From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 1 03:16:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191653] RFE: DBD::MySQL has been updated to 3.0003 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606010316.k513Gupu000987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: DBD::MySQL has been updated to 3.0003 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191653 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-05-31 23:09 EST ------- perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0004-1.FC5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 1 20:35:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193818] New: spamd should start before sendmail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 Summary: spamd should start before sendmail Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: oliva at lsd.ic.unicamp.br CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: Users that rely on spamc/spamd for mail delivery might face silent mail delivery failure if spamd is not running when sendmail attempts to deliver them e-mail. Starting spamd before sendmail would reduce the probability of such a problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sendmail-8.13.6-1 spamassassin-3.1.2-1.fc6 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1.Boot up Actual results: spamd starts after sendmail Expected results: It should start before Additional info: both are S80, which causes sendmail to start first since it sorts alphabetically before spamd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 2 07:42:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 03:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193818] spamd should start before sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606020742.k527gp45028406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamd should start before sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-06-02 03:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Additional info: > both are S80, which causes sendmail to start first since it sorts alphabetically > before spamd. It should also start before spamass-milter, which in Extras is S79 to ensure that *it* starts before sendmail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 2 14:26:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193818] spamd should start before sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606021426.k52EQlvt018053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamd should start before sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-06-02 10:19 EST ------- So S78 then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 2 14:42:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193818] spamd should start before sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606021442.k52EgJ6V019414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamd should start before sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-06-02 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > So S78 then? WORKSFORME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 3 04:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 00:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606030403.k5343xkP032558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-06-02 23:55 EST ------- rpmlint complains: E: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel no-binary Unfortunately the package can't be noarch because of the map file, so this is acceptable. BuildRequires: perl is not necessary (not a blocker). The documentation is over half of the size of the package, but the total package size is small so I don't think it's necessary to place it in a subpackage. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: 6ee6257d4b66cb9e147a0b50603d1387 Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.2603.tar.gz 6ee6257d4b66cb9e147a0b50603d1387 Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.2603.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary). * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). O rpmlint has only ignorable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) = 0.2603 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Cell) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Dump) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::FmtDefault) = 0.05 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::FmtJapan) = 0.05 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::FmtJapan2) = 0.05 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::FmtUnicode) = 0.05 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Font) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Format) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::SaveParser) = 0.01 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::SaveParser::Workbook) = 0.06 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::SaveParser::Worksheet) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Utility) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Workbook) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Worksheet) perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel = 0.2603-1.fc6 - perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(Jcode) perl(OLE::Storage_Lite) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::FmtDefault) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::FmtJapan) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Utility) perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) perl(Unicode::Map) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and the single test passes: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..1 ok 1 * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. O documentation is relatively small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 17:42:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194077] New: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias at redhat.com ReportedBy: jvdias at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: These upstream perl bugs / issue have beed fixed in the upstream 5.8.x maintenance release of perl since perl-5.8.8 was released: o 38454 - 'rindex corrects for $[ on bytes rather than UTF-8' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38454 apply upstream patch #27116 o 24816 - 'Magic vars seem unsure if they are purely numeric' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=24816 ( perl -wle 'print $? = $? ^ "3"' -> 'Argument "^C" isn't numeric' ) apply upstream patch #27391 o Avoid writing over the input string in the case 'F' in moreswitches. apply upstream patch #27426 o 34925 - 'overload and rebless' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=34925 apply upstream patches #27509, #27512 o 3038 - '$qr = qr/^a$/m; $x =~ $qr; fails' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=3038 apply upstream patch #27604 o apply upstream patch #27605 - 'Fix off-by-one in $0 set magic.' o 23141 - '($_) = () fails to set $_ to undef' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=23141 apply upstream patch #27914 o 38619 - 'Bug in lc and uc (interaction between UTF-8, substr, and lc/uc)' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38619 apply upstream patch #27329 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-4 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: See upstream bug reports and the new RHTS test cases in CVS perl/perl-tests/FC6 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 17:44:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194077] upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606051744.k55Hi0LX022617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 jvdias at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-06-05 13:36 EST ------- Fixed in perl-5.8.8-6 (FC-6) and perl-5.8.8-5 (FC5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 21:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188441] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606052108.k55L8Zc9008006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-06-05 17:00 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 21:08:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191416] h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606052108.k55L8wST008040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191416 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-06-05 17:01 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 21:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194077] upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606052109.k55L9LAt008083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-06-05 17:01 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jpo at lsd.di.uminho.pt Mon Jun 5 22:45:02 2006 From: jpo at lsd.di.uminho.pt (Jose Pedro Oliveira) Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:45:02 +0100 Subject: Rawhide:perl modules to update (2006-06-05) Message-ID: <4484B3EE.1070109@lsd.di.uminho.pt> Jason Dias, The attached text file includes a list of perl modules that should be updated, a couple of package licenses that should corrected, and also one package group that should be corrected (for consistency). Do you want me to open bugzilla tickets for them? Regards, jpo -- Jos? Pedro Oliveira * mailto: jpo at di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo * * gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B * -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: rawhide_updates_20060605.txt URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4616 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From jvdias at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 22:47:41 2006 From: jvdias at redhat.com (Jason Vas Dias) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:47:41 -0400 Subject: Rawhide:perl modules to update (2006-06-05) In-Reply-To: <4484B3EE.1070109@lsd.di.uminho.pt> References: <4484B3EE.1070109@lsd.di.uminho.pt> Message-ID: <200606051847.42113.jvdias@redhat.com> On Monday 05 June 2006 18:45, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > Jason Dias, > > The attached text file includes a list of perl modules that > should be updated, a couple of package licenses that > should corrected, and also one package group that should > be corrected (for consistency). > > Do you want me to open bugzilla tickets for them? > > Regards, > jpo Thanks Jose - No, it won't be necessary to open Bugzillas for these - I'll try and get all the updated modules into tomorrow's rawhide / FC-5 updates. Regards, Jason From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 22:52:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194146] New: perl fails to build in mock Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194146 Summary: perl fails to build in mock Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias at redhat.com ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,jkeating at redhat.com This package fails to build in mock. build.log is attached. ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-06-05 18:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130552) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130552&action=view) Matt Domsch's build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 22:52:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191529] Tracker bug for BuildRequires fixes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606052252.k55MqFiK015864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker bug for BuildRequires fixes Alias: BuildReqBlocker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191529 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |194146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 5 22:57:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194146] perl fails to build in mock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606052257.k55MvGZB016250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl fails to build in mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194146 jvdias at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-06-05 18:49 EST ------- It looks like the lib/Net/t/hostname test failed because there was no 'localhost' entry in your /etc/hosts. This did not happen in our Brew build system Mock build - both perl-5.8.8-6 and perl-5.8.8-5 were built in Mock with Brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 6 18:02:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178580] /etc/sysconfig/spamassasin loses file context and timestamp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606061802.k56I2XTP023015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: /etc/sysconfig/spamassasin loses file context and timestamp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178580 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |RHSA-2006-0543 ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla at redhat.com 2006-06-06 13:54 EST ------- An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0543.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 6 21:23:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194290] New: CVE-2006-2447 spamassassin arbitrary command execution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194290 Summary: CVE-2006-2447 spamassassin arbitrary command execution Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: bressers at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,security-response- team at redhat.com,wtogami at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #193865 +++ CVE-2006-2447 spamassassin arbitrary command execution If spamd is run with the "-v" / "--vpopmail" switch, AND with the "-P" / "--paranoid" switch It becomes possible to execute arbitrary commands as the user spamd is running as. This issue is mitigated by the fact that no imap servers as shipped with RHEL support vpopmail. These options are also not the default spamd options when it is started as a service. This issue should also affect FC4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 7 06:08:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193100] sa-update failed to execute without some dependency RPMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606070608.k57686RM002142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-update failed to execute without some dependency RPMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193100 t.matsuu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.matsuu at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From t.matsuu at gmail.com 2006-06-07 02:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > You may install them from Extras Really? I found perl-Archive-Tar and perl-IO-Zlib in FC5. ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/5/source/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 7 15:25:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193100] sa-update failed to execute without some dependency RPMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606071525.k57FPmjN010229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-update failed to execute without some dependency RPMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193100 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-06-07 11:17 EST ------- Hmm, didn't realize they were in Core. Adding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 7 15:27:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169236] New version of SpamAssassin available (3.1.0) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606071527.k57FRfvA010344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New version of SpamAssassin available (3.1.0) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169236 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-06-07 11:19 EST ------- I've given up on updating to 3.1.x in FC4 because of the spamd scaling problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 