From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 1 21:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 114271] 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711012113.lA1LDcPu024686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=114271 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-01 17:13 EST ------- perl-5.8.8-25.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 1 21:13:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 114271] 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711012113.lA1LDdJo024707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'Attempt to free unreferenced scalar' bug in perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=114271 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |5.8.8-25.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 1 21:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 356071] R errantly provides perl(File::Copy::Recursive), perl(Text::DelimMatch) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711012120.lA1LKqax029150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: R errantly provides perl(File::Copy::Recursive), perl(Text::DelimMatch) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356071 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.6.0-3.fc7.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 1 21:20:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 356071] R errantly provides perl(File::Copy::Recursive), perl(Text::DelimMatch) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711012120.lA1LKlKe026497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: R errantly provides perl(File::Copy::Recursive), perl(Text::DelimMatch) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356071 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-01 17:20 EST ------- R-2.6.0-3.fc7.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 5 16:04:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 327481] Missing perl(HTTP::Request::AsCGI) dependency In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711051604.lA5G49pA025855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing perl(HTTP::Request::AsCGI) dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327481 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-11-05 11:04 EST ------- Working on updating to 5.7011 -- will include this in that update :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 6 15:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245699] perl-DBD-Sqlite: version 1.13 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711061525.lA6FPsH1019655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBD-Sqlite: version 1.13 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245699 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-06 10:25 EST ------- I'll update this package on 1.14 into devel, if no one protests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 6 20:15:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245592] Errno architecture i386-linux-thread-multi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711062015.lA6KFeV7001272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Errno architecture i386-linux-thread-multi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245592 sorin at intersol.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sorin at intersol.ro ------- Additional Comments From sorin at intersol.ro 2007-11-06 15:15 EST ------- Switching from simple kernel to kernel-xen or back will bring this bug back. We need a real solution! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 6 21:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:15:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245592] Errno architecture i386-linux-thread-multi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711062115.lA6LFD16011071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Errno architecture i386-linux-thread-multi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245592 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-11-06 16:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > FYI. I've found that editing the file: > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Errno.pm line 11. You should NOT have this file. This file did NOT come from the Fedora perl package. [spot at localhost ~]$ rpm -qlp perl-5.8.8-25.fc7.i386.rpm |grep Errno /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Errno.pm /usr/share/man/man3/Errno.3pm.gz Figure out what owns that file, or what placed it there, and you'll know what caused the bug... but it's not the Fedora perl package. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 294021 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 7 08:44:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 03:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 331011] perl-Text-Iconv-1.6 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711070844.lA78iHCB009198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Text-Iconv-1.6 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331011 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|andreas at bawue.net |mmaslano at redhat.com Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-07 03:44 EST ------- Updated on 1.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 7 09:14:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 04:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711070914.lA79EtZB014148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-07 04:14 EST ------- *** Bug 305721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 7 09:14:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 04:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 305721] branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711070914.lA79Es5u014123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305721 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-07 04:14 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 250873 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 7 09:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 04:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711070920.lA79KCD5015426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-07 04:20 EST ------- I think for new branch is review needed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and I didn't find any review of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 7 10:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 05:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 305721] branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711071000.lA7A0P3Q021629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305721 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-11-07 05:00 EST ------- while you should actually fill out the template requesting branches i made the request to get this package branched. so im granting it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 7 10:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 05:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 305721] branch for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711071053.lA7Arjjd031159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: branch for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305721 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-07 05:53 EST ------- I didn't fill template, I close this like duplicate. The template should be filled in bug #250873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 7 12:19:49 2007 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 07:19:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-11-07 Message-ID: <20071107121949.7A47F15213D@buildsys.fedoraproject.org> Broken upgrade path report for repositories FC5, FC5-updates, FE5, FC6, FC6-updates, FE6, F7, F7-updates, F7-updates-testing, F8, F8-updates, F8-updates-testing perl-PDF-API2 FE6 > F7-updates (0:0.65-1.fc6 > 0:0.62-2.fc7) From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 9 18:23:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248136] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.5 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711091823.lA9INNM4018844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248136 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-11-09 13:23 EST ------- Upgraded to new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 11:36:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382221] New: perl-Event uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382221 Summary: perl-Event uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Event AssignedTo: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: sh: line 0: fg: no job control Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73421 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf Event-1.09 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/Event-1.09.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd Event-1.09 + perldoc perlgpl + perldoc perlartistic + find . -type f -exec chmod -c -x '{}' + + '%{_fixperms}' demo util /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73421: line 41: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73421 (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73421 (%prep) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Today's rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 11:38:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382241] New: perl-IO-Prompt uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382241 Summary: perl-IO-Prompt uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-IO-Prompt AssignedTo: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: sh: line 0: fg: no job control sh: line 0: fg: no job control Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73050 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf IO-Prompt-v0.99.4 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/IO-Prompt-v0.99.4.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd IO-Prompt-v0.99.4 + cd examples + chmod -x clear.pl cmdline.pl data.pl default.pl hand.pl interactive.pl lingua.pl menu.pl nonl.pl num.pl passwd.pl record.pl require.pl to.pl tty.pl underscore.pl while_until.pl yesno.pl + '%{_fixperms}' clear.pl cmdline.pl data.pl default.pl hand.pl interactive.pl lingua.pl menu.pl nonl.pl num.pl passwd.pl record.pl require.pl to.pl tty.pl underscore.pl while_until.pl yesno.pl /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73050: line 38: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73050 (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73050 (%prep) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Today's rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 11:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382251] New: perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382251 Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-POE-Component-IRC AssignedTo: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: sh: line 0: fg: no job control sh: line 0: fg: no job control Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25289 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf POE-Component-IRC-5.29 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/POE-Component-IRC-5.29.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd POE-Component-IRC-5.29 + '%{_fixperms}' Changes MANIFEST MANIFEST.SKIP META.yml Makefile.PL README docs examples inc lib t /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25289: line 36: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25289 (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25289 (%prep) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Today's rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 16:05:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382251] perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711141605.lAEG5fss023805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382251 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu, | |pauln at truemesh.com AssignedTo|cweyl at alumni.drew.edu |pmatilai at redhat.com Component|perl-POE-Component-IRC |rpm ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-11-14 11:05 EST ------- %{_fixperms} has been around since the dim mists of antiquity. (at least RH7.x; I wasn't playing with rpms in my RH4.x days :)) If %{_fixperms} has disappeared from today's rawhide, this isn't a PoCo::IRC problem; it's an rpm bug that the rpm package isn't delivering this macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 16:53:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382251] perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711141653.lAEGrcaJ032078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382251 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-11-14 11:53 EST ------- *** Bug 382241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 16:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382241] perl-IO-Prompt uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711141653.lAEGrbOd032052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-IO-Prompt uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382241 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-11-14 11:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 382251 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 16:53:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382251] perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711141653.lAEGrUGg032092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382251 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-11-14 11:53 EST ------- *** Bug 382221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 16:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382221] perl-Event uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711141653.lAEGrT1d032067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Event uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382221 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-11-14 11:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 382251 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rnorwood at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 04:32:06 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:32:06 -0500 Subject: perl-DBI - split? Message-ID: Hi, The issue of .h files in a non-devel RPM rears its head again. In the package review for perl-DBI, my package reviewer points out rpmlint warnings about .h files in a non-devel package. So, the question is, is it worth it? Technical rpm correctness, or the blessed silence of people not yelling about having to change their BR's? Of course, in this case it's a much more limited set of packages to change. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226253 -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From tibbs at math.uh.edu Wed Nov 14 18:25:38 2007 From: tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) Date: 14 Nov 2007 12:25:38 -0600 Subject: perl-DBI - split? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >>>>> "RN" == Robin Norwood writes: RN> Hi, The issue of .h files in a non-devel RPM rears its head again. RN> In the package review for perl-DBI, my package reviewer points out RN> rpmlint warnings about .h files in a non-devel package. Pretty much every arch-specific Perl module will have a .h file buried fifteen directories under /usr/lib/perl5. It would be insanity to split them all out. There's no directory ownership issue like there is with .pc files, and frankly I don't know what on earth would actually use those .h files. In all of the Perl package reviews I have done, I have allowed those files to remain in the main package. - J< From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 14 19:30:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382251] perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711141930.lAEJUsFk025480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382251 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-11-14 14:30 EST ------- %{_fixperms} macro hasn't gone anywhere. Whatever the problems here, it starts earlier than that: sh: line 0: fg: no job control sh: line 0: fg: no job control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Thu Nov 15 01:00:18 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:00:18 -0800 Subject: perl-DBI - split? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711141700j7538f8b4vf7d57be329a1a859@mail.gmail.com> On 14 Nov 2007 12:25:38 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "RN" == Robin Norwood writes: > > RN> Hi, The issue of .h files in a non-devel RPM rears its head again. > RN> In the package review for perl-DBI, my package reviewer points out > RN> rpmlint warnings about .h files in a non-devel package. > > Pretty much every arch-specific Perl module will have a .h file buried > fifteen directories under /usr/lib/perl5. It would be insanity to > split them all out. There's no directory ownership issue like there > is with .pc files, and frankly I don't know what on earth would > actually use those .h files. In all of the Perl package reviews I > have done, I have allowed those files to remain in the main package. Same here. Additionally, this would destroy the scheme of virtual perl provides/requires with no (IMHO) sensible repair; e.g. perl-DBD-Pg could no longer just br perl(DBI) to pull in the correct deps to build against the DBI. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 15 08:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382251] perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711150848.lAF8mLZ2010116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC uses nonexistent %{_fixperms} macro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382251 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-11-15 03:48 EST ------- This is a side-effect of the switch to NSS - crypto isn't initialized early enough in case of mock and such, so packages fail to install due to (false) md5sum failures. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 382091 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 15 21:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 385751] New: Newt::Form::DESTROY prints deprecated code warning. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=385751 Summary: Newt::Form::DESTROY prints deprecated code warning. Product: Fedora Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Newt AssignedTo: jorton at redhat.com ReportedBy: charlieb-redhat-bugzilla at e-smith.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: examples/install prints warnings during exit - same is probably true of program using Newt::Form::xxx. Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Newt::Form::DESTROY() is deprecated during global destruction (#1) Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Newt::Form::DESTROY() is deprecated during global destruction. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): bash-3.00$ rpm -q perl-Newt perl-Newt-1.08-17 bash-3.00$ How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: Run "perl expample/install". Additional info: Adding this to Newt.pm makes the warnings go away: *Newt::Form::AUTOLOAD = \&Newt::AUTOLOAD; That's the recommended workaround from 'man perldiag'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 15 21:56:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 385751] Newt::Form::DESTROY prints deprecated code warning. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711152156.lAFLukph031266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Newt::Form::DESTROY prints deprecated code warning. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=385751 ------- Additional Comments From charlieb-redhat-bugzilla at e-smith.com 2007-11-15 16:56 EST ------- Note that this issue applies to RHEL4 at least, and probably other releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 16 10:55:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711161055.lAGAtoDO015064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-16 05:55 EST ------- CVS request is missing, so here it is: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-MLDBM New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 16 11:16:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711161116.lAGBG0pv017735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-11-16 06:16 EST ------- Well, I'm still waiting for Jose. If he doesn't care about the package at all, I would take it - or just the EPEL branches. If he cares about the package, I will be just quiet. Thus I put no branch request into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 16 17:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711161708.lAGH821o011282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-11-16 12:08 EST ------- I am pretty sure Jose is no longer interested in fedora. Robert: Let me know if you would like to wait a bit more, or would like me to just go ahead and make those branches for you now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 18 08:05:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 03:05:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711180805.lAI85Fow031040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-11-18 03:05 EST ------- This fails to build for me; the tests fail because Test::More and Data::Dump are not present. Adding BuildReqires: perl(Test::More) perl(Data::Dump) should get things building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 18 20:12:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 129724] can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711182012.lAIKCqM1029170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=129724 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Core |Fedora p.van.egdom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |p.van.egdom at gmail.com Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA ------- Additional Comments From p.van.egdom at gmail.com 2007-11-18 15:12 EST ------- The information we've requested above is required in order to review this problem report further and diagnose/fix the issue if it is still present. Since there haven't been any updates to the report in quite a long time now after we've requested additional information, we're assuming the problem is either no longer present in our current OS release, or that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem. Setting status to "INSUFFICIENT_DATA", however if you still experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora release and are still interested in Red Hat tracking the issue, and assisting in troubleshooting the problem, please feel free to provide the information requested above, and reopen the report. Thank you in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 18 21:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389741] New: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389741 Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES AssignedTo: wjhns174 at hardakers.net ReportedBy: fevapp at o2.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is already available. Repo version is 0.01. Please update the package. If you have any questions or suggestions related to Fever, feel free to write them in this bug or have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver Don't send any messages to fevapp at o2.pl please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From steve at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 19 14:36:34 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:36:34 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Test-Output/EL-5 perl-Test-Output.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200711191436.lAJEaYJT011243@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Output/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11128 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Test-Output.spec Log Message: Sync with devel. --- NEW FILE perl-Test-Output.spec --- Name: perl-Test-Output Version: 0.10 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Output/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SS/SSORICHE/Test-Output-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.14 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) >= 1.04 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Tester) >= 0.103 Requires: perl(Sub::Exporter) Requires: perl(Test::Tester) >= 0.103 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description Test::Output provides a simple interface for testing output sent to STDOUT or STDERR. A number of different utilies are included to try and be as flexible as possible to the tester. %prep %setup -q -n Test-Output-%{version} %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorlib}/* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Thu Jul 05 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.10-2 - Rebuild. * Mon Jul 02 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.10-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.71. - Fix License. - BR Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Output/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 3 Jul 2007 15:33:55 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Nov 2007 14:35:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Test-Output-0.10.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Output/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 3 Jul 2007 15:33:55 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Nov 2007 14:35:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dcf67296e04a41a9f73f70c10fe5f825 Test-Output-0.10.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 19 19:41:53 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:41:53 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Text-Autoformat/EL-5 perl-Text-Autoformat.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <200711191941.lAJJfrBG017512@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Text-Autoformat/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17488 Modified Files: perl-Text-Autoformat.spec Log Message: Sync with devel. Index: perl-Text-Autoformat.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Text-Autoformat/EL-5/perl-Text-Autoformat.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- perl-Text-Autoformat.spec 4 Sep 2006 18:51:23 -0000 1.7 +++ perl-Text-Autoformat.spec 19 Nov 2007 19:41:17 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Text-Autoformat Version: 1.13 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Automatic text wrapping and reformatting License: Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DC/DCONWAY/Text-Autoformat-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Text::Reform) >= 1.11 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; -chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test @@ -61,6 +62,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Wed Apr 18 2007 Steven Pritchard 1.13-5 +- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. +- BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. + * Fri Sep 01 2006 Steven Pritchard 1.13-4 - Rework spec to look more like current cpanspec output. From steve at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 19 19:44:42 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:44:42 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-DateTime/EL-5 .cvsignore, 1.12, 1.13 perl-DateTime.spec, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.12, 1.13 Message-ID: <200711191944.lAJJighv017894@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17855 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime.spec sources Log Message: Sync with devel. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- .cvsignore 22 Jan 2007 18:14:35 -0000 1.12 +++ .cvsignore 19 Nov 2007 19:44:09 -0000 1.13 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -DateTime-0.36.tar.gz -DateTime-Locale-0.33.tar.gz -DateTime-TimeZone-0.59.tar.gz +DateTime-0.41.tar.gz +DateTime-Locale-0.35.tar.gz +DateTime-TimeZone-0.67.tar.gz Index: perl-DateTime.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/EL-5/perl-DateTime.