From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 03:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208731] New: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,jpo at di.uminho.pt >From Jose on fedora-perl-devel-list: Removing support for perl 5.8.3 and perl 5.8.4 reduces the number of directories in the perl search path (@INC), which improves the perl modules loading time. This has already been done in past for FC-4 where support for perl 5.8.0/5.8.1/5.8.2 has dropped. perl specfile patch: -------------------- --- perl.spec.588_8 2006-07-14 22:22:06.000000000 +0100 +++ perl.spec 2006-09-17 16:10:58.000000000 +0100 @@ -26,9 +26,7 @@ Provides: perl(:WITHOUT_THREADS) %endif -%define perlmodcompat 5.8.7 5.8.6 5.8.5 5.8.4 5.8.3 -Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.3) -Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.4) +%define perlmodcompat 5.8.7 5.8.6 5.8.5 Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.5) Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.7) -------------------- Note: The FC-4 change was reported in the Release Notes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 03:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610010326.k913QbJX001897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |150224 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 03:27:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208315] Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610010327.k913ROMT001949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |150224 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 03:27:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208535] perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610010327.k913Roqa001984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-09-30 23:27 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208315 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 03:28:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208315] Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610010328.k913S2ve002017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-09-30 23:28 EST ------- *** Bug 208535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:16:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208639] Update request for perl-Archive-Tar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012316.k91NGXFD000467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update request for perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208639 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:16 EST ------- The new version has been approved for inclusion in FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:17:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208633] Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012317.k91NH2wq000486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208633 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:17 EST ------- The new version has been approved for inclusion in FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:26:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194077] upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012326.k91NQTGA001056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:26 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:27:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199736] perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012327.k91NRuXs001174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199736 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:27 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:28:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199372] PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012328.k91NSMPB001243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199372 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:28 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:29:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172739] Deep recursion in CGI::Carp::warn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012329.k91NTxBm001401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Deep recursion in CGI::Carp::warn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172739 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:29 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:30:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 142837] Need site-specific man page directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012330.k91NUcC3001512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Need site-specific man page directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=142837 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:30 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:31:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199152] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012331.k91NVF6O001591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199152 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:31 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:31:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175459] wrong coding In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012331.k91NViHR001681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: wrong coding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175459 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:31 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:31:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191416] h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012331.k91NVwwO001713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191416 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:31 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:32:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 137202] getXXXent functions blow up after recursing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012332.k91NWBKr001773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: getXXXent functions blow up after recursing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137202 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:32 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:32:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172396] multi-threaded perl builds use localtime_r which does not call tzset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012332.k91NWNrR001824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: multi-threaded perl builds use localtime_r which does not call tzset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172396 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:32 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:33:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188441] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012333.k91NXUk0001976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:33 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:33:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178343] h2ph problem with gcc internal defines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012333.k91NXrQZ002040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178343 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:33 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172792] use of study() with utf8 support enabled breaks regexps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610012334.k91NYbWp002138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: use of study() with utf8 support enabled breaks regexps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172792 