7 15:42:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193818] spamd should start before sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606071542.k57FgoRk011545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamd should start before sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-06-07 11:34 EST ------- Going into FC6 for now. Will bring this back into FC5 later. Does chkconfig properly handle removing the previous S80 files when this number is changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 7 15:45:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194290] CVE-2006-2447 spamassassin arbitrary command execution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606071545.k57FjnaX011814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CVE-2006-2447 spamassassin arbitrary command execution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194290 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |3.0.6 and 3.1.3 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-06-07 11:37 EST ------- Pushed updates to FC4 and FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 7 16:38:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193818] spamd should start before sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606071638.k57Gc1WX015843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamd should start before sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-06-07 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Going into FC6 for now. Will bring this back into FC5 later. Does chkconfig > properly handle removing the previous S80 files when this number is changed? No, you would need some trickery like this to fix the starting sequence: /sbin/chkconfig --add spamassassin LEVELS=$(/sbin/chkconfig --list spamassassin | sed -e 's/[0-6]:off//g;s/[^0-6]//g') /sbin/chkconfig --del spamassassin /sbin/chkconfig --add spamassassin [ -n "$LEVELS" ] && /sbin/chkconfig --levels $LEVELS spamassassin on The first --add makes sure that chkconfig knows about spamassassin for a first-time install, and has no effect on upgrades. The subsequent stuff records the current runlevels, removes the existing links, adds in new ones, and restores the runlevels to the original settings. A facility to do something like this would be nice to have within chkconfig itself of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 7 19:20:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193818] spamd should start before sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606071920.k57JKxxD029010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamd should start before sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-06-07 15:13 EST ------- Argh... this is quite a mess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 8 05:59:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606080559.k585x8bg000754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-06-08 01:51 EST ------- imported, owners list updated, branched, built for FC-4/5 and rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 8 18:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194521] New: Update to version 0.7009? Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194521 Summary: Update to version 0.7009? Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc5 Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk-Perl/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Gtk-Perl AssignedTo: matthias at rpmforge.net ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org,fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com 0.7009 is available... And needed for a module I'm packaging. Would an update be possible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 9 22:03:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194706] New: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194706 Summary: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-XML-SAX AssignedTo: jvdias at redhat.com ReportedBy: michael at knox.net.nz CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,jkeating at redhat.com This package fails to build in mock. build.log is attached. ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-06-09 17:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130865) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130865&action=view) Matt Domsch's build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 9 22:03:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191529] Tracker bug for BuildRequires fixes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606092203.k59M3T4S003600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker bug for BuildRequires fixes Alias: BuildReqBlocker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191529 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |194706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 9 23:35:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194706] perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606092335.k59NZEPK006591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194706 jvdias at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-06-09 19:27 EST ------- Well, perl-XML-SAX-0.14-1 built fine on Monday 5th June in Brew / Mock, and builds fine with mock-0.4.8 on my rawhide machine - this bug would hence seem to be caused by a bug with the mock / build system you are using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 9 23:44:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194706] perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606092344.k59NiIL7007212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194706 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-06-09 19:36 EST ------- Brew wasn't using the correct minimal buildroots until late this week. This package maynot rebuild in brew now. Please investigate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 10 00:19:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194706] perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606100019.k5A0JY9l008580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194706 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-06-09 20:11 EST ------- OK, it would help if I could test on my machine - I tried installing the latest mock-0.5-12.20060519, and running 'mock perl-XML-SAX-0.14-1.src.rpm', but it fails on the command: '../mock-helper yum --installroot ... install buildsys-build' In what yum repo is the buildsys-build package? It isn't in any of mine, nor in the yum source. I found the 'buildsys-build.spec' in the mock source, but no pointers to any repo for the packages. Do I need to build the buildsys package myself and create my own yum repo in order to run mock? This is definitely a mock regression from mock-0.4.8, which had no such problems installing the build root . Any ideas where I can find the 'buildsys-build' package in a yum repo ? Thanks, Jason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 10 01:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194706] perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606100144.k5A1ipU4011347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194706 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-06-09 21:36 EST ------- The mock package upstream is about to have a new release. There are some things that are broken when using on FC5. You can use brew to test, edit your spec file, make test-srpm, brew build --scratch dist-fc6 package.src.rpm It will allow you to test builds without doing numerous CVS checkings, version bumps, tags, etc... Also the package will not show up in any collection because of the --scratch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 10 01:52:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194706] perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606100152.k5A1qwqB011795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194706 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-06-09 