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- perl-DateTime.spec 22 Jan 2007 18:14:35 -0000 1.12 +++ perl-DateTime.spec 19 Nov 2007 19:44:09 -0000 1.13 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define DTTimeZone_version 0.59 -%define DTLocale_version 0.33 +%define DTTimeZone_version 0.67 +%define DTLocale_version 0.35 Name: perl-DateTime -Version: 0.36 +Version: 0.41 Release: 1%{?dist} Epoch: 1 Summary: Date and time objects @@ -14,16 +14,19 @@ Source2: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/DateTime-Locale-%{DTLocale_version}.tar.gz Patch0: DateTime-LeapSecond-utf8.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildRequires: perl(Class::Singleton) >= 1.03 +BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) BuildRequires: perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.76 -BuildRequires: perl(Class::Singleton) >= 1.03 BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Man) >= 1.14 -BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Output) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) -BuildRequires: perl(DateTime::Format::ICal) -BuildRequires: perl(DateTime::Format::Strptime) -Requires: perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.76 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) >= 1.08 +# Creates a build dependency loop. +#BuildRequires: perl(DateTime::Format::ICal) +#BuildRequires: perl(DateTime::Format::Strptime) Requires: perl(Class::Singleton) >= 1.03 +Requires: perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.76 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) Provides: perl-DateTime-TimeZone = %{DTTimeZone_version} Provides: perl-DateTime-Locale = %{DTLocale_version} @@ -31,6 +34,14 @@ Provides: perl(DateTimePP) Provides: perl(DateTimePPExtra) +Source98: DateTime-filter-requires.sh +%global real_perl_requires %{__perl_requires} +%define __perl_requires %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-%(%{__id_u} -n)-filter-requires + +Source99: DateTime-filter-provides.sh +%global real_perl_provides %{__perl_provides} +%define __perl_provides %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-%(%{__id_u} -n)-filter-provides + %description DateTime is a class for the representation of date/time combinations, and is part of the Perl DateTime project. For details on this project please @@ -47,13 +58,11 @@ %patch0 -p1 cd - -cat > filter-provides.sh << EOF -#!/bin/sh -# Remove redundant unversioned provides of perl(DateTime) and perl(DateTime::TimeZone) -exec %{__perl_provides} $* | egrep -v '^perl[(]DateTime(::TimeZone)?[)]$' -EOF -%define __perl_provides %{_builddir}/DateTimeBundle/filter-provides.sh -chmod 755 filter-provides.sh +sed -e 's,@@PERL_REQ@@,%{real_perl_requires},' %{SOURCE98} > %{__perl_requires} +chmod +x %{__perl_requires} + +sed -e 's,@@PERL_PROV@@,%{real_perl_provides},' %{SOURCE99} > %{__perl_provides} +chmod +x %{__perl_provides} %build cd DateTime-Locale-%{DTLocale_version} @@ -70,30 +79,30 @@ PERLLIB=../DateTime-Locale-%{DTLocale_version}/blib/lib PERLLIB=$PERLLIB:../DateTime-TimeZone-%{DTTimeZone_version}/blib/lib export PERLLIB -%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" +%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags} cd - %install -rm -rf %{buildroot} +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT cd DateTime-Locale-%{DTLocale_version} -./Build install destdir=%{buildroot} +./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT cd - cd DateTime-TimeZone-%{DTTimeZone_version} -./Build install destdir=%{buildroot} +./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT cd - cd DateTime-%{version} -make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} +make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT cd - -find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; -find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; -find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; -%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/* +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* # Move documentation into bundle area mkdir DT::Locale DT::TimeZone @@ -120,7 +129,7 @@ make -C DateTime-%{version} test %clean -rm -rf %{buildroot} +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__perl_requires} %{__perl_provides} %files %defattr(-,root,root,0755) @@ -134,6 +143,42 @@ %{perl_vendorarch}/DateTime*.pm %changelog +* Mon Sep 17 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.41-1 +- Update to DateTime 0.41. +- Update to DateTime::Locale 0.35. +- Update to DateTime::TimeZone 0.67. + +* Wed Aug 29 2007 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:0.39-2 +- Rebuild for selinux ppc32 issue. + +* Sun Jul 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.39-1 +- Update to DateTime 0.39. +- Update to DateTime::TimeZone 0.6603. + +* Thu Jul 05 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.38-2 +- BR Test::Output. + +* Mon Jul 02 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.38-1 +- Update to DateTime 0.38. +- Update to DateTime::TimeZone 0.6602. +- BR Test::Pod::Coverage. + +* Mon Apr 02 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.37-3 +- Drop BR DateTime::Format::* to avoid circular build deps. + +* Mon Apr 02 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.37-2 +- Filter Win32::TieRegistry dependency. +- Do the provides filter like we do in cpanspec. +- Drop some macro usage. + +* Sat Mar 31 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.37-1 +- Update to DateTime 0.37. +- Update to DateTime::TimeZone 0.63. + +* Tue Mar 13 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.36-2 +- Update to DateTime::Locale 0.34. +- Update to DateTime::TimeZone 0.62. + * Mon Jan 22 2007 Steven Pritchard 1:0.36-1 - Update to Date::Time 0.36. - Update to DateTime::Locale 0.33. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- sources 22 Jan 2007 18:14:35 -0000 1.12 +++ sources 19 Nov 2007 19:44:09 -0000 1.13 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -04a18d055011e34272d9b892b9634c68 DateTime-0.36.tar.gz -9cfff24a08c399fba62bf6fa5c10be00 DateTime-Locale-0.33.tar.gz -c3b92c620f80b8ef026a45850395ee75 DateTime-TimeZone-0.59.tar.gz +cbd27b0d9a3eee5ffa6afb9211b19a9e DateTime-0.41.tar.gz +857b23381a1a8e7dc2e7d0caa285827d DateTime-Locale-0.35.tar.gz +4684adbdf78d863a3526d5d9a52b4d79 DateTime-TimeZone-0.67.tar.gz From steve at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 19 19:49:35 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:49:35 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-DateTime/EL-5 DateTime-filter-provides.sh, NONE, 1.1 DateTime-filter-requires.sh, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200711191949.lAJJnZGv018368@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18357 Added Files: DateTime-filter-provides.sh DateTime-filter-requires.sh Log Message: Add missing files. --- NEW FILE DateTime-filter-provides.sh --- #!/bin/sh # # Remove redundant unversioned provides of # perl(DateTime) and perl(DateTime::TimeZone). @@PERL_PROV@@ "$@" | sed -e '/^perl(DateTime\(::TimeZone\)\?)$/d' --- NEW FILE DateTime-filter-requires.sh --- #!/bin/sh @@PERL_REQ@@ "$@" | sed -e '/^perl(Win32::.*$/d' From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 05:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391471] New: HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391471 Summary: HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-HTML-Table AssignedTo: orion at cora.nwra.com ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com HTML::Table 2.06 introduces a feature I use extensively. Any chance of an update to at least 2.06 in F7+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:48:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392291] Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711201348.lAKDmMgx002143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |392331 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392291] Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711201346.lAKDkRao001860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |392301 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392301] New: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392301 Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Params-Util AssignedTo: rc040203 at freenet.de ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com Description of problem: package should BuildRequire: perl-Test-MinimumVersion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392331] New: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392331 Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Class-Autouse AssignedTo: rc040203 at freenet.de ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com Description of problem: package should BuildRequire: perl-Test-MinimumVersion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:47:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392291] Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711201347.lAKDlGcd002983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |392311 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:47:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392291] Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711201347.lAKDlppF003105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |392321 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392291] Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711201348.lAKDmsSm003257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |392341 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:47:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392311] New: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392311 Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-File-Remove AssignedTo: rc040203 at freenet.de ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com Description of problem: package should BuildRequire: perl-Test-MinimumVersion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392341] New: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392341 Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Algorithm-Dependency AssignedTo: rc040203 at freenet.de ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com Description of problem: package should BuildRequire: perl-Test-MinimumVersion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 20 13:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392321] New: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392321 Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Class-Inspector AssignedTo: rc040203 at freenet.de ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com Description of problem: package should BuildRequire: perl-Test-MinimumVersion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 21 21:54:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242926] Need perl modules in FC/FE added to EPEL to satisfy deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711212154.lALLsL7H021286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Need perl modules in FC/FE added to EPEL to satisfy deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242926 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-11-21 16:54 EST ------- All bugzilla dependencies are now met for EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 03:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:27:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391471] HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711220327.lAM3RYIk031825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391471 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-21 22:27 EST ------- perl-HTML-Table-2.06-1.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-Table' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 03:35:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:35:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391471] HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711220335.lAM3Z1Ec001132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HTML::Table 2.07-b2 is available :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391471 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-21 22:35 EST ------- perl-HTML-Table-2.06-1.fc7.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-Table' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 12:04:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242065] perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221204.lAMC4UAF008034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242065 athienem at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From athienem at redhat.com 2007-11-22 07:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Session Short Description: Persistent session data in CGI applications Owners: ixs Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 12:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242065] perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221214.lAMCE3bM009604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242065 athienem at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250872 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 12:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221214.lAMCE2Vu009584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 athienem at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |242065 nThis| | Priority|low |urgent ------- Additional Comments From athienem at redhat.com 2007-11-22 07:14 EST ------- I'd like to see that in EPEL as well as a perl-CGI-Session dependency. Please branch the package accordingly. If you want to, I'll (co-) maintain the package for you in EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 12:33:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221233.lAMCX1aq011345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-11-22 07:33 EST ------- Maintainer of this package isn't available for a long time. Maybe you should ask about branching, if it's really urgent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 12:47:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221247.lAMClEdB015648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-11-22 07:47 EST ------- Andreas, I don't need to (co-) maintain the package, I just would do it, if nobody else would care about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 13:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221305.lAMD5YF5017437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-11-22 08:05 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 19:38:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242065] perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221938.lAMJcDMk010961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242065 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-11-22 14:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 19:51:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221951.lAMJplsX011110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 athienem at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From athienem at redhat.com 2007-11-22 14:51 EST ------- Maintainer is AWOL. Branching request set, will take over the package officially next week. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-November/msg01790.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 19:51:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711221951.lAMJp3iF012686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 ------- Additional Comments From athienem at redhat.com 2007-11-22 14:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-FreezeThaw Short Description: Convert Perl structures to strings and back Owners: ixs Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jpo at di.uminho.pt, perl-devel-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 20:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396061] 0.23 is out. Update! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711222003.lAMK3wHn014459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 0.23 is out. Update! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396061 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |396071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 20:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711222001.lAMK1tXd014289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-11-22 15:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 22 20:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396071] New: File::BaseDir 0.03 is out Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396071 Summary: File::BaseDir 0.03 is out Product: Fedora Version: f8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-File-BaseDir AssignedTo: pertusus at free.fr ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com 0.03 is out and is required by an update of a package of mine; can we update in F-7+ by any chance? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 23 11:13:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396541] New: HTTP::DAV::UserAgent breaks LWP::UserAgent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396541 Summary: HTTP::DAV::UserAgent breaks LWP::UserAgent Product: Fedora Version: f8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-HTTP-DAV AssignedTo: steve at silug.org ReportedBy: alex.kiernan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Description of problem: perl-HTTP-DAV breaks LWP::UserAgent when redirections occur inside LWP::UserAgent Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.31-fc8 Patch against upstream patch here: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=19616 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Sat Nov 24 17:34:30 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:34:30 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where it's probably the Right Time to think about bumping from 5.8 to 5.10. http://perlbuzz.com/project-hum/2007/10/perl-5100-nears-code-freeze-release.html -Chris ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Steven Bakker Date: Nov 23, 2007 2:04 AM Subject: Re: AWOL: jpo To: Development discussions related to Fedora On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:41:25 -0700 Richi Plana wrote: > As much as I love Perl and I prefer it over all existing scripting > languages I'm familiar with, it's hard to get excited about its future > since the developers are extremely quiet about it. They're probably quiet about it because they prefer coding over talking :-) Perl 5.10-RC1 has been unleashed recently[1], full of nice new features[2], borrowing some from (the still-vaporware) Perl6 (named capture buffers!). [1] http://search.cpan.org/~rgarcia/perl-5.10.0-RC1/ [2] http://www.slideshare.net/rjbs/perl-510-for-people-who-arent-totally-insane -- Steven -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From tcallawa at redhat.com Sat Nov 24 18:03:08 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:03:08 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 09:34 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in > F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA > not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where > it's probably the Right Time to think about bumping from 5.8 to 5.10. Any idea how intrusive this will be? Will it require a mass-rebuild of perl packages? ~spot From rgarciasuarez at gmail.com Sat Nov 24 18:17:58 2007 From: rgarciasuarez at gmail.com (Rafael Garcia-Suarez) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:17:58 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On 24/11/2007, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 09:34 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in > > F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA > > not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where > > it's probably the Right Time to think about bumping from 5.8 to 5.10. > > Any idea how intrusive this will be? Will it require a mass-rebuild of > perl packages? Yes. All modules that have XS parts will need to be rebuilt, since 5.10 isn't binary compatible with 5.8. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Sat Nov 24 19:16:16 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:16:16 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> On Nov 24, 2007 10:17 AM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 24/11/2007, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 09:34 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > > Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in > > > F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA > > > not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where > > > it's probably the Right Time to think about bumping from 5.8 to 5.10. > > > > Any idea how intrusive this will be? Will it require a mass-rebuild of > > perl packages? > > Yes. All modules that have XS parts will need to be rebuilt, since > 5.10 isn't binary compatible with 5.8. We also use the magic perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_x.x.x) tag even in noarch packages, which I imagine will need to change. So, from a couple quick queries off yum list on my laptop (which will be slightly skewed -- I have ~10ish perl rpms installed not yet in Fedora): 642 noarch 172 x86_64 ------------- 814 total I suspect we can ease the pain by coordinating a mass rebuild here, and just kicking off the rebuilds centrally. (e.g. an annointed Rebuilder In Chief) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 10:12:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 05:12:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398271] New: Branching request for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398271 Summary: Branching request for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 AssignedTo: gauret at free.fr ReportedBy: athienem at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 is not available in EPEL. Please branch the package accordingly for EL-5 and optionally for EL-4. Thanks. If you're short on time, not interested or simply need help maintaining it in EPEL I'd be glad to (co-)maintain the EPEL Branch with/for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 10:11:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 05:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398241] New: Branching request for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398241 Summary: Branching request for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Unicode-String AssignedTo: gauret at free.fr ReportedBy: athienem at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Unicode-String is not available in EPEL. Please branch the package accordingly for EL-5 and optionally for EL-4. Thanks. If you're short on time, not interested or simply need help maintaining it in EPEL I'd be glad to (co-)maintain the EPEL Branch with/for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 10:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 05:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398231] New: Branching request for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398231 Summary: Branching request for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Unicode-Map AssignedTo: gauret at free.fr ReportedBy: athienem at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Unicode-Map is not available in EPEL. Please branch the package accordingly for EL-5 and optionally for EL-4. Thanks. If you're short on time, not interested or simply need help maintaining it in EPEL I'd be glad to (co-)maintain the EPEL Branch with/for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 10:12:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 05:12:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398251] New: Branching request for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398251 Summary: Branching request for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Unicode-Map8 AssignedTo: gauret at free.fr ReportedBy: athienem at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Unicode-Map8 is not available in EPEL. Please branch the package accordingly for EL-5 and optionally for EL-4. Thanks. If you're short on time, not interested or simply need help maintaining it in EPEL I'd be glad to (co-)maintain the EPEL Branch with/for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 16:09:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392291] Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711251609.lAPG9VDJ018629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |398451 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 16:09:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398451] New: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398451 Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion Product: Fedora Version: f8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-prefork AssignedTo: rc040203 at freenet.de ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com Description of problem: package should BuildRequire: perl-Test-MinimumVersion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 16:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392301] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711251612.lAPGCAnY019523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392301 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 16:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392311] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711251611.lAPGBXqg019460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392311 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 16:10:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392331] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711251610.lAPGAg39019414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392331 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 16:10:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392341] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711251610.lAPGA8hj019281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392341 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 16:11:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392321] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711251611.lAPGBBFK019229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392321 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 25 22:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398801] New: perl-Config-General-2.37 is available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398801 Summary: perl-Config-General-2.37 is available Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Config-General AssignedTo: ville.skytta at iki.fi ReportedBy: fevapp at o2.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com perl-Config-General-2.37 is already available. Repo version is 2.33. Please update the package. If you have any questions or suggestions related to Fever, feel free to write them in this bug or have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver Don't send any messages to fevapp at o2.pl please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Mon Nov 26 01:00:55 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:00:55 -0800 Subject: CPAN -> fedora mapping update! Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711251700i369077cat94ab86793beda85@mail.gmail.com> Hey all -- I put some additional work into the CPAN->Fedora mapping tools over Thanksgiving break... * version info is now pulled from koji * version in testing, if available, is published * versions pre F-7 are not pulled (working to fix this) * data is now stored in a backend db * upstream-querying is now modular, so querying other upstreams (e.g. for non-perl) should just be a matter of writing the correct backend extension and providing a way to determine it should be used against a package. The page is still up out at http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/perl/. Note I consider the page a stop-gap; next time I get some cycles I'll probably give Catalyst a whirl and see if I can't make something nice and dynamic to present it :) Note also there are CSS issues; I've asked the infrastructure list to set me right. I'm also looking to leverage a greater integration with koji and the packagedb as opportunities present themselves. The code is out under the camelus hosted project[1] It's still early, mildly slap-dash and requires a bunch of modules not yet available in Fedora (a number of MooseX ones and DBIx::Class spring to mind). Patches / comments / collaboration quite welcome :) -Chris [1] https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/camelus/ -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From tcallawa at redhat.com Mon Nov 26 16:18:18 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:18:18 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 11:16 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > 642 noarch > 172 x86_64 > ------------- > 814 total > > I suspect we can ease the pain by coordinating a mass rebuild here, > and just kicking off the rebuilds centrally. (e.g. an annointed > Rebuilder In Chief) The circular dependencies will be fun! First things first, lets divide up all of jpo's perl packages tomorrow (assuming that he doesn't come out of AWOL status in the next 24 hours), so that we have owners to help push this through. Here's the list of his packages (mostly perl), feel free to start staking claims on what you'd like: * asymptote -- Descriptive vector graphics language * eventlog -- Syslog-ng v2 support library * kchmviewer -- CHM viewer with KDE support * libcgi -- CGI easy as C * libol -- Support library for syslog-ng * libsmi -- A library to access SMI MIB information * nagios-plugins -- Host/service/network monitoring program plugins for Nagios * nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc -- Nagios SNMP plugins to monitor remote disk and processes * pdfjam -- Utilities for join, rotate and align PDFs * perl-Alien-wxWidgets -- Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries * perl-AppConfig -- Perl module for reading configuration files * perl-Array-Compare -- Perl extension for comparing arrays * perl-Authen-SASL -- SASL Authentication framework for Perl * perl-B-Keywords -- Lists of reserved barewords and symbol names * perl-Cache-Cache -- Generic cache interface and implementations * perl-Cairo -- Perl interface to the cairo library * perl-Carp-Assert -- Executable comments * perl-Carp-Assert-More -- Convenience wrappers around Carp::Assert * perl-Compress-Bzip2 -- Interface to Bzip2 compression library * perl-Config-IniFiles -- A module for reading .ini-style configuration files * perl-Config-Tiny -- Perl module for reading and writing .ini style configuration files * perl-CSS-Tiny -- Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible * perl-Data-Compare -- Compare perl data structures * perl-DBD-CSV -- DBI driver for CSV files * perl-DBD-SQLite -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver * perl-DBD-XBase -- Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files * perl-Devel-Cover -- Code coverage metrics for Perl * perl-Devel-Cycle -- Find memory cycles in objects * perl-Digest-MD4 -- Perl interface to the MD4 Algorithm * perl-Email-Address -- RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation * perl-Email-MessageID -- Generate world unique message-ids * perl-Email-MIME -- Easy MIME message parsing * perl-Email-MIME-ContentType -- Parse a MIME Content-Type Header * perl-Email-MIME-Encodings -- Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding * perl-Email-MIME-Modifier -- Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily * perl-Email-Simple -- Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers * perl-Error -- Error Perl module * perl-Expect -- Expect for Perl * perl-Expect-Simple -- Wrapper around the Expect module * perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder -- Compile and link C code for Perl modules * perl-ExtUtils-Depends -- Easily build XS extensions that depend on XS extensions * perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS -- Module and a script for converting Perl XS code into C code * perl-ExtUtils-PkgConfig -- Simplistic interface to pkg-config * perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI -- Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule * perl-File-HomeDir -- Get the home directory for yourself or other users * perl-File-Tail -- Perl extension for reading from continously updated files * perl-File-Which -- Portable implementation of the 'which' utility * perl-FreezeThaw -- Convert Perl structures to strings and back * perl-GD -- Perl interface to the GD graphics library * perl-GDGraph -- Graph generation package for Perl * perl-GDGraph3d -- 3D graph generation package for Perl * perl-GDTextUtil -- Text utilities for use with GD * perl-Geo-Constants -- Standard Geo:: constants * perl-Geo-Ellipsoids -- Standard Geo:: ellipsoids * perl-Geo-Forward -- Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading * perl-Geo-Functions -- Standard Geo:: functions * perl-Geo-Inverse -- Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair * perl-Glib -- Perl interface to GLib * perl-GPS -- Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol * perl-GPS-PRN -- Package for PRN - Object ID conversions * perl-GSSAPI -- Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library * perl-Gtk2 -- Perl interface to the 2.x series of the Gimp Toolkit library * perl-Hook-LexWrap -- Lexically scoped subroutine wrappers * perl-HTML-Scrubber -- Library for scrubbing/sanitizing html * perl-HTML-Template -- Perl module to use HTML Templates * perl-HTTP-Proxy -- A pure Perl HTTP proxy * perl-HTTP-Recorder -- Record interaction with web sites * perl-HTTP-Request-Params -- Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests * perl-HTTP-Server-Simple -- Very simple standalone HTTP daemon * perl-Image-Base -- Base class for loading, manipulating and saving images in Perl * perl-Image-Info -- Image meta information extraction module for Perl * perl-Image-Size -- Determine the size of images in several common formats in Perl * perl-Image-Xbm -- Load, create, manipulate and save xbm image files in Perl * perl-Image-Xpm -- Load, create, manipulate and save xpm image files in Perl * perl-IO-Capture -- Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output * perl-IO-Interface -- Perl extension for accessing network card configuration information * perl-IO-Socket-SSL -- Perl library for transparent SSL * perl-IO-String -- Emulate file interface for in-core strings * perl-IO-Tty -- Perl interface to pseudo tty's * perl-IO-Zlib -- Perl IO:: style interface to Compress::Zlib * perl-IPC-Shareable -- Share Perl variables between processes * perl-IPC-SharedCache -- Perl module to manage a cache in SysV IPC shared memory * perl-List-MoreUtils -- Provide the stuff missing in List::Util * perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy -- Maketext from already interpolated strings * perl-Log-Dispatch -- Dispatches messages to one or more outputs * perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate -- Log to files that archive/rotate themselves * perl-Log-Log4perl -- Log4j implementation for Perl * perl-Mail-Sender -- Module for sending mails with attachments through an SMTP server * perl-Mail-Sendmail -- Simple platform independent mailer for Perl * perl-MARC-Record -- Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling * perl-MLDBM -- Store multi-level hash structure in single level tied hash * perl-Module-CoreList -- Perl core modules indexed by perl versions * perl-Module-Find -- Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category * perl-Module-Locate -- Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" * perl-Module-ScanDeps -- Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies * perl-Module-Versions-Report -- Report versions of all modules in memory * perl-Net-GPSD -- Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon * perl-Net-SNMP -- Object oriented interface to SNMP * perl-Net-SSLeay -- Perl extension for using OpenSSL * perl-PadWalker -- Play with other peoples' lexical variables * perl-Perl-Critic -- Critique Perl source code for best-practices * perl-pmtools -- A suite of small programs to help manage Perl modules * perl-Pod-Coverage -- Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive * perl-Pod-Escapes -- Perl module for resolving POD escape sequences * perl-Pod-Simple -- Framework for parsing POD documentation * perl-Pod-Spell -- A formatter for spellchecking Pod * perl-Pod-Strip -- Remove POD from Perl code * perl-PPI -- Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl * perl-PPI-HTML -- Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI * perl-PPI-Tester -- A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester * perl-Scalar-Properties -- Run-time properties on scalar variables * perl-Set-Scalar -- Basic set operations * perl-SNMP_Session -- SNMP support for Perl 5 * perl-Socket6 -- IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators * perl-SQL-Statement -- SQL parsing and processing engine * perl-String-Format -- Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions * perl-Sub-Uplevel -- Run a perl function in an upper stack frame * perl-Test-Builder-Tester -- Test runner for Test::Builder testsuites * perl-Test-Cmd -- Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts * perl-Test-Differences -- Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok * perl-Test-Exception -- Library of test functions for exception based Perl code * perl-Test-Expect -- Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs * perl-Test-File -- Test file attributes * perl-Test-Manifest -- Test case module for Perl * perl-Test-Memory-Cycle -- Check for memory leaks and circular memory references * perl-Test-MockObject -- Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces * perl-Test-Number-Delta -- Compare the difference between numbers against a given tolerance * perl-Test-Object -- Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers * perl-Test-Perl-Critic -- Use Perl::Critic in test programs * perl-Test-Pod -- Perl module for checking for POD errors in files * perl-Test-Pod-Coverage -- Check for pod coverage in your distribution * perl-Test-Spelling -- Check for spelling errors in POD files * perl-Test-SubCalls -- Track the number of times subs are called * perl-Test-Warn -- Perl extension to test methods for warnings * perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize -- Testing-specific WWW::Mechanize subclass * perl-TeX-Hyphen -- Hyphenate words using TeX's patterns * perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Comma-separated values manipulation routines * perl-Text-Template -- Expand template text with embedded Perl * perl-Text-WikiFormat -- Translate Wiki formatted text into other formats * perl-Tie-IxHash -- Ordered associative arrays for Perl * perl-Tree-DAG_Node -- Class for representing nodes in a tree * perl-UNIVERSAL-can -- Hack around people calling UNIVERSAL::can() as a function * perl-UNIVERSAL-isa -- Hack around module authors using UNIVERSAL::isa as a function * perl-WWW-Bugzilla -- Handles submission/update of bugzilla bugs via WWW::Mechanize * perl-WWW-Mechanize -- Automates web page form & link interaction * perl-Wx -- Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit * perl-XML-Simple -- Easy API to maintain XML in Perl * srecord -- Manipulate EPROM load files * swatch -- Tool for actively monitoring log files * syslog-ng -- Syslog replacement daemon * tetex-beamer -- A LaTeX class for producing presentations and slides * tetex-bytefield -- Create illustrations for network protocol specifications * tetex-perltex -- Define LaTeX macros in terms of Perl code * tetex-pgf -- Create PostScript and PDF graphics in TeX * tetex-xcolor -- Driver-independent color extensions for LaTeX and pdfLaTeX ~spot From jpazdziora at redhat.com Mon Nov 26 16:56:37 2007 From: jpazdziora at redhat.com (Jan Pazdziora) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:56:37 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20071126165637.GA10983@redhat.com> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:18:18AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 11:16 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > > 642 noarch > > 172 x86_64 > > ------------- > > 814 total > > > > I suspect we can ease the pain by coordinating a mass rebuild here, > > and just kicking off the rebuilds centrally. (e.g. an annointed > > Rebuilder In Chief) > > The circular dependencies will be fun! > > First things first, lets divide up all of jpo's perl packages tomorrow > (assuming that he doesn't come out of AWOL status in the next 24 hours), > so that we have owners to help push this through. > > Here's the list of his packages (mostly perl), feel free to start > staking claims on what you'd like: [...] > * perl-DBD-XBase -- Perl module for reading and writing the dbf > files Being the author/upstream for DBD::XBase, I can take this ... -- Jan Pazdziora Satellite Engineering, Red Hat From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 26 18:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396071] File::BaseDir 0.03 is out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711261839.lAQIdnbc022501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: File::BaseDir 0.03 is out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396071 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-26 13:39 EST ------- perl-File-BaseDir-0.03-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-File-BaseDir' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 26 18:52:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396071] File::BaseDir 0.03 is out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711261852.lAQIqK6i026274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: File::BaseDir 0.03 is out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396071 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-26 13:52 EST ------- perl-File-BaseDir-0.03-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-File-BaseDir' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rnorwood at redhat.com Mon Nov 26 21:04:20 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:04:20 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Tom Callaway's message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:18:18 -0500") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" writes: > On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 11:16 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > >> 642 noarch >> 172 x86_64 >> ------------- >> 814 total >> >> I suspect we can ease the pain by coordinating a mass rebuild here, >> and just kicking off the rebuilds centrally. (e.g. an annointed >> Rebuilder In Chief) > > The circular dependencies will be fun! > > First things first, lets divide up all of jpo's perl packages tomorrow > (assuming that he doesn't come out of AWOL status in the next 24 hours), > so that we have owners to help push this through. > > Here's the list of his packages (mostly perl), feel free to start > staking claims on what you'd like: > > * perl-Compress-Bzip2 -- Interface to Bzip2 compression library > * perl-DBD-CSV -- DBI driver for CSV files > * perl-DBD-SQLite -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver > * perl-FreezeThaw -- Convert Perl structures to strings and back > * perl-Log-Log4perl -- Log4j implementation for Perl > * perl-Pod-Coverage -- Checks if the documentation of a module is > comprehensive > * perl-Pod-Escapes -- Perl module for resolving POD escape > sequences > * perl-Pod-Simple -- Framework for parsing POD documentation > * perl-Pod-Spell -- A formatter for spellchecking Pod > * perl-Pod-Strip -- Remove POD from Perl code > * perl-SQL-Statement -- SQL parsing and processing engine > * perl-Test-Pod -- Perl module for checking for POD errors in > files > * perl-Test-Pod-Coverage -- Check for pod coverage in your > distribution > * perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Comma-separated values manipulation routines I can take these. Is there a good way to mass-convert these modules, or do we just do individual requests? -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From tcallawa at redhat.com Mon Nov 26 21:08:22 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:08:22 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:04 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > > * perl-Compress-Bzip2 -- Interface to Bzip2 compression library > > * perl-DBD-CSV -- DBI driver for CSV files > > * perl-DBD-SQLite -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver > > * perl-FreezeThaw -- Convert Perl structures to strings and back > > * perl-Log-Log4perl -- Log4j implementation for Perl > > * perl-Pod-Coverage -- Checks if the documentation of a module is > > comprehensive > > * perl-Pod-Escapes -- Perl module for resolving POD escape > > sequences > > * perl-Pod-Simple -- Framework for parsing POD documentation > > * perl-Pod-Spell -- A formatter for spellchecking Pod > > * perl-Pod-Strip -- Remove POD from Perl code > > * perl-SQL-Statement -- SQL parsing and processing engine > > * perl-Test-Pod -- Perl module for checking for POD errors in > > files > > * perl-Test-Pod-Coverage -- Check for pod coverage in your > > distribution > > * perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Comma-separated values manipulation routines > > I can take these. Is there a good way to mass-convert these modules, or > do we just do individual requests? I'll just handle them when I move everything else tomorrow. Anyone else interested in any of the remaining modules? (I'll take whatever remains...but I'd prefer to share the load) ~spot From rnorwood at redhat.com Mon Nov 26 21:19:14 2007 From: rnorwood at redhat.com (Robin Norwood) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:19:14 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Tom Callaway's message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:08:22 -0500") References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" writes: > On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:04 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > >> > * perl-Compress-Bzip2 -- Interface to Bzip2 compression library >> > * perl-DBD-CSV -- DBI driver for CSV files >> > * perl-DBD-SQLite -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver >> > * perl-FreezeThaw -- Convert Perl structures to strings and back >> > * perl-Log-Log4perl -- Log4j implementation for Perl >> > * perl-Pod-Coverage -- Checks if the documentation of a module is >> > comprehensive >> > * perl-Pod-Escapes -- Perl module for resolving POD escape >> > sequences >> > * perl-Pod-Simple -- Framework for parsing POD documentation >> > * perl-Pod-Spell -- A formatter for spellchecking Pod >> > * perl-Pod-Strip -- Remove POD from Perl code >> > * perl-SQL-Statement -- SQL parsing and processing engine >> > * perl-Test-Pod -- Perl module for checking for POD errors in >> > files >> > * perl-Test-Pod-Coverage -- Check for pod coverage in your >> > distribution >> > * perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Comma-separated values manipulation routines >> >> I can take these. Is there a good way to mass-convert these modules, or >> do we just do individual requests? > > I'll just handle them when I move everything else tomorrow. Anyone else > interested in any of the remaining modules? (I'll take whatever > remains...but I'd prefer to share the load) I can also handle some of the excess, but there aren't any in particular that I'm interested in other than the ones quoted above. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching From steve at silug.org Mon Nov 26 21:47:40 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:47:40 -0600 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20071126214740.GA32059@osiris.silug.org> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:18:18AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > The circular dependencies will be fun! Hopefully a lot of those have been resolved with the EPEL rebuild. > First things first, lets divide up all of jpo's perl packages tomorrow > (assuming that he doesn't come out of AWOL status in the next 24 hours), > so that we have owners to help push this through. > > Here's the list of his packages (mostly perl), feel free to start > staking claims on what you'd like: [...] I'll definitely take the following: > * perl-Authen-SASL -- SASL Authentication framework for Perl amavisd-new dependency. > * perl-Cache-Cache -- Generic cache interface and implementations perl-HTML-Mason dependency. > * perl-DBD-SQLite -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver amavisd-new and sqlgrey both use this. > * perl-Devel-Cycle -- Find memory cycles in objects Indirect depencency for several things. > * perl-Error -- Error Perl module perl-Cache-Cache dependency. > * perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder -- Compile and link C code for Perl > modules perl-Module-Build dependency. > * perl-ExtUtils-Depends -- Easily build XS extensions that depend > on XS extensions perl-Imager build dependency. > * perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS -- Module and a script for converting Perl > XS code into C code perl-Module-Build dependency. > * perl-FreezeThaw -- Convert Perl structures to strings and back Indirect perl-BerkeleyDB and perl-IO-All build dependency. > * perl-GSSAPI -- Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 > library perl-Authen-SASL dependency. > * perl-IO-Socket-SSL -- Perl library for transparent SSL Indirect amavisd-new dependency (via spamassassin). > * perl-IO-String -- Emulate file interface for in-core strings perl-Pipeline and perl-IO-All dependency. > * perl-IO-Zlib -- Perl IO:: style interface to Compress::Zlib Indirect dependency for cpanspec and amavisd-new. > * perl-MLDBM -- Store multi-level hash structure in single level > tied hash perl-BerkeleyDB and perl-IO-All build dependency. > * perl-Module-CoreList -- Perl core modules indexed by perl > versions cpanspec, perl-CPANPLUS, and various others... > * perl-Module-ScanDeps -- Recursively scan Perl code for > dependencies perl-Module-Install dependency. > * perl-Net-SSLeay -- Perl extension for using OpenSSL perl-IO-Socket-SSL dependency. > * perl-PadWalker -- Play with other peoples' lexical variables perl-Devel-Caller dependency. > * perl-Pod-Coverage -- Checks if the documentation of a module is > comprehensive perl-Graphics-ColorNames dependency. > * perl-Pod-Escapes -- Perl module for resolving POD escape > sequences > * perl-Pod-Simple -- Framework for parsing POD documentation cpanspec dependencies. > * perl-Sub-Uplevel -- Run a perl function in an upper stack frame perl-Test-Warn dependency. > * perl-Test-Builder-Tester -- Test runner for Test::Builder > testsuites Various build dependencies. > * perl-Test-Exception -- Library of test functions for exception > based Perl code Various build dependencies. > * perl-Test-Memory-Cycle -- Check for memory leaks and circular > memory references perl-HTML-Mason and perl-Spoon build dependency. > * perl-Test-Pod -- Perl module for checking for POD errors in > files > * perl-Test-Pod-Coverage -- Check for pod coverage in your > distribution Nearly everything requires these now... > * perl-TeX-Hyphen -- Hyphenate words using TeX's patterns perl-Text-Reform dependency. Those are all of the obvious ones (and their dependencies). In addition... > * perl-Digest-MD4 -- Perl interface to the MD4 Algorithm Paul Howarth should probably take that. It's used by Perl-Crypt-SmbHash. > * perl-Hook-LexWrap -- Lexically scoped subroutine wrappers > * perl-HTML-Scrubber -- Library for scrubbing/sanitizing html > * perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy -- Maketext from already interpolated > strings > * perl-Log-Dispatch -- Dispatches messages to one or more outputs > * perl-Module-Versions-Report -- Report versions of all modules in > memory > * perl-Text-Template -- Expand template text with embedded Perl > * perl-XML-Simple -- Easy API to maintain XML in Perl It looks like rt3 is the main user (or at least one of the big users) of these. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From steve at silug.org Mon Nov 26 21:48:56 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:48:56 -0600 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20071126214856.GB32059@osiris.silug.org> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:08:22PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > I'll just handle them when I move everything else tomorrow. Anyone else > interested in any of the remaining modules? (I'll take whatever > remains...but I'd prefer to share the load) Feel free to put me down as a co-maintainer on any of the remaining perl-* packages. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Mon Nov 26 22:44:17 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:44:17 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711261444k2a49e30brb300f1138668dc35@mail.gmail.com> On Nov 26, 2007 8:18 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 11:16 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > > 642 noarch > > 172 x86_64 > > ------------- > > 814 total > > > > I suspect we can ease the pain by coordinating a mass rebuild here, > > and just kicking off the rebuilds centrally. (e.g. an annointed > > Rebuilder In Chief) > > The circular dependencies will be fun! Aw man -- I'd forgotten about those :) I have a number of outstanding BZ's to deal with a few of those (215637, 232736, 232380) but I haven't run into any others. If no one screams, I'll create a PERL-5_10 blocker bug. > First things first, lets divide up all of jpo's perl packages tomorrow > (assuming that he doesn't come out of AWOL status in the next 24 hours), > so that we have owners to help push this through. > > Here's the list of his packages (mostly perl), feel free to start > staking claims on what you'd like: I'm trying to not take on too many more, as I have my eyes on the MooseX namespace next :) The ones I'll proffer to take over completely are below; I second Robin's comments. > * perl-B-Keywords -- Lists of reserved barewords and symbol names > * perl-Config-Tiny -- Perl module for reading and writing .ini > style configuration files > * perl-CSS-Tiny -- Read/Write .css files with as little code as > possible > * perl-Expect -- Expect for Perl > * perl-Expect-Simple -- Wrapper around the Expect module > * perl-List-MoreUtils -- Provide the stuff missing in List::Util > * perl-Module-Find -- Find and use installed modules in a > (sub)category > * perl-Module-Locate -- Locate modules in the same fashion as > "require" and "use" > * perl-Module-Versions-Report -- Report versions of all modules in > memory > * perl-Perl-Critic -- Critique Perl source code for best-practices > * perl-pmtools -- A suite of small programs to help manage Perl > modules > * perl-Test-Expect -- Automated driving and testing of > terminal-based programs > * perl-Test-Perl-Critic -- Use Perl::Critic in test programs > * perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize -- Testing-specific WWW::Mechanize > subclass > * perl-WWW-Bugzilla -- Handles submission/update of bugzilla bugs > via WWW::Mechanize > * perl-WWW-Mechanize -- Automates web page form & link interaction -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Tue Nov 27 02:06:11 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:06:11 -0800 Subject: perl 5.10 blocker bug: perl_5.10 Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711261806s66f51089qffddd4b74d8a44e@mail.gmail.com> I've created a tracker bug for perl 5.10 issues: BZ#400471 (aka "perl_5.10"). Enjoy :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 02:03:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232736] perl-Pod-Readme: explicit requires on buildtime-only deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711270203.lAR23geT027288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Pod-Readme: explicit requires on buildtime-only deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232736 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |400471 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 02:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232380] Pod::Readme: BR'ing perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) creates a circular BR loop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711270203.lAR23feF027252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Pod::Readme: BR'ing perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) creates a circular BR loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232380 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |400471 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Nov 27 03:40:33 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:40:33 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:08 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:04 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > > I can take these. Is there