From paul at city-fan.org Thu Nov 2 13:36:50 2006 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:36:50 +0000 Subject: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto Message-ID: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> I've just received a bug report on perl-MailTools requesting that it own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto since it places directories and files (resulting from autosplit) under there (#213561). The bug report suggests a few options: 1. Own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto in my own package. 2. Try to get the Core perl package to own it. 3. Move the files concerned to somewhere else, such as %{perl_vendorarch)/auto. Option 3 is a non-starter, at least with respect to using %{perl_vendorarch), since perl-MailTools is a noarch package. I could go with option 1 but option 2 looks the most sensible to me. Any other suggestions? Paul. From rnorwood at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 03:03:39 2006 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:03:39 -0500 Subject: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto In-Reply-To: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> (Paul Howarth's message of "Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:36:50 +0000") References: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> Message-ID: Paul Howarth writes: > I've just received a bug report on perl-MailTools requesting that it > own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto since it places directories and files > (resulting from autosplit) under there (#213561). > > The bug report suggests a few options: > > 1. Own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto in my own package. > 2. Try to get the Core perl package to own it. > 3. Move the files concerned to somewhere else, such as > %{perl_vendorarch)/auto. > > Option 3 is a non-starter, at least with respect to using > %{perl_vendorarch), since perl-MailTools is a noarch package. > > I could go with option 1 but option 2 looks the most sensible to me. > > Any other suggestions? Well, perl already owns the other 'auto' directories for pretty much the same reason: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73970 I don't see any reason not to do the same thing here and go with option #2 Any objections? If not, Paul, feel free to re-assign the bug to me and the perl package. Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From rc040203 at freenet.de Fri Nov 3 04:57:31 2006 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 05:57:31 +0100 Subject: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto In-Reply-To: References: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <1162529852.23543.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 22:03 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > Paul Howarth writes: > > > I've just received a bug report on perl-MailTools requesting that it > > own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto since it places directories and files > > (resulting from autosplit) under there (#213561). > > > > The bug report suggests a few options: > > > > 1. Own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto in my own package. > > 2. Try to get the Core perl package to own it. > > 3. Move the files concerned to somewhere else, such as > > %{perl_vendorarch)/auto. > > > > Option 3 is a non-starter, at least with respect to using > > %{perl_vendorarch), since perl-MailTools is a noarch package. > > > > I could go with option 1 but option 2 looks the most sensible to me. > > > > Any other suggestions? > > Well, perl already owns the other 'auto' directories for pretty much the > same reason: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73970 > > I don't see any reason not to do the same thing here and go with option > #2 > > Any objections? No, but .. are you sure the perl-Mail*'s auto aren't bugs? At least I am not. Ralf From paul at city-fan.org Fri Nov 3 09:11:20 2006 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:11:20 +0000 Subject: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto In-Reply-To: <1162529852.23543.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> <1162529852.23543.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <454B07B8.2050006@city-fan.org> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 22:03 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: >> Paul Howarth writes: >> >>> I've just received a bug report on perl-MailTools requesting that it >>> own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto since it places directories and files >>> (resulting from autosplit) under there (#213561). >>> >>> The bug report suggests a few options: >>> >>> 1. Own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto in my own package. >>> 2. Try to get the Core perl package to own it. >>> 3. Move the files concerned to somewhere else, such as >>> %{perl_vendorarch)/auto. >>> >>> Option 3 is a non-starter, at least with respect to using >>> %{perl_vendorarch), since perl-MailTools is a noarch package. >>> >>> I could go with option 1 but option 2 looks the most sensible to me. >>> >>> Any other suggestions? >> Well, perl already owns the other 'auto' directories for pretty much the >> same reason: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73970 >> >> I don't see any reason not to do the same thing here and go with option >> #2 Ok, though I don't think I can reassign a bug from an Extras package to a Core one; how about I reopen #73970 and then mark #213561 as a duplicate of that? >> Any objections? > No, but .. are you sure the perl-Mail*'s auto aren't bugs? > > At least I am not. I'm not sure. Where *should* autosplit-ted bits of noarch packages go? Paul. From altblue at n0i.net Mon Nov 6 23:10:59 2006 From: altblue at n0i.net (Marius Feraru) Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:10:59 +0200 Subject: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto In-Reply-To: <454B07B8.2050006@city-fan.org> References: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> <1162529852.23543.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <454B07B8.2050006@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <454FC103.8020109@n0i.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Howarth wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> No, but .. are you sure the perl-Mail*'s auto aren't bugs? >> At least I am not. > I'm not sure. Where *should* autosplit-ted bits of noarch packages go? $ man AutoLoader ... DESCRIPTION ... AutoLoader implements an AUTOLOAD subroutine. When an undefined subroutine in is called in a client module of AutoLoader, AutoLoader's AUTOLOAD subroutine attempts to locate the subroutine in a file with a name related to the location of the file from which the client module was read. As an example, if POSIX.pm is located in /usr/local/lib/perl5/POSIX.pm, AutoLoader will look for perl subroutines POSIX in /usr/local/lib/perl5/auto/POSIX/*.al, where the ".al" file has the same name as the subroutine, sans package. - -- Marius Feraru -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFT8EDtZHp/AYZiNkRArPwAKDoggJg1qznegqnlS/D4D8ElHohpwCfQkId aPMjdcQbZEfdTozHUK1ZVfY= =euqK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From paul at city-fan.org Tue Nov 7 11:21:56 2006 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:21:56 +0000 Subject: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto In-Reply-To: <454FC103.8020109@n0i.net> References: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> <1162529852.23543.