From mkanat at bugzilla.org Sun Feb 4 16:28:56 2007 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 08:28:56 -0800 Subject: Bugzilla 3.0 Perl Requirements Message-ID: <20070204162857.1AD9B8C8001@help.trusthosting.net> Hey folks. Just wanted to let you know that Bugzilla 3.0 (which should be out soon) has a few perl pre-reqs that aren't in Extras. One of them is required: Email-Send And all of the others are optional but still useful: Template-GD Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper Email-Reply In particular, Template-GD really should be in FE--it was originally part of Template-Toolkit and was moved out in version 2.15. I figured I'd let you know sooner rather than later, when users kept asking you for the packages, or when you had to build them anyway to build a new Bugzilla package. :-) -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla Services. And Everything Else, too. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 5 19:33:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167933] RFE: net-snmp: don't remove the tkmib perl script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702051933.l15JX8GY029067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: net-snmp: don't remove the tkmib perl script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167933 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla at redhat.com 2007-02-05 14:33 EST ------- REOPENED status has been deprecated. ASSIGNED with keyword of Reopened is preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 04:38:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227622] New: Unable to pass argument to sa-update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227622 Summary: Unable to pass argument to sa-update Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: milan.kerslager at pslib.cz CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com As there is a standartized cron script now to utilize sa-update, please allow pass arguments to this command. Use /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin to set $SAUPDATEOPT, and use this in /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron: [...] if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin ]; then . /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin fi /usr/bin/sa-update $SAUPDATEOPT These argument are necessary to be able to alter sa-update default behaviour. Also I dislike output (echo commands with mailing to root by cron daemon) in this file even there is no (error) output. Please remove it along with tee commad and redirection of output in the file /etc/cron.d/sa-update. Unix-like style is to report nothing when there is no error. There is also a possibility to add -D (--debug [area=n,...]) argument to the sa-update to get output mailed if one need it. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 21:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227738] New: spamasssin (sa-update) needs perl-libwww-perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227738 Summary: spamasssin (sa-update) needs perl-libwww-perl Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: milan.kerslager at pslib.cz CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Spamassassin needs perl-libwww-perl (LWP::UserAgent, see line 92 in /usr/bin/sa-update). This dependency is not required by spamassassin package (RHEL3, RHEL4 and probably FC too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 21:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227738] spamasssin (sa-update) needs perl-libwww-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702072146.l17LkaAN023913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamasssin (sa-update) needs perl-libwww-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227738 ------- Additional Comments From milan.kerslager at pslib.cz 2007-02-07 16:46 EST ------- sa-update needs gnupg to run succesfully. This should be in Requires too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 21:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227738] spamasssin (sa-update) needs perl-libwww-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702072148.l17LmGkt024102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamasssin (sa-update) needs perl-libwww-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227738 ------- Additional Comments From felicity at kluge.net 2007-02-07 16:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > sa-update needs gnupg to run succesfully. This should be in Requires too. no it doesn't, actually, though gpg verification is highly recommended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 21:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227738] spamasssin (sa-update) needs gnupg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702072150.l17LoGeD024313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamasssin (sa-update) needs gnupg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227738 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|spamasssin (sa-update) needs|spamasssin (sa-update) needs |perl-libwww-perl |gnupg ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-02-07 16:50 EST ------- Bug #193100 already covers the perl deps, it just hasn't been pushed to FC6 yet. Good catch with gnupg. I didn't realize nothing else actually Required gnupg. I'll add that to rawhide, and it will be in FC6 eventually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 22:35:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227756] New: spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227756 Summary: spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: milan.kerslager at pslib.cz CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com sa-update returns 1 if there is no update available sa-update returns 0 if update has been succesfull Please change /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron to not restart spamassassin when there is no change in the updated rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 22:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227756] spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702072243.l17MhWeR027401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227756 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-02-07 17:43 EST ------- Nice catch, adding this to the package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 22:47:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:47:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227756] spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702072247.l17Mlnar027701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227756 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-02-07 17:47 EST ------- Please double-check me... sa-update.cronscript now reads: #!/bin/bash sleep $(expr $RANDOM % 7200) echo SpamAssassin rule update begins at `date` # Only restart spamd if sa-update returns 0, meaning it updated the rules /usr/bin/sa-update && /etc/init.d/spamassassin condrestart echo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 23:24:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227756] spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702072324.l17NONeu029602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin needs restart only if sa-update returns 0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227756 ------- Additional Comments From milan.kerslager at pslib.cz 2007-02-07 18:24 EST ------- This seems to be correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 9 18:07:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228043] New: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit? Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228043 Summary: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit? Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Odd minor problem... low priority. /usr/share/man/man1/sa-update.1.gz differs by the following unidiff between the 32bit and 64bit architecture builds of spamassassin. --- 32 2007-02-09 12:46:19.000000000 -0500 +++ 64 2007-02-09 12:46:10.000000000 -0500 @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ .\" ======================================================================== .\" .IX Title "SA-UPDATE 1" -.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2006-07-30" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation" +.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2007-01-22" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation" .SH "NAME" sa\-update \- automate SpamAssassin rule updates .SH "SYNOPSIS" This appears to be the only difference in version 3.1.7. Notice that the 32bit version retained the original source timestamp, while the 64bit version somehow decided to differ in this behavior by changing the timestamp to the build date. The above example is 3.1.7 built on RHEL4, but this persists through perl-5.8.8 in FC7 too. While this appears to create a multilib conflict, in practice this is not a real problem because spamassassin is based on perl, and we don't ship both archs in a multilib distribution. This bug is merely to figure out *why* it is behaving in this strange way betweeen 32bit and 64bit builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 9 18:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228043] ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702091808.l19I8pOM026627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228043 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-02-09 13:08 EST ------- Oops, spamd.1 manpage also differs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 10 14:52:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228147] New: RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228147 Summary: RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc6 Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/~abw/Template-Toolkit-2.18/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: perl-Template-Toolkit AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: rmo at sunnmore.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: A new updated version of Template Toolkit has been released Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Version 2.18 - 9th February 2007 #------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Merged in Adam's changes in 2.16 and 2.17 back into the developer CVS repository and added his name to the credits. * Changed the parser grammar to accept expressions as arguments to a subroutine, method or virtual method call. I'm embarrassed to admit that it was a one line change that could (and should) have been made long ago, if only I had realised just how trivial it was. Anyway, you can now write nested expressions like this: [% add(a+5, b < 10 ? c : d + e*5) %] * Put the t/fileline.t test back in as this was fixed in 2.15a * Added the Template::Toolkit documentation-only module. #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Version 2.17 - 8th Feb 2007 #------------------------------------------------------------------------ Another interim release from Adam Kennedy. * Change in Makefile.PL to force an upgrade to File::HomeDir 0.64 on darwin. This is due to problems caused by changes made to Perl on the new Intel versions of Mac OS X. * skip_all filelines.t on darwin #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Version 2.16 - 23rd Jan 2007 #------------------------------------------------------------------------ Interim release from Adam Kennedy. * Skip fileline.t on Win32, as it has some hard-coded path seperator assumptions. This will be fixed more comprehensively later. * Handle spurious errors in Makefile.PL when a dev version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker is installed. * Don't say "nmake" on Win32 when $Config{make} is 'dmake'. This corrects the message on Strawberry Perl. #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Version 2.15c - Not released ## DEVELOPER RELEASE ## #------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Fixed a bug in Template::Parser which caused it to get confused about block names if it encountered a syntax error inside a BLOCK. Thanks to Bill Moseley for reporting the problem. http://tt2.org/pipermail/templates/2006-July/008815.html * Fixed a minor buglet in Template::Provider which came to light while investigating the above problem. If a previously cached template is changed on disk and then fails to compile, the provider now invalidates the cache entry immediately. Without this fix, the provider would report the error once, then reuse the cached good version of the template until $STAT_TTL ticked over when it would try to load and compile the disk version again. The problem was that error messages were only reported once every $STAT_TTL second(s) and any requests for the same template in the interim time would mysteriously work. This way errors get reported consistently and immediately and no-one has to waste an afternoon trying to figure out where the errors went! #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Version 2.15b - 30th May 2006 ## DEVELOPER RELEASE ## #------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Changed the uri filter to escape all reserved characters as per URI::Escape and RFC2396. This now includes &, @, /, ;, :, =, +, ? and $ which were previously not escaped. Thanks to islue at cpan.org for reporting the problem. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=19593 * Also changed the uri filter to encode all wide characters as the equivalent UTF escapes. Thanks to Jonathan Rockway for reporting the problem. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=19354 * Fixed the redirect filter to not support relative paths. Thanks to Paul Seamons for spotting the problem and providing a solution. * Moved all the virtual methods out of Template::Stash and into a new Template::VMethods module. * Fixed the version number of Template::Stash which had rolled over to 2.102 making it appear to predate the 2.86 stash in TT v2.14. Thanks to Randal Schwartz for reporting the problem. Changed all version numbers in other modules to be a hard-coded numbers instead of grokking it automagically from the CVS revision. * Changed the _recover() method of Template::Service to check if the error thrown is a Template::Exception object rather than just a reference. Thanks to David Wheeler for reporting the problem. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=17630 * Fixed the some tests in stash.t and stash-xs.t which were failing under Perl 5.6.2 due to a slightly different error message being generated. Thanks to Anton Berezin for reporting the problem. * Fixed a bug in the Template::Provider _load() method to check that $data is a hash ref before trying to mess with its innards. Thanks to barbie at cpan.org for reporting the problem. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18653 #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Version 2.15a - 29th May 2006 ## DEVELOPER RELEASE ## #------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Removed the latex filter from Template::Filters and related config variables from Template::Config * Changed the t/fileline.t test to remove the line number from what Perl reports as "(eval $line)". It appears to get the $line wrong on FreeBSD, although the correct line number is reported following that so the tests still do the right thing. Thanks to Anton Berezin for reporting the problem. * Changed the t/compile3.t test to do something similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 10 15:06:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228147] RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702101506.l1AF6aU6030892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228147 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-02-10 10:06 EST ------- Tom, Could you also package Template-GD? It used to be part of Template Toolkit and is a new Bugzilla 3.0 requirement. Please see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2007-February/msg00000.html for the packaging request. tia, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 13 05:01:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch? Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433 Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch? Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: perl-version AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4. Any chance of an EPEL branch? :) (note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the standard Makefile.PL provided.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 13 05:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702130512.l1D5C0Yq031283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-02-13 00:11 EST ------- Erm, scratch that last bit. The spec does indeed build via Makefile.PL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 13 05:51:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702130551.l1D5povA000669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-02-13 00:51 EST ------- ...and to build on that, it would appear that since the spec is using Makefile.PL to build, the buildreq on perl(Module::Build) >= 0.2611 is spurious. perl-version builds nicely in mock with that br removed and without other alterations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 13 09:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228470] New: LibXML failing under mod_perl (missing initialization code in .xs) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228470 Summary: LibXML failing under mod_perl (missing initialization code in .xs) Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: perl-XML-LibXML AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: misch at czechin.cz CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-XML-LibXML-1.58-2.2.2.1 How reproducible: Easily. Steps to Reproduce: 1. run following program under mod_perl or SpeedyCGI or any similar persistent perl interpreter (not /usr/bin/perl, as it is not persistent): use XML::Simple; XMLin('/path/to/any/valid/xml/file.xml') && print "OK" Actual results: first run prints "OK", second run dies with message: Couldn't create file parser context for file "/path/to/any/valid/xml/file.xml": No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/XML/LibXML.pm line 427. Expected results: "OK" Additional info: This bug is already documented in Debian's bug-tracking system, please look there: http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240334 Basicaly, there is missing one initialization block in LibXML library for perl, which causes it to work correctly when running under non-persistent Perl interpreter, but fails under persistent Perl (eg. mod_perl, etc.). I assigned it a "high" level priority, because this bug effectively disables all functionality of mod_perl modules which are using LibXML, and it is impossible to get around this bug :(((. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 13 09:45:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228470] LibXML failing under mod_perl (missing initialization code in .xs) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702130945.l1D9j7Ib016317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibXML failing under mod_perl (missing initialization code in .xs) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228470 ------- Additional Comments From misch at czechin.cz 2007-02-13 04:44 EST ------- I forgot EXACT steps to repdocute this bug: $ cat - >a.pl use XML::Simple; XMLin('file.xml') && print "OK"; ^D $ cat - >file.xml ^D $ perl a.pl OK $ perl a.pl OK $ /usr/bin/speedy a.pl OK $ /usr/bin/speedy a.pl Couldn't create file parser context for file "file.xml": No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread- multi/XML/LibXML.pm line 427. at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/XML/LibXML/SAX.pm line 63 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Tue Feb 13 21:22:40 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:22:40 -0600 Subject: [Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070213212240.GA20695@osiris.silug.org> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:01:16AM -0500, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > (note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't > available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the > standard Makefile.PL provided.) Of course, the only reason Module::Build isn't available in EPEL yet is I haven't got around to it yet. :-) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 14 04:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228429] mod_perl errantly provides perl(warnings) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702140442.l1E4gGok002181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: mod_perl errantly provides perl(warnings) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228429 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 14 14:37:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228688] New: invalid syntax results in interpreter seg fault Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228688 Summary: invalid syntax results in interpreter seg fault Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: robert.haas at tekconnect.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Attempting to execute the following code produces a segmentation fault: sub frob { my ($r) = @_; sub { . 3; }; } Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-10 How reproducible: Run the code above. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Save the code above in a text file (6 lines) called "oops". 2. Type "perl < oops" Actual results: Seg fault Expected results: Syntax error Additional info: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Wed Feb 14 21:09:21 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:09:21 -0800 Subject: [Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch? In-Reply-To: <20070213212240.GA20695@osiris.silug.org> References: <20070213212240.GA20695@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490702141309l65083fa7oeb61157d53287ed9@mail.gmail.com> On 2/13/07, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:01:16AM -0500, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > > (note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't > > available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the > > standard Makefile.PL provided.) > > Of course, the only reason Module::Build isn't available in EPEL yet > is I haven't got around to it yet. :-) That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL. Being w/o it makes things... difficult. :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From steve at silug.org Wed Feb 14 22:20:10 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:20:10 -0600 Subject: [Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490702141309l65083fa7oeb61157d53287ed9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070213212240.GA20695@osiris.silug.org> <7dd7ab490702141309l65083fa7oeb61157d53287ed9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070214222010.GA6362@osiris.silug.org> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:09:21PM -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL. Being w/o it > makes things... difficult. :) I've been a little out of the loop lately... I don't suppose you have a pointer to the procedure for making EPEL branches and such handy, do you? Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Thu Feb 15 00:23:11 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:23:11 -0800 Subject: [Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch? In-Reply-To: <20070214222010.GA6362@osiris.silug.org> References: <20070213212240.GA20695@osiris.silug.org> <7dd7ab490702141309l65083fa7oeb61157d53287ed9@mail.gmail.com> <20070214222010.GA6362@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490702141623y5a9f0850sb4f597e0325efdc8@mail.gmail.com> On 2/14/07, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:09:21PM -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL. Being w/o it > > makes things... difficult. :) > > I've been a little out of the loop lately... I don't suppose you have > a pointer to the procedure for making EPEL branches and such handy, do > you? Yah. Unless something else has changed in the last couple days, it's just a matter of: 1. adding a branch request to CVSSyncNeeded with EL-4 as the branch, and 2. sending a note to cvsadmin-members at fedoraproject.org with the lines to be added to owners.epel (essentially the same as in owners.list). The branch will just show up as EL-4, and behave the way one expects it to, once the cvs admins have worked their magic. At least, that's the way I've been doing it :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 15 00:50:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228792] New: Please update to spamassassin 3.1.8 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228792 Summary: Please update to spamassassin 3.1.8 Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: umar at compsci.cas.vanderbilt.edu CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Among other things it fixes a DoS. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 15 01:32:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228792] Please update to spamassassin 3.1.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702150132.l1F1WCYM023166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please update to spamassassin 3.1.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228792 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-02-14 20:32 EST ------- Already built and pushed, it should appear in FC6 updates real soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at city-fan.org Thu Feb 15 07:20:00 2007 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:20:00 +0000 Subject: [Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490702141623y5a9f0850sb4f597e0325efdc8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070213212240.GA20695@osiris.silug.org> <7dd7ab490702141309l65083fa7oeb61157d53287ed9@mail.gmail.com> <20070214222010.GA6362@osiris.silug.org> <7dd7ab490702141623y5a9f0850sb4f597e0325efdc8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1171524000.14861.0.camel@metropolis.intra.city-fan.org> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:23 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > On 2/14/07, Steven Pritchard wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:09:21PM -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > > That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL. Being w/o it > > > makes things... difficult. :) > > > > I've been a little out of the loop lately... I don't suppose you have > > a pointer to the procedure for making EPEL branches and such handy, do > > you? > > Yah. Unless something else has changed in the last couple days, it's > just a matter of: > > 1. adding a branch request to CVSSyncNeeded with EL-4 as the branch, and > 2. sending a note to cvsadmin-members at fedoraproject.org with the lines > to be added to owners.epel (essentially the same as in owners.list). > > The branch will just show up as EL-4, and behave the way one expects > it to, once the cvs admins have worked their magic. > > At least, that's the way I've been doing it :) You can also request EL-5 branches if you'll be supporting the next release too... Paul. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 16 09:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:58:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228968] New: sa-learn perl error since update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228968 Summary: sa-learn perl error since update Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: jansen at strw.leidenuniv.nl CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20070209 Fedora/1.5.0.9-3.fc6 Firefox/1.5.0.9 pango-text Description of problem: Since I installed the spamassassin update (3.1.8-1) this morning, sa-learn gives errors like this: archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2 at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm line 724, line 1. Learned tokens from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined) This is sa-learn invoked manually (in mutt: | sa-learn --spam); spamassassin inside evolution doesn't seem to give errors Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): spamassassin-3.1.8-1.fc6.i386 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. open a mailbox in mutt 2. select spam message 3. type '| sa-learn --spam' (actually, I have this bound to a key of course) Actual Results: archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2 at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm line 724, line 1. Learned tokens from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined) Expected Results: Until yesterday, only the message Learned tokens from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined) was shown Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 16 16:26:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228968] sa-learn perl error since update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702161626.l1GGQwYM016902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-learn perl error since update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228968 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-02-16 11:26 EST ------- http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5336 Could you please test the upstream patch for this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 16 19:30:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229065] New: double ?? in prepare causes seg fault on execute Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229065 Summary: double ?? in prepare causes seg fault on execute Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: perl-DBD-Pg AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: robert.haas at tekconnect.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: If you attempt to prepare and execute a statement that contains "??", perl seg faults. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-10 perl-DBI-1.52-1.fc6 perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-1.fc6 postgresql-8.1.8-1.fc6 How reproducible: require DBI; my $dbh = DBI->connect('DBI:Pg:'); my $sth = $dbh->prepare("SELECT foo(??)"); $sth->execute(1, 1); Steps to Reproduce: 1. Put the script above into a file 2. Fiddle connection string if necessary. Any valid database will cause the same result. 