From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 3 11:39:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 06:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391471] HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712031139.lB3Bd7GP031758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391471 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.06-1.fc8.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 3 11:39:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 06:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391471] HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712031139.lB3Bd6I8031737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391471 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-12-03 06:39 EST ------- perl-HTML-Table-2.06-1.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 3 11:48:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 06:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391471] HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712031148.lB3Bm28n029997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391471 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-12-03 06:48 EST ------- perl-HTML-Table-2.06-1.fc7.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 3 14:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712031452.lB3EqAnj029859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide Bug 250862 depends on bug 250873, which changed state. Bug 250873 Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 3 14:52:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712031452.lB3EqBoN029883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 15:45:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398231] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051545.lB5FjmXp005088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398231 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-05 10:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Unicode-Map New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: pghmcfc, ixs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 15:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398251] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051548.lB5FmnKM005463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398251 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-05 10:48 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Unicode-Map8 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: pghmcfc, ixs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 15:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398241] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051547.lB5FlZiU005381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398241 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-05 10:47 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Unicode-String New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: pghmcfc, ixs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 15:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398271] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051549.lB5Fnu34003796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398271 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-05 10:49 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: pghmcfc, ixs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 19:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398231] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051944.lB5Ji0eE014049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398231 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-12-05 14:43 EST ------- Given the time this has been open without reply, I will just go ahead and make the requested branches. Aurelien: If you decide you would like to maintain in EPEL, just let us know. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 19:44:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398241] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051944.lB5JirrY014102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398241 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-12-05 14:44 EST ------- Given the time this has been open without reply, I will just go ahead and make the requested branches. Aurelien: If you decide you would like to maintain in EPEL, just let us know. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 19:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398251] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051945.lB5Jjqw9012971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398251 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-12-05 14:45 EST ------- Given the time this has been open without reply, I will just go ahead and make the requested branches. Aurelien: If you decide you would like to maintain in EPEL, just let us know. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 19:46:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398271] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712051946.lB5JkT2e013020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398271 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-12-05 14:46 EST ------- Given the time this has been open without reply, I will just go ahead and make the requested branches. Aurelien: If you decide you would like to maintain in EPEL, just let us know. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rnorwood at redhat.com Wed Dec 5 20:32:41 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:32:41 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> (Chris Weyl's message of "Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:34:30 -0800") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: "Chris Weyl" writes: > Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in > F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA > not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where > it's probably the Right Time to think about bumping from 5.8 to 5.10. > > http://perlbuzz.com/project-hum/2007/10/perl-5100-nears-code-freeze-release.html Now that progress has been made on dividing up the other packages, I played around for a few minutes with hacking a perl 5.10.0 spec file based upon our 5.8.8 one. Many of you have probably already done the same, but here's what I found: o Most of our patches to 5.8.8 are either applied in 5.10.0, or fixed differently. - Many due to spot submitting all of them upstream when he did the package review. Spot rocks. - The others seem to be RH/Fedora specific, including the diddling we do with the path for the perlmodcompat stuff. o Speaking of the perlmodcompat stuff - is 5.10.0 a good time to get rid of it? Or we be kicking ourselves when 5.10.x is released and we need to rebuild everything? o A bunch of formerly CPAN modules have been moved into core. Here's an incomplete list: perl-Module-CoreList perl-version perl-IO-Compress-Base perl-IO-Compress-Gzip perl-IO-Compress-Zip perl-IO-Compress-Zlib perl-Archive-Tar perl-Module-Build perl-Compress-Zlib perl-IO-Zlib perl-Compress-Gzip perl-Module-Build perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder perl-Pod-Simple perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS perl-Pod-Escapes - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't change version in 5.10.0: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.30 perl-Test-Harness-2.56 perl-CPAN-1.76 perl-ExtUtils-Embed-1.26 perl-Test-Simple-0.62 This means that the release field for the 5.8.8 packages will be 31 (or whatever), while the release field for 5.10.0 will probably start at 1...meaning the 5.8.8 versions will win vercomp. How to fix it? - Start at whatever the last perl.5.8.8 release is + 1? (Yuck!) - Epoch (double yuck!) - Something smarter? (Smarter would be good) o How to develop the spec file? Shall we throw one up on the wiki somewhere for easier editing? -RN > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Steven Bakker > Date: Nov 23, 2007 2:04 AM > Subject: Re: AWOL: jpo > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:41:25 -0700 Richi Plana wrote: > >> As much as I love Perl and I prefer it over all existing scripting >> languages I'm familiar with, it's hard to get excited about its future >> since the developers are extremely quiet about it. > > They're probably quiet about it because they prefer coding over talking :-) > > Perl 5.10-RC1 has been unleashed recently[1], full of nice new > features[2], borrowing some from (the still-vaporware) Perl6 (named > capture buffers!). > > [1] http://search.cpan.org/~rgarcia/perl-5.10.0-RC1/ > [2] http://www.slideshare.net/rjbs/perl-510-for-people-who-arent-totally-insane > > -- Steven > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > > -- > Chris Weyl > Ex astris, scientia -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From jkeating at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 5 22:06:25 2007 From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:06:25 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/devel perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <200712052206.lB5M6Plu002655@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2628 Modified Files: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec Log Message: * Wed Dec 05 2007 Release Engineering - 0.13-5 - Rebuild for deps Index: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/devel/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec 29 Aug 2007 04:15:19 -0000 1.2 +++ perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec 5 Dec 2007 22:05:48 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA Version: 0.13 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Perl interface to OpenSSL for DSA License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Wed Dec 05 2007 Release Engineering - 0.13-5 + - Rebuild for deps + * Wed Aug 29 2007 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.13-4 - Rebuild for selinux ppc32 issue. From jkeating at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 5 22:07:12 2007 From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:07:12 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/devel perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200712052207.lB5M7CAw002784@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2731 Modified Files: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec Log Message: * Wed Dec 05 2007 Release Engineering - 0.04-3 - Rebuild for deps Index: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/devel/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec 24 May 2007 15:11:58 -0000 1.1 +++ perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec 5 Dec 2007 22:06:40 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random Version: 0.04 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Perl interface to OpenSSL for Random License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Wed Dec 05 2007 Release Engineering - 0.04-3 + - Rebuild for deps + * Wed May 23 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.04-2 - Add document file: LICENSE From rgarciasuarez at gmail.com Thu Dec 6 09:39:36 2007 From: rgarciasuarez at gmail.com (Rafael Garcia-Suarez) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:39:36 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 05/12/2007, Robin Norwood wrote: > o Most of our patches to 5.8.8 are either applied in 5.10.0, or fixed > differently. > - Many due to spot submitting all of them upstream when he > did the package review. Spot rocks. Submitting upstream rocks. I'd like more vendors to do this. > - The others seem to be RH/Fedora specific, including the diddling we > do with the path for the perlmodcompat stuff. > > o Speaking of the perlmodcompat stuff - is 5.10.0 a good time to get rid > of it? Or we be kicking ourselves when 5.10.x is released and we need > to rebuild everything? What's the perlmodcompat stuff, if I may ask? > o A bunch of formerly CPAN modules have been moved into core. Here's an > incomplete list: You'll get a full list from pod/perl5100delta.pod. [...] > - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be > more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll > want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. Except perl-version, which is really tied to the core, I assume you can make them subpackages, if that would ease upgrading them separately. > o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't > change version in 5.10.0: > > perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.30 > perl-Test-Harness-2.56 > perl-CPAN-1.76 > perl-ExtUtils-Embed-1.26 > perl-Test-Simple-0.62 > > This means that the release field for the 5.8.8 packages will be 31 (or > whatever), while the release field for 5.10.0 will probably start at > 1...meaning the 5.8.8 versions will win vercomp. > > How to fix it? > > - Start at whatever the last perl.5.8.8 release is + 1? (Yuck!) Forget it: that could cause problems with intermediate perl upgrades for 5.8.8 in maintenance branches (like, security fixes). > - Epoch (double yuck!) Epoch isn't nice, but works, it wouldn't dismiss it from the start. > - Something smarter? (Smarter would be good) Smarter means tricky. My two cents: you could produce those subpackages with a Requires on perl-base >= 5.10.0 and a Conflicts on perl-base < 5.10.0. Not sure how upgraders (as yum) will cope with that though. From tcallawa at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 09:53:51 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:23:51 +0530 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:32 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > o Speaking of the perlmodcompat stuff - is 5.10.0 a good time to get rid > of it? Or we be kicking ourselves when 5.10.x is released and we need > to rebuild everything? I think we should try to drop it. Upstream perl doesn't really like that we're carrying it, and it doesn't have a significant benefit these days. If we get a huge uproar, it shouldn't be too hard to enable it later. > o A bunch of formerly CPAN modules have been moved into core. Here's an > incomplete list: > - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be > more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll > want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. This seems reasonable to me, but I know that the subpackages are controversial for some people. > o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't > change version in 5.10.0: > perl-CPAN-1.76 This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this would get updated in 5.10.0. :P > - Epoch (double yuck!) I think this is the lesser evil. I can't think of anything more clever. > - Something smarter? (Smarter would be good) > > o How to develop the spec file? Shall we throw one up on the wiki > somewhere for easier editing? I'd planned to start working on it when I got back to the US and put it on the Fedora wiki for commentss, but don't feel like you need to wait for me (I'm in the middle of FOSS.in at the moment). ~spot From rgarciasuarez at gmail.com Thu Dec 6 10:01:51 2007 From: rgarciasuarez at gmail.com (Rafael Garcia-Suarez) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:01:51 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On 06/12/2007, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't > > change version in 5.10.0: > > > perl-CPAN-1.76 > > This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this > would get updated in 5.10.0. :P Now that you mention it, 5.10.0 RC2 does have 1.9205. As far as I know most modules are synchronized with their CPAN versions. A notable exception is Test::Harness, since on CPAN we have the 3.00 major release of it, and it was too late to tempt a major upgrade of such a central module. From tcallawa at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 10:09:53 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:39:53 +0530 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196935793.3360.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 11:01 +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 06/12/2007, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't > > > change version in 5.10.0: > > > > > perl-CPAN-1.76 > > > > This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this > > would get updated in 5.10.0. :P > > Now that you mention it, 5.10.0 RC2 does have 1.9205. As far as I know > most modules are synchronized with their CPAN versions. A notable > exception is Test::Harness, since on CPAN we have the 3.00 major > release of it, and it was too late to tempt a major upgrade of such a > central module. Oh, good. That makes a lot more sense, and should minimize the subpackage epoch needs. ~spot From rc040203 at freenet.de Thu Dec 6 10:12:18 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:12:18 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196935939.3630.189.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 15:23 +0530, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:32 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > > - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be > > more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll > > want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. > > This seems reasonable to me, but I know that the subpackages are > controversial for some people. I think, we should use the upgrade to perl-5.10.x as an opportunity to systematically split out all "dual life" perl dists. > > o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't > > change version in 5.10.0: > > > perl-CPAN-1.76 > > This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this > would get updated in 5.10.0. :P One reason more to split out "dual life" perl dists ;) Ralf From rnorwood at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 16:12:02 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:12:02 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: (Rafael Garcia-Suarez's message of "Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:01:51 +0100") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" writes: > On 06/12/2007, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >> > o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't >> > change version in 5.10.0: >> >> > perl-CPAN-1.76 >> >> This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this >> would get updated in 5.10.0. :P > > Now that you mention it, 5.10.0 RC2 does have 1.9205. As far as I know > most modules are synchronized with their CPAN versions. A notable > exception is Test::Harness, since on CPAN we have the 3.00 major > release of it, and it was too late to tempt a major upgrade of such a > central module. " %package CPAN Version: 1.76_02 " Oh, duh. I didn't realize that the version was hardcoded in the spec file. I'll fix that today. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From rnorwood at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 16:14:25 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:14:25 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Tom Callaway's message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:23:51 +0530") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1196934831.3360.