21:45 EST ------- I'm not trying to build on FC-5 - I'm trying to build on an i686 updated to the latest rawhide of today. I'd really like to be able to build the package in mock on my rawhide machine, so I can inspect the build root if there is a failure - this is not possible with brew (its primary shortcoming in my view). I know the package builds fine on rawhide i686, it builds fine under mock-0.4.8 on rawhide, and it built fine on Monday - the brew logs are unlikely to tell me anything more than the log appended to this bug report. I just need to find out how to get hold of the 'buildsys-build' RPM the new mock-0.5-12.20060519 requires in order to build an rpm - it is in none of our yum repositories, and as you point out, all the URLs shipped with mock are broken, so I can't find this RPM anywhere. I guess I'll have to set up my own yum repository in order to investigate this bug ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 10 10:26:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 06:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194772] New: spamassassin --exit-code always exits with exit code 0 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194772 Summary: spamassassin --exit-code always exits with exit code 0 Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: pavel1r at gmail.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: running spamassassin --exit-code always exits with 0, even if it marks message as spam. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): spamassassin-3.1.3-1.fc5 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. run, for example following command: "cat /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-3.1.3/sample-spam.txt | /usr/bin/spamassassin --exit-code || echo spam". You will see, that header X-Spam-Flag: YES is added to message, but "echo spam" is not invoked 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 10 11:33:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194706] perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606101133.k5ABXMEm007274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-XML-SAX fails to build in mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194706 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-06-09 21:54 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks This will help you to get mock working, however it still has too "fat" of buildroots. Upstream hasn't made a release that uses the trimmed down buildroot so this will not be helpful. To me it looks like the build enviornment is missing perl-XML-LibXML which would provide /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/XML/LibXML/SAX.pm (or the i386 version). This line is the helpful part in the log: Can't locate XML/SAX.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .). yum provides XML/SAX.pm reveals perl-XML-LibXML Please try this in brew. ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-06-10 07:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130911) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130911&action=view) Spec file tweak You can using the current Extras version of mock with a reduced builrroot. See: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-May/msg00904.html (In reply to comment #7) > To me it looks like the build enviornment is missing perl-XML-LibXML > which would provide /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/XML/LibXML/SAX.pm > (or the i386 version). This line is the helpful part in the log: > > Can't locate XML/SAX.pm in @INC (@INC contains: It's looking for XML/SAX.pm, not XML/LibXML/SAX.pm. Actually the package can be fixed just by tweaking it to bring it more in line with the normal perl module template; no additional buildreqs are needed. See attached patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 10 17:51:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194772] spamassassin --exit-code always exits with exit code 0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606101751.k5AHp5Yn013905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin --exit-code always exits with exit code 0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194772 ------- Additional Comments From felicity at kluge.net 2006-06-10 13:43 EST ------- fyi, this is already being tracked in the SpamAssassin bugzilla. I put up a patch, but it hasn't been voted in yet. http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 12 05:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188441] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606120557.k5C5vXte012363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at spiritvideo.com 2006-06-12 01:49 EST ------- I encountered this bug today (or perhaps it's just a very similar one -- mine is described in http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=4709, but it has apparently been fixed since Dec '05) -- I installed FC5 yesterday, and did a yum update last night to update all installed packages. I still have perl-5.8.8-4, which contains CGI.pm 3.15, which has the bug. Tonight I did a 'yum update perl' but it returned 'Could not find update match for perl'. I was able to work around it by updating the package directly from CPAN, but now it is outside of RPM/yum control. I got CGI.pm 3.20 from CPAN, which does not have the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 12 15:54:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188441] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606121554.k5CFsp0B008798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-06-12 11:46 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 12 15:55:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191416] h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606121555.k5CFt5m9008859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191416 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-06-12 11:46 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 12 15:55:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194077] upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606121555.k5CFtdMo008942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-06-12 11:47 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 12 15:56:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191653] RFE: DBD::MySQL has been updated to 3.0003 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606121556.k5CFuC2e008993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: DBD::MySQL has been updated to 3.0003 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191653 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-06-12 11:48 EST ------- perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0004-1.FC5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 12 20:47:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188441] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606122047.k5CKldNj002747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at wolff.to 2006-06-12 16:39 EST ------- I just upgraded and this seems to have fixed the problem. (Previously I had replaced CGI.pm, but I double checked to make sure that file had been replaced by the update.) Unless there are other versions of FC that still need this fix, I think this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 15 13:27:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:27:46 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_195473=5D_New=3A_invalid_use_of_=E2registe?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r=E2_in_linkage_specification?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195473 Summary: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias at redhat.com ReportedBy: ellson at research.att.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: I think the right explanation of this problem is that gcc-4.1.1-3 is a little more pedantic than earlier versions and has exposed a bug in the perl headers. On this basis I'm reporting the bug against perl. Attempting to build a swig-generated perl extension, like the attached example, produces many errors like: /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/perlvars.h:35: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification A workaround is to "#define register" (i.e. null out the register keywork completely) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-6 gcc-4.1.1-3 swig-1.3.29-0.1 How reproducible: 100% problem verified on x86_64 and i386 platforms Steps to Reproduce: 1. zcat bug.tgz | tar xf - 2. cd bug 3. make Actual results: swig -c++ -perl5 -o example_wrap.cpp example.i /usr/bin/g++ -I`perl -e 'use Config; print $Config{archlib};'`/CORE -fPIC -DPIC -c -o example_wrap.o example_wrap.cpp /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/thrdvar.h:34: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/thrdvar.h:38: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/thrdvar.h:40: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification ... /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/perlvars.h:66: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/perlvars.h:69: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/perlvars.h:73: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification example_wrap.cpp:1421: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification example_wrap.cpp:1871: error: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification make: *** [example_wrap.o] Error 1 Expected results: (uncomment the hack that adds "#define register" in Makefile) $ make clean rm -f *.o example_wrap.cpp example.pm libexample* $ make swig -c++ -perl5 -o example_wrap.cpp example.i (echo "#define register"; cat example_wrap.cpp) >example_wrap.cpp.tmp mv -f example_wrap.cpp.tmp example_wrap.cpp /usr/bin/g++ -I`perl -e 'use Config; print $Config{archlib};'`/CORE -fPIC -DPIC -c -o example_wrap.o example_wrap.cpp /usr/bin/g++ -I`perl -e 'use Config; print $Config{archlib};'`/CORE -fPIC -DPIC -c -o example.o example.cpp g++ -shared example_wrap.o example.o -o libexample.so $ ./example.pl 24 Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From ellson at research.att.com 2006-06-15 09:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130972) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130972&action=view) small test case -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dave at dave.org.uk Wed Jun 21 15:48:08 2006 From: dave at dave.org.uk (Dave Cross) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:48:08 +0100 Subject: CPAN Module RPMs Message-ID: <20060621164808.u72cx3gaqm0wskow@webmail.mag-sol.com> I've just started to dabble with packaging RPMs from CPAN modules and making them available for download (see http://rpm.mag-sol.com/). This had brought up a number of questions that people on this list would probably be best placed to answer. 1/ Currently I've been using cpan2rpm to build the RPMs. Are there any better tools out there? What do you use to create RPMs from CPAN distributions? 2/ Are there any good tools for building web pages from RPMs. I've played with rpm2html but I don't want to my web pages to look like it's still 1998. Something that interfaces with the Template Toolkit would be great, and I'd be happy to write that if it doesn't already exist. 3/ I assume there are standards that define how CPAN modules should be packaged for use with Fedora (I'm largely targeting Fedora - if the RPMs work with other distributions then that's a bonus). Are they documented somewhere? Any advice or recommendations would be much appreciated. Cheers, Dave... -- Site: http://dave.org.uk/ Blog: http://blog.dave.org.uk/ From paul at city-fan.org Wed Jun 21 16:27:32 2006 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:27:32 +0100 Subject: CPAN Module RPMs In-Reply-To: <20060621164808.u72cx3gaqm0wskow@webmail.mag-sol.com> References: <20060621164808.u72cx3gaqm0wskow@webmail.mag-sol.com> Message-ID: <44997374.9050109@city-fan.org> Dave Cross wrote: > > I've just started to dabble with packaging RPMs from CPAN modules and > making them available for download (see http://rpm.mag-sol.com/). This > had brought up a number of questions that people on this list would > probably be best placed to answer. > > 1/ Currently I've been using cpan2rpm to build the RPMs. Are there any > better tools out there? What do you use to create RPMs from CPAN > distributions? Try cpanspec (it's in Extras). I don't use it myself but I know a lot of packages in Extras were built starting from a cpanspec package. > 2/ Are there any good tools for building web pages from RPMs. I've > played with rpm2html but I don't want to my web pages to look like it's > still 1998. Something that interfaces with the Template Toolkit would be > great, and I'd be happy to write that if it doesn't already exist. How about repoview, which is used by Fedpra Extras, e.g.: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/i386/repodata/ > 3/ I assume there are standards that define how CPAN modules should be > packaged for use with Fedora (I'm largely targeting Fedora - if the RPMs > work with other distributions then that's a bonus). Are they documented > somewhere? Using cpanspec will give you a good starting point as I believe it's based on the Fedora perl package template. The packages should meet the general packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) and some tips for perl packages in particular can be found at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl Paul. From dave at dave.org.uk Thu Jun 22 07:56:16 2006 From: dave at dave.org.uk (Dave Cross) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:56:16 +0100 Subject: CPAN Module RPMs In-Reply-To: <44997374.9050109@city-fan.org> References: <20060621164808.u72cx3gaqm0wskow@webmail.mag-sol.com> <44997374.9050109@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <20060622085616.wn73i9hoovcoksks@webmail.mag-sol.com> Quoting Paul Howarth : > Dave Cross wrote: >> >> I've just started to dabble with packaging RPMs from CPAN modules >> and making them available for download (see >> http://rpm.mag-sol.com/). This had brought up a number of questions >> that people on this list would probably be best placed to answer. >> >> 1/ Currently I've been using cpan2rpm to build the RPMs. Are there >> any better tools out there? What do you use to create RPMs from >> CPAN distributions? > > Try cpanspec (it's in Extras). I don't use it myself but I know a lot > of packages in Extras were built starting from a cpanspec package. Ah. That looks a lot better. Thanks. >> 2/ Are there any good tools for building web pages from RPMs. I've >> played with rpm2html but I don't want to my web pages to look like >> it's still 1998. Something that interfaces with the Template >> Toolkit would be great, and I'd be happy to write that if it >> doesn't already exist. > > How about repoview, which is used by Fedpra Extras, e.g.: > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/i386/repodata/ That looks useful. But it only took me 15 minutes to put together Template::Plugin::RPM2 (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-Plugin-RPM2/) which is a thin TT wrapper around the Perl module RPM2. >> 3/ I assume there are standards that define how CPAN modules should >> be packaged for use with Fedora (I'm largely targeting Fedora - if >> the RPMs work with other distributions then that's a bonus). Are >> they documented somewhere? > > Using cpanspec will give you a good starting point as I believe it's > based on the Fedora perl package template. The packages should meet the > general packaging guidelines > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) and some tips for > perl packages in particular can be found at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl Lots of interesting reading there. Thanks for all the help. Dave... -- Site: http://dave.org.uk/ Blog: http://blog.dave.org.uk/ From philippe.lang at attiksystem.ch Thu Jun 22 10:33:27 2006 From: philippe.lang at attiksystem.ch (Philippe Lang) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:33:27 +0200 Subject: cpan Module::Build install problem - Argument list too long Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0E49@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> Hi, I'm facing a bug when trying to install a perl module from CPAN, which requires the installation of Module::Build first. This bug is apparently not new: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=19406. And until now, I was not able to find a workaround. Setting the environment variables LANG or LC_ALL to C (tips I could find on internet) did not correct anything. The problem is the following: if you type > cpan Module::Build ... After a while, you get: Running make test /usr/bin/perl Build --makefile_env_macros 1 test t/basic...........ok t/compat..........ok 2/60Couldn't run Build.PL: Argument list too long at /root/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.2801/blib/lib/Module/Build/Compat.pm line 200. # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 180) t/compat..........NOK 3# Failed test (t/compat.t at line 181) t/compat..........NOK 4make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 56) t/compat..........NOK 5make[1]: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 63) t/compat..........NOK 6# Failed test (t/compat.t at line 64) t/compat..........NOK 7# 'MAKE TEST # MAKE[1]: ENTERING DIRECTORY `/ROOT/.CPAN/BUILD/MODULE-BUILD-0.2801/T/_TMP/SIMPLE' # MAKE[1]: LEAVING DIRECTORY `/ROOT/.CPAN/BUILD/MODULE-BUILD-0.2801/T/_TMP/SIMPLE' # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:DONE\.|SUCCESS)' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `realclean'. Stop. # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 66) t/compat..........NOK 8make: *** [test] Interrupt ... And at the end, the module cannot be installed: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- t/compat.t 30 7680 60 30 3-10 13-20 38 41 43 45-46 48-55 59 3 tests and 31 subtests skipped. Failed 1/21 test scripts. 30/670 subtests failed. Files=21, Tests=670, 47 wallclock secs (30.05 cusr + 16.79 csys = 46.84 CPU) Failed 1/21 test programs. 30/670 subtests failed. make: *** [test] Error 255 /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK Running make install make test had returned bad status, won't install without force This problem is specific to Redhat. I did the same job under FreeBSD 6.1 just before, without any problem. Does anyone have an idea how I can install this Module? Is there maybe an RPM package in order to install Module::Build? Thanks! ---------------------------------- Philippe Lang, Ing. Dipl. EPFL Attik System rte de la Fonderie 2 1700 Fribourg Switzerland http://www.attiksystem.ch Tel: +41 (26) 422 13 75 Fax: +41 (26) 422 13 76 From paul at city-fan.org Thu Jun 22 10:40:46 2006 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:40:46 +0100 Subject: cpan Module::Build install problem - Argument list too long In-Reply-To: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0E49@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> References: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0E49@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> Message-ID: <449A73AE.2060404@city-fan.org> Philippe Lang wrote: > Hi, > > I'm facing a bug when trying to install a perl module from CPAN, which > requires the installation of Module::Build first. > > This bug is apparently not new: > http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=19406. And until now, I > was not able to find a workaround. Setting the environment variables > LANG or LC_ALL to C (tips I could find on internet) did not correct > anything. > > > The problem is the following: if you type > >> cpan Module::Build > > ... After a while, you get: > > Running make test > /usr/bin/perl Build --makefile_env_macros 1 test > t/basic...........ok > > t/compat..........ok 2/60Couldn't run Build.PL: Argument list too long > at /root/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.2801/blib/lib/Module/Build/Compat.pm > line 200. > # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 180) > t/compat..........NOK 3# Failed test (t/compat.t at line 181) > > t/compat..........NOK 4make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile > found. Stop. > # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 56) > t/compat..........NOK 5make[1]: *** No rule to make target `test'. > Stop. > # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 63) > t/compat..........NOK 6# Failed test (t/compat.t at line 64) > > t/compat..........NOK 7# 'MAKE TEST > > # MAKE[1]: ENTERING DIRECTORY > `/ROOT/.CPAN/BUILD/MODULE-BUILD-0.2801/T/_TMP/SIMPLE' > # MAKE[1]: LEAVING DIRECTORY > `/ROOT/.CPAN/BUILD/MODULE-BUILD-0.2801/T/_TMP/SIMPLE' > # ' > # doesn't match '(?-xism:DONE\.|SUCCESS)' > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `realclean'. Stop. > # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 66) > t/compat..........NOK 8make: *** [test] Interrupt > > > > ... And at the end, the module cannot be installed: > > > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------- > t/compat.t 30 7680 60 30 3-10 13-20 38 41 43 45-46 48-55 59 > 3 tests and 31 subtests skipped. > Failed 1/21 test scripts. 30/670 subtests failed. > Files=21, Tests=670, 47 wallclock secs (30.05 cusr + 16.79 csys = 46.84 > CPU) Failed 1/21 test programs. 30/670 subtests failed. > make: *** [test] Error 255 > /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK > Running make install > make test had returned bad status, won't install without force > > > > > > This problem is specific to Redhat. I did the same job under FreeBSD 6.1 > just before, without any problem. > > > Does anyone have an idea how I can install this Module? Is there maybe > an RPM package in order to install Module::Build? This problem affects RHL9, FC1-FC3, and RHEL3-4. It may also affect older RHL and RHEL releases; I haven't tried them. It can be worked around for RHL9, FC1, FC2, RHEL3 by setting LANG=C before running the test suite. For FC3 and RHEL4 you'll need to use an older version of Module::Build, such 0.2612. I have packages here: http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/perl-modules/ Paul. From philippe.lang at attiksystem.ch Thu Jun 22 10:45:57 2006 From: philippe.lang at attiksystem.ch (Philippe Lang) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:45:57 +0200 Subject: cpan Module::Build install problem - Argument list too long Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0E4A@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> fedora-perl-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com wrote: > Philippe Lang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm facing a bug when trying to install a perl module from CPAN, >> which requires the installation of Module::Build first. >> >> This bug is apparently not new: >> http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=19406. And until now, I >> was not able to find a workaround. Setting the environment variables >> LANG or LC_ALL to C (tips I could find on internet) did not correct >> anything. >> >> >> The problem is the following: if you type >> >>> cpan Module::Build >> >> ... After a while, you get: >> >> Running make test >> /usr/bin/perl Build --makefile_env_macros 1 test t/basic...........ok >> >> t/compat..........ok 2/60Couldn't run Build.PL: Argument list too >> long at >> > /root/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.2801/blib/lib/Module/Build/Compat.pm >> line 200. >> # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 180) >> t/compat..........NOK 3# Failed test (t/compat.t at line 181) >> >> t/compat..........NOK 4make[1]: *** No targets specified and no >> makefile found. Stop. # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 56) >> t/compat..........NOK 5make[1]: *** No rule to make target `test'. >> Stop. # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 63) >> t/compat..........NOK 6# Failed test (t/compat.t at line 64) >> >> t/compat..........NOK 7# 'MAKE TEST >> >> # MAKE[1]: ENTERING DIRECTORY >> `/ROOT/.CPAN/BUILD/MODULE-BUILD-0.2801/T/_TMP/SIMPLE' # MAKE[1]: >> LEAVING DIRECTORY >> `/ROOT/.CPAN/BUILD/MODULE-BUILD-0.2801/T/_TMP/SIMPLE' # ' # >> doesn't match '(?