From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189899] Is there any way to get PDL/Graphics/PLplot.pm built? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011541.l71FfJns022750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Is there any way to get PDL/Graphics/PLplot.pm built? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189899 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-01 11:41 EST ------- Closing this in favor of the review bug to get this addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250502] New: maintain perl-Data-Dump for EPEL? Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250502 Summary: maintain perl-Data-Dump for EPEL? Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Data-Dump AssignedTo: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: ralston at pobox.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com I noticed on the EPEL ContributorStatus page that you are interested in maintaining your Fedora packages for EPEL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatus Would you be willing to maintain perl-Data-Dump for EPEL? I've encountered some packages that like to use Data::Dump during "make check", so not having it on RHEL is a pain... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Aug 3 16:37:50 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:37:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-08-03 Message-ID: <20070803163750.190F315213E@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> perl-Algorithm-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc5 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc6 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) perl-Algorithm-Dependency FE6 > F7 (0:1.103-1.fc6 > 0:1.102-2.fc6) perl-CGI-Ex FE5 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc5 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc6 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) perl-Class-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc5 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc6 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) perl-Class-C3-XS FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) perl-Class-Data-Accessor FE5 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc5 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc6 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) perl-Class-MOP FE5 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc5 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc6 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) perl-Data-Alias FE5 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc5 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc6 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) perl-DBIx-DBSchema FE6 > F7 (0:0.33-1.fc6 > 0:0.32-1.fc7) perl-Event FE6 > F7 (0:1.09-1.fc6 > 0:1.08-1.fc7) perl-File-Remove FE6 > F7 (0:0.37-1.fc6 > 0:0.34-1.fc7) perl-Gtk2-Notify FE6 > F7 (0:0.03-1.fc6 > 0:0.02-4.fc7) perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) perl-JSON-XS FE5 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc5 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc6 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) perl-Moose FE5 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc5 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc6 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) perl-Params-Util FE5 > F7 (0:0.25-1.fc5 > 0:0.24-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.25-1.fc6 > 0:0.24-1.fc7) perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP FE5 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc5 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc6 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI FE5 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc5 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc6 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SSLify FE5 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc5 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc6 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) perl-Sub-Exporter FE5 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc5 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc6 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) perl-Want FE6 > F7 (0:0.15-1.fc6 > 0:0.14-1.fc7) From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:11:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032111.l73LBWvr008881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250839 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032119.l73LJTA2010444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250845 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:24:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032124.l73LOHDB011086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:29:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032129.l73LTKXG011572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:35:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032135.l73LZmto012380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:53:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250860] New: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Authen-SASL AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Authen-SASL-2.10-1 Actual results: No perl-Authen-SASL in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-Authen-SASL in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild looks NOT successfull per default: No Package Found for perl(GSSAPI) 4:perl-5.8.8-10.i386 0:perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-15.noarch Cannot find build req perl(GSSAPI). Exiting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:54:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032154.l73Ls8b8014776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250860 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:54:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032154.l73LsA01014801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:57:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250862] New: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-BerkeleyDB AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-BerkeleyDB-0.32-1 Actual results: No perl-BerkeleyDB in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-BerkeleyDB in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Rebuild in mock looks NOT well: 0:perl-Test-Pod-1.26-1.el5.noarch 4:perl-5.8.8-10.i386 No Package Found for perl(MLDBM) 0:db4-devel-4.3.29-9.fc6.i386 Cannot find build req perl(MLDBM). Exiting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032159.l73LxI7f015341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250862 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032159.l73LxLdf015366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:05:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250863] New: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250863 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Mail-SPF-Query AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1 Actual results: No perl-Mail-SPF-Query in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-Mail-SPF-Query in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1-3.el5.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032205.l73M5exA015797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250863] Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032205.l73M5ijx015822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250863 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:12:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] New: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Convert-UUlib AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Convert-UUlib-1.08-2 Actual results: No perl-Convert-UUlib in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-Convert-UUlib in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded after ripping out perl-devel build requirement for me and looks fine, too: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Convert-UUlib-1.08-2.el5.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Convert-UUlib-debuginfo-1.08-2.el5.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:13:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032213.l73MDBl5016418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:13:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032213.l73MDE2O016457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:17:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250867] New: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250867 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Convert-TNEF AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Convert-TNEF-0.17-7 Actual results: No perl-Convert-TNEF in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-Convert-TNEF in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Convert-TNEF-0.17-7.el5.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032217.l73MHYnh016924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250867 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250867] Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032217.l73MHZVb016948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250867 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032219.l73MJxMe017123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250846, which changed state. Bug 250846 Summary: Please rebuild cabextract for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250846 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:27:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250869] New: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Razor-Agent AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Razor-Agent-2.82-1 Actual results: No perl-Razor-Agent in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-Razor-Agent in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Razor-Agent-2.82-1.el5.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Razor-Agent-debuginfo-2.82-1.el5.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032227.l73MRgLi017722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250869 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250869] Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032227.l73MRlVO017749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:16:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250872] New: perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 Summary: perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-FreezeThaw AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-5 Actual results: No perl-FreezeThaw in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-FreezeThaw in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's a perl-MLDBM dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-5.el5.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:19:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250873] New: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-MLDBM AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-MLDBM-2.01-5 Actual results: No perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's a perl-BerkeleyDB dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:20:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032320.l73NKOOv020928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-5 |Please rebuild perl- | |FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032321.l73NLPue021037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250872 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032321.l73NLQ0P021056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |250873 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032322.l73NMjke021185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:22:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032322.l73NMl3G021228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |250862 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:31:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250876] New: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-GSSAPI AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-GSSAPI-0.24-1 Actual results: No perl-GSSAPI in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-GSSAPI in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's a perl-Authen-SASL dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 5 succeded for me and looks fine, too: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-GSSAPI-0.24-1.el5.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-GSSAPI-debuginfo-0.24-1.el5.