a good way to mass-convert these modules, or > > do we just do individual requests? > > I'll just handle them when I move everything else tomorrow. Anyone else > interested in any of the remaining modules? (I'll take whatever > remains...but I'd prefer to share the load) I'd be volunteering to assist maintaining/co-maintain all of the perl-modules and to act as principle maintainer for those which are direct deps of rt3 (I haven't checked which would qualify as such. Probably something similar to Steve's list). But: I'd also prefer to share the load and prefer to see collective maintainership to be encouraged, so .. proposal: Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be orphaned" packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody who maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) Ralf From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Tue Nov 27 05:36:28 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:36:28 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711262136r7a45b407kbea096acf58945d8@mail.gmail.com> On Nov 26, 2007 7:40 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:08 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:04 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > > > > I can take these. Is there a good way to mass-convert these modules, or > > > do we just do individual requests? > > > > I'll just handle them when I move everything else tomorrow. Anyone else > > interested in any of the remaining modules? (I'll take whatever > > remains...but I'd prefer to share the load) > I'd be volunteering to assist maintaining/co-maintain all of the > perl-modules and to act as principle maintainer for those which are > direct deps of rt3 (I haven't checked which would qualify as such. > Probably something similar to Steve's list). > > But: I'd also prefer to share the load and prefer to see collective > maintainership to be encouraged, so .. proposal: > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be orphaned" > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody who > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) +1! This is exactly what we should be doing. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From pertusus at free.fr Tue Nov 27 08:58:53 2007 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:58:53 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <20071127085853.GA2616@free.fr> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:40:33AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be orphaned" > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody who > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) This seems to me to be a very good idea. -- Pat From paul at city-fan.org Tue Nov 27 10:58:13 2007 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:58:13 +0000 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <20071126214740.GA32059@osiris.silug.org> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071126214740.GA32059@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <474BF845.5080708@city-fan.org> Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:18:18AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >> The circular dependencies will be fun! > > Hopefully a lot of those have been resolved with the EPEL rebuild. > >> First things first, lets divide up all of jpo's perl packages tomorrow >> (assuming that he doesn't come out of AWOL status in the next 24 hours), >> so that we have owners to help push this through. >> >> Here's the list of his packages (mostly perl), feel free to start >> staking claims on what you'd like: > [...] > > I'll definitely take the following: ... >> * perl-IO-Socket-SSL -- Perl library for transparent SSL > > Indirect amavisd-new dependency (via spamassassin). I also have an interest in this for smbldap-tools, but the package database says that Warren is the owner, not JPO... Same applies for perl-Net-SSLeay. ... > Those are all of the obvious ones (and their dependencies). In > addition... > >> * perl-Digest-MD4 -- Perl interface to the MD4 Algorithm > > Paul Howarth should probably take that. It's used by > Perl-Crypt-SmbHash. Yes, I'll take that one. And +1 to Ralf's suggestion re the perl SIG owning all this stuff. Paul. From tcallawa at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 14:00:50 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:00:50 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > orphaned" > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > who > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) Sure, this is acceptable to me. I just need to know who the "co maintainers" will be, packages cannot be owned by the perl SIG user. As an aside, I don't ACL any of my perl packages, specifically to allow other perl SIG members who need to make changes while I am unavailable. ~spot From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Nov 27 15:00:14 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:00:14 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:00 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > > orphaned" > > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > > who > > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) > > Sure, this is acceptable to me. I just need to know who the "co > maintainers" will be, packages cannot be owned by the perl SIG user. Why not? > As an aside, I don't ACL any of my perl packages, specifically to allow > other perl SIG members who need to make changes while I am unavailable. The same has applied to my packages, ever since they exist. Ralf From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Nov 27 15:02:37 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:02:37 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-Pod-Readme/devel perl-Pod-Readme.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <200711271502.lARF2bdX013581@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Readme/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13492 Modified Files: perl-Pod-Readme.spec Log Message: Update License tag. Drop explicit dependencies on Test::* modules (#232736). Index: perl-Pod-Readme.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Readme/devel/perl-Pod-Readme.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- perl-Pod-Readme.spec 10 Dec 2006 01:47:07 -0000 1.4 +++ perl-Pod-Readme.spec 27 Nov 2007 15:02:03 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ Name: perl-Pod-Readme Version: 0.090 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Convert POD to README file -License: GPL or Artistic +License: GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Pod-Readme/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RR/RRWO/Pod-Readme-%{module_version}.tar.gz @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::Portability::Files) # Core module that appears to be out of date. #BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Text) >= 3.0 -Requires: perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.00 -Requires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) -Requires: perl(Test::Portability::Files) # Core module that appears to be out of date. #Requires: perl(Pod::Text) >= 3.0 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) @@ -59,6 +56,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Nov 27 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.090-2 +- Update License tag. +- Drop explicit dependencies on Test::* modules (#232736). + * Sat Dec 09 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.090-1 - Update to 0.09. - Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 15:03:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232736] perl-Pod-Readme: explicit requires on buildtime-only deps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711271503.lARF3Qh2010352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Pod-Readme: explicit requires on buildtime-only deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232736 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-11-27 10:03 EST ------- Fixed in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 14:59:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232380] Pod::Readme: BR'ing perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) creates a circular BR loop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711271459.lARExrkU014706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Pod::Readme: BR'ing perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) creates a circular BR loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232380 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-11-27 09:59 EST ------- Haven't we broken this circular dependency already by not BR'ing Pod::Readme in Module::Build (bug #215558)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tcallawa at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 15:04:38 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:04:38 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:00 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:00 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > > > orphaned" > > > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > > > who > > > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) > > > > Sure, this is acceptable to me. I just need to know who the "co > > maintainers" will be, packages cannot be owned by the perl SIG user. > Why not? Not sure. I think it has to do with the fact that the perl-SIG isn't a legal entity, and thus, cannot sign the CLA. As is, its really not an issue, as I don't intend to put acls on anything, its merely a question of who wants to see the bugzillas personally as opposed to through the perl-SIG email. ~spot From steve at fedoraproject.org Tue Nov 27 15:13:09 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:13:09 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-YAML/devel perl-YAML.spec,1.17,1.18 Message-ID: <200711271513.lARFD9FK014461@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-YAML/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14195 Modified Files: perl-YAML.spec Log Message: Correct changelog entry. Index: perl-YAML.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-YAML/devel/perl-YAML.spec,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- perl-YAML.spec 16 Oct 2007 16:36:16 -0000 1.17 +++ perl-YAML.spec 27 Nov 2007 15:12:36 -0000 1.18 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ * Tue Mar 13 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.62-3 - Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. -- Drop Test::Base build dependency to avoid a BR loop. +- Drop Test::Base build dependency to avoid a BR loop (#215637). - BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. * Sat Sep 16 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.62-2 From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Nov 27 15:13:17 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:13:17 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 10:04 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:00 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:00 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > > > > orphaned" > > > > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > > > > who > > > > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) > > > > > > Sure, this is acceptable to me. I just need to know who the "co > > > maintainers" will be, packages cannot be owned by the perl SIG user. > > Why not? > > Not sure. I think it has to do with the fact that the perl-SIG isn't a > legal entity, and thus, cannot sign the CLA. Hmm, is this a technical limitations of the fedora infrastructure or a legal issue? I would not understand the latter. > As is, its really not an issue, as I don't intend to put acls on > anything, its merely a question of who wants to see the bugzillas > personally as opposed to through the perl-SIG email. So you indent to assign ownership to yourself but to allow perl-sig member to work on your packages? IMO, this doesn't encourage "perl-sig seniors" to work on these packages, because it doesn't make the difference between "collectively maintained" packages and packages being maintained by "individuals who will shoot" when touching your packages apparent. OK, the latter group could apply ACLs, but ... you are loosing the "marketing factor" of "collective maintainership". Ralf From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Nov 27 16:10:43 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:10:43 +0100 Subject: Retiring File::NCopy? Message-ID: <1196179843.12310.553.