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <454B07B8.2050006@city-fan.org> <454FC103.8020109@n0i.net> Message-ID: <45506C54.2070903@city-fan.org> Marius Feraru wrote: > Paul Howarth wrote: >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> No, but .. are you sure the perl-Mail*'s auto aren't bugs? >>> At least I am not. >> I'm not sure. Where *should* autosplit-ted bits of noarch packages go? > > $ man AutoLoader > ... > DESCRIPTION > ... > AutoLoader implements an AUTOLOAD subroutine. When an undefined > subroutine in is called in a client module of AutoLoader, AutoLoader's > AUTOLOAD subroutine attempts to locate the subroutine in a file with a > name related to the location of the file from which the client module > was read. > As an example, if POSIX.pm is located in > /usr/local/lib/perl5/POSIX.pm, AutoLoader will look for perl subroutines > POSIX in /usr/local/lib/perl5/auto/POSIX/*.al, where the ".al" > file has the same name as the subroutine, sans package. So it would appear that perl-MailTools does this correctly: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/Internet.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/Util.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/_prephdr.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/add_signature.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/autosplit.ix /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/escape_from.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/nntppost.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/reply.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/send.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/sign.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/smtpsend.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/unescape_from.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/autosplit.ix /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/mailaddress.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/maildomain.al /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/read_mbox.al Robin, is it OK for me to reopen #73970 and then mark #213561 as a duplicate of that since I don't think I can reassign an Extras bug to a Core component i.e. perl. Paul. From rnorwood at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 15:55:40 2006 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:55:40 -0500 Subject: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto In-Reply-To: <45506C54.2070903@city-fan.org> (Paul Howarth's message of "Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:21:56 +0000") References: <4549F472.2090201@city-fan.org> <1162529852.23543.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <454B07B8.2050006@city-fan.org> <454FC103.8020109@n0i.net> <45506C54.2070903@city-fan.org> Message-ID: Paul Howarth writes: > Marius Feraru wrote: [...] >> $ man AutoLoader >> ... >> DESCRIPTION >> ... >> AutoLoader implements an AUTOLOAD subroutine. When an undefined >> subroutine in is called in a client module of AutoLoader, AutoLoader's >> AUTOLOAD subroutine attempts to locate the subroutine in a file with a >> name related to the location of the file from which the client module >> was read. >> As an example, if POSIX.pm is located in >> /usr/local/lib/perl5/POSIX.pm, AutoLoader will look for perl subroutines >> POSIX in /usr/local/lib/perl5/auto/POSIX/*.al, where the ".al" >> file has the same name as the subroutine, sans package. > > So it would appear that perl-MailTools does this correctly: > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/Internet.pm > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/Util.pm > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/_prephdr.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/add_signature.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/autosplit.ix > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/escape_from.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/nntppost.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/reply.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/send.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/sign.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/smtpsend.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/unescape_from.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/autosplit.ix > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/mailaddress.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/maildomain.al > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/read_mbox.al > > Robin, is it OK for me to reopen #73970 and then mark #213561 as a > duplicate of that since I don't think I can reassign an Extras bug to > a Core component i.e. perl. Personally, I'd rather a new bug since #73970 has a lot of back-and-forth in it, and takes a few minutes for someone to read through and understand what's going on. But I'll still fix it if you just reopen #73970. :-) Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 03:50:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187974] selinux denials of spamd reading files in /var/lib/spamassassin/ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080350.kA83oww4027095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: selinux denials of spamd reading files in /var/lib/spamassassin/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187974 ------- Additional Comments From t.matsuu at gmail.com 2006-11-07 22:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140624) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140624&action=view) A patch to fix it. Sorry for ading a comment to already closed bug. This patch changes the local state dir from /var/lib/spamassassin to /var/spool/spamassain. As far as I tested, sa-update'ed SapmAssassin rules seems to work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 10:16:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193818] spamd should start before sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081016.kA8AGsOK016718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamd should start before sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-08 05:16 EST ------- Since this is fixed in FC6, the bug can be closed, can't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 14:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214580] New: perl package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214580 Summary: perl package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com The main perl package should own the %{perl_vendorlib}/auto directory, as discussed in Bug #73970 and on fedora-perl-devel-list: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2006-November/msg00000.