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:34 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 3 16:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199149] upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610031619.k93GJTcR011730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199149 Bug 199149 depends on bug 194077, which changed state. Bug 194077 Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 3 16:26:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207430] perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610031626.k93GQADY012515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207430 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-03 12:26 EST ------- Oops - the new version (perl-LDAP-0.33-3.fc6) has been in for awhile, but I neglected to update the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Tue Oct 3 16:41:13 2006 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:41:13 -0700 Subject: recently orphaned perl modules.... In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490609212037y5d3f8924pa0c9fac6fccfe6b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dd7ab490609212037y5d3f8924pa0c9fac6fccfe6b1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490610030941p280987efie6c6f6e984594e59@mail.gmail.com> On 9/21/06, Chris Weyl wrote: > > Good idea? Bad? Yes? No? Oh well... I tried at least :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From paul at city-fan.org Tue Oct 3 16:45:18 2006 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:45:18 +0100 Subject: recently orphaned perl modules.... In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490610030941p280987efie6c6f6e984594e59@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dd7ab490609212037y5d3f8924pa0c9fac6fccfe6b1@mail.gmail.com> <7dd7ab490610030941p280987efie6c6f6e984594e59@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4522939E.7060009@city-fan.org> Chris Weyl wrote: > On 9/21/06, Chris Weyl wrote: >> >> Good idea? Bad? Yes? No? > > Oh well... I tried at least :) Can't think of any reason why perl module packages should be any different to any other package really; if someone needs on that's been orphaned, they can pick it up. Paul. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 3 16:53:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610031653.k93GrPOD016670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-03 12:53 EST ------- This is fixed in perl-5.8.8-10, which has been accepted for FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Tue Oct 3 17:12:05 2006 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:12:05 -0700 Subject: recently orphaned perl modules.... In-Reply-To: <4522939E.7060009@city-fan.org> References: <7dd7ab490609212037y5d3f8924pa0c9fac6fccfe6b1@mail.gmail.com> <7dd7ab490610030941p280987efie6c6f6e984594e59@mail.gmail.com> <4522939E.7060009@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490610031012sb060418w6ba1bbcf24de5888@mail.gmail.com> On 10/3/06, Paul Howarth wrote: > Can't think of any reason why perl module packages should be any > different to any other package really; if someone needs on that's been > orphaned, they can pick it up. There's been a bit of discussion off and on in other fora about leveraging SIGs in this fashion. I just thought I'd see if I could jump start it over here. No big deal, really, but it would lend credence to our caring more about the totality of "perl" in fedora vs just our own individual packages. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 3 17:13:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610031713.k93HDwtc019935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-10-03 13:13 EST ------- This might be a bit untimely, but is this just to improve loading times, or is there an actual incompatibility issue with modules built for 5.8.[34] and the perl 5.8.8 package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 3 17:24:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610031724.k93HOdRR020660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-03 13:24 EST ------- Pretty much just for the loading time improvements. It was discussed a bit on fedora-perl-devel-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2006-September/msg00028.html I discussed the issue a bit more offlist with Jose, and with Warren Togami, and it was agreed that the best thing to do was to go ahead and drop the directories. That discussion should've been more open, I apologize...we didn't mean to exclude anyone, I think fedora-perl-devel-list got dropped from the recipients accidentally. Do you anticipate any major problems with this change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Tue Oct 3 23:57:22 2006 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:57:22 -0500 Subject: recently orphaned perl modules.... In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490610031012sb060418w6ba1bbcf24de5888@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dd7ab490609212037y5d3f8924pa0c9fac6fccfe6b1@mail.gmail.com> <7dd7ab490610030941p280987efie6c6f6e984594e59@mail.gmail.com> <4522939E.7060009@city-fan.org> <7dd7ab490610031012sb060418w6ba1bbcf24de5888@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061003235722.GA28996@osiris.silug.org> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:12:05AM -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > There's been a bit of discussion off and on in other fora about > leveraging SIGs in this fashion. I just thought I'd see if I could > jump start it over here. No big deal, really, but it would lend > credence to our caring more about the totality of "perl" in fedora vs > just our own individual packages. FWIW, I took care of the last batch of perl packages that were orphaned. If someone doesn't beat me to it (and I hope they do, mind you :), I'll take the last batch too. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 4 18:39:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173563] filelist cleanup: drop unnecessary files, eliminate duplicates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610041839.k94IdSuQ001918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: filelist cleanup: drop unnecessary files, eliminate duplicates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173563 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 4 18:40:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185406] h2ph problem with gcc internal defines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610041840.k94IehHt002031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185406 Bug 185406 depends on bug 178343, which changed state. Bug 178343 Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178343 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 4 18:41:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199152] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610041841.k94IfZb8002099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199152 Bug 199152 depends on bug 188441, which changed state. Bug 188441 Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 4 18:49:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191416] h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610041849.k94InMwE002804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191416 Bug 191416 depends on bug 191409, which changed state. Bug 191409 Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191409 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 4 19:18:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200440] Building perl-5.8.8-8 without threading