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" writes: > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:32 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > >> o Speaking of the perlmodcompat stuff - is 5.10.0 a good time to get rid >> of it? Or we be kicking ourselves when 5.10.x is released and we need >> to rebuild everything? > > I think we should try to drop it. Upstream perl doesn't really like that > we're carrying it, and it doesn't have a significant benefit these days. > If we get a huge uproar, it shouldn't be too hard to enable it later. Alright, I'll see what changes I need to make to yank it out. >> - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be >> more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll >> want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. > > This seems reasonable to me, but I know that the subpackages are > controversial for some people. Yup - if anyone doesn't like it...speak up. >> o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't >> change version in 5.10.0: > >> perl-CPAN-1.76 > > This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this > would get updated in 5.10.0. :P Yeah, as Rafael points out, this was my mistake. If there are any that are lower/the same in 5.10.0, I'll bump the epoch unless/until someone figures something better out. >> o How to develop the spec file? Shall we throw one up on the wiki >> somewhere for easier editing? > > I'd planned to start working on it when I got back to the US and put it > on the Fedora wiki for commentss, but don't feel like you need to wait > for me (I'm in the middle of FOSS.in at the moment). I'll do that today. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From rnorwood at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 16:35:38 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:35:38 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: (Rafael Garcia-Suarez's message of "Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:39:36 +0100") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" writes: > On 05/12/2007, Robin Norwood wrote: >> o Most of our patches to 5.8.8 are either applied in 5.10.0, or fixed >> differently. >> - Many due to spot submitting all of them upstream when he >> did the package review. Spot rocks. > > Submitting upstream rocks. I'd like more vendors to do this. > >> - The others seem to be RH/Fedora specific, including the diddling we >> do with the path for the perlmodcompat stuff. >> >> o Speaking of the perlmodcompat stuff - is 5.10.0 a good time to get rid >> of it? Or we be kicking ourselves when 5.10.x is released and we need >> to rebuild everything? > > What's the perlmodcompat stuff, if I may ask? This is the business that creates the directories: /usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8} So that rpms built for older releases will still work. It's kindof nasty, but as I understand it, it was to prevent having to rebuilt all the perl modules when perl does a point release. I think we can deal with this a lot better from an infrastructure point of view than in the old days...though a big red 'rebuild all of perl magically' button would be nice. >> o A bunch of formerly CPAN modules have been moved into core. Here's an >> incomplete list: > > You'll get a full list from pod/perl5100delta.pod. Oh, excellent. > [...] >> - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be >> more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll >> want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. > > Except perl-version, which is really tied to the core, I assume you can > make them subpackages, if that would ease upgrading them separately. Ok. I'll leave that in for now. >> o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't >> change version in 5.10.0: >> >> perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.30 >> perl-Test-Harness-2.56 >> perl-CPAN-1.76 >> perl-ExtUtils-Embed-1.26 >> perl-Test-Simple-0.62 >> >> This means that the release field for the 5.8.8 packages will be 31 (or >> whatever), while the release field for 5.10.0 will probably start at >> 1...meaning the 5.8.8 versions will win vercomp. >> >> How to fix it? >> >> - Start at whatever the last perl.5.8.8 release is + 1? (Yuck!) > > Forget it: that could cause problems with intermediate perl upgrades > for 5.8.8 in maintenance branches (like, security fixes). > >> - Epoch (double yuck!) > > Epoch isn't nice, but works, it wouldn't dismiss it from the start. > >> - Something smarter? (Smarter would be good) > > Smarter means tricky. My two cents: you could produce those subpackages > with a Requires on perl-base >= 5.10.0 and a Conflicts on perl-base < > 5.10.0. Not sure how upgraders (as yum) will cope with that though. Eeeh. Tricky. Yeah, epoch is probably the way to go. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 17:32:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:32:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712061732.lB6HWZ2E022013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpo at di.uminho.pt |steve at silug.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 17:34:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712061734.lB6HYp0e022291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-06 12:34 EST ------- This seems to be a package that came over from fedora.us. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Authen-SASL New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 19:23:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250876] Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712061923.lB6JNET2008133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpo at di.uminho.pt |steve at silug.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 19:27:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250876] Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712061927.lB6JRAML008903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-06 14:27 EST ------- EL-4 and EL-5 branches requested in bug #187809. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 19:29:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712061929.lB6JT5t8009148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-06 14:29 EST ------- *** Bug 305691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 19:29:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 305691] Please Branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712061929.lB6JT4Zl009127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please Branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305691 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpo at di.uminho.pt |steve at silug.org Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-06 14:29 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 250860 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jkeating at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 6 20:13:36 2007 From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:13:36 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/devel perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <200712062013.lB6KDawg030953@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30762 Modified Files: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec Log Message: * Thu Dec 06 2007 Release Engineering - 0.05-2 - Rebuild for deps Index: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/devel/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec 6 Dec 2007 16:24:12 -0000 1.3 +++ perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec 6 Dec 2007 20:12:58 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum Version: 0.05 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Perl interface to OpenSSL for Bignum License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Thu Dec 06 2007 Release Engineering - 0.05-2 +- Rebuild for deps + * Thu Dec 6 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.05-1 - Bump to force rebuild with new openssl lib version From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 6 20:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712062056.lB6Kud4I031513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-12-06 15:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jkeating at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 7 15:53:16 2007 From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:53:16 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/devel perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200712071553.lB7FrGXH022846@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22760 Modified Files: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec Log Message: * Fri Dec 07 2007 Jesse Keating - 0.04-2 - Fix the bad version bump Index: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/devel/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec 6 Dec 2007 20:12:58 -0000 1.4 +++ perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec 7 Dec 2007 15:52:42 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -Version: 0.05 +Version: 0.04 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Perl interface to OpenSSL for Bignum License: GPL+ or Artistic @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Fri Dec 07 2007 Jesse Keating - 0.04-2 +- Fix the bad version bump + * Thu Dec 06 2007 Release Engineering - 0.05-2 - Rebuild for deps From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 7 17:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398241] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712071707.lB7H7ls9026214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398241 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gauret at free.fr |paul at city-fan.org Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-07 12:07 EST ------- This is now branched, built, and released to the testing repos for EPEL 4 and 5. Andreas and I are set up as co-maintainers for the EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 7 17:05:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398231] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712071705.lB7H5pHm026057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398231 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gauret at free.fr |paul at city-fan.org Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-07 12:05 EST ------- This is now branched, built, and released to the testing repos for EPEL 4 and 5. Andreas and I are set up as co-maintainers for the EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 7 17:10:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398251] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712071710.lB7HAPoi026905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398251 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gauret at free.fr |paul at city-fan.org Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-07 12:10 EST ------- This is now branched, built, and released to the testing repos for EPEL 4 and 5. Andreas and I are set up as co-maintainers for the EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 7 17:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398271] Branching request for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712071711.lB7HBctr027048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branching request for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398271 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gauret at free.fr |paul at city-fan.org Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-12-07 12:11 EST ------- This is now branched, built, and released to the testing repos for EPEL 4 and 5. Andreas and I are set up as co-maintainers for the EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rnorwood at redhat.com Fri Dec 7 19:46:55 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:46:55 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: (Robin Norwood's message of "Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:32:41 -0500") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Robin Norwood writes: > "Chris Weyl" writes: > >> Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in >> F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA >> not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where >> it's probably the Right Time to think about bumping from 5.8 to 5.10. >> >> http://perlbuzz.com/project-hum/2007/10/perl-5100-nears-code-freeze-release.html Here's my attempt at said spec file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RobinNorwood/Perl510Spec Any comments/fixes/etc? Have at it. It's wiki so other people can edit it, so don't be shy about fixing things. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From rnorwood at redhat.com Fri Dec 7 20:15:46 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:15:46 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: (Robin Norwood's message of "Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:46:55 -0500") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Robin Norwood writes: > Robin Norwood writes: > >> "Chris Weyl" writes: >> >>> Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in >>> F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA >>> not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where >>> it's probably the Right Time to think about bumping from 5.8 to 5.10. >>> >>> http://perlbuzz.com/project-hum/2007/10/perl-5100-nears-code-freeze-release.html > > Here's my attempt at said spec file: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RobinNorwood/Perl510Spec > > Any comments/fixes/etc? Have at it. It's wiki so other people can edit > it, so don't be shy about fixing things. Oh, and don't forget to Subscribe to that page if you want to keep an eye on changes. (via the Subscribe link in the righthand column of the page) -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 8 19:46:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416781] New: SOAP::Lite contains useful examples not packaged under %doc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416781 Summary: SOAP::Lite contains useful examples not packaged under %doc Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-SOAP-Lite AssignedTo: mmcgrath at redhat.com ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com SOAP::Lite contains a slew of useful examples under examples/ in the source dist; I found these useful. Why not include the directory in %doc? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 8 22:09:18 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:09:18 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-4 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-BerkeleyDB.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <200712082209.lB8M9IPx018503@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-4 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18479 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-BerkeleyDB.spec sources Log Message: Rebuild on EL-4 without Test::Pod. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-4/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 2 Aug 2005 23:43:35 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 8 Dec 2007 22:08:43 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -BerkeleyDB-0.26.tar.gz +BerkeleyDB-0.32.tar.gz Index: perl-BerkeleyDB.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-4/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- perl-BerkeleyDB.spec 3 Aug 2005 19:06:03 -0000 1.2 +++ perl-BerkeleyDB.spec 8 Dec 2007 22:08:43 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ -%{!?perl_vendorarch: %define perl_vendorarch %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorarch`"; echo $installvendorarch)} - Name: perl-BerkeleyDB -Version: 0.26 -Release: 3%{?dist} -Summary: BerkeleyDB Perl module +Version: 0.32 +Release: 0.1%{?dist} +Summary: Perl extension for Berkeley DB version 2, 3 or 4 License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/BerkeleyDB/ -Source0: http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/BerkeleyDB/BerkeleyDB-0.26.tar.gz +Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PM/PMQS/BerkeleyDB-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: db4-devel +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) # For "make test". -BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod), perl(MLDBM) +BuildRequires: perl(MLDBM) +#BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -%{__perl} -pi -e 's/^\tLD_RUN_PATH=[^\s]+\s*/\t/' Makefile make %{?_smp_mflags} %install @@ -40,11 +39,11 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; -chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* -%check || : +%check make test %clean @@ -53,12 +52,56 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README Todo -%{perl_vendorarch}/BerkeleyDB* %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* +%{perl_vendorarch}/BerkeleyDB* %{_mandir}/man3/* %{_bindir}/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 04 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.32-0.1 +- Rebuild on EL-4 without Test::Pod. + +* Fri Jul 13 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.32-1 +- Update to 0.32. + +* Tue Apr 17 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.31-3 +- BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. + +* Mon Oct 16 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.31-2 +- Rebuild. + +* Mon Oct 16 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.31-1 +- Update to 0.31. +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. + +* Wed Sep 13 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.30-1 +- Update to 0.30. + +* Mon Aug 28 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.29-2 +- Minor spec cleanup. + +* Fri Jul 07 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.29-1 +- Update to 0.29. + +* Fri Jun 30 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.28-1 +- Update to 0.28 + +* Sat Feb 18 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.27-2 +- Rebuild + +* Tue Jan 10 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.27-1 +- Update to 0.27 + +* Wed Oct 12 2005 Steven Pritchard 0.26-6 +- Another rebuild + +* Sat Sep 24 2005 Steven Pritchard 0.26-5 +- Rebuild for new db4 in rawhide + +* Mon Sep 05 2005 Steven Pritchard 0.26-4 +- Spec cleanup +- Include COPYING and Artistic + * Wed Aug 03 2005 Steven Pritchard 0.26-3 - Move OPTIMIZE to Makefile.PL instead of make Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-4/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 2 Aug 2005 23:43:35 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 8 Dec 2007 22:08:43 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -6e9882f4e4bac48b24079d082af30e6c BerkeleyDB-0.26.tar.gz +df74b8d381d08b17ada69185b45e06a6 BerkeleyDB-0.32.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 9 01:00:10 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:00:10 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-GSSAPI/devel perl-GSSAPI.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <200712090100.lB910Atm008820@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-GSSAPI/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8759 Modified Files: perl-GSSAPI.spec Log Message: Update License tag. Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. Source in /etc/profile.d/krb5-devel.sh to get our path right. Index: perl-GSSAPI.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-GSSAPI/devel/perl-GSSAPI.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- perl-GSSAPI.spec 22 Feb 2007 10:53:04 -0000 1.5 +++ perl-GSSAPI.spec 9 Dec 2007 00:59:36 -0000 1.6 @@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Name: perl-GSSAPI Version: 0.24 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library Group: Development/Libraries -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/GSSAPI/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AG/AGROLMS/GSSAPI-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ %build +. /etc/profile.d/krb5-devel.sh %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags} @@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -exec rm -f {} ';' find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' -chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check @@ -63,6 +64,11 @@ %changelog +* Sat Dec 08 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.24-2 +- Update License tag. +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. +- Source in /etc/profile.d/krb5-devel.sh to get our path right. + * Thu Feb 22 2007 Jose Pedro Oliveira - 0.24-1 - Update to 0.24. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Sun Dec 9 18:00:06 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:00:06 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490712091000x5795ce9ue80bfae7fc5ab859@mail.gmail.com> On Dec 6, 2007 8:35 AM, Robin Norwood wrote: > "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" writes: > > What's the perlmodcompat stuff, if I may ask? > > This is the business that creates the directories: > > /usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8} > > So that rpms built for older releases will still work. It's kindof > nasty, but as I understand it, it was to prevent having to rebuilt all > the perl modules when perl does a point release. I think we can deal > with this a lot better from an infrastructure point of view than in the > old days...though a big red 'rebuild all of perl magically' button would > be nice. I'm not opposed to dropping it in principle, but do we have a nice way to determine that a built rpm will work with a given perl rpm? E.g. If we have perl-Foo, a noarch perl package built against 5.10.: a) will we need to rebuild it against 5.10.1? b) do we have meta-information embedded in the rpm that will let yum/apt go "this no workie"? a is just an awareness issue, and maybe the building out of a Big Red Button. b is pretty clutch, or we're going to break a bunch of stuff... [...] > >> - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be > >> more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll > >> want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. > > > > Except perl-version, which is really tied to the core, I assume you can > > make them subpackages, if that would ease upgrading them separately. > > Ok. I'll leave that in for now. I'm starting to relax on this :) I do think any version bumps of dual-life'd core modules, outside of a core upgrade itself, ought to be the subject of discussion here. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Sun Dec 9 19:33:38 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:33:38 -0800 Subject: groups as owners in pkgdb (was: Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?) Message-ID: <7dd7ab490712091133k37f655b4p5b94105b7db9f4f7@mail.gmail.com> It bounced -- I forwarded back on 11/28. On Nov 28, 2007 9:21 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Chris, if this bounces from the list, feel free to forward it there. > > Chris Weyl wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2007 6:25 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > >> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > >>>> Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the > >>>> pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? > >>>> and select 'group members can commit?'. > >>> IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an > >>> "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as > >>> owner ;) > >> Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. > >> > >> You should talk to Toshio about this. > > > > I'm unfamiliar with the limitations of the accounts/grouping/packagedb > > system, but if we can have the accounts system enforce a requirement > > that members of one group must be a subset of another group (e.g. > > perl-sig group members must be members of the cla-done group), would > > this satisfy the requirement that all package owners have signed > > CLA's? > > Yes, this part is currently possible. We're changing over to an LDAP > backend and better web frontend in a few months, though, so I don't know > the limitations and abilities of that system. > > One other thing is that people would need to be a member of cvsextras as > well as cla_done in order to login to the cvs server. Excellent. So it sounds like we can rig things such that there should be no legal issues to group ownership that I see -- though IANAL =) > > Can we have a group own a package? > > > Not currently. Pseudo groups like the current perl-sig can own a > package but a real group cannot. This requires a bit of recoding in > order to change. > > OTOH, letting a group be comaintainer (equivalent rights to owner) of a > package is fairly complete (there are a few places where we are > currently checking for cvsextras explicitly, but we can change those to > list other groups without much difficulty. > > The biggest area where group ownership won't work precisely right at > this time is in the webUI. cvsextras is our only current group and we > aren't showing all the acls for it, just the commit acl. For the > perl-sig, I imagine that you'll want to have at least commit, > watchbugzilla, and watchcommits set. I can code this into the > commandline tool admins are using to set permissions but doing the same > for the webUI will require some rethinking of what it should look like > and how complex it should be. Exactly it, AFAIK. All members of perl-sig should be subscribed to this group, so I suspect individual emails to the group members may be a touch redundant. If we were to do this prior to any impending work, I'd say make it as quick and easy as possible (no sense doing something just to rework it). I don't know if anyone else is clamoring for this capability yet. > > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective > > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is > > another variant of "dirty hacks". > > > Agreed. If you want to move forward with getting this working in the > packagedb you should open a ticket[1]_, we can try and record all the > changes we need in the packagedb and account system to enable the > change. Then I can talk to the FAS2 author to be sure it won't cause > him any grief when we migrate and we can code something up. > > We're shooting to deploy FAS2 in February. So if there are > interdependencies between FAS and pkgdb that should wait on that > deployment we would do so after that. Done! https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/packagedb/ticket/109 I tried to be succinct; if there's additional verbiage needed I'd be more than happy to update the ticket. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From jkeating at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 9 21:25:48 2007 From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:25:48 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES/devel perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <200712092125.lB9LPmUn019441@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jkeating Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19411 Modified Files: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec Log Message: * Sun Dec 09 2007 Release Engineering - 0.03-2 - Rebuild for deps Index: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES/devel/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec 6 Dec 2007 16:22:49 -0000 1.3 +++ perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec 9 Dec 2007 21:25:13 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES Version: 0.03 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Perl interface to OpenSSL for AES License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Sun Dec 09 2007 Release Engineering - 0.03-2 +- Rebuild for deps + * Thu Dec 6 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.03-1 - Bump to force rebuild with new openssl lib version From altblue at n0i.net Mon Dec 10 00:14:54 2007 From: altblue at n0i.net (Marius Feraru) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:14:54 +0200 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <475C84FE.6030003@n0i.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [My apologies for my digression, feel free to ignore it.] Robin Norwood wrote: > /usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8} > So that rpms built for older releases will still work. It's kindof > nasty, but as I understand it, it was to prevent having to rebuilt all > the perl modules when perl does a point release. I think we can deal > with this a lot better from an infrastructure point of view than in the > old days...though a big red 'rebuild all of perl magically' button would > be nice. Now, if you're talking about a major "all Perl related" rebuild, maybe this could be a good point for raising a "better" (YM*M*V) Perl infrastructure: a) let "site" be "site" (as in "local" IS "local"), e.g.: ./Configure [..] -Dsiteprefix=/usr/local \ -Dsitelib="/usr/local/lib/perl5" \ -Dsitearch="/usr/local/lib/perl5/%{perl_archname}" \ -Dsiteman1dir=/usr/local/share/man/man1 \ -Dsiteman3dir=/usr/local/share/man/man3 \ [...] (if some of you think Debian like, than paranoid may be good, so you could decide involving a %{perl_version} there as some handy/safe "site" handler - not that it would matter, but I'd nay it) b) no more creepo "compat stuff", let there be a "perl(abi..)" BS of some kind if you need it (IMHO, there *is* an inherent need for something like that for RPM's sake), e.g.: ./Configure [..] [...] -Dprivlib=%{_datadir}/perl/%{perl_abi} -Darchlib=%{_libdir}/perl/%{perl_abi} -Dvendorlib=%{_datadir}/perl/%{perl_abi} -Dvendorarch=%{_libdir}/perl/%{perl_abi} (yes, "vendor" should be the very same thing as "priv", and "perl_abi" should be anything "Fedora Perl master" decides - "5.8", "5.10", etc) As you may have noticed, there is nothing new here, they're proved paths by (many) other *nix distros ("Debian" will be my only example, as I already had to mention it). On a different cue ("rant-wise"), looking at the "split" thingie, there is still a lot more to require from upstream (I mean "rpm" - you know, perl.prov/req & co) until we could get some "real" (as in "useful"... or maybe "granular"?) require/provide computing. But that (again) is handled with as much care as it could be imposed for a voluntary project by the many Fedora Perl modules packagers. Cheers - -- Marius Feraru -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFHXIT+tZHp/AYZiNkRAmSqAJ9xtOHfZn4s+qF/tAChfVKI04XMIQCfQgDy YhdIbH8e8yK7g/GYYnX376A= =txiY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 14:36:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712101436.lBAEakA1019325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 Bug 250873 depends on bug 250872, which changed state. Bug 250872 Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 14:36:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712101436.lBAEakdZ019303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-12-10 09:36 EST ------- Bah! Why did nobody close this bug report? - perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-5.el4 - perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 14:34:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712101434.lBAEYiFN018712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-12-10 09:34 EST ------- Bah! Why did nobody close this bug report? - perl-BerkeleyDB-0.32-1.el5 - perl-BerkeleyDB-0.32-0.1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 14:36:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242065] perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712101436.lBAEaliG019350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242065 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc6 |6 Bug 242065 depends on bug 250872, which changed state. Bug 250872 Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 14:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712101434.lBAEYjYQ018732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide Bug 249079 depends on bug 250862, which changed state. Bug 250862 Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 15:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712101501.lBAF1V6q008636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-10 10:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Bah! Why did nobody close this bug report? Because I just got it built on Saturday? :-) I'm working on perl-GSSAPI now. perl-Authen-SASL is next. Then I think amavisd-new might work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rnorwood at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 16:50:26 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:50:26 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490712091000x5795ce9ue80bfae7fc5ab859@mail.gmail.com> (Chris Weyl's message of "Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:00:06 -0800") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <7dd7ab490712091000x5795ce9ue80bfae7fc5ab859@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: "Chris Weyl" writes: > On Dec 6, 2007 8:35 AM, Robin Norwood wrote: >> "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" writes: >> > What's the perlmodcompat stuff, if I may ask? >> >> This is the business that creates the directories: >> >> /usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8} >> >> So that rpms built for older releases will still work. It's kindof >> nasty, but as I understand it, it was to prevent having to rebuilt all >> the perl modules when perl does a point release. I think we can deal >> with this a lot better from an infrastructure point of view than in the >> old days...though a big red 'rebuild all of perl magically' button would >> be nice. > > I'm not opposed to dropping it in principle, but do we have a nice way > to determine that a built rpm will work with a given perl rpm? E.g. > If we have perl-Foo, a noarch perl package built against 5.10.: > > a) will we need to rebuild it against 5.10.1? > b) do we have meta-information embedded in the rpm that will let > yum/apt go "this no workie"? > > a is just an awareness issue, and maybe the building out of a Big Red > Button. b is pretty clutch, or we're going to break a bunch of > stuff... Well, for b), we still have: Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) in the perl RPM, and: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) In all of our Fedora RPMs. The way the 5.10.0 rpm is now, that will require that all of the perl RPMs be specifically built for 5.10.0 before they can be installed. When 5.10.1 rolls around, we could either: 1) Return to creating the permodcompat directories, and include Provides for both 5.10.0 and 5.10.1. 2) Rebuild the whole darn world (and make people download all those updates if we do it during a release). Neither seems particularly appealing to me, to be honest. But if we already know we're going to do (1), we might as well leave the rest of the perlmodcompat spec stuff in. >> > Except perl-version, which is really tied to the core, I assume you can >> > make them subpackages, if that would ease upgrading them separately. >> >> Ok. I'll leave that in for now. > > I'm starting to relax on this :) I do think any version bumps of > dual-life'd core modules, outside of a core upgrade itself, ought to > be the subject of discussion here. Yes, I agree. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From steve at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 10 17:10:15 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:10:15 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-XML-XQL/EL-5 XML-XQL-filter-provides.sh, NONE, 1.1 perl-XML-XQL.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200712101710.lBAHAFsU023331@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XML-XQL/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23114 Modified Files: perl-XML-XQL.spec Added Files: XML-XQL-filter-provides.sh Log Message: Sync with devel. --- NEW FILE XML-XQL-filter-provides.sh --- #!/bin/sh # Remove unversioned XML::XQL and bogus XML::DOM provides. @@PERL_PROV@@ "$@" | sed -e '/^perl(XML::\(DOM::\|XQL)$\)/d' Index: perl-XML-XQL.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XML-XQL/EL-5/perl-XML-XQL.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- perl-XML-XQL.spec 1 Sep 2006 02:53:58 -0000 1.4 +++ perl-XML-XQL.spec 10 Dec 2007 17:09:33 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,61 +1,58 @@ Name: perl-XML-XQL Version: 0.68 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Perl module for querying XML tree structures with XQL - -Group: Development/Libraries License: GPL or Artistic +Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-XQL/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TJ/TJMATHER/XML-XQL-%{version}.tar.gz Patch0: %{name}-tput-147465.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: perl(XML::DOM) >= 1.29 -BuildRequires: perl(Date::Manip) +BuildRequires: perl(Date::Manip) >= 5.33 +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +BuildRequires: perl(LWP::UserAgent) BuildRequires: perl(Parse::Yapp) +BuildRequires: perl(XML::DOM) >= 1.29 +BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) >= 2.30 Requires: perl(XML::DOM) -Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) + +Source99: XML-XQL-filter-provides.sh +%global real_perl_provides %{__perl_provides} +%define __perl_provides %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-%(%{__id_u} -n)-filter-provides %description This is a Perl extension that allows you to perform XQL queries on XML object trees. Currently only the XML::DOM module is supported, but other implementations, like XML::Grove, may soon follow. - %prep %setup -q -n XML-XQL-%{version} %patch0 -p0 -cat < %{name}-prov -#!/bin/sh -# Filter versionless XML::XQL, we expect perl.prov to emit the versioned one. -%{__perl_provides} \$* | grep -v 'perl(XML::\(DOM::\|XQL)$\)' -EOF -%define __perl_provides %{_builddir}/XML-XQL-%{version}/%{name}-prov +sed -e 's,@@PERL_PROV@@,%{real_perl_provides},' %{SOURCE99} > %{__perl_provides} chmod +x %{__perl_provides} - %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make %{?