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:32:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032332.l73NWDei021776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:32:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250876] Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032332.l73NWEAW021794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |250860 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:37:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032337.l73NbL8l022230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO CC| |wtogami at redhat.com BugsThisDependsOn| |249081 Flag| |needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-03 19:37 EST ------- Sorry for the Bugzilla spam. I think, now I filed any missing build and run- time dependencies into bug reports requesting the packages rebuilt for EPEL. Steven, the main problem of clamav 0.88.x vs. 0.9x.x IIRC is, that the configuration files got incompatible and you can't simply upgrade without breaking things. As I got informed, wtogami wanted to look into, but nothing happened, yet? Warren? Any status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 02:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060244.l762iwI4004417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gregory.douglas at sympatico.ca ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-05 22:44 EST ------- *** Bug 250885 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:26:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249807] License issues with dependency on File::chmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061426.l76EQqS4022703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: License issues with dependency on File::chmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249807 Bug 249807 depends on bug 249996, which changed state. Bug 249996 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:07:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250869] Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061607.l76G7Oei010818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-06 12:07 EST ------- I personally don't use perl-Razor-Agent anymore. Would you like to take over ownership in Fedora and EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Aug 6 20:22:14 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:22:14 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-08-06 Message-ID: <20070806202214.46E49152143@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> perl-Algorithm-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc5 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc6 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) perl-Algorithm-Dependency FE6 > F7 (0:1.103-1.fc6 > 0:1.102-2.fc6) perl-CGI-Ex FE5 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc5 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc6 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) perl-Class-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc5 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc6 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) perl-Class-C3-XS FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) perl-Class-Data-Accessor FE5 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc5 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc6 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) perl-Class-MOP FE5 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc5 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc6 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) perl-Data-Alias FE5 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc5 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc6 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) perl-DBIx-DBSchema FE6 > F7 (0:0.33-1.fc6 > 0:0.32-1.fc7) perl-Event FE6 > F7 (0:1.09-1.fc6 > 0:1.08-1.fc7) perl-File-Remove FE6 > F7 (0:0.37-1.fc6 > 0:0.34-1.fc7) perl-Gtk2-Notify FE6 > F7 (0:0.03-1.fc6 > 0:0.02-4.fc7) perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) perl-JSON-XS FE5 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc5 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc6 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) perl-Moose FE5 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc5 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc6 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) perl-Params-Util FE5 > F7 (0:0.25-1.fc5 > 0:0.24-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.25-1.fc6 > 0:0.24-1.fc7) perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP FE5 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc5 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc6 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI FE5 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc5 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc6 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SSLify FE5 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc5 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc6 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) perl-Sub-Exporter FE5 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc5 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc6 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) perl-Want FE6 > F7 (0:0.15-1.fc6 > 0:0.14-1.fc7) From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:41:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062141.l76LfGcv021827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-06 17:40 EST ------- Rebuilding in mock at EPEL 5 succeeded and looks fine: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:47:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062147.l76LlTKE022157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-06 17:47 EST ------- When the requirement is fulfilled, mock build works at EPEL 5 and looks fine: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-BerkeleyDB-0.32-1.el5.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-BerkeleyDB-debuginfo-0.32-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062150.l76LofIs022427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-06 17:49 EST ------- Once requirements are matched, rebuild in mock at EPEL 5 works and looks fine: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Authen-SASL-2.10-1.el5.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 22:05:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251075] New: Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251075 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Net-CIDR-Lite AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Net-CIDR-Lite-0.20-3 Actual results: No perl-Net-CIDR-Lite in EPEL 4 and 5 Expected results: Package perl-Net-CIDR-Lite in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's a runtime requirement of perl-Mail-SPF-Query. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Rebuilding mock for EPEL 5 worked for me after ripping out perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) to avoid the dependency hell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 22:06:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251075] Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062206.l76M6tlB023497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251075 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |250863 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 22:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250863] Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062206.l76M6w7N023523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250863 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |251075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 10:17:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249807] License issues with dependency on File::chmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071017.l77AHkLn010446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: License issues with dependency on File::chmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249807 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |251128 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-07 06:17 EST ------- Need perl-Test-Script to be able to upgrade perl-Test-Inline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:38:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250869] Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071938.l77JcZGv009598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-07 15:38 EST ------- Thanks Warren, yes I would like to take it over hereby: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Razor-Agent New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated Fedora Owners: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de Please agree. I didn't add any EPEL owners line as there is no EPEL branch, yet. Is this correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071952.l77JqmLg011561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-08-07 15:52 EST ------- I tried to reproduce this again. This time I downgraded yum and yum-metadata-resolver to the versions distributed with FC6 and tried again, but yum has correctly found that perl-libs has to be installed. Greg, was your FC6 updated? Or did you started from the original install of FC6? What were the versions of yum and yum-metatada-parser before the upgrade? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 22:07:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250869] Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072207.l77M7WbG030467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Wed Aug 8 09:25:33 2007 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:25:33 +0200 Subject: mark pod files as %doc? Message-ID: <20070808092533.GA7210@free.fr> Hello, There are some .pod files below /usr/lib/perl5/. I guess they correspond with pod documentation that is not associated with some code. Should they be marked as %doc? If so maybe this could be done automatically? -- Pat From chris at chrisgrau.com Wed Aug 8 15:56:17 2007 From: chris at chrisgrau.com (Chris Grau) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:56:17 -0700 Subject: mark pod files as %doc? In-Reply-To: <20070808092533.GA7210@free.fr> References: <20070808092533.GA7210@free.fr> Message-ID: <20070808155617.GK13285@chrisgrau.com> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:25:33AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > There are some .pod files below /usr/lib/perl5/. I guess they > correspond with pod documentation that is not associated with some > code. Should they be marked as %doc? If so maybe this could be done > automatically? Which means they'd be installed under /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}, right? The usual reason those .pod files exist is so they can be viewed using perldoc, which searches @INC for .pm and .pod files. That said, I don't know. I've seen some that have no reason to be installed and others that do. It wouldn't be a huge burden to use perldoc to view a .pod file in the /usr/share/doc area instead. The user would just have to know to look there. -- Chris Grau -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tibbs at math.uh.edu Wed Aug 8 16:09:00 2007 From: tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) Date: 08 Aug 2007 11:09:00 -0500 Subject: mark pod files as %doc? In-Reply-To: <20070808155617.GK13285@chrisgrau.com> References: <20070808092533.GA7210@free.fr> <20070808155617.GK13285@chrisgrau.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "CG" == Chris Grau writes: CG> Which means they'd be installed under CG> /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}, right? No, it means they'd be marked as %doc and therefore wouldn't be installed with an --excludedocs install. - J< From chris at chrisgrau.com Wed Aug 8 16:11:18 2007 From: chris at chrisgrau.com (Chris Grau) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:11:18 -0700 Subject: mark pod files as %doc? In-Reply-To: References: <20070808092533.GA7210@free.fr> <20070808155617.GK13285@chrisgrau.com> Message-ID: <20070808161118.GN13285@chrisgrau.com> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:09:00AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "CG" == Chris Grau writes: > > CG> Which means they'd be installed under > CG> /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}, right? > > No, it means they'd be marked as %doc and therefore wouldn't be > installed with an --excludedocs install. Oh. In that case, I don't see why .pod files shouldn't be marked as %doc. -- Chris Grau -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pertusus at free.fr Wed Aug 8 16:32:30 2007 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:32:30 +0200 Subject: mark pod files as %doc? In-Reply-To: References: <20070808092533.GA7210@free.fr> <20070808155617.GK13285@chrisgrau.com> Message-ID: <20070808163230.GK15409@free.fr> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:09:00AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "CG" == Chris Grau writes: > > CG> Which means they'd be installed under > CG> /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}, right? > > No, it means they'd be marked as %doc and therefore wouldn't be > installed with an --excludedocs install. Indeed, that's what I was thinking. -- Pat From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Aug 8 18:48:20 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-08-08 Message-ID: <20070808184820.20C70152141@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> perl-Algorithm-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc5 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc6 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) perl-CGI-Ex FE5 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc5 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc6 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) perl-Class-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc5 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc6 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) perl-Class-C3-XS FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) perl-Class-Data-Accessor FE5 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc5 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc6 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) perl-Class-MOP FE5 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc5 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc6 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) perl-Data-Alias FE5 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc5 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc6 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) perl-Event FE6 > F7 (0:1.09-1.fc6 > 0:1.08-1.fc7) perl-Gtk2-Notify FE6 > F7 (0:0.03-1.fc6 > 0:0.02-4.fc7) perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) perl-JSON-XS FE5 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc5 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc6 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) perl-Moose FE5 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc5 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc6 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP FE5 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc5 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc6 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI FE5 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc5 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc6 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SSLify FE5 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc5 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc6 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) perl-Sub-Exporter FE5 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc5 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc6 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 09:42:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 05:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090942.l799gsWV000526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 mpoly at panix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED CC| |mpoly at panix.com Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From mpoly at panix.com 2007-08-09 05:42 EST ------- Here's another manifestation (FC6 machine, upgrade to FC7 using yum). Let me know if there is any other diagnostic info that I can provide. [root at delos /]# perl perl: error while loading shared libraries: libperl.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root at delos /]# rpm -q --whatprovides libperl.so perl-libs-5.8.8-18.fc7 [root at delos /]# yum install perl-libs Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do [root at delos /]# rpm -e perl-libs-5.8.8-18.fc7 --nodeps [root at delos /]# yum -y install perl-libs Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-libs.i386 4:5.8.8-18.fc7 set to be updated (snip) Installed: perl-libs.i386 4:5.8.8-18.fc7 Complete! [root at delos /]# perl perl: error while loading shared libraries: libperl.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root at delos /]# rpm -q --whatprovides libperl.so perl-libs-5.8.8-18.fc7 [root at delos /]# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jorton at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 12:56:48 2007 From: jorton at redhat.com (Joe Orton) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 13:56:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] perl-XML-Parser: BR MakeMaker Message-ID: <20070809125648.GA26399@redhat.com> This fixes the build of perl-XML-Parser in mock: Index: perl-XML-Parser.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-XML-Parser/devel/perl-XML-Parser.spec,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.19 perl-XML-Parser.spec --- perl-XML-Parser.spec 12 Jul 2006 07:48:16 -0000 1.19 +++ perl-XML-Parser.spec 9 Aug 2007 12:53:28 -0000 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-XML-Parser Version: 2.34 -Release: 6.1.2.2.1 +Release: 7 Summary: A low level Perl module for parsing XML either via trees or streaming Group: Development/Libraries @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSERGEANT/XML-Parser-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: perl >= 2:5.8.0 +BuildRequires: perl >= 2:5.8.0, perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: expat-devel # The script LWPExternEnt.pl is loaded by Parser.pm BuildRequires: perl(LWP), perl(URI) @@ -60,7 +60,10 @@ %changelog -* Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating - sh: line 0: fg: no job control +* Thu Aug 9 2007 Joe Orton 2.34-7 +- BuildRequire perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) + +* Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.34-6.1.2.2.1 - rebuild * Fri Feb 10 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.34-6.1.2.2 From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Aug 9 20:07:03 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:07:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-08-09 Message-ID: <20070809200703.8E980152170@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> perl-Algorithm-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc5 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.07-1.fc6 > 0:0.06-1.fc7) perl-CGI-Ex FE5 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc5 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:2.13-1.fc6 > 0:2.12-1.fc7) perl-Class-C3 FE5 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc5 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.18-1.fc6 > 0:0.14-1.fc6) perl-Class-C3-XS FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.04-1.fc7) perl-Class-Data-Accessor FE5 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc5 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.04001-1.fc6 > 0:0.04000-3.fc7) perl-Class-MOP FE5 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc5 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.38-1.fc6 > 0:0.37-1.fc7) perl-Data-Alias FE5 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc5 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.05-1.fc6 > 0:1.04-1.fc7) perl-Event FE6 > F7 (0:1.09-1.fc6 > 0:1.08-1.fc7) perl-Gtk2-Notify FE6 > F7 (0:0.03-1.fc6 > 0:0.02-4.fc7) perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon FE5 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc5 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:0.06-1.fc6 > 0:0.03-3.fc6) perl-JSON-XS FE5 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc5 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:1.22-1.fc6 > 0:1.21-3.fc7) perl-Moose FE5 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc5 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.22-1.fc6 > 0:0.21-1.fc7) perl-POE-Component-Server-SOAP FE5 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc5 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.11-1.fc6 > 0:1.10-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI FE5 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc5 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) FE6 > F7 (0:1.16-1.fc6 > 0:1.15-1.fc6) perl-POE-Component-SSLify FE5 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc5 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.08-1.fc6 > 0:0.07-1.fc7) perl-Sub-Exporter FE5 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc5 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) FE6 > F7 (0:0.974-1.fc6 > 0:0.972-1.fc7) From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 21:53:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092153.l79Lrohe022447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From mpoly at panix.com 2007-08-09 17:53 EST ------- By the way, /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so does exist, and creating a link on /usr/lib/libperl.so does fix the problem (or at least the symptom), at least for the short term. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 00:01:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 20:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250008] Devel-Size 0.68 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100001.l7A01l6b032386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Devel-Size 0.68 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250008 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-09 20:01 EST ------- Building now. Apologies for the lag :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rnorwood at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 16:56:55 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:56:55 -0400 Subject: License tag for perl modules Message-ID: Hi, So there was a question about licenses for one of my perl rpms in Fedora, and I asked Tom Callaway about it. He explained that the correct tag for my module, as well as any that are distributed 'under the same terms as perl itself' is: License: GPL+ or Artistic So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not blindly, of course...there are probably exceptions). -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From tibbs at math.uh.edu Fri Aug 10 17:05:14 2007 From: tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) Date: 10 Aug 2007 12:05:14 -0500 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >>>>> "RN" == Robin Norwood writes: RN> So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not RN> blindly, of course...there are probably exceptions). I think there may be a few modules out there which are Artistic _only_, which it seems makes them unacceptable for Fedora. I honestly had no clue that the artistic license was considered non-free until spot started the recent licensing work. - J< From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 17:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249807] License issues with dependency on File::chmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101717.l7AHHGoe023328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: License issues with dependency on File::chmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249807 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-10 13:17 EST ------- Looks like upstream fixed the licensing issue with File::chmod, fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at city-fan.org Fri Aug 10 17:34:19 2007 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:34:19 +0100 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070810183419.58121650@metropolis.intra.city-fan.org> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:56:55 -0400 Robin Norwood wrote: > Hi, > > So there was a question about licenses for one of my perl rpms in > Fedora, and I asked Tom Callaway about it. He explained that the > correct tag for my module, as well as any that are distributed 'under > the same terms as perl itself' is: > > License: GPL+ or Artistic > > So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not blindly, of > course...there are probably exceptions). rpmlint (at least up to rpmlint-0.80-2) still complains about this: W: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 invalid-license Artistic The licensing page on the wiki says that "GPL+Artistic" is OK (probably should say "GPL+ or Artistic" for clarity) in the "Bad Licenses" table entry for Artistic, and since this is going to be a very common combination, I'd suggest that rpmlint include this exception in the license check. Ville, should I raise this on the rpmlint trac, in Fedora bugzilla, or is this email enough? Paul. From tibbs at math.uh.edu Fri Aug 10 17:37:47 2007 From: tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) Date: 10 Aug 2007 12:37:47 -0500 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: <20070810183419.58121650@metropolis.intra.city-fan.org> References: <20070810183419.58121650@metropolis.intra.city-fan.org> Message-ID: >>>>> "PH" == Paul Howarth writes: PH> rpmlint (at least up to rpmlint-0.80-2) still complains about PH> this: Yes, Ville has indicated that he's fixing this. - J< From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 20:17:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249807] License issues with dependency on File::chmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102017.l7AKHORe011778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: License issues with dependency on File::chmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249807 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-10 16:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Looks like upstream fixed the licensing issue with File::chmod, fwiw. Yes, c.f.: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ianburrell at gmail.com Fri Aug 10 20:32:58 2007 From: ianburrell at gmail.com (Ian Burrell) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:32:58 -0700 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 10 Aug 2007 12:05:14 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "RN" == Robin Norwood writes: > > RN> So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not > RN> blindly, of course...there are probably exceptions). > > I think there may be a few modules out there which are Artistic > _only_, which it seems makes them unacceptable for Fedora. I honestly > had no clue that the artistic license was considered non-free until > spot started the recent licensing work. > Why would Artistic license be considered unacceptable for Fedora? It is OSI approved. It is considered non-free and GPL-incompatible by the FSF. But my impression is that OSI approved is acceptable for Fedora. Also, the Artistic 2.0 license is different. It is OSI approved and GPL compatible. It is used Perl 6 and Parrot without dual licensing. It should be tagged separately. - Ian From tibbs at math.uh.edu Fri Aug 10 20:46:20 2007 From: tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) Date: 10 Aug 2007 15:46:20 -0500 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >>>>> "IB" == Ian Burrell writes: IB> Why would Artistic license be considered unacceptable for Fedora? It's in the "Bad Licenses" list at the bottom of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing IB> Also, the Artistic 2.0 license is different. Yes, as recognized on the above page. IB> It should be tagged separately. It isn't? It sure seems to be tagged separately to me, according to the above page. - J< From rc040203 at freenet.de Sat Aug 11 05:14:15 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:14:15 +0200 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1186809255.31901.554.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 12:05 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "RN" == Robin Norwood writes: > > RN> So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not > RN> blindly, of course...there are probably exceptions). > > I think there may be a few modules out there which are Artistic > _only_, which it seems makes them unacceptable for Fedora. I honestly > had no clue that the artistic license was considered non-free until > spot started the recent licensing work. The fundamental question would be: Is this consideration applicable at all? Consider: Most perl packages are scripts and not linked against anything. They "use" other packages. Ralf From rc040203 at freenet.de Sat Aug 11 05:18:27 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:18:27 +0200 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1186809507.31901.560.