fails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610041918.k94JIU7j005431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Building perl-5.8.8-8 without threading fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200440 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias at redhat.com |rnorwood at redhat.com Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:34 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 9 19:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204800] perl.prov script misparses some version information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610091954.k99JseEk030887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl.prov script misparses some version information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204800 mikem at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|mikem at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 12 20:49:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610122049.k9CKnH2B022782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 ------- Additional Comments From davej at redhat.com 2006-10-12 16:49 EST ------- This hasn't reoccured since that one evening, so I'm happy to close this unless you'd prefer to keep digging. The lack of reproducability severely impairs any effort to root cause it though. :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 13 05:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610130510.k9D5AgfX018865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-10-13 01:10 EST ------- reopen if you're able to find a reproducer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 16 18:47:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175439] [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610161847.k9GIlKmI016321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175439 ------- Additional Comments From davej at redhat.com 2006-10-16 14:47 EST ------- A new kernel update has been released (Version: 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5) based upon a new upstream kernel release. Please retest against this new kernel, as a large number of patches go into each upstream release, possibly including changes that may address this problem. This bug has been placed in NEEDINFO state. Due to the large volume of inactive bugs in bugzilla, if this bug is still in this state in two weeks time, it will be closed. Should this bug still be relevant after this period, the reporter can reopen the bug at any time. Any other users on the Cc: list of this bug can request that the bug be reopened by adding a comment to the bug. In the last few updates, some users upgrading from FC4->FC5 have reported that installing a kernel update has left their systems unbootable. If you have been affected by this problem please check you only have one version of device-mapper & lvm2 installed. See bug 207474 for further details. If this bug is a problem preventing you from installing the release this version is filed against, please see bug 169613. If this bug has been fixed, but you are now experiencing a different problem, please file a separate bug for the new problem. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 17 19:55:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205562] maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610171955.k9HJtCfJ009960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205562 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-17 15:55 EST ------- This fix didn't make it into FC6, but should be available as an update, and is fixed in FC7 and RHEL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 17 20:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610172014.k9HKEjIh011896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chrismcc at pricegrabber.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-10-17 16:14 EST ------- *** Bug 205624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Wed Oct 18 00:09:33 2006 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:09:33 -0500 Subject: Bricolage Message-ID: <20061018000933.GA32680@osiris.silug.org> Last year I worked for a while on getting Bricolage packaged. Since I may never get back to it at the rate I'm going, here's the last spec that I had: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/bricolage/bricolage.spec (That's really the spec for 1.8.6, but apparently I had started to update it for 1.9.0 at one point.) The only problem with Bricolage is it doesn't work on apache2/mod_perl2. I had a brute-force, untested port here: https://svn.bricolage.cc/bricolage/branches/dev_apache2/ Development has moved on since then (obviously), so that may not be useful at this point. Besides, upstream *really* wants a solution that makes Bricolage work on either mod_perl 1 or 2. (There were some discussions about that on the Bricolage devel list last year.) The only dependencies that don't seem to be available right now are these: perl(Apache::SizeLimit) perl(Cache::Mmap) perl(Devel::Profiler) >= 0.03 perl(HTTP::DAV) perl(MasonX::Interp::WithCallbacks) >= 1.10 perl(Net::FTPServer) perl(Net::SFTP) >= 0.08 perl(Params::CallbackRequest) >= 1.10 perl(Term::ReadPassword) perl(Test::Class) >= 0.04 perl(Test::File::Contents) perl(Text::Aspell) perl(XML::Writer) I think I've had packages for all of these (except Apache::SizeLimit, which is a apache1 thing IIRC) lingering in my queue for a year or so. I'll try to get them all submitted soon. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 18 18:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 100786] DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610181805.k9II5jtV025449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100786 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords| |FutureFeature notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-10-18 14:05 EST ------- Red Hat Linux is no longer supported by Red Hat, Inc. If you are still running Red Hat Linux, you are strongly advised to upgrade to a current Fedora Core release or Red Hat Enterprise Linux or comparable. Some information on which option may be right for you is available at http://www.redhat.com/rhel/migrate/redhatlinux/. Red Hat apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We do want to make sure that no important bugs slip through the cracks. If this issue is still present in a current Fedora Core release, please open a new bug with the relevant information. Closing as CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 19 12:59:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202402] Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610191259.k9JCxa1b008969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202402 tjb at unh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjb at unh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-10-19 08:59 EST ------- I'm running fc6t3+rawhide and it still fails because of LWP:UserAgent missing: raptor> sa-update --help Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. raptor> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 19 13:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202402] Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610191310.k9JDA87j010189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202402 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-10-19 09:09 EST ------- Well I just installed cpan2rpm to try to build the missing perl modules and it installed perl-libwww-perl as a requirement. That fixed sa-learn so I guess it's just a missing Requires. The naming of perl module rpms can be a little bit non-intuitive sometimes. I did an intial yum search LWP and found some perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse and yet the parent module is named perl-libwww-perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 19 16:25:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202402] Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610191625.k9JGPRDE028957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202402 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-10-19 12:25 EST ------- The right thing to do in a situation like this is "yum install 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'". The package name follows the upstream name (with "perl-" tacked on to the beginning), which doesn't always make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 26 15:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212369] New: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212369 Summary: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: tjb at unh.edu CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: I'm running spamass-milter along with spamassassin and I'm seeing these errors in /var/log/maillog: Oct 26 09:19:19 raptor spamd[2509]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 879, line 5. Oct 26 09:19:19 raptor spamd[2509]: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 953, line 5. The may be just warnings as mail is being tagged. Also saw this: Oct 26 11:28:21 raptor spamd[5990]: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK' Oct 26 11:28:21 raptor spamd[5990]: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp (running version 3.1.4) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): spamassassin-3.1.4-1.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 26 15:31:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205562] maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610261531.k9QFVS4j018639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205562 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-10-26 11:31 EST ------- $ rpm -q --provides perl-Crypt-SSLeay SSLeay.so perl(Crypt::SSLeay) = 0.51 perl(Crypt::SSLeay::CTX) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::Conn) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::Err) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::MainContext) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::X509) perl(Net::SSL) = 2.77 perl-Crypt-SSLeay = 0.51-11.fc7 Verified, I close the bug with resolution RAWHIDE, feel free to do otherwise if it is a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 28 00:15:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610280015.k9S0FUT7019580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-10-27 20:15 EST ------- On a belated note... :) I don't anticipate any problems, but it's good to know the history of a change like this when it's not on the perl list. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 29 03:26:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212792] New: FC5=>FC6 upgrade replaced local.cf with default stub file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212792 Summary: FC5=>FC6 upgrade replaced local.cf with default stub file Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: jbass at dmsd.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: The upgrade process saved the local.cf file, and repaced with a default stub, removing critical site specific settings to protect from excessive spam. Unless there are critical version skew problems with file formats and options, production configuration files should be left in place during an upgrade/update process ... and the new file installed as .rpmnew. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: appears always, did for both of our servers. Steps to Reproduce: 1.CDROM upgrade from FC5=>FC6 2. 3. Actual results: spamassassin is cripled by having site specific settings removed. Expected results: upgrade should leave existing configuration files untouched, unless there are compelling changes in file format or options requiring manual intervention after an upgrade/update. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 29 21:59:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 129724] can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610292159.k9TLxhCm001810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129724 thacker at math.cornell.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|test3 |fc3test1 ------- Additional Comments From thacker at math.cornell.edu 2006-10-29 16:59 EST ------- Changing version to correct one. (test1 -> fc3test1, and some were filed as test3 accidentally instead; but clearly must be fc3test1 given the date of filing.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 30 05:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175439] [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610300512.k9U5C9AT029005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175439 davej at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NeedsRetesting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 31 16:44:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213285] New: perl INC path is missing locations on ppc64 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213285 Summary: perl INC path is missing locations on ppc64 Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: powerpc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: galak at kernel.crashing.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: the perl @INC path is missing the 'ppc' vendor path (/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/) Which is where certain perl modules are built and installed (perl-HTML-Parser) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-10 perl-HTML-Parser-3.55-1.fc6 How reproducible: A simple perl script which report the @INC path: print " @INC "; Steps to Reproduce: 1. perl test.pl Actual results: /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 . Expected results: Should also have /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/ Should have Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 31 16:56:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213285] perl INC path is missing locations on ppc64 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610311656.k9VGuldD031813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl INC path is missing locations on ppc64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213285 ------- Additional Comments From galak at kernel.crashing.org 2006-10-31 11:56 EST ------- The other solution maybe that perl modules may also need ppc64 builds. When I hacked in perl script to explicilty include /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/ I got the following message: Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/auto/HTML/Parser/Parser.so' for module HTML::Parser: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/auto/HTML/Parser/Parser.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 31 16:59:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213285] perl INC path is missing locations on ppc64 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200610311659.k9VGxbtZ032215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl INC path is missing locations on ppc64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213285 ------- Additional Comments From galak at kernel.crashing.org 2006-10-31 11:59 EST ------- Doing a rebuild of perl-HTML-Parser-3.55-1.fc6.src.rpm on a ppc64 host ends up generating perl-HTML-Parser-3.55-1.fc6.ppc64.rpm which when installed resolves the issue with my specific script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.