same name. * Fixed 05gzsetp -- it left a temp file hanging around. * Integrate core change 24787 - SvUPGRADE returns void in blead * Integrate core change 24788 - Makefile.PL adjustments for the core ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2005-09-02 17:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=118409) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=118409&action=view) spec file update to 1.37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 2 21:48:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 17:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167471] RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509022148.j82LmRuS028131@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167471 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |167354 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 3 11:27:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 07:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167471] RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509031127.j83BRuhv030066@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167471 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-03 07:27 EST ------- FC5 built, FC4 pushed to test updates where your test verification is needed. Are you sure this is safe to push to FC3 too, it wont break other software that used the older version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 3 14:18:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 10:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167205] Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509031418.j83EII6h014336@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167205 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-09-03 10:18 EST ------- Ditto. Didn't actually test the patch, but it looks obviously correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 3 15:50:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167471] RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509031550.j83Fot2h021492@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167471 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2005-09-03 11:50 EST ------- As soon as it hits updates-testing, I'll give it a try on a couple of my servers. I'm doing a test build for FC-3 now. I'll let you know how that goes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 3 16:08:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167205] Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509031608.j83G8RQ0022642@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unpackaged files at rebuilding perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167205 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-09-03 12:08 EST ------- +1 I don't see any problem either. Tested the patch in FC4: no differences in the file lists of the binary RPMS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 3 16:14:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167471] RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509031614.j83GEnb8023041@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167471 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2005-09-03 12:14 EST ------- WORKSFORME on FC-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 4 10:15:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 06:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 114271] 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509041015.j84AF1LA010107@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114271 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-04 06:14 EST ------- Has this been reported to upstream CPAN? Has this been fixed upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 4 10:16:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 06:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 140871] [PATCH] Convert man pages to UTF-8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509041016.j84AGwpu010269@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [PATCH] Convert man pages to UTF-8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140871 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|139341 |150221 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-04 06:16 EST ------- Can anyone ACK to verify this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 4 10:22:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 06:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166488] Wrong GPG key In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509041022.j84AMnMP010766@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Wrong GPG key https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166488 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Component|perl-XML-SAX |fedora-release ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-04 06:22 EST ------- We screwed up when we issued FC4 by not resigning all packages to use the same key. You can workaround this problem with: rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 4 10:24:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 06:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166475] RFE: Update Test::More In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509041024.j84AOi2m010930@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Update Test::More https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166475 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-04 06:24 EST ------- Sorry I agree with Ville here. We can't add this to all older distributions and it really isn't that important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 4 15:30:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 114271] 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509041530.j84FURwh006217@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114271 ed at membled.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ed at membled.com 2005-09-04 11:30 EST ------- No, I reported it here first because Red Hat applies some patches to the vanilla perl distribution. FWIW, I can still reproduce this on FC4 with perl-5.8.6-15 and perl-XML-Parser-2.34-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 08:55:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 04:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 140871] [PATCH] Convert man pages to UTF-8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509050855.j858twOw008891@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [PATCH] Convert man pages to UTF-8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140871 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-09-05 04:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=118449) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=118449&action=view) Recode more docs ACK, but I'd recode the files in %prep before installing them so that the corresponding "perldoc foo" get fixed too, not only the manpages. See patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 11:14:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 07:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 136009] MakeMaker::MM_Unix doesn't honor LD_RUN_PATH requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509051114.j85BETqs024510@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: MakeMaker::MM_Unix doesn't honor LD_RUN_PATH requirements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136009 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-05 07:14 EST ------- List, should this be considered an unsupported configuration? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 11:19:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 07:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 114271] 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509051119.j85BJP2R025193@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114271 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-05 07:19 EST ------- I mean, is this an issue with a non-Fedora build of perl? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 5 13:27:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 114271] 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509051327.j85DRLPD008829@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114271 ed at membled.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ed at membled.com 2005-09-05 09:27 EST ------- OK, I'll download a vanilla source tarball of perl5 and see if I can reproduce there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 05:35:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167471] RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509060535.j865ZnCD003583@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167471 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2005-09-06 01:35 EST ------- >From User-Agent: XML-RPC perl-Compress-Zlib-1.37-1.fc3 has been pushed for FC3, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 05:36:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 145578] CAN-2005-0077 perl-DBI insecure temporary file usage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509060536.j865a1nK003620@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CAN-2005-0077 perl-DBI insecure temporary file usage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145578 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2005-09-06 01:35 EST ------- >From User-Agent: XML-RPC perl-DBI-1.40-6.fc3 has been pushed for FC4, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 6 17:46:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167471] RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509061746.j86HkZrt006742@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Update perl-Compress-Zlib to 1.37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167471 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.37-1 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2005-09-06 13:46 EST ------- The update works great. Thanks, Warren. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 7 10:11:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 06:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 101767] perl iThreads app hangs with NPTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509071011.j87ABwWP018639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl iThreads app hangs with NPTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Red Hat Raw Hide |Fedora Core Version|1.0 |devel Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_ENG Component|perl |perl CC|cturner at redhat.com |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-07 06:11 EST ------- Anyone have any clue if this is still an issue? No idea if Chip followed up upstream as mentioned here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 7 13:44:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 101767] perl iThreads app hangs with NPTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509071344.j87Di6qM017415@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl iThreads app hangs with NPTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767 ------- Additional Comments From albert.tobey at priority-health.com 2005-09-07 09:43 EST ------- Seems to be OK in RHEL3 U4 when I re-run that same script both with RHEL's perl and mine. I'm not sure what fixed it, though. I think the glibc update following Jakub's note actually fixed it for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 7 14:06:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 10:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 101767] perl iThreads app hangs with NPTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509071406.j87E6QXr021311@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl iThreads app hangs with NPTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767 ------- Additional Comments From albert.tobey at priority-health.com 2005-09-07 10:06 EST ------- Here are two patches that I think contain contributions from Chip related to shared libperl.so and "build issues." The 18877 patch seems to have the more interesting changes in it, making changes to the dynamic loader. ftp://ftp.linux.activestate.com/pub/staff/gsar/APC/perl-5.8.x-diffs/19061.gz ftp://ftp.linux.activestate.com/pub/staff/gsar/APC/perl-5.8.x-diffs/18877.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 7 20:36:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509072036.j87KaAuk019299@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|test1 |devel ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-09-07 16:36 EST ------- Yes, in particular the most important one, XML-DOM; the latest one is from ~1.5 months ago compared to latest libxml-enno from ~5.5 _years_ ago. If implemented completely, the split would be into (possible new prerequisites of these not checked): http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-DOM/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Checker/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Filter-DetectWS/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Filter-Reindent/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Filter-SAXT/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Handler-Composer/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Handler-PrintEvents/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-RegExp/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-UM/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-XQL/ Ugh. I suppose the majority of these could go directly to Extras or be even dropped (taking FC and FE dependencies into account) until/unless someone yells though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 7 23:19:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 19:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509072319.j87NJIdq007334@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEEDINFO_ENG OtherBugsDependingO| |150221 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-07 19:19 EST ------- I need to talk to rel-eng to see what they think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From chris at chrisgrau.com Thu Sep 8 00:19:49 2005 From: chris at chrisgrau.com (Chris Grau) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:19:49 -0700 Subject: Data::UUID problem In-Reply-To: <20050902172405.GA21289@osiris.silug.org> References: <20050902172405.GA21289@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <20050908001949.GA9289@chrisgrau.com> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:05PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote: > I'm trying to build a package for Data::UUID. Something, possibly the > from_string() function, apparently isn't 64-bit clean. ("make test" > fails on x86_64 but works fine on i386.) Unfortunately, I can't see > an obvious problem. Well, I can't figure out what's going on in the > code really either... :-) > > Anyway, if there's anyone on this list that might be able to help me > figure this out, I'd really appreciate it. The author doesn't seem to > be terribly responsive. Not very responsive at all. This same bug looks to have been reported at rt.cpan.org on Jan 4, 2005 without response. I took a quick look at the code. These lines in UUID.h appear to be the problem: typedef unsigned long unsigned32; typedef unsigned short unsigned16; typedef unsigned char unsigned8; typedef unsigned char byte; typedef unsigned long long unsigned64_t; typedef unsigned64_t uuid_time_t; I can't readily verify this right now, since I don't have access to an x86_64 box, but I suspect that sizeof(long) is 4 on x86 and 8 on x86_64. This would change the size of uuid_t and throw off the pointer arithmetic done in from_string(). The program could probably be patched fairly easily with some #ifdefs to handle the different architectures, but that's a pretty fundamental change to be making in a distribution patch. -- Chris Grau From paul at city-fan.org Thu Sep 8 09:33:39 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:33:39 +0100 Subject: Data::UUID problem In-Reply-To: <20050908001949.GA9289@chrisgrau.com> References: <20050902172405.GA21289@osiris.silug.org> <20050908001949.GA9289@chrisgrau.com> Message-ID: <43200573.5060903@city-fan.org> Chris Grau wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:05PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote: > >>I'm trying to build a package for Data::UUID. Something, possibly the >>from_string() function, apparently isn't 64-bit clean. ("make test" >>fails on x86_64 but works fine on i386.) Unfortunately, I can't see >>an obvious problem. Well, I can't figure out what's going on in the >>code really either... :-) >> >>Anyway, if there's anyone on this list that might be able to help me >>figure this out, I'd really appreciate it. The author doesn't seem to >>be terribly responsive. > > > Not very responsive at all. This same bug looks to have been reported > at rt.cpan.org on Jan 4, 2005 without response. > > I took a quick look at the code. These lines in UUID.h appear to be the > problem: > > typedef unsigned long unsigned32; > typedef unsigned short unsigned16; > typedef unsigned char unsigned8; > typedef unsigned char byte; > typedef unsigned long long unsigned64_t; > typedef unsigned64_t uuid_time_t; > > I can't readily verify this right now, since I don't have access to an > x86_64 box, but I suspect that sizeof(long) is 4 on x86 and 8 on x86_64. > This would change the size of uuid_t and throw off the pointer > arithmetic done in from_string(). > > The program could probably be patched fairly easily with some #ifdefs to > handle the different architectures, but that's a pretty fundamental > change to be making in a distribution patch. Attached patch appears to be in the spirit of what the author intended, and results in working "make test" on FC4 (i386) and RHEL3 (x86_64). RHEL3 is the only platform I have access to an x86_64 box with. Paul. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Data-UUID-0.11-types.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rc040203 at freenet.de Thu Sep 8 09:43:15 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:43:15 +0200 Subject: Data::UUID problem In-Reply-To: <43200573.5060903@city-fan.org> References: <20050902172405.GA21289@osiris.silug.org> <20050908001949.GA9289@chrisgrau.com> <43200573.5060903@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <1126172595.22372.253.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:33 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > Attached patch appears to be in the spirit of what the author intended, > and results in working "make test" on FC4 (i386) and RHEL3 (x86_64). > RHEL3 is the only platform I have access to an x86_64 box with. You'd better use the POSIX types from stdint.h instead of the obsolete BSD types from sys/types.h Also check md5.h, it contains the same issue lurking. Ralf From paul at city-fan.org Thu Sep 8 09:59:01 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:59:01 +0100 Subject: Data::UUID problem In-Reply-To: <1126172595.22372.253.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <20050902172405.GA21289@osiris.silug.org> <20050908001949.GA9289@chrisgrau.com> <43200573.5060903@city-fan.org> <1126172595.22372.253.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <43200B65.8030208@city-fan.org> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:33 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > >>Attached patch appears to be in the spirit of what the author intended, >>and results in working "make test" on FC4 (i386) and RHEL3 (x86_64). >>RHEL3 is the only platform I have access to an x86_64 box with. > > > You'd better use the POSIX types from stdint.h instead of the obsolete > BSD types from sys/types.h > > Also check md5.h, it contains the same issue lurking. Thanks; revised patch attached. Paul. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Data-UUID-0.11-types.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1395 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 10:31:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 06:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167797] New: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167797 Summary: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-DBD-Pg AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: The update to 1.43 appears to have introduced an issue where rpm does not autogenerate the perl(DBD::Pg) virtual. So modules requiring this have to depend on perl-DBD-Pg rather than perl(DBD::Pg) (e.g. bugzilla #166191). The FC3 and FC4 packages do provide perl(DBD::Pg). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-DBD-Pg-1.43-1 How reproducible: Easy Steps to Reproduce: rpm -q --provides perl-DBD-Pg Actual results: Pg.so perl-DBD-Pg = 1.43-1 Expected results: Pg.so perl(DBD::Pg) = 1.43 perl-DBD-Pg = 1.43-1 Additional info: Easy fix would just be to add the Provides: perl(DBD::Pg) = %{version} manually in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 10:40:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 06:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167797] perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509081040.j88AeIxl011197@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167797 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-08 06:40 EST ------- Well, the bigger question is figuring out *why* it no longer auto-provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 11:10:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167797] perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509081110.j88BANZ4014532@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167797 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-09-08 07:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=118587) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=118587&action=view) Patch to reformat Pg.pm so that perl.prov can interpret it properly (In reply to comment #1) > Well, the bigger question is figuring out *why* it no longer auto-provides. Good point. Patch fixes the formatting of Pg.pm so that auto-provides works again. Ideal fix would be for perl.prov to be able to parse the code as-is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 11:29:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167797] perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509081129.j88BTFYl016655@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167797 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-08 07:29 EST ------- Thanks. Could you please submit this upstream too to make future maintenance easier? While I agree it would be ideal to fix perl.prov, that isn't a solution for older distros unfortunately. =( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 12:17:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167797] perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509081217.j88CH9j0023806@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167797 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-09-08 08:17 EST ------- Reported upstream: http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=14509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 8 14:48:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167797] perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509081448.j88EmC6Y020550@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167797 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-09-08 10:47 EST ------- One theoretical point worth noting: Even though providing perl(DBD::Pg) in this package is correct, one could argue that packages in general should not have manually added dependencies on perl(DBD::*) in their specfiles. In the vast majority of use cases, the DBD::* drivers are not explicitly loaded in Perl code, but DBI loads the appropriate driver based on the data source given in connect(). Therefore, manually adding dependencies on perl(DBD::*) is kind of hardcoding assumptions about DBI's internals into specfiles, and in that sense, using the corresponding perl-DBD-* package names in dependencies wouldn't be that bad an alternative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Thu Sep 8 16:48:16 2005 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:48:16 -0500 Subject: Data::UUID problem In-Reply-To: <43200B65.8030208@city-fan.org> References: <20050902172405.GA21289@osiris.silug.org> <20050908001949.GA9289@chrisgrau.com> <43200573.5060903@city-fan.org> <1126172595.22372.253.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <43200B65.8030208@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <20050908164816.GA13417@osiris.silug.org> Thanks (everybody) for the help. I was looking in *completely* the wrong place... Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 03:13:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 122391] Polling pipes fails on Fedora. Example provided In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509090313.j893DkgN018671@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Polling pipes fails on Fedora. Example provided https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122391 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc1 |fc3 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-08 23:13 EST ------- What about FC4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 10:50:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 06:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 136494] perl-Time-Hires no longer needed. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509091050.j89Aomaa004669@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Time-Hires no longer needed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136494 laroche at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|NOTABUG | CC| |sopwith at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From laroche at redhat.com 2005-09-09 06:50 EST ------- Elliot, can you remove this package from FC-development trees? Thanks, Florian La Roche -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 11:03:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167901] New: what about perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167901 Summary: what about perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: laroche at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,sopwith at redhat.com Description of problem: The newest perl package has fileconflicts with perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple. Can those two be deleted from FC-development trees? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 11:35:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167901] what about perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509091135.j89BZWiM009338@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: what about perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167901 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-09-09 07:35 EST ------- The packages perl-Filter, perl-Filter-Simple, and perl-Time-HiRes include several perl 5.8.x core modules (they were being deleted in the perl package specfile and were being packaged separately using the CPAN tarballs). This no longer happens as of perl 5.8.7: we are sticking with the modules from the main perl tarball. For more information see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907 in particular comments #5, #6, and #11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 17:38:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167937] New: perl-DateManip: update to 5.44 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167937 Summary: perl-DateManip: update to 5.44 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-DateManip AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Update DateManip to the latest version available in CPAN. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-DateManip-5.42a-4 Expected results: perl-DateManip-5.44-1 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-09-09 13:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=118648) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=118648&action=view) Specfile patch (update to 5.44) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 17:43:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167938] New: perl-XML-NamespaceSupport: update to 1.09 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167938 Summary: perl-XML-NamespaceSupport: update to 1.09 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-XML-NamespaceSupport AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Update to XML::NamespaceSupport to the latest CPAN version. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-XML-NamespaceSupport-1.08-7 Expected results: perl-XML-NamespaceSupport-1.09-1 Additional info: http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=XML-NamespaceSupport-1.08&to=XML-NamespaceSupport-1.09 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-09-09 13:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=118649) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=118649&action=view) Specfile patch (update to 1.09) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 9 20:55:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 16:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509092055.j89KtrJe027608@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_ENG |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-09 16:55 EST ------- The Glorious Supreme Leader said, "find out what uses it. move it all to extras :)" Maybe it isn't possible to move to Extras, but the next step is to look at the deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 10 08:47:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 04:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509100847.j8A8lrZ3004160@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |167997 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 10 08:50:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 04:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509100850.j8A8ofnh004337@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-09-10 04:50 EST ------- All dependent packages: rpm -q --provides perl-libxml-enno | awk '{ print $1 }' \ | xargs repoquery --whatrequires | sort -u Core packages (FC4): - foomatic: perl-libxml-enno >= 1.02 (dubious?, bug 167997) Extras packages (FE4): - inkscape: perl(XML::XQL), perl(XML::XQL::DOM) - perl-Template-Toolkit: perl(XML::DOM) So, based on the above it looks like it would suffice to: - Check if foomatic really requires anything in perl-libxml-enno, and modify it to use perl(Foo::Bar) style dependencies as appropriate - Package the following in Core/Extras depending on the foomatic outcome: * perl-XML-RegExp (required by perl-XML-DOM) * perl-XML-DOM (required by perl-XML-XQL) * perl-XML-XQL (required by inkscape) * Add Obsoletes: perl-libxml-enno <= 1.02 to one (or some) of the above, I'd say to perl-XML-DOM only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 10:41:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128430] Cannot Install Template-Toolkit - undefined symbol: mysql_ssl_set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111041.j8BAfXLE009430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Cannot Install Template-Toolkit - undefined symbol: mysql_ssl_set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128430 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 06:41 EST ------- closing due to lack of activity and FC2 is no longer supported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 10:42:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 137965] timelocal does not return earliest possible time in eastern hemisphere ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111042.j8BAgOHn009528@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: timelocal does not return earliest possible time in eastern hemisphere ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137965 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 06:42 EST ------- Closing due to lack of activity and FC2 is no longer supported. If this is still an issue in FC3+ please reopen this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 10:43:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 137299] Perl segfaults with spamd -d user In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111043.j8BAhEiX009607@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Perl segfaults with spamd -d user https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137299 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 06:42 EST ------- Closing because FC2 is no longer supported. Please reopen if this is an issue in FC3+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 10:43:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128529] man3/Text::Kakasi.3pm.gz is japanese manpage, but not installed ja/man3 directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111043.j8BAhhSS009669@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: man3/Text::Kakasi.3pm.gz is japanese manpage, but not installed ja/man3 directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128529 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 06:43 EST ------- Closing due to lack of activity and FC2 is no longer supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 10:45:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 144672] perl needs dependency on specific libdb version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111045.j8BAjbIG009884@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl needs dependency on specific libdb version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144672 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 06:45 EST ------- On second thought, mixing repositories is unsupported and the initial report was of rawhide during an inconsistent state. Closing WONTFIX, unless someone is willing to submit a concrete, simple and obviously correct way to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 10:47:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 140993] useless files included, incomplete h2ph, wrong files location, duplicate files... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111047.j8BAlZ2K010106@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: useless files included, incomplete h2ph, wrong files location, duplicate files... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140993 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 06:47 EST ------- Closing due to lack of response from original submitter, and things in the perl package have changed substantially since then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 11:07:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111107.j8BB7587011971@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl(Inline) duplication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158733 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:06 EST ------- Attempted build again today. Only one test failure on ppc: t/primitive.................# Failed test 20 in t/primitive.t at line 120 # t/primitive.t line 120 is: eval '$c = all($b==pdl([[0,1],[2,2]]))'; ok(!$@ && $c); FAILED test 20 Upstream CPAN shows mostly failures on this module version, and seems unwilling or unable to fix this module after a few months of failure. So this leaves us with few options: 1) Disable tests and allow this to go into rawhide, assuming it is only a problem of the tests themselves (?) 2) Downgrade to the previous version and hope that it works. 