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 12:56 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote: > Hi, > > So there was a question about licenses for one of my perl rpms in > Fedora, and I asked Tom Callaway about it. He explained that the > correct tag for my module, as well as any that are distributed 'under > the same terms as perl itself' is: > > License: GPL+ or Artistic "under the same time as perl" doesn't mean "GPL+ or Artistic", but indirects licensing to another package ("perl") - Consider what happens if "perl" should change to a completely different license. Ralf From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Sat Aug 11 05:18:58 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:18:58 -0700 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7dd7ab490708102218p2d1310f8q832a285c1125958c@mail.gmail.com> On 8/10/07, Robin Norwood wrote: > Hi, > > So there was a question about licenses for one of my perl rpms in > Fedora, and I asked Tom Callaway about it. He explained that the > correct tag for my module, as well as any that are distributed 'under > the same terms as perl itself' is: > > License: GPL+ or Artistic > > So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not blindly, of > course...there are probably exceptions). I've updated the licensing section under PackagingDrafts/Perl. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From tcallawa at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 12:25:26 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:25:26 -0400 Subject: License tag for perl modules In-Reply-To: <1186809255.31901.554.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1186809255.31901.554.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1186835126.4096.80.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 07:14 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 12:05 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >>>>> "RN" == Robin Norwood writes: > > > > RN> So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not > > RN> blindly, of course...there are probably exceptions). > > > > I think there may be a few modules out there which are Artistic > > _only_, which it seems makes them unacceptable for Fedora. I honestly > > had no clue that the artistic license was considered non-free until > > spot started the recent licensing work. > > The fundamental question would be: Is this consideration applicable at > all? > > Consider: Most perl packages are scripts and not linked against > anything. They "use" other packages. So, its only applicable for those items which are only "Artistic" 1.0, not for anything dual licensed, and not for anything which Requires/BuildRequires something "Artistic" 1.0. ~spot From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250869] Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111631.l7BGVUQP011155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-11 12:31 EST ------- I bumped perl-Razor-Agent to 2.84 and tested - results below: Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Build on target fedora-6-extras succeeded. Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111631.l7BGVVSB011173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250869, which changed state. Bug 250869 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 17:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111713.l7BHD9qS013041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-11 13:13 EST ------- Steve? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 17:14:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111714.l7BHEVmO013128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-11 13:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Convert-UUlib New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated Fedora Owners: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net,robert Updated EPEL Owners: robert,nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 17:47:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111747.l7BHlMgP014645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-11 13:47 EST ------- ok with me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 21:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112159.l7BLxgBr026094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-11 17:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 23:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112317.l7BNHVVi029648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250839, which changed state. Bug 250839 Summary: Please rebuild lzop for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250839 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 23:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112345.l7BNjuqJ030633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From gregory.douglas at sympatico.ca 2007-08-11 19:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > I tried to reproduce this again. This time I downgraded yum and > yum-metadata-resolver to the versions distributed with FC6 and tried again, but > yum has correctly found that perl-libs has to be installed. > > Greg, was your FC6 updated? Or did you started from the original install of FC6? > What were the versions of yum and yum-metatada-parser before the upgrade? My FC6 was updated just before migrating to FC7 a couple of weeks ago. Not certain exact yum versions in FC6, but yum was at the most recent FC6 version as of the end of July 2007. I did a network update to FC7, since I do not have a DVD drive. After the upgrade to FC7, I had to replace my old yum.conf and fedora-updates.repo to newer files with the extension "rpmnew". This opened the door to many new FC7 updates, but did not resolve the perl dependency problem. I also tried to remove perl and ignore dependencies (rpm -e --allmatches --nodeps perl) and then reinstall perl (yum install perl). But again, the dependencies were ignored. Therefore I just manually installed them after learning they were missing. Hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 13:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 09:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251850] New: Please add altermime dep Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251850 Summary: Please add altermime dep Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: amavisd-new AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com amavisd-new can use altermime which is available in the Fedora repo, so it should declare an altermime dep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 13:14:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 09:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235704] Fedora 8 Target In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121314.l7CDEVf7004025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora 8 Target Alias: F8Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235704 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |251850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:17:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251850] Please add altermime dep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121917.l7CJH062019660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please add altermime dep https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251850 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-08-12 15:16 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:23:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121923.l7CJNaQA020038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-08-12 15:23 EST ------- MLDBM still isn't available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 22:03:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251850] Please add altermime dep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122203.l7CM34b9028018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please add altermime dep https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251850 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-12 18:02 EST ------- Thanks a lot! Actually looking again at amavisd logs it seems perl(Mail::SPF) can be added to the mix, as do perl(Digest::SHA), perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA), perl(Image::Info::JPEG), and perl(Mail::SPF) (not sure about those, the logs are somewhat unclear if they are optional amavisd-new or spamassassin modules) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 22:35:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122235.l7CMZKWr029270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-12 18:35 EST ------- Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. Nicolas, I upgraded on EPEL branch to 1.09 for the initial packages, can I also do this for the Fedora ones or do you want to do this yourself? If you would like to do it, feel free to copy from the EPEL branches. I'll close this bug report anyway as EPEL 4 and 5 are built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 22:35:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122235.l7CMZKEh029288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250865, which changed state. Bug 250865 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 22:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122236.l7CMawVp029429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250851, which changed state. Bug 250851 Summary: Please rebuild freeze for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 05:36:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130536.l7D5aesO014737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-13 01:36 EST ------- I'll do it for devel in ~ a week I don't touch released distros unless there is a blocking problem to fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 05:37:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130537.l7D5bxGl014919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-13 01:37 EST ------- BTW since you're interested in amavisd-new its startup messages list a few optional perl modules which are not in Fedora yet, and could be ported from atrpms/dag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 06:27:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130627.l7D6RJ5u018206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-13 02:27 EST ------- Kevin, seems I can't touch this package anymore ;( cvs commit... **** Access denied: nim is not in ACL for rpms/perl-Convert-UUlib cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed **** Access allowed: nim is in ACL for rpms/perl-Convert-UUlib/devel. cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 06:27:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130627.l7D6RKmS018230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250865, which changed state. Bug 250865 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 07:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130721.l7D7LPHE021177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-13 03:21 EST ------- And Kevin, you'll IMHO have to do this change for every other package you touched this weekend for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 17:40:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251960] New: perl-File-Which for EPEL? Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251960 Summary: perl-File-Which for EPEL? Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: perl-File-Which AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Hi - can I get perl-File-Which for EPEL? I need it for bug #250493 . Or I'd be happy to own it if you don't want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 17:41:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251960] perl-File-Which for EPEL? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131741.l7DHfMJv018329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-File-Which for EPEL? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251960 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |250493 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:44:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131844.l7DIiQcU027488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:04:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132004.l7DK4dSh009734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250848, which changed state. Bug 250848 Summary: Please rebuild nomarch for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:49:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252044] New: perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252044 Summary: perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Test-Pod AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL 4 and 5. Can you build it? Or, I'd be happy to own it for EPEL if you don't want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:50:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252044] perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132050.l7DKogwG017120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252044 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |251763 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:54:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132054.l7DKsA2k017472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250865, which changed state. Bug 250865 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:04:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252044] perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132104.l7DL4apm018744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252044 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-13 17:04 EST ------- (perl-Test-Pod-Coverage would be nice too, fwiw) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:53:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132153.l7DLrVpc025104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250845, which changed state. Bug 250845 Summary: Please rebuild arj for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250845 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:54:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250867] Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132154.l7DLsg3u025381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250867 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-13 17:54 EST ------- Well Steve, this is your turn and nothing is blocking it, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:56:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251075] Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132156.l7DLu3SF025512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251075 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-13 17:56 EST ------- Steven? Do you need help regarding the perl(Test::*) dependency hell? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132156.l7DLuxIH025607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-13 17:56 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250876] Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132157.l7DLvcVc025682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-13 17:57 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:07:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132307.l7DN7hh2032354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 19:07 EST ------- This was due to a packagedb glitch... it should be all fixed. Please let me know if it's not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250867] Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132339.l7DNd3qn001819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250867 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-08-13 19:39 EST ------- You're right. This is an easy one. It's building now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132339.l7DNd4nv001838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250867, which changed state. Bug 250867 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250867 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251075] Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132355.l7DNtCac002752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251075 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-08-13 19:55 EST ------- Thanks, but I've got it building right now without the Test::Pod* dependencies (temporarily). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250863] Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132355.l7DNtCXD002770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250863 Bug 250863 depends on bug 251075, which changed state. Bug 251075 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251075 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:58:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251850] Please add altermime dep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132358.l7DNwgas002990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please add altermime dep https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251850 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at la | |poste.net) ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-08-13 19:58 EST ------- I added Mail::SPF (and removed Mail::SPF::Query) when I added altermime. Can I see the logs relating to those other modules? I don't see anything about those in my logs, but I'm running a stock spamassassin config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 01:25:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140125.l7E1PkvQ008474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250863, which changed state. Bug 250863 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250863 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 05:46:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251850] Please add altermime dep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140546.l7E5kupp026996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please add altermime dep https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251850 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at la| |poste.net) | ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-14 01:46 EST ------- Aug 14 07:44:29 rousalka amavis[17039]: INFO: SA version: 3.2.3, 3.002003, no optional modules: Sys::Hostname::Long Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::PgSQL Encode::Dete ct Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM IP::Country::Fast Mail::DKIM Mail::DKIM::Verifier Image::Info Image::Info::GIF Image::Info::JPEG Image::Info::PNG Image::Info::TIF F Mail::SPF::Query Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA auto::Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA::new_public_key auto::Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA::new_key_from_parameters auto::Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA::get_key _parameters auto::Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA::import_random_seed Digest::SHA I'm running stock fedora-devel sa + sa-update on updates.spamassassin.org and saupdates.openprotect.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161508.l7GF81Tp009270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|test4 |f7 ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-08-16 11:07 EST ------- Hello Michael, (In reply to comment #23) > Here's another manifestation (FC6 machine, upgrade to FC7 using yum). I believe your problem differs from what the rest of this bug report discusses. First, could you please check the version of glibc (rpm -q glibc)? If it is 2.6.90-9, you might have hit bug #252146. Try upgrading to 2.6.90-10. (If it is not at your mirror yet, use: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=13841 .) If this is not the cause, will you please file a new bug report? The problem does not seem to be caused by yum, so the new bug should be against Component: perl. Please include also the output of the following commands: rpm -qa 'glibc*' objdump -p /usr/bin/perl | grep PATH ldconfig -p | grep perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:35:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161535.l7GFZppK013290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-08-16 11:35 EST ------- I'm no longer so sure this is a problem in yum. Perhaps some other package provides libperl.so. In any case, the unversioned libperl.so provide is dangerous, so I'll add "Requires: perl-libs = %{version}-%{release}" to perl.spec; it shouldn't hurt and there are situations where it will help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161541.l7GFfZLI014522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-08-16 11:41 EST ------- Could the guys who tripped over this problem post the output of the commands rpm -q --whatprovides libperl.so and rpm -q --whatprovides 'libperl.so()(64bit)' ? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 21:36:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162136.l7GLahlT004310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 gregory.douglas at sympatico.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From gregory.douglas at sympatico.ca 2007-08-16 17:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Could the guys who tripped over this problem post the output of the commands > rpm -q --whatprovides libperl.so > and > rpm -q --whatprovides 'libperl.so()(64bit)' > ? > Thanks Although I have manually added the missing perl libs package, Here is the first: # rpm -q --whatprovides libperl.so fedora-ds-7.1-2.RHEL4 perl-libs-5.8.8-18.fc7 And the second: # rpm -q --whatprovides 'libperl.so()(64bit)' no package provides libperl.so()(64bit) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 22:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162207.l7GM7bIv007502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-16 18:07 EST ------- Fascinating - Greg, any idea what 'fedora-ds' is? (rpm -qi ?) The only fedora-ds I'm aware of is the fedora directory server, and that seems to be at version 1.04, not 7.1: http://www.directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Download Anyway, Stepan's solution in comment #27 should work...though I suspect fedora-ds probably shouldn't Provide: libperl.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 04:09:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170409.l7H49g9t003965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 00:09 EST ------- Got following mock build failure log + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00.load...............Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at t/00.load.t line 1. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/00.load.t line 1. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) t/mm_coverage...........Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at t/mm_coverage.t line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/mm_coverage.t line 5. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) t/mm_coverage_config....Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at t/mm_coverage_config.t line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/mm_coverage_config.t line 5. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) t/pod-coverage..........Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at t/pod-coverage.t line 3. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/pod-coverage.t line 3. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) FAILED--5 test scripts could be run, alas--no output ever seen make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 05:26:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170526.l7H5Qmxg009235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 01:26 EST ------- good to have t/* added under %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 10:50:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171050.l7HAo1SO005491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From gregory.douglas at sympatico.ca 2007-08-17 06:49 EST ------- Hi Robin. It is indeed the Fedora Directory, but an earlier version. I installed it manually a while back when it was released. Name : fedora-ds Relocations: /opt/fedora-ds Version : 7.1 Vendor: (none) Release : 2.RHEL4 Build Date: Thu 26 May 2005 04:33:32 PM EDT Install Date: Wed 01 Jun 2005 02:33:22 PM EDT Build Host: earthquake Group : System Environment/Daemons Source RPM: fedora-ds-7.1-2.RHEL4.src.rpm Size : 169747913 License: GPL plus extensions Signature : (none) URL : http://fedora.redhat.com Summary : Fedora Directory Server Description : Fedora Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server. I want to remove it, but there are hundreds of dependencies, probably because of the libperl.so. I think that I will force a removal with the rpm and the nodeps option. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 13:40:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171340.l7HDeB7i025312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: yum breaks dependecies on upgrade (perl no-longer self-provides libperl.so) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-08-17 09:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > [...] I suspect fedora-ds probably shouldn't Provide: libperl.so I agree. I was going to file it as a bug, but it seems that recent fedora-ds* rpms no longer have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skasal at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:37:48 2007 From: skasal at redhat.com (Stepan Kasal) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:37:48 +0200 Subject: Stepan Kasal: self-introduction Message-ID: <20070817153748.GA31517@camelia.ucw.cz.> Hello, I was assigned to help resolve perl bugs in RH bugzilla. Though my perl programming skills are minimal, I hope I will be able to help, e.g. w/ the packaging problems. As my first commit, I fixed bug #240540 in rawhide, in version 5.8.8-23.fc8. The same fix goes to F-7, as 5.8.8-20.fc7. When it builds I'll push it to testing. Have a nice weekend, Stepan Kasal From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 16:05:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] perl-libs not installed on upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171605.l7HG5LBe017297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-libs not installed on upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|yum breaks dependecies on |perl-libs not installed on |upgrade (perl no-longer |upgrade |self-provides libperl.so) | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Component|yum |perl ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-08-17 12:05 EST ------- The problem is fixed by the Jakub's solution I presented in commment #27. In Fedora Development it's fixed in 5.8.8-23.fc8, in Fedora 7 Updates it is in version 5.8.8-20.fc7. Reassigning back to perl, chnaging the summary again; this is not a yum bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:32:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171832.l7HIWwM4002288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-17 14:32 EST ------- ok - new spec file and SRPM with fixed BuildRequires: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-2.fc7.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage.spec wrt the suggestion of including tests in %doc - that doesn't seem to be standard procedure for perl rpms in fedora. If we were to do this, I'd rather make the decision to do in wholesale than on a case by case basis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 22:05:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253336] New: /usr//bin/perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253336 Summary: /usr//bin/perl Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Curses AssignedTo: garrick at usc.edu ReportedBy: laroche at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Newest package requires /usr//bin/perl instead of /usr/bin/perl. regards, Florian La Roche Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skasal at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 07:06:45 2007 From: skasal at redhat.com (Stepan Kasal) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:06:45 +0200 Subject: Fixing the License tag Message-ID: <20070818070645.GA12564@camelia.ucw.cz.> Hello, I set up to fix the License: tag. The tag "GPL" has to be replaced with something more specific, see the discussion on fedora-maintainers-list. In this case "GPL+" is to be used, meaning "version 1 or any higher." But I noticed that modules Tie::File and Getopt::Long require GPL version 2 or higher. After a quick discussion with Tom "spot" Callaway, I learnt that the rpm containing these modules has to have License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) Another problem is Digest::MD5, which IMVHO has contradicting licenses: It says "under the same terms as Perl itself" in perl-5.8.8/ext/Digest/MD5/README and, in other words, again in perl-5.8.8/ext/Digest/MD5/MD5.pm . But the license inside MD5.pm also says: - every material mentioning this sw has to contain string1 - every derivative work has to be labeled with string2 It seems that these extra conditions has to be fulfilled unless the code is distributed as part of Perl. Confusing. spot has asked the lawyers about this module. Then there is perl-core rpm, which does not contain any file, just a few requires. I suspect the correct tag would say "no copyrightable material", but for now, I used the usual perl license tag. I committed this to devel (patch attached) and I'm going to commit it to F-7 and F-6, too. (The policy is "commit to cvs, but do not issue an update until there is a real fix.") Have a nice day, Stepan -------------- next part -------------- Index: perl.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl/devel/perl.spec,v retrieving revision 1.126 diff -u -r1.126 perl.spec --- perl.spec 17 Aug 2007 18:02:13 -0000 1.126 +++ perl.spec 18 Aug 2007 05:33:14 -0000 @@ -20,11 +20,15 @@ Name: perl Version: %{perl_version} -Release: 23%{?dist} +Release: 21%{?dist} Epoch: %{perl_epoch} Summary: The Perl programming language Group: Development/Languages -License: Artistic or GPL +# Modules Tie::File and Getopt::Long are licenced under "GPLv2+ or Artistic," +# we have to reflect that in the sub-package containing them. +# FIXME: Digest::MD5 has a must-advertise-RSA license with an exception, +# the tag does not reflect that (yet). +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) Url: http://www.perl.org/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NW/NWCLARK/%{name}-%{perl_version}.tar.bz2 Source11: filter-depends.sh @@ -205,7 +209,7 @@ %package libs Summary: The libraries for the perl runtime -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} %description libs @@ -214,7 +218,7 @@ %package devel Summary: Header files for use in perl development -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} %description devel @@ -224,7 +228,7 @@ %package suidperl Summary: Suidperl, for use with setuid perl scripts -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} %description suidperl @@ -233,7 +237,7 @@ %package CPAN Summary: Query, download and build perl modules from CPAN sites -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 1.76_02 Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} @@ -244,7 +248,7 @@ %package ExtUtils-Embed Summary: Utilities for embedding Perl in C/C++ applications -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 1.26 Requires: perl-devel @@ -255,7 +259,7 @@ %package ExtUtils-MakeMaker Summary: Create a module Makefile -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 6.30 Requires: perl-devel @@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ %package Test-Harness Summary: Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 2.56 Requires: perl-devel @@ -278,7 +282,7 @@ %package Test-Simple Summary: Basic utilities for writing tests -Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 0.62 Requires: perl-devel @@ -289,7 +293,8 @@ %package core Summary: Base perl metapackage -Group: Development/Languages +# FIXME: Hey, I'm not sure this rpm contains any copyrightable material! +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: %{perl_version} Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} @@ -748,6 +753,10 @@ # Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Zarro. Uh uh. Nope. Sorry. %changelog +* Sat Aug 18 2007 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-24 +- Fix the License: tags. +- Remove the redundant Group: tags from sub-packages. + * Fri Aug 17 2007 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-23 - perl rpm requires the corresponding version of perl-libs rpm - Resolves: rhbz#240540 From skasal at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 07:15:18 2007 From: skasal at redhat.com (Stepan Kasal) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:15:18 +0200 Subject: Fixing the License tag In-Reply-To: <20070818070645.GA12564@camelia.ucw.cz.> References: <20070818070645.GA12564@camelia.ucw.cz.> Message-ID: <20070818071518.GA13007@camelia.ucw.cz.> Hello, On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 09:06:45AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > I committed this to devel (patch attached) [...] oh no, the Group: tag has to be releated for each sub-package. Attached please find a fixed patch. Sorry, Stepan Kasal -------------- next part -------------- Index: perl.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl/devel/perl.spec,v retrieving revision 1.124 retrieving revision 1.128 diff -u -r1.124 -r1.128 --- perl.spec 17 Aug 2007 14:31:25 -0000 1.124 +++ perl.spec 18 Aug 2007 07:09:29 -0000 1.128 @@ -20,11 +20,15 @@ Name: perl Version: %{perl_version} -Release: 23%{?dist} +Release: 24%{?dist} Epoch: %{perl_epoch} Summary: The Perl programming language Group: Development/Languages -License: Artistic or GPL +# Modules Tie::File and Getopt::Long are licenced under "GPLv2+ or Artistic," +# we have to reflect that in the sub-package containing them. +# FIXME: Digest::MD5 has a must-advertise-RSA license with an exception, +# the tag does not reflect that (yet). +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) Url: http://www.perl.org/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NW/NWCLARK/%{name}-%{perl_version}.tar.bz2 Source11: filter-depends.sh @@ -108,7 +112,8 @@ Patch37: perl-5.8.8-useCFLAGSwithCC.patch # Upstream bug 39903 Patch38: perl-5.8.8-bz199736.patch -# Disable test_hosts because hostname tests fail in mock buildroots +# Skip hostname tests, since hostname lookup isn't available in Fedora +# buildroots by design. Patch39: perl-5.8.8-disable_test_hosts.patch # XXX: Fixme - Finish patch. #Patch39: perl-5.8.8-bz204679.patch @@ -205,6 +210,7 @@ %package libs Summary: The libraries for the perl runtime Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} %description libs @@ -214,6 +220,7 @@ %package devel Summary: Header files for use in perl development Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} %description devel @@ -224,6 +231,7 @@ %package suidperl Summary: Suidperl, for use with setuid perl scripts Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} %description suidperl @@ -233,6 +241,7 @@ %package CPAN Summary: Query, download and build perl modules from CPAN sites Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 1.76_02 Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} @@ -244,6 +253,7 @@ %package ExtUtils-Embed Summary: Utilities for embedding Perl in C/C++ applications Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 1.26 Requires: perl-devel @@ -255,6 +265,7 @@ %package ExtUtils-MakeMaker Summary: Create a module Makefile Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 6.30 Requires: perl-devel @@ -267,6 +278,7 @@ %package Test-Harness Summary: Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 2.56 Requires: perl-devel @@ -278,6 +290,7 @@ %package Test-Simple Summary: Basic utilities for writing tests Group: Development/Languages +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: 0.62 Requires: perl-devel @@ -289,6 +302,8 @@ %package core Summary: Base perl metapackage Group: Development/Languages +# FIXME: Hey, I'm not sure this rpm contains any copyrightable material! +License: (GPL+ or Artistic) Epoch: 0 Version: %{perl_version} Requires: perl = %{perl_epoch}:%{perl_version}-%{release} @@ -747,6 +762,9 @@ # Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Zarro. Uh uh. Nope. Sorry. %changelog +* Sat Aug 18 2007 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-24 +- Fix the License: tags. + * Fri Aug 17 2007 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-23 - perl rpm requires the corresponding version of perl-libs rpm - Resolves: rhbz#240540 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 15:13:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] perl-libs not installed on upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191513.l7JFDMlJ029957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-libs not installed on upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-19 11:13 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-22.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 03:58:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200358.l7K3wSFZ009777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-19 23:58 EST ------- t/pod-coverage..........skipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 required for testing POD coverage t/pod...................skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. tests got skipped. Can you enable them and test that also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 15:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201513.l7KFDtTv008883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-20 11:13 EST ------- Alright - a new version of the spec file and a new SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-3.fc7.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 16:02:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240540] perl-libs not installed on upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201602.l7KG25Ps015482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-libs not installed on upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240540 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-20 12:02 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-23.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Aug 21 00:25:38 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:25:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-08-20 Message-ID: <20070821002538.3F54F152141@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> perl-capitalization FE6 > F7 (0:0.03-5.fc6 > 0:0.03-4.fc6) perl-Class-Inspector FE6 > F7 (0:1.17-1.fc6 > 0:1.16-3.fc7) perl-Class-ReturnValue FE6 > F7 (0:0.54-1.fc6 > 0:0.53-6.fc7) From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 03:04:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210304.l7L34MFO012813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-20 23:04 EST ------- cool. Thanks for updates Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c48557fe6e6c92e2d36e2eda9ae7e746 ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00.load...............# Testing ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage 0.05 ok t/mm_coverage...........ok t/mm_coverage_config....ok t/pod-coverage..........ok t/pod...................ok All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=39, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.34 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.41 CPU) + exit 0 + Provides: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage) = 0.05 + Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 05:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204800] perl.prov script misparses some version information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210525.l7L5PNLT028141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl.prov script misparses some version information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204800 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Core |Fedora AssignedTo|pnasrat at redhat.com |pjones at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla at redhat.com 2007-08-21 01:25 EST ------- User pnasrat at redhat.com's account has been closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skasal at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 09:55:28 2007 From: skasal at redhat.com (Stepan Kasal) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:55:28 +0200 Subject: making the new subpackages noarch? Message-ID: <20070821095527.GA22242@camelia.ucw.cz.> Hello, I noticed that the following rpms perl-CPAN perl-ExtUtils-Embed perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker perl-Test-Harness perl-Test-Simple contain platform-independent code only. Would you mind if I made them noarch? (It seems that a sub-package of an arch-specific package can be made noarch, see kernel-doc.) Stepan Kasal From skasal at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 10:21:42 2007 From: skasal at redhat.com (Stepan Kasal) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:21:42 +0200 Subject: making the new subpackages noarch? In-Reply-To: <20070821095527.GA22242@camelia.ucw.cz.> References: <20070821095527.GA22242@camelia.ucw.cz.> Message-ID: <20070821102142.GA22569@camelia.ucw.cz.> Hallo again, On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > perl-CPAN > perl-ExtUtils-Embed > perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker > perl-Test-Harness > perl-Test-Simple ... > (It seems that a sub-package of an arch-specific package can be made > noarch, see kernel-doc.) oops, I posted before "cvs co kernel" has finished. To allow a noarch sub-package, one has to use an ugly hack: ExclusiveArch: noarch %{all_x86} x86_64 ppc ppc64 ia64 sparc sparc64 s390x alpha alphaev56 I do not think is is appropriate here. So I'd like to move these modules to one separate source package or to individual source packages to build them as "noarch". Comments welcome. Thanks, Stepan Kasal; From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 12:54:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211254.l7LCs6HP012385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-21 08:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage Short Description: Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover Owners: rnorwood at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:52:02 2007 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:52:02 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-Razor-Agent Orphaned Message-ID: <200708211452.l7LEq2dX005223@app3.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-Razor-Agent in Fedora 1 was orphaned by Warren Togami (wtogami) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Razor-Agent From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:52:03 2007 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:52:03 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-Razor-Agent Owned Message-ID: <200708211452.l7LEq56r029810@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-Razor-Agent in Fedora 1 is now owned by Warren Togami (wtogami) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Razor-Agent From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:52:06 2007 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:52:06 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-Razor-Agent Orphaned Message-ID: <200708211452.l7LEq67R005232@app3.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-Razor-Agent in Fedora 1 was orphaned by Warren Togami (wtogami) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Razor-Agent From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:52:10 2007 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:52:10 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-Razor-Agent Orphaned Message-ID: <200708211452.l7LEqBCg029819@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-Razor-Agent in Fedora 2 was orphaned by Warren Togami (wtogami) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Razor-Agent From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:52:13 2007 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:52:13 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-Razor-Agent Orphaned Message-ID: <200708211452.l7LEqDZf005242@app3.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-Razor-Agent in Fedora 3 was orphaned by Warren Togami (wtogami) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Razor-Agent From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:52:16 2007 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:52:16 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-Razor-Agent Orphaned Message-ID: <200708211452.l7LEqGpd029828@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-Razor-Agent in Fedora 4 was orphaned by Warren Togami (wtogami) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Razor-Agent From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211458.l7LEwU5Y029262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-21 10:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skasal at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:28:14 2007 From: skasal at redhat.com (Stepan Kasal) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:28:14 +0200 Subject: Removing unused find-depends.sh Message-ID: <20070821162814.GC29662@camelia.ucw.cz.> Hello, the helper script find-depends.sh seems to be unused these times, because macro _perl_requires is no longer used; perl requirements are handled by the main find-provides script. I removed the script from devel/perl.spec. Have a nice day, Stepan Kasal From rnorwood at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 17:57:34 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:57:34 -0400 Subject: Removing unused find-depends.sh In-Reply-To: <20070821162814.GC29662@camelia.ucw.cz.> (Stepan Kasal's message of "Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:28:14 +0200") References: <20070821162814.GC29662@camelia.ucw.cz.> Message-ID: Stepan Kasal writes: > Hello, > the helper script find-depends.sh seems to be unused these times, > because macro _perl_requires is no longer used; perl requirements are > handled by the main find-provides script. > > I removed the script from devel/perl.spec. Stepan (+ co), This change appears to be breaking builds in rawhide: Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Mac::InternetConfig) is needed by package perl Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Tk::Pod) is needed by package perl Error: Missing Dependency: perl(FCGI) is needed by package perl So Jesse/f13 is removing the tag from your latest build, bringing us back down to the previous version. Stepan, can you check on this and fix it? I'm tied up with something else for the moment, but I'll look at it later if you don't get to it first. Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From skasal at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 18:28:54 2007 From: skasal at redhat.com (Stepan Kasal) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:28:54 +0200 Subject: Removing unused find-depends.sh In-Reply-To: References: <20070821162814.GC29662@camelia.ucw.cz.> Message-ID: <20070821182854.GA4399@camelia.ucw.cz.> Hello, On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:57:34PM -0400, Robin Norwood wrote: > Stepan Kasal writes: > > the helper script find-depends.sh seems to be unused these times, > > because macro _perl_requires is no longer used; perl requirements are > > handled by the main find-provides script. this is not true, I was lost in the jungle of "internal" vs "external" and "rpm" vs "redhat rpm config" dep resolvers. > This change appears to be breaking builds in rawhide: ... > So Jesse/f13 is removing the tag from your latest build, [...] That expolains why my "koji untag-pkg" attempts were not successful. Actually, I should have untag it as soon as I got the suspicion that the change was wrong---it is possible to re-tag it if the suspicion were false. That way I might save several developers' precious time. One learns all the time... I apologize for the inconveniency. > Stepan, can you check on this and fix it? I'll fix this tomorrow morning. I have the fix in my mind, but it's getting late in Europe. Stepan From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 06:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204800] perl.prov script misparses some version information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220634.l7M6Y8YL000892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl.prov script misparses some version information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204800 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pjones at redhat.com |pmatilai at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-22 02:34 EST ------- Reassigning to owner after bugzilla made a mess, sorry about the noise... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Thu Aug 23 13:34:52 2007 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:34:52 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-packaging] review guidelines vs packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: <38883.192.54.193.51.1187867685.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> References: <38883.192.54.193.51.1187867685.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20070823133452.GE2447@free.fr> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Jeu 23 ao?t 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a ?crit : > > > Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the guidelines > > are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is impossible. > > I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time do > they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or > multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be Indeed. It would be much more clearer if there was, in addition to all the explanations, a simple sentence saying, maybe as a conclusion of all the examples: "In any case there should never be any unowned directory appearing after a package uninstall." -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232023.l7NKN5jx022356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-23 16:22 EST ------- Built for devel/f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 05:29:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240502] FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240529.l7O5Tume016579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240502 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-24 01:29 EST ------- perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 05:30:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217138] Wrong library initialization causes errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240530.l7O5U0vx016649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Wrong library initialization causes errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217138 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-24 01:29 EST ------- perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217138] Wrong library initialization causes errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241452.l7OEqlJH011367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Wrong library initialization causes errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217138 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-24 10:52 EST ------- Can someone test the above version and let me know how it works for you? Especially on x86_64 systems as described above. x86_64 version: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/7/x86_64/perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm x86 version: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/7/i386/perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7.i386.rpm (or just enable your updates testing repo and use yum) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:53:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240502] FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241453.l7OErS4K011440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240502 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-24 10:53 EST ------- Can someone test the above version and let me know how it works for you? x86_64 version: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/7/x86_64/perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm x86 version: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/7/i386/perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7.i386.rpm (or just enable your updates testing repo and use yum) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Aug 27 21:29:47 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-08-27 Message-ID: <20070827212947.A0A10152144@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> perl-capitalization FE6 > F7 (0:0.03-5.fc6 > 0:0.03-4.fc6) perl-Class-Inspector FE6 > F7 (0:1.17-1.fc6 > 0:1.16-3.fc7) perl-Class-ReturnValue FE6 > F7 (0:0.54-1.fc6 > 0:0.53-6.fc7) From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Wed Aug 29 01:26:39 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:26:39 -0700 Subject: perl/Fedora status listing Message-ID: <7dd7ab490708281826y4068f3dch1e579b065687464e@mail.gmail.com> Hey all -- So I'm moving right now, joyous experience that it is; as a result I can't regenerate the perl module listing for the next couple days. Hopefully it should be back up and going sometime this weekend. :) -Chirs -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 07:47:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240502] FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290747.l7T7llB4009804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240502 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-08-29 03:47 EST ------- The perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-2.fc8.x86_64 on rawhide works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 09:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 262841] New: Public key for perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not installed Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262841 Summary: Public key for perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not installed Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-PDF-API2 AssignedTo: bjohnson at symetrix.com ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: The latest update to perl-PDF-API2 seems to have been signed with the rawhide key Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.62-2.fc7 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run 'yum update' 2. See yum try to install perl-PDF-API2 3. See yum fail to install perl-PDF-API2 with the error message : Public key for perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not installed Actual results: Yum fails to update the rpm Expected results: Yum should update the rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:34:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 