3. Feed it to perl. Actual results: Segmentation fault Expected results: Query gets executed and succeeds or fails or whatever the case may be. Additional info: I also tried this on an FC4 system with the same result, so it's not a new regression. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 17 17:41:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229128] New: spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229128 Summary: spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: jbayes at cs.oberlin.edu CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com The following appears in my spamassassin logfile whenever a mail arrives: [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314OlxB8Wtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314WBWPZ7tmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314BahtmFtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314uLK3LLtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314GcCsvAtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin23146TyGmitmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314hdTOSmtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314C1oQPLtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314MmXR2dtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314e2CZlltmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314I5i4motmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314xMfhoOtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314Ie5f70tmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314tjeSFxtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314Of9zE8tmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin23145ToCChtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314vjUqeptmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314adUyVrtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin23146yZn6jtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: util: secure_tmpfile failed to create file '/tmp/.spamassassin2314l1bMPxtmp': Permission denied [2314] warn: print() on closed filehandle $tmpfile at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 332, chunk 1. [2314] warn: archive-iterator: unable to open /tmp/.spamassassin2314l1bMPxtmp: Permission denied procmail: Program failure (1) of "/usr/bin/spamassassin" procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded >From linden at matrixoz.com.au Sat Feb 17 09:20:15 2007 Subject: on earthin Folder: mbox.SPOOL 1719 The message, of course, does not get tagged as spam or ham as it should. This problem occurs with spamassassin-3.1.8-1.fc6. It did not occur with my previous version of spamassassin (which I think was 3.1.7something). I would be willing to try to isolate this problem further, but I'm not sure what to do as I don't understand what could possibly keep spamassassin from writing to /tmp. I have already cleared /tmp and done a fixfiles /tmp and rebooted, but the problem still occurs. spoo:~$ ls -al /tmp total 72 drwxrwxrwt 8 root root 4096 Feb 17 09:33 . drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Feb 17 09:08 .. drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 09:07 .ICE-unix -r--r--r-- 1 root jbayes 11 Feb 17 09:09 .X0-lock drwxrwxrwt 2 root jbayes 4096 Feb 17 09:09 .X11-unix drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 09:08 .font-unix drwx------ 2 jbayes jbayes 4096 Feb 17 09:12 flashgot.default.ger drwx------ 3 jbayes jbayes 4096 Feb 17 09:12 gconfd-jbayes drwx------ 2 jbayes jbayes 4096 Feb 17 09:12 orbit-jbayes spoo:~$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 18 16:20:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229128] spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702181620.l1IGKH04026631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229128 djuran at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|spamassassin |selinux-policy ------- Additional Comments From djuran at redhat.com 2007-02-18 11:20 EST ------- If I'm not mistaken, this something that crept into selinux-policy-2.4.6-37.fc6 and is now fixed in selinux-policy-2.4.6-40.fc6 in updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 18 17:25:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229128] spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702181725.l1IHPp2p029191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229128 ------- Additional Comments From jbayes at cs.oberlin.edu 2007-02-18 12:25 EST ------- Upgrading selinux-policy did the trick. Thanks very much for the help. Seems like every time something breaks these days, it's an selinux problem. Hmpf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 19 12:00:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229179] New: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229179 Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing. Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: m.d.t.evans at qmul.ac.uk CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: The SA source contains 2 useful perl scripts, one to maintain the autowhitelist database file and a nagios monitoring script. It would be helpful if you could include them. I've attached a patch below (which you will may want to tweak a bit). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.1.8-1.fc6 ------- Additional Comments From m.d.t.evans at qmul.ac.uk 2007-02-19 07:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148315&action=view) Patch file for spamassassin that adds check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 19 18:47:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227622] Unable to pass argument to sa-update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702191847.l1JIl57i032415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unable to pass argument to sa-update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227622 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-02-19 13:47 EST ------- I have since silenced it so it no longer generates mail. What regular use case is there to have options to sa-update? Debug is not a good case, because you can just add it manually to the script and watch it temporarily during your debugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 19 18:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227622] Unable to pass argument to sa-update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702191851.l1JIpVmY000525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unable to pass argument to sa-update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227622 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-02-19 13:51 EST ------- I'd say the configuration of alternate or additional channels is a reasonable use case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 19 20:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227622] Unable to pass argument to sa-update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702192018.l1JKIWxp008154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Unable to pass argument to sa-update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227622 ------- Additional Comments From milan.kerslager at pslib.cz 2007-02-19 15:18 EST ------- Yes. That's it. Thank you a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 20 11:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702201111.l1KBBTqE022082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.14-11.fc5 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-02-20 06:11 EST ------- The PR seems obsolete since a long time, closing ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 20 14:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229128] spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702201439.l1KEdH4W001896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229128 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wtogami at redhat.com |dwalsh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Feb 21 09:00:41 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:00:41 +0100 Subject: RFE: Upgrading perl(Test::Builder::Tester)? Message-ID: <1172048442.23237.85.