Test::Pod::Coverage tests...

[Chris Weyl]

On 4/27/07, Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> wrote:
> My opinion is that we ought to not mandate the use of Pod coverage
> tests, simply because for our purposes it doesn't really matter what
> their result is.  If they're present, we should conditionalize the
> tests (e.g. %_with_pod_tests magic or some such), but not insist on
> them by default.

So, to follow up to myself here, given the lack of comments I'm
inclined to approve 237883 without insisting on Test::Pod::Coverage
due to T::P::C not testing the _functionality_ of the package.  One
last chance to scream :)

                                 -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia