[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 21 12:34:39 UTC 2006

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2


jpo at di.uminho.pt changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|jpo at di.uminho.pt            |fedora-perl-devel-
                   |                            |list at redhat.com

------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt  2006-09-21 08:34 EST -------
CC += fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com

* I believe Jason is no longer around;  maybe Robin Norwood could take over
  this and try to contact the Red Hat Legal Department

* The core perl-RPM-Specfile package has the same problem:
   - same author (Chip Turner)
   - same initial packager (Chip Turner)
   - it doesn't contain any copyright information
   - the specfile states the license is "GPL or Artistic"
     $ rpm -qp --qf="%{license}\n" perl-RPM-Specfile-1.19-2.1.1.src.rpm
     GPL or Artistic

* The upstream RPM package started including the perl RPM[2] module as of 4.4.3.
  It now generates a rpm-perl subpackage (http://wraptastic.org/pub/rpm-4.4.x/)

  $ rpm -qpl rpm-perl-4.4.3-1.i386.rpm

  $ rpm -qpl rpm-perl-4.4.6-1.i386.rpm

  Note: the rpm maintainer has renamed the perl module (RPM2 -> RPM)

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

More information about the Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list