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Hi, I maintain a perl-module perl-Test-LongString, which according to its upstream would require perl(Test::Builder::Tester) >= 1.04 This module is part of the base perl package, but none of the Fedoras ships a sufficiently new version. Q1: Any chances to see an upgrade to this module or to see this module split out into a separate package? Q2: I haven't yet checked, if perl-Test-LongString's upstream is just overly restrictive and if older perl(Test::Builder::Tester) modules also would suffice. Ralf From rgarciasuarez at gmail.com Wed Feb 21 09:06:03 2007 From: rgarciasuarez at gmail.com (Rafael Garcia-Suarez) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:06:03 +0100 Subject: RFE: Upgrading perl(Test::Builder::Tester)? In-Reply-To: <1172048442.23237.85.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1172048442.23237.85.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: On 21/02/07, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Q2: I haven't yet checked, if perl-Test-LongString's upstream is just > overly restrictive and if older perl(Test::Builder::Tester) modules also > would suffice. Hi, thanks for maintaining an rpm of my module :) the dependency on Test::Builder::Tester is only needed to run the regression tests. Otherwise they'll fail due to bugs in Test::Builder::Tester. For the proper operation of Test::LongString you don't need Test::Builder::Tester at all. HTH From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Feb 21 09:33:57 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:33:57 +0100 Subject: RFE: Upgrading perl(Test::Builder::Tester)? In-Reply-To: References: <1172048442.23237.85.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1172050437.23237.91.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 10:06 +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 21/02/07, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Q2: I haven't yet checked, if perl-Test-LongString's upstream is just > > overly restrictive and if older perl(Test::Builder::Tester) modules also > > would suffice. > > Hi, thanks for maintaining an rpm of my module :) Feel invited to take over or to co-maintain it - I've got enough of other perl-modules ;) > the dependency on Test::Builder::Tester is only needed to run the > regression tests. Otherwise they'll fail due to bugs in > Test::Builder::Tester. For the proper operation of Test::LongString > you don't need Test::Builder::Tester at all. OK, so you are saying, ignoring the warning and continuing as if it wasn't present is the way to go? This would be the simplest work-around to my issue (esp. because the running tests doesn't expose any error at all :) ). Ralf From rgarciasuarez at gmail.com Wed Feb 21 09:41:09 2007 From: rgarciasuarez at gmail.com (Rafael Garcia-Suarez) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:41:09 +0100 Subject: RFE: Upgrading perl(Test::Builder::Tester)? In-Reply-To: <1172050437.23237.91.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1172048442.23237.85.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1172050437.23237.91.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: On 21/02/07, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Hi, thanks for maintaining an rpm of my module :) > > Feel invited to take over or to co-maintain it - I've got enough of > other perl-modules ;) I don't use Fedora at the moment; I'm just lurking around. > > the dependency on Test::Builder::Tester is only needed to run the > > regression tests. Otherwise they'll fail due to bugs in > > Test::Builder::Tester. For the proper operation of Test::LongString > > you don't need Test::Builder::Tester at all. > > OK, so you are saying, ignoring the warning and continuing as if it > wasn't present is the way to go? > > This would be the simplest work-around to my issue (esp. because the > running tests doesn't expose any error at all :) ). OK, nice. So yes you can ignore the warning. (It's a bit difficult to make sure this module works with all versions of Test::Builder out there...) From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Feb 21 10:03:12 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:03:12 +0100 Subject: RFE: Upgrading perl(Test::Builder::Tester)? In-Reply-To: References: <1172048442.23237.85.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1172050437.23237.91.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1172052193.23237.99.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 10:41 +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 21/02/07, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Hi, thanks for maintaining an rpm of my module :) > > > the dependency on Test::Builder::Tester is only needed to run the > > > regression tests. Otherwise they'll fail due to bugs in > > > Test::Builder::Tester. For the proper operation of Test::LongString > > > you don't need Test::Builder::Tester at all. > > > > OK, so you are saying, ignoring the warning and continuing as if it > > wasn't present is the way to go? > > > > This would be the simplest work-around to my issue (esp. because the > > running tests doesn't expose any error at all :) ). > > OK, nice. So yes you can ignore the warning. (It's a bit difficult to > make sure this module works with all versions of Test::Builder out > there...) FYI: FC5, FC6 and FC7 have Test::Builder::Tester 1.02. The tests from Test-LongString-0.11 don't expose any error on any of them. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 21 13:17:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228968] sa-learn perl error since update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702211317.l1LDHgrS016949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: sa-learn perl error since update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228968 ------- Additional Comments From jansen at strw.leidenuniv.nl 2007-02-21 08:17 EST ------- Upstream patch seems to work fine, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 21 15:43:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:43:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229128] spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702211543.l1LFh1FC031770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229128 dwalsh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |Current ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2007-02-21 10:42 EST ------- It is out now. This is a common misconception about selinux policy. selinux policy releases are almost assuredly not breaking things. Either the problem has been there all along or an update to the confined application now is not allowed by current policy. The owners of packages should always test with SELinux in enforcing mode, and try to catch problems before they update packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 21 18:49:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228147] RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702211849.l1LInUwX017927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228147 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-02-21 13:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Tom, > > Could you also package Template-GD? It used to be part of Template Toolkit > and is a new Bugzilla 3.0 