_smp_mflags} - %install -rm -rf %{buildroot} -make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} -find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' -find %{buildroot} -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' -chmod -R u+w %{buildroot}/* +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + +make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT + +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test - %clean -rm -rf %{buildroot} - +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__perl_provides} %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) @@ -64,8 +61,13 @@ %{perl_vendorlib}/XML/ %{_mandir}/man3/XML::XQL*.3* - %changelog +* Wed Apr 18 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.68-4 +- Reformat to match cpanspec output. +- Fix find option order. +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. +- BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. + * Mon Aug 27 2006 Michael J. Knox - 0.68-3 - Rebuild for FC6 From rnorwood at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 17:40:43 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:40:43 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <475C84FE.6030003@n0i.net> (Marius Feraru's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:14:54 +0200") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <475C84FE.6030003@n0i.net> Message-ID: Marius Feraru writes: > [My apologies for my digression, feel free to ignore it.] > > Robin Norwood wrote: >> /usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8} >> So that rpms built for older releases will still work. It's kindof >> nasty, but as I understand it, it was to prevent having to rebuilt all >> the perl modules when perl does a point release. I think we can deal >> with this a lot better from an infrastructure point of view than in the >> old days...though a big red 'rebuild all of perl magically' button would >> be nice. > > Now, if you're talking about a major "all Perl related" rebuild, maybe this > could be a good point for raising a "better" (YM*M*V) Perl infrastructure: > > a) let "site" be "site" (as in "local" IS "local"), e.g.: > ./Configure [..] > -Dsiteprefix=/usr/local \ > -Dsitelib="/usr/local/lib/perl5" \ > -Dsitearch="/usr/local/lib/perl5/%{perl_archname}" \ > -Dsiteman1dir=/usr/local/share/man/man1 \ > -Dsiteman3dir=/usr/local/share/man/man3 \ > [...] > (if some of you think Debian like, than paranoid may be good, so you > could decide involving a %{perl_version} there as some handy/safe > "site" handler - not that it would matter, but I'd nay it) This seems to me to be perfectly sane and more in keeping with the LSB filesystem guidelines. I'm not sure all of the historical reasons for the way our paths are set up. I don't have an objection to changing them after some debate, though. > b) no more creepo "compat stuff", let there be a "perl(abi..)" BS of some > kind if you need it (IMHO, there *is* an inherent need for something like > that for RPM's sake), e.g.: > ./Configure [..] > [...] > -Dprivlib=%{_datadir}/perl/%{perl_abi} > -Darchlib=%{_libdir}/perl/%{perl_abi} > -Dvendorlib=%{_datadir}/perl/%{perl_abi} > -Dvendorarch=%{_libdir}/perl/%{perl_abi} > (yes, "vendor" should be the very same thing as "priv", and "perl_abi" > should be anything "Fedora Perl master" decides - "5.8", "5.10", etc) > > As you may have noticed, there is nothing new here, they're proved paths by > (many) other *nix distros ("Debian" will be my only example, as I already > had to mention it). I'm probably missing the point, but I don't really see how this is significantly better than the way we do the perlmodcompat stuff now. > On a different cue ("rant-wise"), looking at the "split" thingie, there is > still a lot more to require from upstream (I mean "rpm" - you know, > perl.prov/req & co) until we could get some "real" (as in "useful"... or > maybe "granular"?) require/provide computing. But that (again) is handled > with as much care as it could be imposed for a voluntary project by the many > Fedora Perl modules packagers. Well, RH/Fedora are spending more resources on our variant of RPM these days, so there's a there's a better chance that specific bugs will get attention, or, even better, patches. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From rnorwood at redhat.com Mon Dec 10 19:40:23 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Rafael Garcia-Suarez] Ready for release? Message-ID: 5.10.0 before Christmas, looks like. Neat. -RN -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" Subject: Ready for release? Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 01:27:57 +0100 Size: 4129 URL: -------------- next part -------------- -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From altblue at n0i.net Tue Dec 11 02:26:45 2007 From: altblue at n0i.net (Marius Feraru) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:26:45 +0200 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <475C84FE.6030003@n0i.net> Message-ID: <475DF565.70801@n0i.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robin Norwood wrote: > I'm probably missing the point, but I don't really see how this is > significantly better than the way we do the perlmodcompat stuff now. Let's detail what these changes mean: a) using "ABI based" layout (instead "version based"); b) moving "arch independent" components in "/usr/share"; c) unifying "install" and "vendor" folders; d) moving "site" folders to "/usr/local". So here's what comes to mind as (maybe not so significant) advantages: - - [a),c)] less items in @INC [1] => faster module/functions loading => light performance gain; - - [b),c),d)] more FHS conformity; - - [a),c),d)] less rebuilds/updates/conflicts/metadata => vendor maintenance cost reduction; - - [d)] leveraging local sysop's job/ownership [2]; ...(FIXME: add more pros and - more importantly - *cons*)... [1] a "uniq" patch is needed in order to drop duplicate paths from @INC. [2] a vendor update would not override sysop's "temporary" system "patching", so that's why Debian (among others) prefers adding "precise" (version based) suffixes to locally maintained folders (e.g. "/usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.0" instead "/usr/local/lib/perl/5.10"). > Well, RH/Fedora are spending more resources on our variant of RPM these > days, so there's a there's a better chance that specific bugs will get > attention, or, even better, patches. Hehe, as I mentioned, I was merely "ranting" as I'm pretty confident the current approach used by perl.(prov|req) (or perldeps.pl) will lead us nowhere even if we keep on monkey patching it on a daily/package basis. As I'm sure you know, each vendor uses its "custom" way of detecting these dependencies/provides, each with its own flaws. :) I guess we will talk about patches in January, when we'll deal with rpm5's perl helper ;-) cheers - -- Marius Feraru -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFHXfVltZHp/AYZiNkRAr1OAJ9lKFC2GKoGocRwn1BeErAdzIa19wCeI2Jx E9dR58bpK/+zbLKeIXzLIeM= =rGEZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 02:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250876] Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712110238.lBB2cjud028151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-10 21:38 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 02:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712110238.lBB2ckhX028171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 Bug 250860 depends on bug 250876, which changed state. Bug 250876 Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 02:39:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712110239.lBB2dMvO005368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-10 21:39 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 02:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712110239.lBB2dNiQ005388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 250860, which changed state. Bug 250860 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tcallawa at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 02:50:05 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:50:05 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <475DF565.70801@n0i.net> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <475C84FE.6030003@n0i.net> <475DF565.70801@n0i.net> Message-ID: <1197341405.15754.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 04:26 +0200, Marius Feraru wrote: > I guess we will talk about patches in January, when we'll deal with > rpm5's perl helper ;-) Last time I looked, Fedora wasn't planning to use that fork. ~spot From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Tue Dec 11 03:01:17 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:01:17 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <7dd7ab490712091000x5795ce9ue80bfae7fc5ab859@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490712101901m47df97d3j5d757dbe79c84e01@mail.gmail.com> On Dec 10, 2007 8:50 AM, Robin Norwood wrote: > Well, for b), we still have: Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) in > the perl RPM, and: Ohhh, duh. I was conflating the two. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From altblue at n0i.net Tue Dec 11 03:19:28 2007 From: altblue at n0i.net (Marius Feraru) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:19:28 +0200 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1197341405.15754.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <475C84FE.6030003@n0i.net> <475DF565.70801@n0i.net> <1197341405.15754.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <475E01C0.4030500@n0i.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > Last time I looked, Fedora wasn't planning to use that fork. Right, I remember the discussions; I should have kept the "still-ranting" mark for that paragraph. Sorry ;-) - -- Marius Feraru -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFHXgHAtZHp/AYZiNkRArYaAKC0zYdKp1ahd1+iGXAKWNXG4wiU6QCdEz3I +JLGYtsaE+Gq2AQA66m71Ck= =KW3Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 11:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 419601] New: missing build requirement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419601 Summary: missing build requirement Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Text-Levenshtein AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: karsten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com rebuild of this package fails with 'Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: blib/lib blib/arch /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at test.pl line 2.. Loo! ks like the perl-Test-Simple package isn't in the chain of build requirements anymore and needs to be added to this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 11:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 419591] New: missing build requirement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419591 Summary: missing build requirement Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Test-Expect AssignedTo: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: karsten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com rebuild of this package fails with 'ERROR: Test::More is not installed' and 'ERROR: Test::Builder is not installed'. Looks like the perl-Test-Simple package isn't in the chain of build requirements anymore and needs to be added to this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 11 11:59:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 419611] New: missing build requirement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419611 Summary: missing build requirement Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Text-Levenshtein AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: karsten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com rebuild of this package fails with 'Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: (long path list deleted) .) at test.pl line 2..' Looks like the perl-Test-Simple package isn't in the chain of build requirements anymore and needs to be added to this package or maybe to perl-test-harness -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 15:09:51 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:09:51 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Apache-LogRegex/devel perl-Apache-LogRegex.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <200712111509.lBBF9pKV029746@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Apache-LogRegex/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29677 Modified Files: perl-Apache-LogRegex.spec Log Message: Update License tag. BR Test::More. Index: perl-Apache-LogRegex.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Apache-LogRegex/devel/perl-Apache-LogRegex.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- perl-Apache-LogRegex.spec 18 Apr 2007 16:46:02 -0000 1.4 +++ perl-Apache-LogRegex.spec 11 Dec 2007 15:09:00 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,14 +1,15 @@ Name: perl-Apache-LogRegex Version: 1.4 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Parse a line from an Apache logfile into a hash -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Apache-LogRegex/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PE/PETERHI/Apache-LogRegex-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description @@ -47,6 +48,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.4-3 +- Update License tag. +- BR Test::More. + * Wed Apr 18 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.4-2 - BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 15:13:17 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:13:17 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Cache-Mmap/devel perl-Cache-Mmap.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <200712111513.lBBFDH9b030176@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Cache-Mmap/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30013 Modified Files: perl-Cache-Mmap.spec Log Message: Update License tag. BR Test::More. Index: perl-Cache-Mmap.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Cache-Mmap/devel/perl-Cache-Mmap.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- perl-Cache-Mmap.spec 17 Apr 2007 20:57:32 -0000 1.2 +++ perl-Cache-Mmap.spec 11 Dec 2007 15:12:37 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@ Name: perl-Cache-Mmap Version: 0.09 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Shared data cache using memory mapped files -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cache-Mmap/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PM/PMH/Cache-Mmap-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description @@ -49,6 +50,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.09-3 +- Update License tag. +- BR Test::More. + * Tue Apr 17 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.09-2 - BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 15:31:06 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:31:06 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/devel perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec, 1.21, 1.22 Message-ID: <200712111531.lBBFV649003996@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3840 Modified Files: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec Log Message: Update to 0.21. Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. Reformat to more closely match cpanspec output (but don't use Module::Build, since that would create a dependency loop). Package README. Index: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/devel/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec 15 Oct 2007 20:10:55 -0000 1.21 +++ perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec 11 Dec 2007 15:30:31 -0000 1.22 @@ -1,14 +1,12 @@ Name: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder -Version: 0.19 -Release: 1%{?dist}.1 +Version: 0.21 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Compile and link C code for Perl modules - -Group: Development/Libraries License: GPL+ or Artistic +Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KW/KWILLIAMS/ExtUtils-CBuilder-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) @@ -19,40 +17,43 @@ motivated by the Module::Build project, but may be useful for other purposes as well. - %prep %setup -q -n ExtUtils-CBuilder-%{version} - %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make %{?_smp_mflags} - %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' -chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; + +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test - %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc Changes -%{perl_vendorlib}/ExtUtils/ -%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm* - +%doc Changes README +%{perl_vendorlib}/* +%{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.21-1 +- Update to 0.21. +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. +- Reformat to more closely match cpanspec output (but don't use + Module::Build, since that would create a dependency loop). +- Package README. + * Mon Oct 15 2007 Tom "spot" Callaway - 0.19-1.1 - correct license tag - add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 15:32:55 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:32:55 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-DateTime/devel .cvsignore, 1.17, 1.18 perl-DateTime.spec, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.17, 1.18 Message-ID: <200712111532.lBBFWtQr004343@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4309 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime.spec sources Log Message: Update License tag. Update to DateTime::TimeZone 0.70. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- .cvsignore 18 Sep 2007 14:02:57 -0000 1.17 +++ .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 15:32:13 -0000 1.18 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ DateTime-0.41.tar.gz DateTime-Locale-0.35.tar.gz -DateTime-TimeZone-0.67.tar.gz +DateTime-TimeZone-0.70.tar.gz Index: perl-DateTime.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/devel/perl-DateTime.spec,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- perl-DateTime.spec 18 Sep 2007 14:02:57 -0000 1.21 +++ perl-DateTime.spec 11 Dec 2007 15:32:13 -0000 1.22 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -%define DTTimeZone_version 0.67 +%define DTTimeZone_version 0.70 %define DTLocale_version 0.35 Name: perl-DateTime Version: 0.41 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Epoch: 1 Summary: Date and time objects -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/DateTime-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ %{perl_vendorarch}/DateTime*.pm %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.41-2 +- Update License tag. +- Update to DateTime::TimeZone 0.70. + * Mon Sep 17 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.41-1 - Update to DateTime 0.41. - Update to DateTime::Locale 0.35. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- sources 18 Sep 2007 14:02:57 -0000 1.17 +++ sources 11 Dec 2007 15:32:13 -0000 1.18 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ cbd27b0d9a3eee5ffa6afb9211b19a9e DateTime-0.41.tar.gz 857b23381a1a8e7dc2e7d0caa285827d DateTime-Locale-0.35.tar.gz -4684adbdf78d863a3526d5d9a52b4d79 DateTime-TimeZone-0.67.tar.gz +f0304d29b3e245eddcc66e348f0c05ef DateTime-TimeZone-0.70.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 15:34:10 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:34:10 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/devel .cvsignore, 1.15, 1.16 sources, 1.15, 1.16 Message-ID: <200712111534.lBBFYAqS004442@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4409 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: Remember to check in sources this time... Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 --- .cvsignore 31 May 2007 22:07:08 -0000 1.15 +++ .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 15:33:25 -0000 1.16 @@ -1 +1 @@ -ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.19.tar.gz +ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.21.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 --- sources 31 May 2007 22:07:08 -0000 1.15 +++ sources 11 Dec 2007 15:33:25 -0000 1.16 @@ -1 +1 @@ -65cea2b1f960236092788002d7c5c477 ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.19.tar.gz +aa5050d68d65858cdf58ceeef84d6bb2 ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.21.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 15:51:10 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:51:10 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-YAML-Tiny/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 perl-YAML-Tiny.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <200712111551.lBBFpAvE005399@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-YAML-Tiny/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5321 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-YAML-Tiny.spec sources Log Message: Update to 1.21. Update License tag. BR Test::MinimumVersion. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-YAML-Tiny/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- .cvsignore 13 Jul 2007 15:24:16 -0000 1.6 +++ .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 15:50:35 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -YAML-Tiny-1.13.tar.gz +YAML-Tiny-1.21.tar.gz Index: perl-YAML-Tiny.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-YAML-Tiny/devel/perl-YAML-Tiny.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- perl-YAML-Tiny.spec 13 Jul 2007 15:24:16 -0000 1.5 +++ perl-YAML-Tiny.spec 11 Dec 2007 15:50:35 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,17 +1,18 @@ Name: perl-YAML-Tiny -Version: 1.13 +Version: 1.21 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/YAML-Tiny/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/YAML-Tiny-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::MinimumVersion) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) BuildRequires: perl(YAML) BuildRequires: perl(YAML::Syck) -BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description @@ -49,6 +50,14 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.21-1 +- Update to 1.21. +- Update License tag. +- BR Test::MinimumVersion. + +* Thu Aug 23 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.14-1 +- Update to 1.14. + * Fri Jul 13 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.13-1 - Update to 1.13. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-YAML-Tiny/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- sources 13 Jul 2007 15:24:16 -0000 1.6 +++ sources 11 Dec 2007 15:50:35 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -163276aab3d9b63ba525c8c267a223b2 YAML-Tiny-1.13.tar.gz +939ee5cc2ce680780beef3ade074b5fa YAML-Tiny-1.21.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 19:18:16 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:18:16 -0500 Subject: rpms/cpanspec/devel .cvsignore, 1.17, 1.18 cpanspec.spec, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.17, 1.18 Message-ID: <200712111918.lBBJIGtt016125@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16074 Modified Files: .cvsignore cpanspec.spec sources Log Message: Update to 1.74. Update License tag. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- .cvsignore 22 Jul 2007 20:07:10 -0000 1.17 +++ .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 19:17:42 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -cpanspec-1.73.tar.gz +cpanspec-1.74.tar.gz Index: cpanspec.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/devel/cpanspec.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- cpanspec.spec 22 Jul 2007 20:07:10 -0000 1.18 +++ cpanspec.spec 11 Dec 2007 19:17:42 -0000 1.19 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ Name: cpanspec -Version: 1.73 +Version: 1.74 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: RPM spec file generation utility -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Tools URL: http://cpanspec.sourceforge.net/ Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/cpanspec/cpanspec-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man1/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.74-1 +- Update to 1.74. +- Update License tag. + * Sun Jul 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.73-1 - Update to 1.73. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- sources 22 Jul 2007 20:07:10 -0000 1.17 +++ sources 11 Dec 2007 19:17:42 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b7465f7fd974c43d1869511884f78346 cpanspec-1.73.tar.gz +e14bc9b8b5aceb446fd0211fc435a68b cpanspec-1.74.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 20:12:12 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:12:12 -0500 Subject: rpms/cpanspec/F-8 .cvsignore, 1.17, 1.18 cpanspec.spec, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.17, 1.18 Message-ID: <200712112012.lBBKCCFe027445@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-8 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27350 Modified Files: .cvsignore cpanspec.spec sources Log Message: Sync with devel. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-8/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- .cvsignore 22 Jul 2007 20:07:10 -0000 1.17 +++ .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 20:11:30 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -cpanspec-1.73.tar.gz +cpanspec-1.74.tar.gz Index: cpanspec.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-8/cpanspec.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- cpanspec.spec 22 Jul 2007 20:07:10 -0000 1.18 +++ cpanspec.spec 11 Dec 2007 20:11:30 -0000 1.19 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ Name: cpanspec -Version: 1.73 +Version: 1.74 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: RPM spec file generation utility -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Tools URL: http://cpanspec.sourceforge.net/ Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/cpanspec/cpanspec-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man1/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.74-1 +- Update to 1.74. +- Update License tag. + * Sun Jul 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.73-1 - Update to 1.73. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-8/sources,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- sources 22 Jul 2007 20:07:10 -0000 1.17 +++ sources 11 Dec 2007 20:11:30 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b7465f7fd974c43d1869511884f78346 cpanspec-1.73.tar.gz +e14bc9b8b5aceb446fd0211fc435a68b cpanspec-1.74.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 20:17:18 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:17:18 -0500 Subject: rpms/cpanspec/F-7 .cvsignore, 1.16, 1.17 cpanspec.spec, 1.17, 1.18 sources, 1.16, 1.17 Message-ID: <200712112017.lBBKHITO027746@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-7 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27713 Modified Files: .cvsignore cpanspec.spec sources Log Message: Sync with devel. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-7/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17 --- .cvsignore 22 Jul 2007 20:08:37 -0000 1.16 +++ .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 20:16:37 -0000 1.17 @@ -1 +1 @@ -cpanspec-1.73.tar.gz +cpanspec-1.74.tar.gz Index: cpanspec.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-7/cpanspec.spec,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- cpanspec.spec 22 Jul 2007 20:08:37 -0000 1.17 +++ cpanspec.spec 11 Dec 2007 20:16:37 -0000 1.18 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ Name: cpanspec -Version: 1.73 +Version: 1.74 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: RPM spec file generation utility -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Tools URL: http://cpanspec.sourceforge.net/ Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/cpanspec/cpanspec-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man1/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.74-1 +- Update to 1.74. +- Update License tag. + * Sun Jul 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.73-1 - Update to 1.73. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cpanspec/F-7/sources,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17 --- sources 22 Jul 2007 20:08:37 -0000 1.16 +++ sources 11 Dec 2007 20:16:37 -0000 1.17 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b7465f7fd974c43d1869511884f78346 cpanspec-1.73.tar.gz +e14bc9b8b5aceb446fd0211fc435a68b cpanspec-1.74.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 11 21:28:40 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:28:40 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-IPC-Cmd/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 perl-IPC-Cmd.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <200712112128.lBBLSe0h011204@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-Cmd/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10950 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-IPC-Cmd.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.40. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-Cmd/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2007 18:59:47 -0000 1.7 +++ .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 21:27:57 -0000 1.8 @@ -1 +1 @@ -IPC-Cmd-0.38.tar.gz +IPC-Cmd-0.40.tar.gz Index: perl-IPC-Cmd.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-Cmd/devel/perl-IPC-Cmd.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- perl-IPC-Cmd.spec 15 Oct 2007 18:59:47 -0000 1.7 +++ perl-IPC-Cmd.spec 11 Dec 2007 21:27:57 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Name: perl-IPC-Cmd -Version: 0.38 +Version: 0.40 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Finding and running system commands made easy License: GPL+ or Artistic @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Dec 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.40-1 +- Update to 0.40. + * Mon Oct 15 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.38-1 - Update to 0.38. - Update License tag. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-Cmd/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- sources 15 Oct 2007 18:59:47 -0000 1.7 +++ sources 11 Dec 2007 21:27:57 -0000 1.8 @@ -1 +1 @@ -3f0b171081b946c3fb836eb0b10e4dc5 IPC-Cmd-0.38.tar.gz +fe97b70d363e1b69cb635086d90dcee4 IPC-Cmd-0.40.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 12 12:36:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196836] perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712121236.lBCCaYgq016955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196836 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc5 |5 ------- Additional Comments From marcos.marado at sonae.com 2007-12-12 07:36 EST ------- According to the changelog, 4:5.8.8-19 for -fc7 solves this bug, but the latest 4:5.8.8-27 still gives this warning: WARNING: DBIx::Class::StartupCheck: This version of Perl is likely to exhibit extremely slow performance for certain critical operations. Please consider recompiling Perl. For more information, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196836 and/or http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2007-October/005119.html. You can suppress this message by setting DBIC_NO_WARN_BAD_PERL=1 in your environment. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 12 16:43:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196836] perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712121643.lBCGhO8k027372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-5.8.8-5 is 30X slower than perl-5.8.8-4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196836 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-12-12 11:43 EST ------- Following through that thread, and looking at the source of DBIC::StartupCheck, it appears that it's more of a "MAY" than definite, and that DBIC::StartupClass doesn't know how to check to see if the particular patches have been applied. (AFAICT at least.) I have DBIx::Class up for review (bug perl-DBIx-Class); if we can verify that indeed Fedora perl has the correct fixes in place (which it does sound like it does) then hopefully we can: 1. override DBIC::StartupCheck's logic in Fedora's packages, until #2 2. create and funnel logic upstream that accurately figures out if this has been applied... Note that this needs to be a near no-op, as these checks are run everytime DBIC is use'd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Sun Dec 16 01:32:57 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:32:57 -0800 Subject: updating dependent packages not in rawhide? Message-ID: <7dd7ab490712151732mad7a0e0u86b6ced915243b96@mail.gmail.com> Soooo.... Lo and behold, Class::MOP 0.49 is out with significant speedups. Moose is also out with 0.33. Unfortunately, the new Class::MOP breaks Moose < 0.33, and Moose 0.33 breaks on Class::MOP < 0.49. The XS speedups in Class::MOP are on the order of 45% in terms of class load time for Moose. This gives rise to a question of how to build new versions of 2 (or more) packages that are mutually dependent on each other? Unfortunately this isn't just a matter of building and then tagging both builds in bodhi. My understanding is that new builds will not build against testing (and I wouldn't want to break Moose in testing in any case). I poked around in the wiki but if the answer is in there, it successfully kept itself from me. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From tcallawa at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 01:35:01 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:35:01 -0500 Subject: updating dependent packages not in rawhide? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490712151732mad7a0e0u86b6ced915243b96@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dd7ab490712151732mad7a0e0u86b6ced915243b96@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1197768901.4306.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 17:32 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > Soooo.... Lo and behold, Class::MOP 0.49 is out with significant > speedups. Moose is also out with 0.33. Unfortunately, the new > Class::MOP breaks Moose < 0.33, and Moose 0.33 breaks on Class::MOP < > 0.49. The XS speedups in Class::MOP are on the order of 45% in terms > of class load time for Moose. > > This gives rise to a question of how to build new versions of 2 (or > more) packages that are mutually dependent on each other? > Unfortunately this isn't just a matter of building and then tagging > both builds in bodhi. My understanding is that new builds will not > build against testing (and I wouldn't want to break Moose in testing > in any case). I poked around in the wiki but if the answer is in > there, it successfully kept itself from me. Just build the new Moose, then email rel-eng and ask them to override tag it into the buildroot. Then, wait for the repodata to regenerate (hour or so), then rebuild the new Class::MOP. When that's done, push them both as a combined update in bodhi. ~spot From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Sun Dec 16 02:03:31 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:03:31 -0800 Subject: updating dependent packages not in rawhide? In-Reply-To: <1197768901.4306.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490712151732mad7a0e0u86b6ced915243b96@mail.gmail.com> <1197768901.4306.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490712151803l309ae2dfp79c8777c1630f633@mail.gmail.com> On Dec 15, 2007 5:35 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 17:32 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > Soooo.... Lo and behold, Class::MOP 0.49 is out with significant > > speedups. Moose is also out with 0.33. Unfortunately, the new > > Class::MOP breaks Moose < 0.33, and Moose 0.33 breaks on Class::MOP < > > 0.49. The XS speedups in Class::MOP are on the order of 45% in terms > > of class load time for Moose. > > > > This gives rise to a question of how to build new versions of 2 (or > > more) packages that are mutually dependent on each other? > > Unfortunately this isn't just a matter of building and then tagging > > both builds in bodhi. My understanding is that new builds will not > > build against testing (and I wouldn't want to break Moose in testing > > in any case). I poked around in the wiki but if the answer is in > > there, it successfully kept itself from me. > > Just build the new Moose, then email rel-eng and ask them to override > tag it into the buildroot. Then, wait for the repodata to regenerate > (hour or so), then rebuild the new Class::MOP. > > When that's done, push them both as a combined update in bodhi. Gotcha, though I'll have to build Class::MOP first or the Moose tests will bomb. (unless I'm missing something). Won't this break Moose and anything Moose-based in the buildroots until both updates are pushed to stable? In this case, it's just updates of perl-MooseX-* I'm concerned with. Not a huge deal, just want to make sure I know what I'm doing here :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 10:30:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425823] broken deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712161030.lBGAUqWe011779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: broken deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425823 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |425826 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 10:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425826] broken deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712161033.lBGAXxCj012200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: broken deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425826 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|425823 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 10:33:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425826] broken deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712161033.lBGAXpXo012109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: broken deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425826 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |425821 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 10:30:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425826] New: broken deps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425826 Summary: broken deps Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Test-Base AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: fedora at leemhuis.