262841] Public key for perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not installed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291334.l7TDYD4U027386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Public key for perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not installed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262841 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-08-29 09:34 EST ------- Strange. That was after I got this email: Package: perl-PDF-API2 NVR: perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7 User: bodhi Status: failed Tag Operation: moved >From Tag: dist-fc7-updates-testing Into Tag: dist-fc7-updates perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7 unsuccessfully moved from dist-fc7-updates-testing into dist-fc7-updates by bodhi Operation failed with the error: koji.TagError: build perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7 not in tag dist-fc7-updates-testing I'll see if rel-eng can shed any light on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:47:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 262841] Public key for perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not installed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291347.l7TDlRsi030074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Public key for perl-PDF-API2-0.62-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not installed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262841 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-08-29 09:47 EST ------- It seems that rel-eng has signed it with the correct key now, so I'm closing this ticket. They are still looking into the cause though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:29:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217138] Wrong library initialization causes errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291729.l7THTrFX023577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Wrong library initialization causes errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217138 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-29 13:29 EST ------- perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240502] FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291729.l7THTpnD023551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240502 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-29 13:29 EST ------- perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:29:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217138] Wrong library initialization causes errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291729.l7THTthY023631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Wrong library initialization causes errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217138 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.56-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:29:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240502] FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291729.l7THTsbT023606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC6 PKCS12 erroneously reporting "Private key and certificate do not match" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240502 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.56-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250007] Please build perl(MIME::Tools) >= 0:5.413 for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292006.l7TK6KIt021882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build perl(MIME::Tools) >= 0:5.413 for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250007 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-29 16:06 EST ------- I'll close this bug report, as the main issue is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257221] Fedora 8 Test 2 tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292104.l7TL4hil020938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora 8 Test 2 tracker bug Alias: F8Test2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257221 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |265421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265421] New: perl-BerkeleyDB fails to build, perhaps unwrapped open function? Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265421 Summary: perl-BerkeleyDB fails to build, perhaps unwrapped open function? Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: perl-BerkeleyDB AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com BerkeleyDB.xs: In function 'XS_BerkeleyDB__Env_open': BerkeleyDB.xs:1896: error: expected identifier before '(' token http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=138368&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Aug 30 13:46:02 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:46:02 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-08-30 Message-ID: <20070830134602.22B09152133@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> perl-capitalization FE6 > F7 (0:0.03-5.fc6 > 0:0.03-4.fc6) perl-Class-Inspector FE6 > F7 (0:1.17-1.fc6 > 0:1.16-3.fc7) perl-Class-ReturnValue FE6 > F7 (0:0.54-1.fc6 > 0:0.53-6.fc7) From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Thu Aug 23 11:14:45 2007 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:14:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Fedora-packaging] review guidelines vs packaging guidelines Message-ID: <38883.192.54.193.51.1187867685.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Le Jeu 23 ao?t 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a ?crit : > Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the guidelines > are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is impossible. I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time do they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be owned but there are exceptions". And then proceed with some examples where every directory is accounted for without explicitely stating this is a hard rule. I don't think the OP would have been so happy with the lax version if he had understood them to enforce this rule. IMHO since the documented "exceptions" are clearly targetted at perl modules, it would be better to create a perl-filesystem package and forget about all the complex A/B convolutions in the guidelines. But that's for the perl SIG to discuss. -- Nicolas Mailhot From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Thu Aug 23 13:43:05 2007 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:43:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Fedora-packaging] review guidelines vs packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: <20070823133452.GE2447@free.fr> References: <38883.192.54.193.51.1187867685.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> <20070823133452.GE2447@free.fr> Message-ID: <48952.192.54.193.51.1187876585.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Le Jeu 23 ao?t 2007 15:34, Patrice Dumas a ?crit : > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> Le Jeu 23 ao?t 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a ?crit : >> >> > Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the >> guidelines >> > are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is >> impossible. >> >> I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time >> do >> they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or >> multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be > > Indeed. It would be much more clearer if there was, in addition to all > the explanations, a simple sentence saying, maybe as a conclusion of > all > the examples: > > "In any case there should never be any unowned directory appearing > after > a package uninstall." Who can add this ? -- Nicolas Mailhot From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk Fri Aug 24 20:59:42 2007 From: duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Ferguson) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:59:42 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Orphaned Message-ID: <200708242059.l7OKxhuW031297@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora devel was orphaned by Duncan Ferguson (duncs) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk Fri Aug 24 20:59:54 2007 From: duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Ferguson) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:59:54 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Orphaned Message-ID: <200708242059.l7OKxsub019478@app3.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora 7 was orphaned by Duncan Ferguson (duncs) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk Fri Aug 24 21:00:02 2007 From: duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Ferguson) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:00:02 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Orphaned Message-ID: <200708242100.l7OL02rp031336@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora 3 was orphaned by Duncan Ferguson (duncs) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk Fri Aug 24 21:00:06 2007 From: duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Ferguson) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:00:06 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Orphaned Message-ID: <200708242100.l7OL06h2019507@app3.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora 4 was orphaned by Duncan Ferguson (duncs) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk Fri Aug 24 21:00:09 2007 From: duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Ferguson) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:00:09 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Orphaned Message-ID: <200708242100.l7OL09YH019517@app3.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora 5 was orphaned by Duncan Ferguson (duncs) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk Fri Aug 24 21:00:19 2007 From: duncan_j_ferguson at yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Ferguson) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:00:19 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Orphaned Message-ID: <200708242100.l7OL0Jv4031355@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora 6 was orphaned by Duncan Ferguson (duncs) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From jima at beer.tclug.org Fri Aug 24 21:04:01 2007 From: jima at beer.tclug.org (Patrick Laughton) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:04:01 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Owned Message-ID: <200708242104.l7OL41T6031429@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora devel is now owned by Patrick Laughton (jima) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From jima at beer.tclug.org Fri Aug 24 21:04:05 2007 From: jima at beer.tclug.org (Patrick Laughton) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:04:05 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Owned Message-ID: <200708242104.l7OL45s7019623@app3.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora 7 is now owned by Patrick Laughton (jima) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From jima at beer.tclug.org Fri Aug 24 21:04:11 2007 From: jima at beer.tclug.org (Patrick Laughton) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:04:11 -0700 Subject: [pkgdb] perl-X11-Protocol Owned Message-ID: <200708242104.l7OL4B6R031439@app4.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package perl-X11-Protocol in Fedora 6 is now owned by Patrick Laughton (jima) To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-X11-Protocol From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 10:23:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 270701] New: perl-Text-Iconv-1.5 is available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270701 Summary: perl-Text-Iconv-1.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Micha%C5%82Bentkowski/FEve r OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-Text-Iconv AssignedTo: andreas at bawue.net ReportedBy: fevapp at o2.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Text-Iconv-1.5 is already available. Repo version is 1.4. Please update the package. If you have any questions or suggestions related to Fever, feel free to write them in this bug or have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver Don't send any messages to fevapp at o2.pl please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 14:15:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271341] New: IPC::Shareable fails to build on RHEL/CentOS 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271341 Summary: IPC::Shareable fails to build on RHEL/CentOS 5 Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: perl-IPC-Shareable AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: matt at bodgit-n-scarper.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com (Not quite sure what components this should ultimately be filed under, Fedora 7 at least has the perl-IPC-Shareable component) Description of problem: I'm trying to rebuild the FC6/F7 perl-IPC-Shareable Perl module for CentOS 5 x86_64 (like the EPEL RPMs), and it stalls as part of the "make test" phase: ... + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00base......ok t/05sv........ok t/10av........ok t/15hv........ok t/20ref.......ok t/25ipc.......ok t/30lock......ok t/35clean.....ok t/36ipcav.....ok t/38ipchv.....ok 1/5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-3.fc6.src.rpm How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpmbuild --rebuild perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-3.fc6.src.rpm Actual results: Stalls at 1/5 in the 38ipchv tests Expected results: Should complete cleanly with no errors Additional info: Build host is fully updated CentOS 5 x86_64 installation. Build completes correctly on a Fedora 7 installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.