requirement. Sure: 229533 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 21 18:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228147] RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702211850.l1LIojDR018081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Upgrade Template Toolkit to 2.18 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228147 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-02-21 13:50 EST ------- The current perl-Template-Toolkit package in Fedora is now 2.18-1 (as soon as it is signed, it will hit the repository). I didn't catch this the first time because the maintainers aren't updating their website. :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at silug.org Wed Feb 21 21:18:18 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:18:18 -0600 Subject: fun with the number 6 Message-ID: <20070221211818.GA26130@osiris.silug.org> I discovered this by accident today... Run from my mirror, in /pub/fedora/linux/: $ ls core/6/source/SRPMS/perl-[^5]* extras/6/SRPMS/perl-* | wc -l 666 At the moment, www.cpan.org says there are 11217 modules. $ perl -e 'printf "%.0f%% of CPAN\n", (666/11217)*100' 6% of CPAN I should probably get back to work now... :-) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 22 16:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] New: Package Updater Dump Information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 Summary: Package Updater Dump Information Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami at redhat.com ReportedBy: cranbo at gmail.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list at redhat.com,felicity at kluge.net,jm at jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat at sidney.com,wtogami at redhat.com Description of problem: When I try to run the Package Updater I get a list of updates available but when I click the "Apply Updates" button I get the following error: Component: Software Updater Summary: TBccefa5c9 yumRepo.py:426:__get:RepoError: failure: spamassassin-3.1.8-2.fc6.i386.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 433, in _apply self.applyChanges(self.mainwin) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pirut/__init__.py", line 559, in applyChanges self.checkDeps(mainwin) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pirut/__init__.py", line 324, in checkDeps self.populateTs(keepold=0) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 150, in populateTs self.downloadHeader(txmbr.po) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 760, in downloadHeader cache=repo.http_caching != 'none', File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 454, in getHeader cache=cache, File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 426, in __get raise Errors.RepoError, "failure: %s from %s: %s" % (relative, self.id, e) RepoError: failure: spamassassin-3.1.8-2.fc6.i386.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Local variables in innermost frame: e: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. start: 440 url: None text: None self: updates cache: True reget: None relative: spamassassin-3.1.8-2.fc6.i386.rpm headers: () checkfunc: (>, (, 1), {}) copy_local: 1 end: 49616 local: //var/cache/yum/updates/headers/spamassassin-3.1.8-2.fc6.i386.hdr Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): See above How reproducible: Three out of three times Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run Pup 2. Click apply updates Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: I also tried "yum update" and after trying all mirrors it also stopped with Error: failure: spamassassin-3.1.8-2.fc6.i386.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. ------- Additional Comments From cranbo at gmail.com 2007-02-22 11:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148590) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148590&action=view) Package Updater dump information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Thu Feb 22 16:50:03 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:50:03 -0800 Subject: fun with the number 6 In-Reply-To: <20070221211818.GA26130@osiris.silug.org> References: <20070221211818.GA26130@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490702220850x5f417430v712b18408ad701a7@mail.gmail.com> On 2/21/07, Steven Pritchard wrote: > I discovered this by accident today... > > Run from my mirror, in /pub/fedora/linux/: > > $ ls core/6/source/SRPMS/perl-[^5]* extras/6/SRPMS/perl-* | wc -l > 666 I knew there was a reason I'd just submitted perl-Math-Random-MT-Auto for review :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 22 19:09:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] Package Updater Dump Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702221909.l1MJ9Fje014469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater Dump Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|spamassassin |pirut AssignedTo|wtogami at redhat.com |katzj at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 22 19:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229128] spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702221935.l1MJZUqA016735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin fails to create files in /tmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229128 ------- Additional Comments From richip at richip.dhs.org 2007-02-22 14:35 EST ------- I'm having a similar problem but with FC5. The odd thing is the problem only surfaces when I switch to spamassassin 3.1.8-[12] (the 2 updates I've tried). spamassassin-3.1.7-5 and previous were all alright. Should I open a new bug report for FC5? Should it be against spamassassin or selinux-policy? To satisfy my curiosity, could someone tell me why it only happens with the version change to spamassassin 3.1.8? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 23 15:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] Package Updater Dump Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702231551.l1NFpFpY003631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater Dump Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 ------- Additional Comments From pla at dystopia.fi 2007-02-23 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=148590) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148590&action=view) [edit] > Package Updater dump information > Here's my exception summary: Component: Software Updater Summary: TBccefa5c9 yumRepo.py:426:__get:RepoError: failure: repodata/updateinfo.xml.gz from updates-32bit: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 659, in ? main() File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 655, in main pup.run() File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 494, in run self.doRefresh() File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 319, in doRefresh self.populateUpdates() File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 375, in populateUpdates self.updateMetadata.add(repo) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/update_md.py", line 227, in add md = obj.retrieveMD(mdtype) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 615, in retrieveMD cache=self.http_caching == 'all') File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 426, in __get raise Errors.RepoError, "failure: %s from %s: %s" % (relative, self.id, e) RepoError: failure: repodata/updateinfo.xml.gz from updates-32bit: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Local variables in innermost frame: e: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. start: None url: None text: None self: updates-32bit cache: True reget: None relative: repodata/updateinfo.xml.gz headers: () checkfunc: (>, ('updateinfo',), {}) copy_local: 1 end: None local: //var/cache/yum/updates-32bit/updateinfo.xml.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 23 16:02:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] Package Updater Dump Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702231602.l1NG2FMG004679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater Dump Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|pirut |distribution AssignedTo|katzj at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-02-23 11:02 EST ------- repomd.xml references the updateinfo.xml, but it's not there. Something broke in the push process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 23 16:02:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:02:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] Package Updater Dump Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702231602.l1NG2VZV004779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater Dump Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel.frerejacque at normalesu | |p.org CC| |dwyerdj at verizon.net ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-02-23 11:02 EST ------- *** Bug 229777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-02-23 11:02 EST ------- *** Bug 229773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 23 16:02:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] Package Updater Dump Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702231602.l1NG2mEh004823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater Dump Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel.frerejacque at normalesu | |p.org ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-02-23 11:02 EST ------- *** Bug 229777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 23 16:03:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] Package Updater Dump Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702231603.l1NG3JNB004916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater Dump Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Bernhard.Fastenrath at arcor.de ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-02-23 11:03 EST ------- *** Bug 229769 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 23 16:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229663] Package Updater Dump Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702231627.l1NGRsL4008522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater Dump Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229663 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|parkerm at pobox.com, | |wtogami at redhat.com, fedora- | |perl-devel-list at redhat.com, | |reg+redhat at sidney.com, | |jm at jmason.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 23 16:59:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702231659.l1NGxfB2011921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-02-23 11:59 EST ------- ping? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 24 14:20:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229923] New: perl-Config-General-2.32 is available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229923 Summary: perl-Config-General-2.32 is available Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Config-General AssignedTo: ville.skytta at iki.fi ReportedBy: fevapp at o2.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Config-General-2.32 is already available. Repo version is 2.31. Please update the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 26 06:05:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230037] New: not well-formed (invalid token) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230037 Summary: not well-formed (invalid token) Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: perl-HTML-Tree AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: dhighley at highley-recommended.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: HTML Tree builder seems to have broken tv_grab_na_icons Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-1.fc6 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. tv_grab_na_icons 2. enter zip code 3. Actual results: Empty xml file Expected results: Additional info: This has been fixed with the latest versions of HTML::TreeBuilder and XML::Twig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 27 23:34:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229923] perl-Config-General-2.32 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702272334.l1RNYJrs017509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Config-General-2.32 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229923 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.32-1 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-02-27 18:34 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 28 17:31:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702281731.l1SHVoiA018835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rnorwood at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-02-28 12:31 EST ------- Robin, are you going to own this package and import it? Or does anyone else volunteer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 28 19:15:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230406] New: MakeMaker has perl.mak depending on non-existent /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/config.h' Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230406 Summary: MakeMaker has perl.mak depending on non-existent /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread- multi/CORE/config.h' Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: rnorwood at redhat.com ReportedBy: vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: I tried to build git here, the build fails: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/vonbrand/tmp/git/perl' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/config.h', needed by `perl.mak'. Stop. The generated perl.mak file (essentially a Makefile with funny name) contains the following: PERL_INC = /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/sparc-linux-thread-multi/CORE ... CONFIGDEP = $(PERL_ARCHLIB)$(DFSEP)Config.pm $(PERL_INC)$(DFSEP)config.h ... $(FIRST_MAKEFILE) : Makefile.PL $(CONFIGDEP) I don't see how this could ever have worked, as the $(CONFIGDEP) file doesn't exist. Strangely, the same git does build OK on Aurora Linux (essentially an oldish Fedora Core), with the exact same Makefile, where the referenced file doesn't exist either. I'm blaming perl as it is the only piece I think might be involved that changed today, and before updating today the build went fine. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-13.fc7 How reproducible: Don't know. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 28 20:59:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230406] MakeMaker has perl.mak depending on non-existent /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/config.h' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200702282059.l1SKxGf5004752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: MakeMaker has perl.mak depending on non-existent /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/config.h' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230406 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-02-28 15:59 EST ------- Horst, Do you have perl-devel installed? And if not, does installing that fix it? This looks similar to the last few comments of bug #197841 - I suspect that config.h got moved from perl to perl-devel with the new spec file for the perl package review. (that's bug #226276) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.