3) Fix the problem, whatever it is. Opinions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 11:07:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 60853] Perl doesn't look for modules in /usr/local In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111107.j8BB7pvN012066@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Perl doesn't look for modules in /usr/local https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:07 EST ------- Closing due to lack of response. There is a newer report somewhere asking for this elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 11:11:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 71513] perl headers are incompletely built In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111111.j8BBBHnb012575@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl headers are incompletely built https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71513 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:11 EST ------- List, is this still an issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 11:14:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 73486] [PATCH] libperl leaks a THREAD_KEY each time it is reloaded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111114.j8BBEFUN012878@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [PATCH] libperl leaks a THREAD_KEY each time it is reloaded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73486 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Perl segfault after many |[PATCH] libperl leaks a |reloads |THREAD_KEY each time it is | |reloaded Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:14 EST ------- Has perl-5.8.7 fixed this issue? So FC3 and FC4 are affected but not FC5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 11:28:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 73921] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111128.j8BBSE5x014575@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73921 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Red Hat Linux |Fedora Core Version|8.0 |devel Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|perl-RPM2 |perl-RPM2 CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:28 EST ------- Spec has not been rewritten to modern perl packaging standards, so likely still affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 11:35:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 73908] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111135.j8BBZciR015684@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73908 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Red Hat Linux |Fedora Core Version|8.0 |devel Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|perl-Crypt-SSLeay |perl-Crypt-SSLeay CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:35 EST ------- This package has not been cleaned up since then, so likely still needs fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 11 11:42:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 74884] DateManip complains of Malformed UTF-8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509111142.j8BBgxm2016571@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DateManip complains of Malformed UTF-8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74884 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:42 EST ------- Is "non-UTF-8 string literals were inside comments" still fatal in modern perl, and if so would something like the above script be useful in an automated test to avoid this problem in our future perl packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 12 10:15:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 73486] [PATCH] libperl leaks a THREAD_KEY each time it is reloaded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509121015.j8CAFuNI028227@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [PATCH] libperl leaks a THREAD_KEY each time it is reloaded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73486 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2005-09-12 06:15 EST ------- Yup looks that way, which seems fine it's not very critical. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 12 14:41:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 71513] perl headers are incompletely built In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509121441.j8CEf2vW011011@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl headers are incompletely built https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71513 ------- Additional Comments From kjetilho at ifi.uio.no 2005-09-12 10:40 EST ------- sys/syscall.ph works, errno.ph doesn't. this is with perl-5.8.6-15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jpo at di.uminho.pt Mon Sep 12 17:01:11 2005 From: jpo at di.uminho.pt (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Pedro_Oliveira?=) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:01:11 +0100 Subject: Perl 5.8.8 status Message-ID: <4325B457.4080400@di.uminho.pt> This has just appeared in the perl5-porters mailling list: Source: http://www.mail-archive.com/perl5-porters at perl.org/msg90957.html ---------- If there's a plan for 5.8.8, it goes roughly like this 0: All changes that apply to maint are integrated from blead 1: Changes should be in blead by midnight (GMT) on the 16th October 2005 2: RC1 will probably appear within a week ... ---------- jpo PS - It would be great to have it included in FC-5 ;) http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/ -- Jos? Pedro Oliveira * mailto: jpo at di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo * * gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B * http://conferences.yapceurope.org/2005/ * http://braga.yapceurope.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From wtogami at redhat.com Mon Sep 12 18:21:40 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:21:40 -1000 Subject: Perl 5.8.8 status In-Reply-To: <4325B457.4080400@di.uminho.pt> References: <4325B457.4080400@di.uminho.pt> Message-ID: <4325C734.2040909@redhat.com> Jos? Pedro Oliveira wrote: > This has just appeared in the perl5-porters mailling list: > > Source: > http://www.mail-archive.com/perl5-porters at perl.org/msg90957.html > ---------- > If there's a plan for 5.8.8, it goes roughly like this > > 0: All changes that apply to maint are integrated from blead > > 1: Changes should be in blead by midnight (GMT) on the 16th October 2005 > > 2: RC1 will probably appear within a week > ... Get this RC1 into FC before the FC5test1 freeze. We can help to prove that 5.8.8 is ready for release, or find any bugs that need fixing quickly. The huge delay of 5.8.7 would be really bad... we need to push harder this time. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 14:02:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165907] perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509141402.j8EE2xdX010866@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-09-14 10:02 EST ------- For the record: The packages - perl-Filter, perl-Filter-Simple, and perl-Time-HiRes - were removed from rawhide. Source: rawhide report: 20050913 changes https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-September/msg00227.html Details: ... Removed package perl-Time-HiRes Removed package perl-Filter-Simple Removed package perl-Filter ... See also: #136494 and #167901 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 12:39:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 136494] perl-Time-Hires no longer needed. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509141239.j8ECdELE028024@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Time-Hires no longer needed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136494 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-09-14 08:39 EST ------- Perl-Time-HiRes package removed in 20050913. Source: rawhide report: 20050913 changes https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-September/msg00227.html Details: ... Removed package perl-Time-HiRes Removed package perl-Filter-Simple Removed package perl-Filter ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 07:47:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509140747.j8E7lFu1020526@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_ENG CC| |twaugh at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-14 03:47 EST ------- Hi twaugh, which perl pieces if any are needed by foomatic? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 09:36:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509140936.j8E9aF5v005176@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 Bug 128879 depends on bug 167997, which changed state. Bug 167997 Summary: Dubious dependency on perl-libxml-enno https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167997 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 05:44:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167901] what about perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509140544.j8E5ikfk004595@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: what about perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167901 laroche at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From laroche at redhat.com 2005-09-14 01:44 EST ------- Packages are now removed from FC-development, closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 08:48:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509140848.j8E8me13029433@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-14 04:48 EST ------- Excellent. =) Initiating removal process for FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 07:23:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 161785] spamassassin restart fails - functions bug? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509140723.j8E7NN8R017725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin restart fails - functions bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161785 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-14 03:23 EST ------- %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/spamassassin The specific implementation suggested in Comment #3 is not good because during package upgrades, if the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file had been previously modified it will not be replaced and your init.d script would fail. Given this problem, hardcoding the pid path in the script may be the only supportable solution. Any objections? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 14 08:41:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 128879] Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509140841.j8E8fGKK028394@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_ENG |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2005-09-14 04:41 EST ------- I have removed all the explicit dependencies on perl modules from foomatic.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 15 14:42:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168373] New: perl is compiled without 64bit int on i386 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168373 Summary: perl is compiled without 64bit int on i386 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat at olen.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: perl is compiled without 64bit int on i386 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.7-0.3.fc5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install perl 2. perl -e 'printf ("%x", 99999999999999)' Actual results: ffffffff Expected results: 5af3107a3fff Additional info: >From the INSTALL manual: "The use64bitint option does only as much as is required to get 64-bit integers into Perl (this may mean, for example, using "long longs") while your memory may still be limited to 2 gigabytes (because your pointers could still be 32-bit). Note that the name 64bitint does not imply that your C compiler will be using 64-bit ints (it might, but it doesn't have to). The use64bitint simply means that you will be able to have 64 bit-wide scalar values." http://search.cpan.org/~nwclark/perl-5.8.6/INSTALL#Run_Configure At least I need 64bit ints for some internal applications that needs to run on both x86_64 and i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ghenry at suretecsystems.com Tue Sep 20 21:17:49 2005 From: ghenry at suretecsystems.com (Gavin Henry) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:17:49 +0100 Subject: Perl 5.8.8 status In-Reply-To: <4325C734.2040909@redhat.com> References: <4325B457.4080400@di.uminho.pt> <4325C734.2040909@redhat.com> Message-ID: <43307C7D.1090706@suretecsystems.com> Warren Togami said the following on 12/09/05 19:21: > Jos? Pedro Oliveira wrote: > >> This has just appeared in the perl5-porters mailling list: >> >> Source: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/perl5-porters at perl.org/msg90957.html >> ---------- >> If there's a plan for 5.8.8, it goes roughly like this >> >> 0: All changes that apply to maint are integrated from blead >> >> 1: Changes should be in blead by midnight (GMT) on the 16th October 2005 >> >> 2: RC1 will probably appear within a week >> ... > > > Get this RC1 into FC before the FC5test1 freeze. We can help to prove > that 5.8.8 is ready for release, or find any bugs that need fixing > quickly. The huge delay of 5.8.7 would be really bad... we need to push > harder this time. > > Warren Togami > wtogami at redhat.com > > -- > Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list > Fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list Anything I can do to help? -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001 E ghenry at suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions.(tm) http://www.suretecsystems.com/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 23 13:29:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169126] New: Bad: perl 5.8.7 not yet rebuild against 4.3.28 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169126 Summary: Bad: perl 5.8.7 not yet rebuild against 4.3.28 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: oliver at linux-kernel.at QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050915 Fedora/1.5-0.5.0.beta1 Firefox/1.4 Description of problem: DB_File needs compatible versions of libdb & db.h you have db.h version 4.3.27 and libdb version 4.3.28 Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Cache/File/Heap.pm line 29. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Cache/File/Heap.pm line 29. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Cache/File.pm line 26. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Cache/File.pm line 26. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.7-0.3.fc5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Update to latest FCDevel 2. Try to use DB_File stuff :-) Actual Results: -> See description Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 23 15:33:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 122855] fix packages for perl 5.8.3 and perl-suidperl 5.8.3 need perl-NDBM_File <= 1:1.75-34.99.6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509231533.j8NFXl3x023283@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fix packages for perl 5.8.3 and perl-suidperl 5.8.3 need perl-NDBM_File <= 1:1.75-34.99.6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122855 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-23 11:33 EST ------- I have no idea where you got this package, but according to Bug #77351 we have never shipped NDBM_File since 2002 or maybe even earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 23 18:35:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 130803] debugger fails to pick up backspace in screen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509231835.j8NIZGwY017114@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: debugger fails to pick up backspace in screen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130803 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-23 14:35 EST ------- fc1 is no longer supported. If you are able to reproduce this with a fresh install of FC4 or FC5 with a fresh user profile, please open a new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 24 07:51:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 03:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 73908] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509240751.j8O7pdss012893@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73908 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-09-24 03:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=119219) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=119219&action=view) Suggested fix + other improvements -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 24 20:29:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 73908] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509242029.j8OKTTUC025206@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73908 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-24 16:29 EST ------- thanks built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Sat Sep 24 20:33:35 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:33:35 -0400 Subject: Perl 5.8.8 status In-Reply-To: <43307C7D.1090706@suretecsystems.com> References: <4325B457.4080400@di.uminho.pt> <4325C734.2040909@redhat.com> <43307C7D.1090706@suretecsystems.com> Message-ID: <4335B81F.5040007@redhat.com> Gavin Henry wrote: >> >>Get this RC1 into FC before the FC5test1 freeze. We can help to prove >>that 5.8.8 is ready for release, or find any bugs that need fixing >>quickly. The huge delay of 5.8.7 would be really bad... we need to push >>harder this time. > > > Anything I can do to help? > That depends, are you an upstream perl developer, or can you help to foster the development and testing required upstream to get 5.8.8-rc and final out ASAP? We are running on a tight schedule here. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 25 15:40:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 11:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 163219] perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509251540.j8PFeCw7006834@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163219 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-25 11:40 EST ------- t/primitive.................# Failed test 20 in t/primitive.t at line 120 # t/primitive.t line 120 is: eval '$c = all($b==pdl([[0,1],[2,2]]))'; ok(!$@ && $c); FAILED test 20 Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/primitive.t 21 1 4.76% 20 9 tests and 35 subtests skipped. Failed 1/96 test scripts, 98.96% okay. 1/817 subtests failed, 99.88% okay. This happened twice on ppc, unknown if it happens on other archs. Should I make test failures non-fatal? Please advise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 25 21:34:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169236] New: New version of SpamAssassin available (3.1.0) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169236 Summary: New version of SpamAssassin available (3.1.0) Product: Fedora Core Version: fc4 Platform: All URL: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3. 1/UPGRADE OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: milan.kerslager at pslib.cz CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com New SpamAssassin 3.1.0 introduces a lot of changes (mostly move to plugins). Will be there a new fersion for FC4 or 3.1.x is supposed to be in FC5 only? Are there some issues for FC4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 26 00:02:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169236] New version of SpamAssassin available (3.1.0) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509260002.j8Q02LmR021942@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New version of SpamAssassin available (3.1.0) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169236 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-09-25 20:02 EST ------- FC3 and FC4 will remain at 3.0.x while FC5 has 3.1.x. I am in the middle of backporting many fixes from 3.1.x to a future 3.0.5 release. FC3 and FC4 will have an intermediate 3.0.4 + patches and 3.0.5 final. No time estimates on when this will happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 26 17:14:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 163219] perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509261714.j8QHExGV023896@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163219 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-09-26 13:14 EST ------- Someone who knows something about PDL should comment on that. The patched package builds and tests run successfully on FC4 i386. I don't see how this patch would affect any tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 27 18:36:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 112339] Perl is unable to work with regex under UTF-8 locale with input readed from files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509271836.j8RIaT8S013698@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Perl is unable to work with regex under UTF-8 locale with input readed from files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339 taw at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cturner at redhat.com |wtogami at redhat.com CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 27 20:37:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 112339] Perl is unable to work with regex under UTF-8 locale with input readed from files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200509272037.j8RKbREu003954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Perl is unable to work with regex under UTF-8 locale with input readed from files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.