Test::Pod::Coverage tests...

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 16:12 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> On 4/27/07, Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> wrote:
> > My opinion is that we ought to not mandate the use of Pod coverage
> > tests, simply because for our purposes it doesn't really matter what
> > their result is.  If they're present, we should conditionalize the
> > tests (e.g. %_with_pod_tests magic or some such), but not insist on
> > them by default.
> 
> So, to follow up to myself here, given the lack of comments I'm
> inclined to approve 237883 without insisting on Test::Pod::Coverage
> due to T::P::C not testing the _functionality_ of the package.
You don't want to know about the bugs and deficits your packages suffer
from? 

<biting sarcasm>
But then let's be consequent and mandate disabling all testsuites,
avoids a lot of fuzz and lets the distro appear "free of bugs".
<biting sarcasm/>

>   One
> last chance to scream :)
YELL!

Ralf