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,steve at silug.org Description of problem: package: perl-Test-Base - 0.53-1.el5.noarch from epel5-testing unresolved deps: perl(Module::Install::Base) Additional info: I'd like to see the above problems solved. Steve, would you be willing to take care of perl(Text::Aspell) in EPEL5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 10:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425826] broken deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712161034.lBGAYkYg012452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: broken deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425826 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-12-16 05:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Steve, would you be willing to take care of perl(Text::Aspell) in EPEL5? s/perl(Text::Aspell)/perl(Module::Install::Base)/ of course -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 10:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425826] perl-Test-Base: broken deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712161044.lBGAicrR014098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Test-Base: broken deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425826 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|broken deps |perl-Test-Base: broken deps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 16 18:56:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712161856.lBGIuE24010544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-12-16 13:56 EST ------- Steven? You imported an old version of amavisd-new into EPEL 5 but none into EPEL 4 - is this correct and why? And why is an old version in EPEL 5? Latest version from Fedora Rawhide seems to work for me (on both). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 16:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425989] New: Branch for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425989 Summary: Branch for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-IPC-Run AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com This is another package carried over from fedora.us. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IPC-Run New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 16:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425989] Branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171637.lBHGbfqx000464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425989 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 16:38:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425989] Branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171638.lBHGcUqV000524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425989 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |425823 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 16:42:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425826] perl-Test-Base: broken deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171642.lBHGgqxq006701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Test-Base: broken deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425826 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-17 11:42 EST ------- Working on it, but the last time I tried to build it there were still a few missing dependencies. I'll take a look at it again today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 16:47:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:47:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171647.lBHGlnXa007616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-17 11:47 EST ------- I'll build the latest version on both branches as soon as all of the dependencies are met. It's *really* close now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 17:55:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171755.lBHHt3d2013594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove Alias: perl-XML-Grove https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-17 12:55 EST ------- any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 17:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226283] Merge Review: perl-URI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171754.lBHHstVr018592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-17 12:54 EST ------- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 18:42:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226283] Merge Review: perl-URI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171842.lBHIgcx2027301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-12-17 13:42 EST ------- Sorry, meant to update this. Building perl-URI fails with the BR: perl(Business::ISBN) : t/urn-isbn.......Can't locate object method "country_code" via package "Business::ISBN10" at perl-URI/devel/URI-1.35/blib/lib/URI/urn/isbn.pm line 40. And I haven't looked into why yet. I'll take another look today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 19:02:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425989] Branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712171902.lBHJ2oec030877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425989 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-12-17 14:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 21:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426029] Branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712172121.lBHLLP61021219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426029 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-17 16:21 EST ------- Oops, corrected. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IO-Tty New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 21:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:19:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426029] New: Branch for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426029 Summary: Branch for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-IO-Tty AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Another one from fedora.us... Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IO-Tty New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 17 21:41:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426029] Branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712172141.lBHLfxZ5028170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426029 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-12-17 16:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 18 02:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426058] New: perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426058 Summary: perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-PAR-Dist AssignedTo: ville.skytta at iki.fi ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Would you mind branching (and building) perl-PAR-Dist for EPEL? It is required by perl-Module-Install, which is needed by -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 18 16:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:33:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426058] perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712181633.lBIGXtvS003345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426058 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-12-18 11:33 EST ------- I'm not really interested in doing that at the moment, more info at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/VilleSkytt%C3%A4#maintenance You're very welcome to branch it for EPEL if you wish. In fact, I'd be happy if someone took this one over in Fedora as well - I just maintain it because perl-Module-Signature needs it, but apart from some quick test a long time ago, I haven't actually used any PAR functionality so to be honest I don't even know if it works these days... if you're interested in taking it over, let me know and I'll release it in pkgdb. Co-maintainers also welcome. (Not sure what to do about the status of this bug, but will close as WONTFIX because I don't have plans to do what was requested.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 18 17:17:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:17:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426058] perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712181717.lBIHHTUZ014271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426058 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-18 12:17 EST ------- Unfortunately, I don't know the package any better... I just need it as a dependency for something that is a dependency of something else. That said, I don't mind taking responsibility for it. (For whoever does the CVS bit, this is a fedora.us package.) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-PAR-Dist New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 18 17:50:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:50:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426058] perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712181750.lBIHox4S019703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426058 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-12-18 12:50 EST ------- Thanks! I approved all your requests in pkgdb and released package ownership (so you should probably go there and take ownership for it once more). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 18 18:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426058] perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712181814.lBIIES2G021708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-PAR-Dist: branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426058 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-12-18 13:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 02:47:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163350] Tracking bug for Fedora Core ia64/Itanium support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712190247.lBJ2leeO014975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for Fedora Core ia64/Itanium support Alias: fedora-ia64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=163350 dchapman at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426187 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 02:47:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426187] New: perl-Tk build requires perl-devel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426187 Summary: perl-Tk build requires perl-devel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: perl-Tk AssignedTo: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de ReportedBy: dchapman at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: This was seen when building on ia64 however this will probably break on all arches once they rebuild perl-Tk. perl-Tk needs /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ia64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/perl.h which is now in perl-devel instead of perl. The spec file only specifies perl. When building under mock only the packages required are pulled into the chroot environment so this package fails to build. please add: BuildRequires: perl-devel thanks, - Doug Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Tk-804.027-12.fc8.src.rpm How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 05:53:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:53:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426187] perl-Tk build requires perl-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712190553.lBJ5rmWb010584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Tk build requires perl-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426187 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-12-19 00:53 EST ------- Thanks for noticing. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:05:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426214] New: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426214 Summary: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-DBD-SQLite AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 and 5. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-DBD-SQLite-1.12-2 How reproducible: No perl-DBD-SQLite in EPEL 4 Expected results: Package perl-DBD-SQLite in EPEL 4, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 4 succeded for me and looks fine, too (that even means, the package is working for me on an RHEL 4 system): Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-DBD-SQLite-1.12-2.el4.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-DBD-SQLite-debuginfo-1.12-2.el4.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:14:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191214.lBJCEig7003826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426214 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:14:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250867] Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191214.lBJCEkVs003884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-TNEF for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250867 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250863] Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191214.lBJCEldI003921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Mail-SPF-Query for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250863 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250865] Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191214.lBJCEpU8003962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Convert-UUlib for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250865 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:14:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250869] Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191214.lBJCEq3V003984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Razor-Agent for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250869 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426214] Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191214.lBJCElp3003901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426214 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:32:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426217] New: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426217 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Archive-Zip AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Archive-Zip-1.16-1 How reproducible: No perl-Archive-Zip in EPEL 4 Expected results: Package perl-Archive-Zip in EPEL 4, because it's an amavisd-new dependency. Additional info: Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package there. Mockbuild in EPEL 4 succeded for me and looks fine, too (that even means, the package is working for me on an RHEL 4 system). Taking the package from EPEL5 (or was it CentOS 5?) and rebuilding just worked for me: Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-Archive-Zip-1.16-1.el4.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:38:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191238.lBJCcLb1003255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426217 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249079 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 12:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191238.lBJCcIdY003228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426217 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-12-19 07:38 EST ------- I discovered two missing dependencies on RHEL 4 and filed bug reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 19 16:11:15 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:11:15 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/devel perl-DBD-SQLite.spec,1.13,1.14 Message-ID: <200712191611.lBJGBF5v000871@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv703 Modified Files: perl-DBD-SQLite.spec Log Message: Fix find option order. Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. Index: perl-DBD-SQLite.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/devel/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- perl-DBD-SQLite.spec 10 Dec 2007 19:44:47 -0000 1.13 +++ perl-DBD-SQLite.spec 19 Dec 2007 16:10:29 -0000 1.14 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-DBD-SQLite Version: 1.14 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver Group: Development/Libraries @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' -chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Dec 19 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.14-2 +- Fix find option order. +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. + * Mon Dec 10 2007 Robin Norwood - 1.14-1 - Update to latest upstream version: 1.14 - Remove patch - no longer needed. From steve at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 19 16:12:23 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:12:23 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/EL-5 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-DBD-SQLite.spec, 1.11, 1.12 sources, 1.5, 1.6 DBD-SQLite-1.11-type-information-segv.patch, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <200712191612.lBJGCNIH001036@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv942 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DBD-SQLite.spec sources Removed Files: DBD-SQLite-1.11-type-information-segv.patch Log Message: Sync with devel. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- .cvsignore 12 Apr 2006 14:43:56 -0000 1.5 +++ .cvsignore 19 Dec 2007 16:11:45 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -DBD-SQLite-1.12.tar.gz +DBD-SQLite-1.14.tar.gz Index: perl-DBD-SQLite.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/EL-5/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- perl-DBD-SQLite.spec 14 Sep 2006 21:17:52 -0000 1.11 +++ perl-DBD-SQLite.spec 19 Dec 2007 16:11:45 -0000 1.12 @@ -1,13 +1,12 @@ Name: perl-DBD-SQLite -Version: 1.12 +Version: 1.14 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver Group: Development/Libraries -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-SQLite/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MS/MSERGEANT/DBD-SQLite-%{version}.tar.gz -Patch0: DBD-SQLite-1.11-type-information-segv.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl-DBI >= 1.03 @@ -16,6 +15,7 @@ # else # perl-DBD-SQLite is self-contained (uses the sqlite local copy) BuildRequires: sqlite-devel +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ %prep %setup -q -n DBD-SQLite-%{version} -%patch0 -p1 %build @@ -44,8 +43,8 @@ make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' -chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check @@ -65,6 +64,18 @@ %changelog +* Wed Dec 19 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.14-2 +- Fix find option order. +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. + +* Mon Dec 10 2007 Robin Norwood - 1.14-1 +- Update to latest upstream version: 1.14 +- Remove patch - no longer needed. + +* Mon Oct 15 2007 Tom "spot" Callaway - 1.12-2.1 +- correct license tag +- add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) + * Thu Sep 14 2006 Jose Pedro Oliveira - 1.12-2 - Rebuild for FC6. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DBD-SQLite/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- sources 12 Apr 2006 14:43:56 -0000 1.5 +++ sources 19 Dec 2007 16:11:45 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -40b1d208d70d5d8cab7723df96fc239c DBD-SQLite-1.12.tar.gz +78a89cc8fd46bb2a5d537433dcccc8e6 DBD-SQLite-1.14.tar.gz --- DBD-SQLite-1.11-type-information-segv.patch DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 16:15:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426250] perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191615.lBJGFW17009324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426250 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 16:16:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426250] perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191616.lBJGG2Wn009374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426250 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |426214 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 16:16:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:16:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426214] Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191616.lBJGG1n9009358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426214 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426250 AssignedTo|jpo at di.uminho.pt |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-19 11:16 EST ------- EL-5 branch is building now. EL-4 needs a branch created though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 16:15:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426250] New: perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426250 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-DBD-SQLite AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,steve at silug.org Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-DBD-SQLite New Branches: EL-4 Updated EPEL Owners: steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 16:51:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191651.lBJGp1C7015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426217 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rnorwood at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-19 11:51 EST ------- This is a *fun* circular dependency. perl-Archive-Zip requires perl-Compress-Zlib, which requires perl-IO-Compress-Base, which wants perl-Test-Pod for a build dependency (not strictly necessary, but still...), which requires perl-Test-Builder-Tester, which requires perl-Module-Build, which requires perl-Archive-Tar, which requires perl-IO-Zlib, which requires perl-Compress-Zlib. If we drop the Test::Pod dependency in perl-IO-Compress-Base, we should be able to get everything else built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 17:37:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:37:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712191737.lBJHbQrP027176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426217 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-12-19 12:37 EST ------- Steven - stop! Please just build perl-Archive-Zip-1.16-1 (taken from EPEL 5) first. Otherwise EPEL 4 would ship newer software than EPEL 5... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Dec 19 17:47:35 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:47:35 +0100 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: <200712191651.lBJGp1C7015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> References: <200712191651.lBJGp1C7015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1198086455.3656.1.camel@beck.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:51 -0500, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional > comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. > > Summary: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426217 > > > steve at silug.org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |rnorwood at redhat.com > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-19 11:51 EST ------- > This is a *fun* circular dependency. And how is this a problem? We build perl incrementally and not from scratch. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 19 20:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426250] perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712192042.lBJKgCu6001594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426250 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-12-19 15:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Wed Dec 19 23:53:53 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:53:53 -0600 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: <1198086455.3656.1.camel@beck.corsepiu.local> References: <200712191651.lBJGp1C7015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> <1198086455.3656.1.camel@beck.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <20071219235352.GA7436@osiris.silug.org> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > And how is this a problem? > > We build perl incrementally and not from scratch. We're still building from scratch for EPEL. We'll probably have to build everything from scratch again for 5.10 pretty soon. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From rc040203 at freenet.de Thu Dec 20 02:33:33 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:33:33 +0100 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: <20071219235352.GA7436@osiris.silug.org> References: <200712191651.lBJGp1C7015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> <1198086455.3656.1.camel@beck.corsepiu.local> <20071219235352.GA7436@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <1198118014.3656.4.camel@beck.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 17:53 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > And how is this a problem? > > > > We build perl incrementally and not from scratch. > > We're still building from scratch for EPEL. What for? This doesn't make a real sense. > We'll probably have to build everything from scratch again for 5.10 > pretty soon. May-be, but it even if, then once. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 20 06:17:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245699] perl-DBD-Sqlite: version 1.13 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712200617.lBK6Hm52019223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Sqlite: version 1.13 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245699 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-12-20 01:17 EST ------- It seems that Robin tried to build 1.14 in rawhide a week or so ago but one of the tests failed. Also, some of the bugs open against 1.13 and 1.14 are troubling, such as this report that those versions break Class-DBI: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=21406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 20 19:49:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245699] perl-DBD-Sqlite: version 1.13 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712201949.lBKJnKgh017496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Sqlite: version 1.13 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245699 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-12-20 14:49 EST ------- Yeah, he did - then he forgot to come back and fix it. Given the bugs reported upstream, how about we just take a pass on 1.13 and 1.14, and see if 1.15 is better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Fri Dec 21 15:38:50 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:38:50 -0600 Subject: Perl modules in EPEL Message-ID: <20071221153850.GA27232@osiris.silug.org> I've been trying again recently to get as many Perl module packages built for EPEL as possible (so maybe we can finally have amavisd-new, rt3, etc. available). In case anyone else is interested, here's how many Perl module packages are available for various releases (counting source rpms, not including the perl package itself): Fedora Core + Extras 3: 240 Fedora Core + Extras 6: 736 Fedora 7: 753 Fedora 8: 776 development: 783 CentOS 4.5 + EPEL 4 + EPEL testing 4: 148 CentOS 5.1 + EPEL 5 + EPEL testing 5: 256 (This is counting packages available on my local mirror, which may or may not be completely current.) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 21 21:08:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396071] File::BaseDir 0.03 is out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712212108.lBLL84WT018757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: File::BaseDir 0.03 is out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396071 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-12-21 16:08 EST ------- perl-File-BaseDir-0.03-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 21 21:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396071] File::BaseDir 0.03 is out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712212107.lBLL7UdV018726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: File::BaseDir 0.03 is out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396071 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.03-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 21 21:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:07:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396071] File::BaseDir 0.03 is out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712212107.lBLL7T0e018705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: File::BaseDir 0.03 is out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396071 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f8 |8 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-12-21 16:07 EST ------- perl-File-BaseDir-0.03-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 22 01:06:48 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:06:48 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Module-Build/EL-4 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 perl-Module-Build.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <200712220106.lBM16m6t013877@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Build/EL-4 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13815 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Module-Build.spec sources Log Message: Sync with EL-5 branch. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Build/EL-4/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- .cvsignore 10 Jan 2006 21:26:54 -0000 1.8 +++ .cvsignore 22 Dec 2007 01:05:56 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -Module-Build-0.2611.tar.gz +Module-Build-0.2807.tar.gz Index: perl-Module-Build.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Build/EL-4/perl-Module-Build.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- perl-Module-Build.spec 10 Jan 2006 21:26:54 -0000 1.9 +++ perl-Module-Build.spec 22 Dec 2007 01:05:56 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,23 +1,42 @@ +%define module_version 0.2807 + Name: perl-Module-Build -Version: 0.2611 +# When the module version is x.yz, set Version to x.yz00. +Version: 0.2807 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Perl module for building and installing Perl modules -Group: Development/Libraries License: GPL or Artistic +Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Build/ -Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KW/KWILLIAMS/Module-Build-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KW/KWILLIAMS/Module-Build-%{module_version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::ParseXS), perl(YAML) >= 0.35, perl(YAML) < 0.49 -Requires: perl(ExtUtils::ParseXS), perl(YAML) >= 0.35, perl(YAML) < 0.49 +BuildRequires: perl(Archive::Tar) >= 1.08 +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) >= 0.15 +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::ParseXS) >= 1.02 +BuildRequires: perl(YAML) +# Avoid a circular build dependency (#215558). +#BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Readme) >= 0.04 +#BuildRequires: perl(version) >= 0.661 +Requires: perl(Archive::Tar) >= 1.08 +Requires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) >= 0.15 +Requires: perl(ExtUtils::ParseXS) >= 1.02 +#Requires: perl(Pod::Readme) >= 0.04 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description -Perl module for building and installing Perl modules, a replacement to -ExtUtils::MakeMaker. +Module::Build is a system for building, testing, and installing Perl +modules. It is meant to be an alternative to ExtUtils::MakeMaker. +Developers may alter the behavior of the module through subclassing in a +much more straightforward way than with MakeMaker. It also does not require +a make on your system - most of the Module::Build code is pure-perl and +written in a very cross-platform way. In fact, you don't even need a shell, +so even platforms like MacOS (traditional) can use it fairly easily. Its +only prerequisites are modules that are included with perl 5.6.0, and it +works fine on perl 5.005 if you can install a few additional modules. %prep -%setup -q -n Module-Build-%{version} +%setup -q -n Module-Build-%{module_version} %build %{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor @@ -27,13 +46,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0 +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; - -chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* - -perldoc -t perlgpl > COPYING -perldoc -t perlartistic > Artistic +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check ./Build test @@ -43,13 +58,56 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc Changes README COPYING Artistic +%doc Changes README %{_bindir}/config_data %{perl_vendorlib}/Module %{_mandir}/man1/config_data.1* %{_mandir}/man3/Module::Build*.3* %changelog +* Mon May 07 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.2807-2 +- Drop explicit dependency on Pod::Readme. + +* Mon Apr 02 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.2807-1 +- Update to 0.2807. + +* Sat Dec 16 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2806-1 +- Update to 0.2806. +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. + +* Wed Nov 15 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2805-3 +- Don't BR Pod::Readme. (#215558) + +* Sun Sep 17 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2805-2 +- Rebuild. + +* Sat Aug 05 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2805-1 +- Update to 0.2805. +- Use the bundled version.pm code for now. + +* Fri Jul 28 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2804-1 +- Update to 0.2804. +- BR perl(version). +- Fix find option order. + +* Mon May 22 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2801-1 +- Update to 0.2801. +- Drop the /dev/zero hack. (Upstream fixed this problem.) + +* Thu May 18 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2800-2 +- Take input from /dev/zero during "Build test" to avoid test failure. + +* Wed May 17 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.2800-1 +- Update to 0.28, but call it 0.2800 to avoid an epoch bump. +- Various spec cleanups to closer match cpanspec output. + +* Wed Mar 15 2006 Steven Pritchard - 0.2612-2 +- Add versioned deps for Archive::Tar, ExtUtils::CBuilder, and + ExtUtils::ParseXS. + +* Sat Mar 11 2006 Steven Pritchard - 0.2612-1 +- Update to 0.2612. + * Mon Sep 05 2005 Steven Pritchard - 0.2611-2 - Minor spec cleanup. - Add COPYING and Artistic. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Build/EL-4/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 10 Jan 2006 21:26:54 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 22 Dec 2007 01:05:56 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -d0fa9a7917ed43d1c1f8b707e86b6061 Module-Build-0.2611.tar.gz +6766157e8f4ae5ce6d58653271c42ad7 Module-Build-0.2807.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 22 21:05:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239241] perl-Pod-Strip: missing dependency on perl(Pod::Simple) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712222105.lBML5Nif013425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Pod-Strip: missing dependency on perl(Pod::Simple) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239241 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|fc6 |6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 23 22:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389741] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712232249.lBNMnpDB014514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389741 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-12-23 17:49 EST ------- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 26 23:50:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:50:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389741] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712262350.lBQNox2G027724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389741 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-12-26 18:50 EST ------- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 27 01:03:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:03:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389741] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712270103.lBR13NS7001556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389741 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-12-26 20:03 EST ------- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 27 01:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:03:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389741] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712270103.lBR13OWq001585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389741 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.02-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 28 03:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 419591] missing build requirement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712280349.lBS3n31U023322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing build requirement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419591 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-12-27 22:49 EST ------- Looks like this was resolved in rawhide by Ralf for bug 419631. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 28 03:54:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232736] perl-Pod-Readme: explicit requires on buildtime-only deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712280354.lBS3s38A024333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Pod-Readme: explicit requires on buildtime-only deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232736 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc6 |6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 28 03:54:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232380] Pod::Readme: BR'ing perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) creates a circular BR loop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712280354.lBS3s59E024363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Pod::Readme: BR'ing perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) creates a circular BR loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232380 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc6 |6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Fri Dec 28 10:09:33 2007 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:09:33 +0100 Subject: perl(Test::Builder::Tester) not in EL 4? Message-ID: <20071228100933.GA32573@free.fr> Hello, I am looking at perl-Test-Pod for EL-4 right now. Recent versions > 1.20 requires recent Test::* versions. However 1.20 buildrequires Test::More which is in the EL-4 perl, but it also BR Test::Builder::Tester which is not in perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2 This is strange because the RHL-9 version of Test-Pod had already a BR on perl(Test::Builder::Tester), and RHL-9 is much older than EL-4. Anybody knows what is going on? -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 28 11:07:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252044] perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712281107.lBSB7QMS019426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252044 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-12-28 06:07 EST ------- As I already stated on mailing lists, I think that the right version for EL-4 is 1.20. But this version already BuildRequires perl(Test::Builder::Tester) which doesn't seems to be in EL-4. This is a bit strange since this BR is there in the RHL-9 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 28 13:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252044] perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712281313.lBSDDcRB006097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252044 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-12-28 08:13 EST ------- Thanks to Michael Schwendt I found the perl-Test-Builder-Tester which was in older fedora versions. I have build perl-Test-Builder-Tester and perl-Test-Pod 1.20 for EL-4. I'll build Test-Pod-Coverage and its dependencies now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 28 15:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252044] perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712281523.lBSFNiaK023864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Test-Pod is needed for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252044 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-12-28 10:23 EST ------- All built. Everything is also in EL-5, Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 30 04:46:44 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:46:44 -0500 Subject: rpms/amavisd-new/EL-5 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 amavis-clamd.conf, 1.1, 1.2 amavisd-conf.patch, 1.4, 1.5 amavisd-new.spec, 1.16, 1.17 sources, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <200712300446.lBU4kiiE011515@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/amavisd-new/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11486 Modified Files: .cvsignore amavis-clamd.conf amavisd-conf.patch amavisd-new.spec sources Log Message: Sync with devel. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/amavisd-new/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- .cvsignore 22 Feb 2007 21:48:43 -0000 1.8 +++ .cvsignore 30 Dec 2007 04:46:07 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -amavisd-new-2.4.5.tar.gz +amavisd-new-2.5.2.tar.gz Index: amavis-clamd.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/amavisd-new/EL-5/amavis-clamd.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- amavis-clamd.conf 26 Jan 2006 22:11:54 -0000 1.1 +++ amavis-clamd.conf 30 Dec 2007 04:46:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # Use system logger. -LogSyslog +LogSyslog yes # Specify the type of syslog messages - please refer to 'man syslog' # for facility names. @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ # Remove stale socket after unclean shutdown. # Default: disabled -FixStaleSocket +FixStaleSocket yes # Run as a selected user (clamd must be started by root). User amavis amavisd-conf.patch: Index: amavisd-conf.patch =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/amavisd-new/EL-5/amavisd-conf.patch,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- amavisd-conf.patch 10 Oct 2006 22:47:43 -0000 1.4 +++ amavisd-conf.patch 30 Dec 2007 04:46:07 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ ---- amavisd-new-2.4.3/amavisd.conf.orig 2006-10-01 19:02:13.000000000 -0500 -+++ amavisd-new-2.4.3/amavisd.conf 2006-10-10 17:46:45.000000000 -0500 -@@ -14,23 +14,23 @@ - # @bypass_spam_checks_maps = (1); # uncomment to DISABLE anti-spam code +--- amavisd-new-2.5.1/amavisd.conf.orig 2007-05-31 07:09:55.000000000 -0500 ++++ amavisd-new-2.5.1/amavisd.conf 2007-06-22 16:35:04.000000000 -0500 +@@ -15,23 +15,23 @@ + # $bypass_decode_parts = 1; # controls running of decoders&dearchivers $max_servers = 2; # num of pre-forked children (2..15 is common), -m -$daemon_user = 'vscan'; # (no default; customary: vscan or amavis), -u @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ -# $MYHOME = '/var/amavis'; # a convenient default for other settings, -H +$MYHOME = '/var/spool/amavisd'; # a convenient default for other settings, -H $TEMPBASE = "$MYHOME/tmp"; # working directory, needs to exist, -T - $ENV{TMPDIR} = $TEMPBASE; # environment variable TMPDIR + $ENV{TMPDIR} = $TEMPBASE; # environment variable TMPDIR, used by SA, etc. -$QUARANTINEDIR = '/var/virusmails'; # -Q +$QUARANTINEDIR = undef; # -Q # $quarantine_subdir_levels = 1; # add level of subdirs to disperse quarantine @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ +$pid_file = "/var/run/amavisd/amavisd.pid"; # -P #NOTE: create directories $MYHOME/tmp, $MYHOME/var, $MYHOME/db manually - @local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain"] ); -@@ -77,11 +77,11 @@ + $log_level = 0; # verbosity 0..5, -d +@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ # $timestamp_fmt_mysql = 1; # if using MySQL *and* msgs.time_iso is TIMESTAMP; # defaults to 0, which is good for non-MySQL or if msgs.time_iso is CHAR(16) @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ $mailfrom_to_quarantine = ''; # null return path; uses original sender if undef @addr_extension_virus_maps = ('virus'); -@@ -115,10 +115,10 @@ +@@ -148,10 +148,10 @@ # $notify_method = 'smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025'; # $forward_method = 'smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025'; # set to undef with milter! @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ # $os_fingerprint_method = 'p0f:127.0.0.1:2345'; # to query p0f-analyzer.pl -@@ -318,10 +318,10 @@ +@@ -353,10 +353,10 @@ # ['Sophos SAVI', \&sophos_savi ], # ### http://www.clamav.net/ Index: amavisd-new.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/amavisd-new/EL-5/amavisd-new.spec,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17 --- amavisd-new.spec 22 Feb 2007 21:10:55 -0000 1.16 +++ amavisd-new.spec 30 Dec 2007 04:46:07 -0000 1.17 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -#%%define prerelease rc1 +#%%define prerelease rc2 Summary: Email filter with virus scanner and spamassassin support Name: amavisd-new -Version: 2.4.5 -Release: 1%{?prerelease:.%{prerelease}}%{?dist} +Version: 2.5.2 +Release: 2%{?prerelease:.%{prerelease}}%{?dist} License: GPL Group: Applications/System URL: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ @@ -22,18 +22,30 @@ Requires: smtpdaemon Requires: /usr/sbin/clamd, /etc/clamd.d Requires: /usr/sbin/tmpwatch, /etc/cron.daily -Requires: file -Requires: bzip2 -Requires: gzip +Requires: /usr/bin/ar +Requires: altermime Requires: arj +Requires: bzip2 +Requires: cabextract Requires: cpio +Requires: file Requires: freeze +Requires: gzip Requires: lzop Requires: nomarch -Requires: cabextract -Requires: /usr/bin/ar +Requires: p7zip +Requires: tar # We probably should parse the fetch_modules() code in amavisd for this list. # These are just the dependencies that don't get picked up otherwise. +Requires: perl(Archive::Tar) +Requires: perl(Archive::Zip) +Requires: perl(Authen::SASL) +Requires: perl(Compress::Zlib) >= 1.35 +Requires: perl(Convert::TNEF) +Requires: perl(Convert::UUlib) +Requires: perl(DBD::SQLite) +Requires: perl(DBI) +Requires: perl(IO::Socket::INET6) Requires: perl(IO::Stringy) Requires: perl(MIME::Body) Requires: perl(MIME::Decoder::Base64) @@ -46,21 +58,17 @@ Requires: perl(Mail::Field) Requires: perl(Mail::Header) Requires: perl(Mail::Internet) +Requires: perl(Mail::SPF) Requires: perl(Mail::SpamAssassin) -Requires: perl(Archive::Tar) -Requires: perl(Archive::Zip) -Requires: perl(Convert::TNEF) -Requires: perl(Convert::UUlib) -Requires: perl(URI) Requires: perl(Net::DNS) Requires: perl(Net::LDAP) -Requires: perl(DBI) -Requires: perl(DBD::mysql) -Requires: perl(DBD::SQLite) Requires: perl(Razor2::Client::Version) -Requires: perl(Authen::SASL) -Requires: perl(Mail::SPF::Query) -Requires: perl(Compress::Zlib) >= 1.35 +Requires: perl(URI) +Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd +Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig +Requires(post): /sbin/service +Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig +Requires(preun): /sbin/service BuildArch: noarch %description @@ -118,21 +126,23 @@ rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" %pre -if ! id amavis > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then - useradd -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/amavisd amavis +if ! id amavis &>/dev/null ; then + /usr/sbin/useradd -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/amavisd amavis fi %preun if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then - chkconfig --del amavisd - chkconfig --del clamd.amavisd + /sbin/service amavisd stop 2>/dev/null || : + /sbin/chkconfig --del amavisd || : + /sbin/service clamd.amavisd stop 2>/dev/null || : + /sbin/chkconfig --del clamd.amavisd || : fi %post -chkconfig --add amavisd -service amavisd condrestart -chkconfig --add clamd.amavisd -service clamd.amavisd condrestart +/sbin/chkconfig --add clamd.amavisd || : +/sbin/service clamd.amavisd condrestart || : +/sbin/chkconfig --add amavisd || : +/sbin/service amavisd condrestart || : %files %defattr(-,root,root) @@ -156,6 +166,24 @@ %ghost /var/spool/amavisd/clamd.sock %changelog +* Sun Aug 12 2007 Steven Pritchard 2.5.2-2 +- Fix pre/preun/post dependencies and improve scriptlets a bit. +- Drop dependencies on DBD::mysql and Mail::SPF::Query. +- Add dependencies on IO::Socket::INET6, Mail::SPF, and altermime. + +* Sun Jul 08 2007 Steven Pritchard 2.5.2-1 +- Update to 2.5.2. + +* Fri Jun 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 2.5.2-0.1.rc2 +- Update to 2.5.2-rc2. + +* Fri Jun 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 2.5.1-1 +- Update to 2.5.1. +- Fix amavis-clamd.conf (bug #237252). +- Update amavisd-conf.patch. +- Require p7zip and tar. +- Improve pre/preun/post scripts. + * Thu Feb 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 2.4.5-1 - Update to 2.4.5. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/amavisd-new/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 22 Feb 2007 21:48:43 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 30 Dec 2007 04:46:07 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -eef8c03855f9e3a4c6c53c06006d77ea amavisd-new-2.4.5.tar.gz +52d227d442fac64916488b83d79806d7 amavisd-new-2.5.2.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 30 04:55:17 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:55:17 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/EL-5 perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200712300455.lBU4tHsV011672@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11644 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable.spec Log Message: Sync with devel. --- NEW FILE perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable.spec --- Name: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable Version: 0.003 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JM/JMEHNLE/net-dns-resolver-programmable/Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable-v%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) BuildRequires: perl(Net::DNS) BuildRequires: perl(version) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is a Net::DNS::Resolver descendant class that allows a virtual DNS to be emulated instead of querying the real DNS. A set of static DNS records may be supplied, or arbitrary code may be specified as a means for retrieving DNS records, or even generating them on the fly. %prep %setup -q -n Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable-v%{version} %build %{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor ./Build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check ./Build test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc CHANGES LICENSE README TODO %{perl_vendorlib}/* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Wed Jul 11 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.003-2 - Rebuild. * Tue Jul 10 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.003-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.72. - Add "v" to files and path names. - Drop explicit redundant dependencies. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 11 Jul 2007 02:02:18 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 30 Dec 2007 04:54:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable-v0.003.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 11 Jul 2007 02:02:18 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 30 Dec 2007 04:54:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +8d44bf331d6115e7fb4ea21f6cf4b96b Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable-v0.003.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 30 17:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427049] broken spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712301723.lBUHNoY1021588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: broken spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427049 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |419631 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 30 17:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427049] New: broken spec Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427049 Summary: broken spec Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Class-Std AssignedTo: andreas at bawue.net ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Package doesn't build, because the perl-package split has not been reflected to it. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Class-Std-0_0_8-1* How to reproduce: check out from CVS make mockbuild Additional info: I would have fixed this bug in CVS, but you have restrictive ACLs set on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 30 17:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427049] broken spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712301726.lBUHQ4JP018757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: broken spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427049 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-12-30 12:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=290554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=290554&action=view) patch against CVS to fix this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 30 23:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:07:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712302307.lBUN7EWq003327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 249081, which changed state. Bug 249081 Summary: Update clamav in EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249081 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 30 23:12:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:12:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426214] Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712302312.lBUNCmwb000929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426214 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-12-30 18:12 EST ------- Steven, regarding EL-4 branch: Are you going to request the branch and maintain it there as well or not? If not, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 30 23:10:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:10:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712302310.lBUNAujA000786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 426217, which changed state. Bug 426217 Summary: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426217 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 30 23:10:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712302310.lBUNAtnA000762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426217 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-12-30 18:10 EST ------- perl-Archive-Zip-1.16-0.1.2.1 is available in epel-testing - if you would like to upgrade to something newer, it's up to you. But keep in mind, that then EPEL 5 also has to be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 31 03:21:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712310321.lBV3LjoG000766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 31 03:21:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427082] New: Please rebuild perl-NetAddr-IP for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427082 Summary: Please rebuild perl-NetAddr-IP for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-NetAddr-IP AssignedTo: andreas at bawue.net ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Please rebuild perl-NetAddr-IP for the EL-4 and EL-5 branches. It is required by perl-Mail-SPF, which in turn is required by amavisd-new. It built on both branches for me with no problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 31 03:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426214] Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712310325.lBV3PJjx001280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426214 Bug 426214 depends on bug 426250, which changed state. Bug 426250 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite: branch for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426250 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 31 03:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426214] Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712310330.lBV3U3Co001875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426214 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-30 22:30 EST ------- Sorry, I missed the EL-4 branch being created. It's building now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 31 03:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200712310330.lBV3U3cP001899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug 249079 depends on bug 426214, which changed state. Bug 426214 Summary: Please rebuild perl-DBD-SQLite for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426214 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Mon Dec 31 18:30:04 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:30:04 -0800 Subject: [Bug 426217] Please rebuild perl-Archive-Zip for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: <1198086455.3656.1.camel@beck.corsepiu.local> References: <200712191651.lBJGp1C7015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> <1198086455.3656.1.camel@beck.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490712311030x5e844d2fw9555b2f21f9a7a63@mail.gmail.com> On Dec 19, 2007 9:47 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-12-19 11:51 EST ------- > > This is a *fun* circular dependency. > And how is this a problem? > > We build perl incrementally and not from scratch. Well, when trying to build for a different distro (eg RHEL) or needing to rebuild all perl for, say, 5.10 :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia