[Bug 219078] [RFE] sa package should setup sa-update

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: [RFE] sa package should setup sa-update


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219078





------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  2006-12-12 03:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> A few comments:
> 
> 1) Shouldn't that be "service spamassassin condrestart", not "service
> spamassassin restart"?

+1 Sure, if the sa service supports it

> 2) Adding SARE by default is a great idea IMHO, but it might be best to come up
> with some generic way of adding additional update channels.  (One of my clients
> is considering setting up a private update channel for their local SA rules,
for example.)

The way sa-update is setup it really wants a single command with all the
channels stuffed in it, unless you want cascading service restarts after a long
unsynchronization.

But then, I'm sure a perl guru can come up with a smart solution

> 3) What about restarting amavisd?  Or any other SA-using process, for that
> matter.  It might be worth making that a configurable thing as well.

I think all the modern sa users communicate with sa through smamc/spamd, so they
should pick up changes as soon as spamd is restarted

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.