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 14:49:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214580] perl package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081449.kA8En7UC002820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214580 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-08 09:48 EST ------- *** Bug 213561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 22:08:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214709] New: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709 Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: perl-DateManip AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: eploko at gmail.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061024 Firefox/2.0 Description of problem: I have set up my timezone as "Asia/Krasnoyarsk" when installing FC6. It corresponds to the KRAT time zone as reported by the date command. The problem is the perl Date::Manip module isn't recognizing this timezone. If you run perldoc Date::Manip and see the list of the zones it understands, you'll see the KRAT zone isn't listed. Eventually, KRAT is equal to CCT (+0800 China Coast, USSR Zone 7) and echoing CCT to /etc/timezone makes the Date::Manip module happy. But until you do so, all the perl scripts that use Date::Manip fail to run, including /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-DateManip-5.44-1.2.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set timezone to KRAT. 2. Run /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch Actual Results: ERROR: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. Execute the following command in a shell prompt: perldoc Date::Manip The section titled TIMEZONES describes valid TimeZones and where they can be defined. Expected Results: The command should run fluently w/o an error. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 21:05:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 16:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214709] Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092105.kA9L5LfK023451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-11-09 16:05 EST ------- This has been reported upstream already. http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=16360 This is a duplicate of bug 174984 and bug 100786. Bug 100786 was closed CANTFIX since it was opened against RH9. Can someone reopen that and change the product/version? (Or maybe it should just be marked a duplicate of this ticket.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 22:14:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 17:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 100786] DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092214.kA9ME77V028551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100786 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Red Hat Linux |Fedora Core Version|9 |devel Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |FutureFeature, Reopened Resolution|CANTFIX | Component|perl-DateManip |perl-DateManip ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-09 17:13 EST ------- This is still an issue in FC6. Reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 22:14:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 17:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 100786] DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092214.kA9MEkX3028630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100786 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 23:29:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214709] Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092329.kA9NThaF001940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-09 18:29 EST ------- I went ahead and added a simple patch to perl-DateManip to include the requested timezone. This should be available in FC6-testing in the next day or two. Andrey, if you could verify that this fixes your issue, I'll push it as an update to FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 23:31:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214709] Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092331.kA9NVHZJ002038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-09 18:31 EST ------- Steven, I reopened bug #100786 as you requested, and assigned it to me. Thanks for digging it up! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 14:45:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214709] Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101445.kAAEj7SO017203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-11-10 09:44 EST ------- perl-DateManip-5.44-2.fc6 has been pushed for fc6, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 22:13:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199286] Replace hardcoded .fc6 by %{?dist} In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102213.kAAMDxUL020170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Replace hardcoded .fc6 by %{?dist} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199286 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 22:15:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199285] Replace hardcoded .fc6 by %{?dist} In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102215.kAAMFHdr020276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Replace hardcoded .fc6 by %{?dist} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199285 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |jorton at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 22:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214709] Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102228.kAAMS6Ad021095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709 ------- Additional Comments From eploko at gmail.com 2006-11-10 17:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Andrey, if you could verify that this fixes your issue, I'll push it as an > update to FC6. Yup. It now works just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 02:00:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214709] Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110200.kAB20h0W027669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-11-10 21:00 EST ------- perl-DateManip-5.44-2.fc6 has been pushed for fc6, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 07:42:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 02:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199285] Replace hardcoded .fc6 by %{?dist} In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110742.kAB7gINP006358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Replace hardcoded .fc6 by %{?dist} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199285 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jorton at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2006-11-11 02:42 EST ------- I think Robin is the lucky winner here. But bugzilla is still confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215983] New: sa-learn requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215983 Summary: sa-learn requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: dale at bewley.net CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: Spamassassin includes /usr/bin/sa-learn which has unsatisfied dependencies for perl-Archive-Tar and perl-libwww-perl. Should this be considered a bug? Is there a reason not to add these deps? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): spamassassin-3.1.3-1.fc5 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install spamassassin 2. /usr/bin/sa-learn Actual results: [root at noc yum.repos.d]# sa-update Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC ... [root at noc yum.repos.d]# yum -y install perl-libwww-perl [root at noc yum.repos.d]# sa-update Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC ... [root at noc yum.repos.d]# yum -y install perl-Archive-Tar Expected results: [root at noc yum.repos.d]# sa-update sa-update: importing default keyring to '/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'... Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:51:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215983] sa-learn requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161851.kAGIp7F8010466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-learn requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215983 ------- Additional Comments From felicity at kluge.net 2006-11-16 13:50 EST ------- sa-learn has no such requirements. As shown in your "actual results" section, sa-update has extra requirements (all listed in the docs). I think this has been addressed in other tickets, but the SA view point is that sa-update is optional in 3.1, so the modules it requires are optional, so they're not listed as requirements in our spec file. ymmv. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:30:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215983] sa-update requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161930.kAGJU0Q1013975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-update requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215983 dale at bewley.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|sa-learn requires additional|sa-update requires |perl modules (LWP, |additional perl modules |Archive::Tar) |(LWP, Archive::Tar) ------- Additional Comments From dale at bewley.net 2006-11-16 14:29 EST ------- Shoot! I'm sorry. I didn't mean to say sa-learn. I meant sa-update. If because sa-update is considered optional you don't want to list the requirements, I guess I can live with that. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:49:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215983] sa-update requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161949.kAGJnnnx016280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-update requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215983 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-16 14:49 EST ------- For FC5 we considered sa-update to be optional, but FC6 has the requires added making it mandatory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:36:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216541] New: Please update to (at least) 3.1.4 on FC5 if possible Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216541 Summary: Please update to (at least) 3.1.4 on FC5 if possible Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Please update to (at least) 3.1.4 on FC5 if possible. Latest released version is 3.1.7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:08:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216541] Please update to (at least) 3.1.4 on FC5 if possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210108.kAL184V1003648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please update to (at least) 3.1.4 on FC5 if possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216541 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-20 20:07 EST ------- 3.1.7 has been pushed to release engineering for updates-testing of FC5 and FC6. It should appear in that repo soon. Please test that package and post here again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 12:02:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216858] New: test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216858 Summary: test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: Just installed 3.1.7 test update. Suddenly, SA is much too aggressive and is erroneously classifying non-spam as spam. My setup IIRC is as installed by rpm, not customized. Here's an example: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on nbecker X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_PH_SURBL,URIBL_RED autolearn=no version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Report: * 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO * 1.5 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.8 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist * [URIs: techsay.com] * 0.0 URIBL_RED Contains an URL listed in the URIBL redlist * [URIs: techsay.com] * 3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist * [URIs: techsay.com] D Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): spamassassin-3.1.7-1.fc6 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 12:17:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216858] test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221217.kAMCHZKm026229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216858 ------- Additional Comments From jm at jmason.org 2006-11-22 07:17 EST ------- is it possible you've changed something in your DNS configuration, perhaps using a new third-party DNS server? techsay.com is referred to in almost every mail sent via a sourceforge-hosted list; if those DNS blocklists really were listing it (which AFAICS they're not), then we'd all be seeing a massive FP rate, too. A likely explanation is that something in your DNS config is "correcting" DNS lookups and returning some kind of TXT record for non-existent lookups, which isn't compatible with Spamassassin's use of DNS for DNSBL lookups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 12:21:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216858] test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221221.kAMCLsZ5026407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216858 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-11-22 07:21 EST ------- Can you suggest a test I could do? I tried this: nslookup > set type=any > techsay.com Server: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: techsay.com nameserver = dns04.savvis.net. techsay.com nameserver = dns01.savvis.net. techsay.com nameserver = dns02.savvis.net. techsay.com nameserver = dns03.savvis.net. Authoritative answers can be found from: techsay.com nameserver = dns03.savvis.net. techsay.com nameserver = dns04.savvis.net. techsay.com nameserver = dns01.savvis.net. techsay.com nameserver = dns02.savvis.net. dns01.savvis.net internet address = 209.1.222.244 dns02.savvis.net internet address = 209.1.222.245 dns03.savvis.net internet address = 209.1.222.246 dns04.savvis.net internet address = 209.1.222.247 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 12:30:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216858] test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221230.kAMCUsKj026788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: test update 3.1.7 too aggressive! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216858 ------- Additional Comments From reg+redhat at sidney.com 2006-11-22 07:30 EST ------- techsay.com does not show up if you check the SURBL at http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi However, if you are using OpenDNS or a DNS proxy it can change some of the responses resulting in FPs, as described, with a workaround, at http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#opendns -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:06:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 73921] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221706.kAMH6aQ2018631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73921 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |wtogami at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:10:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 73921] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221710.kAMHABjE019015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73921 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-11-22 12:09 EST ------- perl-RPM2 is no longer shipped in any currently maintained Fedora releases. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:10:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 129724] can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221710.kAMHAGus019040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129724 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-11-22 12:10 EST ------- perl-RPM2 is no longer shipped in any currently maintained Fedora releases. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:27:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189899] Is there any way to get PDL/Graphics/PLplot.pm built? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221727.kAMHRS39020743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Is there any way to get PDL/Graphics/PLplot.pm built? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189899 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:35:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197425] iptab fails to print IP address table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221735.kAMHZWwZ021332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: iptab fails to print IP address table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197425 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:35:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197416] looping example fails when incrementing loop variable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221735.kAMHZeHn021363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: looping example fails when incrementing loop variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197416 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:36:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 152535] perl-RPM2 incomplete owned-files list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221736.kAMHapkT021419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-RPM2 incomplete owned-files list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152535 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CANTFIX Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-11-22 12:36 EST ------- This package is no longer shipped in any maintained release of Fedora. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:37:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 147465] XML::XQL not taint-safe by default and warnings if $ENV{TERM} unset. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221737.kAMHbF0Q021492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: XML::XQL not taint-safe by default and warnings if $ENV{TERM} unset. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=147465 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:51:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 73921] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221751.kAMHpZD6022680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73921 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CANTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-22 12:51 EST ------- Re-opening - there's a request to add this back into extras (bug #184530), but I want to make sure this bug is fixed first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:52:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 73921] Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221752.kAMHqBK8022773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73921 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wtogami at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:59:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 129724] can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221759.kAMHx11X023311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129724 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CANTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-22 12:58 EST ------- Re-opening - there's a request to add this back into extras (bug #184530), but I want to make sure this bug is fixed first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:02:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197425] iptab fails to print IP address table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221802.kAMI2fnh023622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: iptab fails to print IP address table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197425 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.25-2.fc6 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-22 13:02 EST ------- Seems to be fixed in fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:05:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197416] looping example fails when incrementing loop variable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221805.kAMI51dA023792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: looping example fails when incrementing loop variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197416 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.25-1.fc5 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-22 13:04 EST ------- Seems to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:18:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221818.kAMIISFS024705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-22 13:18 EST ------- Turns out that there are/were a couple of existing bugs with this package. I haven't verified if they are still bugs with the latest version yet. bugzilla #73921 - packaging issue bugzilla #129724 - perl-RPM2 can't install multiple packages in a single transaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:47:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216541] Please update to (at least) 3.1.4 on FC5 if possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221847.kAMIlsXF027746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please update to (at least) 3.1.4 on FC5 if possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216541 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-22 13:47 EST ------- Looking good so far, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 23:27:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197523] mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222327.kAMNRIwb014350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197523 tgl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com | Component|mysql |perl-DBD-MySQL AssignedTo|tgl at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tgl at redhat.com 2006-11-22 18:26 EST ------- According to the upstream discussion this is a DBD::mysql bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=20153 Reassigning accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 09:34:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217138] New: Wrong library initialization causes errors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217138 Summary: Wrong library initialization causes errors Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: normal Component: perl-Crypt-SSLeay AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: despairr at gmail.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Usage of Crypt::SSLeay, for example when making https requests via LWP using client certificates - causes errors. At least on AMD x86_64 architecture. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Crypt-SSLeay-0.51 How reproducible: Make HTTPS request via LWP using client certificate (use $ENV{HTTPS_CERT_FILE} and $ENV{HTTPS_KEY_FILE}) with Crypt::SSLeay module installed. For example, request to https://w3s.webmoney.ru/asp/XMLOperationsCert.asp. Actual results: You will get a segfault on x86_64 architecture. Expected results: Successful request. Additional info: In perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.51-9.2.2.1.src.rpm there is a patch file perl-Crypt-SSLeay-openssl-098.patch for Crypt-SSLeay-0.51. This patch file should be modified: you should place SSL_library_init() call INSTEAD of SSLeay_add_all_algorithms(). Not after it. Links to discussions about the problem: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.libwww/6722 http://www.mail-archive.com/libwww at perl.org/msg06114.html http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=16735 ------- Additional Comments From despairr at gmail.com 2006-11-24 04:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142052) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142052&action=view) Fixed patch that makes things working -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:14:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217138] Wrong library initialization causes errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271814.kARIEofU022741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Wrong library initialization causes errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217138 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-27 13:14 EST ------- Thanks for the patch, Walery. The fixed package should be available in updates-testing soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:49:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197523] mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271849.kARInLlB025394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197523 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-27 13:49 EST ------- This appears to be fixed by perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0007. I've build this version as an update to FC-5. It should appear in updates-testing soon. Please let me know if this version fixes your issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:56:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:56:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197523] mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271856.kARIuVTM026036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197523 ------- Additional Comments From charles at federales.com 2006-11-27 13:56 EST ------- I have upgraded to FC6 which apparently has the updated version, and the errors have indeed gone away. Feel free to close this one as you see fit. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 19:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197523] mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271941.kARJfPgF029643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197523 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-27 14:41 EST ------- Yeah, FC6 includes perl-DBD-3.0007. I'll leave this bug open and continue with pushing the update to FC5 in case other users run into it. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:15:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217138] Wrong library initialization causes errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272215.kARMF0uG010089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Wrong library initialization causes errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217138 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-11-27 17:14 EST ------- perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.51-12.fc6 has been pushed for fc6, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:15:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:15:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197523] mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272215.kARMFlEN010291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: mysqlhotcopy DBI error in mysql-server-5.0.22-1.FC5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197523 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-11-27 17:15 EST ------- perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0007-1.fc5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:15:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208633] Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272215.kARMFnin010304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208633 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedora.redhat.com 2006-11-27 17:15 EST ------- perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0007-1.fc5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 22:57:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217613] New: spamassassin should depend on Perl-Archive-Tar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217613 Summary: spamassassin should depend on Perl-Archive-Tar Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: andrewb at cse.unsw.edu.au CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Trying to run sa-update on my updated FC5 system, I got: $ rpm -qf =sa-update spamassassin-3.1.3-1.fc5 $ sa-update Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8! .6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81. Installing the 'perl-Archive-Tar' package with yum fixes this problem, so I think it should be marked as a dependency of the spamassassin package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 23:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217613] spamassassin should depend on Perl-Archive-Tar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282303.kASN3xxq006942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin should depend on Perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217613 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-28 18:03 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215983 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 23:04:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215983] sa-update requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282304.kASN4C35006975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-update requires additional perl modules (LWP, Archive::Tar) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215983 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrewb at cse.unsw.edu.au ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-28 18:04 EST ------- *** Bug 217613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.