-xism:DONE\.|SUCCESS)' >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `realclean'. Stop. >> # Failed test (t/compat.t at line 66) >> t/compat..........NOK 8make: *** [test] Interrupt >> >> >> >> ... And at the end, the module cannot be installed: >> >> >> >> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> ------- >> t/compat.t 30 7680 60 30 3-10 13-20 38 41 43 45-46 48-55 59 >> 3 tests and 31 subtests skipped. >> Failed 1/21 test scripts. 30/670 subtests failed. >> Files=21, Tests=670, 47 wallclock secs (30.05 cusr + 16.79 csys = >> 46.84 >> CPU) Failed 1/21 test programs. 30/670 subtests failed. >> make: *** [test] Error 255 >> /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK >> Running make install >> make test had returned bad status, won't install without force >> >> >> >> >> >> This problem is specific to Redhat. I did the same job under FreeBSD >> 6.1 just before, without any problem. >> >> >> Does anyone have an idea how I can install this Module? Is there >> maybe an RPM package in order to install Module::Build? > > This problem affects RHL9, FC1-FC3, and RHEL3-4. > > It may also affect older RHL and RHEL releases; I haven't tried them. > > It can be worked around for RHL9, FC1, FC2, RHEL3 by setting > LANG=C before running the test suite. > > For FC3 and RHEL4 you'll need to use an older version of > Module::Build, such 0.2612. I have packages here: > > http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/perl-modules/ > > Paul. Thanks a lot Paul, it works just great. Regards, --------------- Philippe Lang Attik System From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 23 20:54:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 163219] perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606232054.k5NKsTuW006956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163219 p.van.egdom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |perl-PDL-2.4.2-4.fc5 ------- Additional Comments From p.van.egdom at gmail.com 2006-06-23 16:46 EST ------- This seems fixed in "perl-PDL-2.4.2-4.fc5". Below a piece of the changelog : * ma sep 26 2005 Warren Togami - 2.4.2-2 - Ship pdldoc.db, tune build dependencies and file permissions (#163219 scop) Below is some output of "perldl" : perlDL shell v1.33 PDL comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details, see the file 'COPYING' in the PDL distribution. This is free software and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions, see the same file for details. ReadLines, NiceSlice, MultiLines enabled Reading PDL/default.perldlrc... Found docs database /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/PDL/pdldoc.db Type 'help' for online help Type 'demo' for online demos Loaded PDL v2.4.2 Note: AutoLoader not enabled ('use PDL::AutoLoader' recommended) perldl> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 27 04:26:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196836] New: perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196836 Summary: perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias at redhat.com ReportedBy: ckuskie at sterlink.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: I write and maintain tests for WebGUI, and after upgrading my laptop (running FC5) on June 17th I noticed a huge slowdown in performance in the tests. >From the list of upgraded packages, I traced it down to perl itself. Here's data before and after a downgrade back to perl-5.8.8-4: [colink at redwall t]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/prove perl-5.8.8-5 [colink at redwall t]$ prove --timer i18n/label.t i18n/label....ok 1125.916s All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=6470, 1125 wallclock secs (1068.49 cusr + 1.27 csys = 1069.76 CPU) [colink at redwall t]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/prove perl-5.8.8-4 [colink at redwall t]$ !prove prove --timer i18n/label.t i18n/label....ok 38.331s All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=6470, 39 wallclock secs (36.92 cusr + 0.47 csys = 37.39 CPU) 1125/39 =~ 30 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-5 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install perl-5.8.8-5 2. Huge slowdown in perl. 3. Additional info: The test with the most slowdown uses the Text::Balanced module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 27 14:30:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:30:22 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_195473=5D_invalid_use_of_=E2register=E2_in?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_linkage_specification?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606271430.k5REUMdh029033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: invalid use of ?register? in linkage specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195473 ------- Additional Comments From ellson at research.att.com 2006-06-27 10:21 EST ------- I guess it was a gcc-4.1.1-3 bug. Problem is gone now with: perl-5.8.8-6 gcc-4.1.1-5 swig-1.3.29-0.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Tue Jun 27 20:30:20 2006 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:30:20 -0500 Subject: Pre-review: parrot and pugs Message-ID: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> If any of you happen to be interested in Perl6 development, I have very lightly tested parrot and pugs packages that I'll be submitting for formal review soon: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.5-1.src.rpm http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot/parrot.spec http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Pugs-6.2.12-1.src.rpm http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Pugs/perl-Perl6-Pugs.spec I haven't run these through rpmlint or built them with mock yet, so I'm sure there will be some issues. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From steve at silug.org Tue Jun 27 22:10:32 2006 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:10:32 -0500 Subject: Pre-review: parrot and pugs In-Reply-To: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> References: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <20060627221032.GA32680@osiris.silug.org> I already fixed a couple of things... http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.5-2.src.rpm http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot/parrot.spec Oh, and so far pugs seems to be working. $ pugs -e 'my @n=<>; say "@n[]";' Perl6 is cool Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From chris at chrisgrau.com Tue Jun 27 23:46:45 2006 From: chris at chrisgrau.com (Chris Grau) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:46:45 -0700 Subject: Pre-review: parrot and pugs In-Reply-To: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> References: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <20060627234645.GF6500@chrisgrau.com> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:30:20PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote: > If any of you happen to be interested in Perl6 development, I have > very lightly tested parrot and pugs packages that I'll be submitting > for formal review soon: > > http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.5-1.src.rpm > http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot/parrot.spec > > http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Pugs-6.2.12-1.src.rpm > http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Pugs/perl-Perl6-Pugs.spec > > I haven't run these through rpmlint or built them with mock yet, so > I'm sure there will be some issues. Very cool. I'm going to have to play with these in my free cycles this week (precious few of those lately). So far parrot builds in mock. Rpmlint is unhappy, though. I'll post with more later. -chris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 28 13:34:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196836] perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606281334.k5SDYMPL029651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196836 jc at oreo.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jc at oreo.nl ------- Additional Comments From jc at oreo.nl 2006-06-28 09:25 EST ------- I can confirm this for the X86_64 version. I Use Slim Devices' slimserver (slimserver-6.2.2-1) runs somewhere 20 times faster when just switching between versions perl-5.8.8-4 and perl-5.8.8-5 (and no other rpms are updated) with the perl-5.8.8-5 version being the slower one. Other perl related RPMs I have installed: perl-Digest-SHA1-2.11-1.2 perl-XML-Parser-2.34-6.1.2.2 perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-16.2 mod_perl-2.0.2-5.1 perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-14.2 perl-BSD-Resource-1.24-3.2.2 newt-perl-1.08-9.2.1 perl-Compress-Zlib-1.41-1.2.2 perl-Net-DNS-0.57-1 perl-String-CRC32-1.4-1.FC5 perl-DBI-1.50-2.2 perl-Net-IP-1.24-2.2 perl-libwww-perl-5.805-1.1 perl-HTML-Parser-3.51-1.FC5 perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0004-1.FC5 perl-5.8.8-4 perl-URI-1.35-2.2 perl-HTML-Tagset-3.10-2.1 I am not a perl hacker (I do more in C++ and python), but I am more than willing to provide any trace data that I could generate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 28 14:41:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184319] Spamassassin and SELinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606281441.k5SEf3c4002533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Spamassassin and SELinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184319 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-06-28 10:32 EST ------- Sorry, we will not backport this to FC4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Wed Jun 28 20:31:21 2006 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:31:21 -0500 Subject: Pre-review: parrot and pugs In-Reply-To: <20060627234645.GF6500@chrisgrau.com> References: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> <20060627234645.GF6500@chrisgrau.com> Message-ID: <20060628203121.GA22889@osiris.silug.org> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:46:45PM -0700, Chris Grau wrote: > So far parrot builds in mock. Rpmlint is unhappy, though. I'll post > with more later. This one makes rpmlint slightly happier: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.5-3.src.rpm If you ignore all of the wrong-script-interpreter warnings (and I think you should), that just leaves these: W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/subproxy.so W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/dynlexpad.so W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/match_group.so W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/gdbmhash.so And honestly, I'm not sure what to do with those... Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From tcallawa at redhat.com Wed Jun 28 20:35:17 2006 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom 'spot' Callaway) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:35:17 -0500 Subject: Pre-review: parrot and pugs In-Reply-To: <20060628203121.GA22889@osiris.silug.org> References: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> <20060627234645.GF6500@chrisgrau.com> <20060628203121.GA22889@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <1151526917.17972.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:31 -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:46:45PM -0700, Chris Grau wrote: > > So far parrot builds in mock. Rpmlint is unhappy, though. I'll post > > with more later. > > This one makes rpmlint slightly happier: > > http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.5-3.src.rpm > > If you ignore all of the wrong-script-interpreter warnings (and I > think you should), that just leaves these: > > W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/subproxy.so > W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/dynlexpad.so > W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/match_group.so > W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/gdbmhash.so > > And honestly, I'm not sure what to do with those... Without looking, they probably need to be set chmod +x so that the debuginfo scripts will strip them properly. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! From steve at silug.org Wed Jun 28 21:29:57 2006 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:29:57 -0500 Subject: Pre-review: parrot and pugs In-Reply-To: <1151526917.17972.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> <20060627234645.GF6500@chrisgrau.com> <20060628203121.GA22889@osiris.silug.org> <1151526917.17972.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20060628212957.GA23807@osiris.silug.org> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:35:17PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > Without looking, they probably need to be set chmod +x so that the > debuginfo scripts will strip them properly. Good call. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.5-4.src.rpm Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 29 11:10:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194521] Update to version 0.7009? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606291110.k5TBArqQ015965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update to version 0.7009? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194521 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-06-29 07:02 EST ------- Gtk-Perl is pretty much doomed... I wanted it in Extras only because I thought frozen-bubble still required it, but apparently it doesn't, I must have mixed up with another package, I'm not so sure now... Anyway, in FC devel, many of its (old gtk1) build requirements are missing : libglade-devel, gnome-libs-devel, gtkhtml-devel and gal-devel And the rebuild fails without them being present, even on FC5 apparently (after a quick test). I'll orphan the package now... if you're an Extras contributor, feel free to pick it up. If anyone else is interested, same thing. I just feel that at this point, spending time on gtk1-based stuff isn't really worth it anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 29 12:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194521] Update to version 0.7009? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200606291249.k5TCnltq021147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update to version 0.7009? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194521 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-06-29 08:41 EST ------- Remember to update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Fri Jun 30 19:36:55 2006 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:36:55 -0500 Subject: Pre-review: parrot and pugs In-Reply-To: <20060628212957.GA23807@osiris.silug.org> References: <20060627203020.GA31510@osiris.silug.org> <20060627234645.GF6500@chrisgrau.com> <20060628203121.GA22889@osiris.silug.org> <1151526917.17972.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060628212957.GA23807@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <20060630193655.GA32375@osiris.silug.org> So now that I'm back from YAPC, I'm sitting at an x86_64 box instead of an i386 laptop. At first glance, it looks like both parrot and pugs are multilib-unfriendly. I *think* I almost have parrot fixed up, but any help with pugs would be most sincerely appreciated. For some reason ICU isn't being picked up on x86_64, while it worked fine on i386. Determining whether ICU is installed................................failed. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320