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Hi, According to CPAN this File::NCopy is deprecated. c.f. http://search.cpan.org/~chorny/File-NCopy-0.36 Q1: Is anybody using File::NCopy? Q2: How to retire it? Unless somebody speaks up or an existing use-case can be found in Fedora (I checked the repos but couldn't find one), I'd like to remove it from rawhide, but to continue shipping it for already released distros. Ralf From tcallawa at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 19:57:12 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:57:12 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 10:04 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:00 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:00 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > > > > > orphaned" > > > > > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > > > > > who > > > > > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) > > > > > > > > Sure, this is acceptable to me. I just need to know who the "co > > > > maintainers" will be, packages cannot be owned by the perl SIG user. > > > Why not? > > > > Not sure. I think it has to do with the fact that the perl-SIG isn't a > > legal entity, and thus, cannot sign the CLA. > Hmm, is this a technical limitations of the fedora infrastructure or a > legal issue? I would not understand the latter. I think its a bit of both, as the SIG can't sign the CLA, and the infrastructure won't let users who haven't signed the CLA own anything. > > As is, its really not an issue, as I don't intend to put acls on > > anything, its merely a question of who wants to see the bugzillas > > personally as opposed to through the perl-SIG email. > So you indent to assign ownership to yourself but to allow perl-sig > member to work on your packages? > > IMO, this doesn't encourage "perl-sig seniors" to work on these > packages, because it doesn't make the difference between "collectively > maintained" packages and packages being maintained by "individuals who > will shoot" when touching your packages apparent. I'm not actually sure how to accomplish "collective" maintainership, in the sense that you want it. Nor do I really want to lock them down via ACLs so only perl-sig elites can touch them. I think the packages still need a primary maintainer, and then can have as many co-maintainers as desired. ~spot From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 20:43:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398801] perl-Config-General-2.37 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711272043.lARKhmSG005274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Config-General-2.37 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398801 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-11-27 15:43 EST ------- *** Bug 336121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 20:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 336121] perl-Config-General-2.36 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711272043.lARKhlYU005254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Config-General-2.36 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336121 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-11-27 15:43 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 398801 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Tue Nov 27 21:26:21 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:26:21 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711271326n43dd03e7m68340bb4bf38c3e2@mail.gmail.com> On Nov 27, 2007 11:57 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 10:04 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:00 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:00 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > > > > > > orphaned" > > > > > > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > > > > > > who > > > > > > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) > > > > > > > > > > Sure, this is acceptable to me. I just need to know who the "co > > > > > maintainers" will be, packages cannot be owned by the perl SIG user. > > > > Why not? > > > > > > Not sure. I think it has to do with the fact that the perl-SIG isn't a > > > legal entity, and thus, cannot sign the CLA. > > Hmm, is this a technical limitations of the fedora infrastructure or a > > legal issue? I would not understand the latter. > > I think its a bit of both, as the SIG can't sign the CLA, and the > infrastructure won't let users who haven't signed the CLA own anything. Is there a way to enforce group ownership such that perl-sig members must also be members of cla-done? If we can do that, it should be a moot point... (Transitive property of CLA signing... heh) > > > As is, its really not an issue, as I don't intend to put acls on > > > anything, its merely a question of who wants to see the bugzillas > > > personally as opposed to through the perl-SIG email. > > So you indent to assign ownership to yourself but to allow perl-sig > > member to work on your packages? > > > > IMO, this doesn't encourage "perl-sig seniors" to work on these > > packages, because it doesn't make the difference between "collectively > > maintained" packages and packages being maintained by "individuals who > > will shoot" when touching your packages apparent. > > I'm not actually sure how to accomplish "collective" maintainership, in > the sense that you want it. Nor do I really want to lock them down via > ACLs so only perl-sig elites can touch them. > > I think the packages still need a primary maintainer, and then can have > as many co-maintainers as desired. I think the idea here is more of a way to put a better stamp of collective ownership here, not enable a lock down to us elites (and here I thought I was just another plebian). While possibly more symbolic than not, symbolisim is important, and I think it makes sense to do if we can find a reasonable way. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From tcallawa at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 22:16:49 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:16:49 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490711271326n43dd03e7m68340bb4bf38c3e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711271326n43dd03e7m68340bb4bf38c3e2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1196201809.3054.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 13:26 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > I think the idea here is more of a way to put a better stamp of > collective ownership here, not enable a lock down to us elites (and > here I thought I was just another plebian). While possibly more > symbolic than not, symbolisim is important, and I think it makes sense > to do if we can find a reasonable way. OK, I'm on board with this. What I need is a list of the willing, to be comaintainers on this set of packages. Here's the list as I see it right now: Tom Callaway (spot) Ralf Corsepius (corsepiu) Patrice Dumas (pertusus) Paul Howarth (pghmcfc) Robin Norwood (rnorwood) Steven Pritchard (steve) Chris Weyl (cweyl) Anyone else? (I'll wait until tomorrow to add the comaintainers) All of jpo's packages have a new maintainer now, here's the breakdown: Tom Callaway (aka, no one asked for it explicitly) * perl-Alien-wxWidgets -- Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries * perl-AppConfig -- Perl module for reading configuration files * perl-Array-Compare -- Perl extension for comparing arrays * perl-Cairo -- Perl interface to the cairo library * perl-Carp-Assert -- Executable comments * perl-Carp-Assert-More -- Convenience wrappers around Carp::Assert * ?perl-Config-IniFiles -- A module for reading .ini-style configuration files * perl-Data-Compare -- Compare perl data structures * perl-DBD-XBase -- Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files * perl-Devel-Cover -- Code coverage metrics for Perl * perl-Email-Address -- RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation * perl-Email-MessageID -- Generate world unique message-ids * perl-Email-MIME -- Easy MIME message parsing * perl-Email-MIME-ContentType -- Parse a MIME Content-Type Header * perl-Email-MIME-Encodings -- Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding * perl-Email-MIME-Modifier -- Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily * perl-Email-Simple -- Simple parsing of RFC2822 message format and headers * perl-ExtUtils-PkgConfig -- Simplistic interface to pkg-config * perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI -- Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule * perl-File-HomeDir -- Get the home directory for yourself or other users * perl-File-Tail -- Perl extension for reading from continously updated files * perl-File-Which -- Portable implementation of the 'which' utility * perl-GD -- Perl interface to the GD graphics library * perl-GDGraph -- Graph generation package for Perl * perl-GDGraph3d -- 3D graph generation package for Perl * perl-GDTextUtil -- Text utilities for use with GD * perl-Geo-Constants -- Standard Geo:: constants * perl-Geo-Ellipsoids -- Standard Geo:: ellipsoids * perl-Geo-Forward -- Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading * perl-Geo-Functions -- Standard Geo:: functions * perl-Geo-Inverse -- Calculate geographic distance from a lat & lon pair * perl-Glib -- Perl interface to GLib * perl-GPS -- Perl interface to a GPS receiver that implements the Garmin protocol * perl-GPS-PRN -- Package for PRN - Object ID conversions * perl-Gtk2 -- Perl interface to the 2.x series of the Gimp Toolkit library * perl-Hook-LexWrap -- Lexically scoped subroutine wrappers * perl-HTML-Scrubber -- Library for scrubbing/sanitizing html * perl-HTML-Template -- Perl module to use HTML Templates * perl-HTTP-Proxy -- A pure Perl HTTP proxy * perl-HTTP-Recorder -- Record interaction with web sites * perl-HTTP-Request-Params -- Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests * perl-HTTP-Server-Simple -- Very simple standalone HTTP daemon * perl-Image-Base -- Base class for loading, manipulating and saving images in Perl * perl-Image-Info -- Image meta information extraction module for Perl * perl-Image-Size -- Determine the size of images in several common formats in Perl * perl-Image-Xbm -- Load, create, manipulate and save xbm image files in Perl * perl-Image-Xpm -- Load, create, manipulate and save xpm image files in Perl * perl-IO-Capture -- Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output * perl-IO-Interface -- Perl extension for accessing network card configuration information * perl-IO-Tty -- Perl interface to pseudo tty's * perl-IPC-Shareable -- Share Perl variables between processes * perl-IPC-SharedCache -- Perl module to manage a cache in SysV IPC shared memory * perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy -- Maketext from already interpolated strings * perl-Log-Dispatch -- Dispatches messages to one or more outputs * perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate -- Log to files that archive/rotate themselves * perl-Mail-Sender -- Module for sending mails with attachments through an SMTP server * perl-Mail-Sendmail -- Simple platform independent mailer for Perl * perl-MARC-Record -- Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling * perl-Net-GPSD -- Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon * perl-Net-SNMP -- Object oriented interface to SNMP * perl-PPI -- Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl * perl-PPI-HTML -- Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI * perl-PPI-Tester -- A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester * perl-Scalar-Properties -- Run-time properties on scalar variables * perl-Set-Scalar -- Basic set operations * perl-SNMP_Session -- SNMP support for Perl 5 * perl-String-Format -- Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions * perl-Test-Cmd -- Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts * perl-Test-Differences -- Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok * perl-Test-File -- Test file attributes * perl-Test-Manifest -- Test case module for Perl * perl-Test-MockObject -- Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces * perl-Test-Number-Delta -- Compare the difference between numbers against a given tolerance * perl-Test-Object -- Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers * ?perl-Test-Spelling -- Check for spelling errors in POD files * perl-Test-SubCalls -- Track the number of times subs are called * perl-Test-Warn -- Perl extension to test methods for warnings * perl-Text-Template -- Expand template text with embedded Perl * perl-Text-WikiFormat -- Translate Wiki formatted text into other formats * perl-Tie-IxHash -- Ordered associative arrays for Perl * perl-Tree-DAG_Node -- Class for representing nodes in a tree * perl-UNIVERSAL-can -- Hack around people calling UNIVERSAL::can() as a function * perl-UNIVERSAL-isa -- Hack around module authors using UNIVERSAL::isa as a function * perl-Wx -- Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit Chris Weyl * ?perl-B-Keywords -- Lists of reserved barewords and symbol names * perl-Config-Tiny -- Perl module for reading and writing .ini style configuration files * perl-CSS-Tiny -- Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible * perl-Expect -- Expect for Perl * perl-Expect-Simple -- Wrapper around the Expect module * ?perl-List-MoreUtils -- Provide the stuff missing in List::Util * perl-Module-Find -- Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category * perl-Module-Locate -- Locate modules in the same fashion as "require" and "use" * perl-Module-Versions-Report -- Report versions of all modules in memory * perl-Perl-Critic -- Critique Perl source code for best-practices * perl-pmtools -- A suite of small programs to help manage Perl modules * ?perl-Test-Expect -- Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs * ?perl-Test-Perl-Critic -- Use Perl::Critic in test programs * ?perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize -- Testing-specific WWW::Mechanize subclass * perl-WWW-Bugzilla -- Handles submission/update of bugzilla bugs via WWW::Mechanize * perl-WWW-Mechanize -- Automates web page form & link interaction Paul Howarth * ?perl-Digest-MD4 -- Perl interface to the MD4 Algorithm Steven Pritchard * ?perl-Authen-SASL -- SASL Authentication framework for Perl * ?perl-Cache-Cache -- Generic cache interface and implementations * ??perl-DBD-SQLite (COMAINT) -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver * ?perl-Devel-Cycle -- Find memory cycles in objects * ?perl-Error -- Error Perl module * perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder -- Compile and link C code for Perl modules * perl-ExtUtils-Depends -- Easily build XS extensions that depend on XS extensions * perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS -- Module and a script for converting Perl XS code into C code * ?perl-FreezeThaw (COMAINT) -- Convert Perl structures to strings and back * ?perl-GSSAPI -- Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library * perl-MLDBM -- Store multi-level hash structure in single level tied hash * perl-Module-CoreList -- Perl core modules indexed by perl versions * ?perl-Module-ScanDeps -- Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies * ?perl-PadWalker -- Play with other peoples' lexical variables * perl-Pod-Coverage (COMAINT)-- Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive * perl-Pod-Escapes (COMAINT)-- Perl module for resolving POD escape sequences * perl-Pod-Simple (COMAINT) -- Framework for parsing POD documentation * perl-Sub-Uplevel -- Run a perl function in an upper stack frame * perl-Test-Builder-Tester -- Test runner for Test::Builder testsuites * ?perl-Test-Exception -- Library of test functions for exception based Perl code * ?perl-Test-Memory-Cycle -- Check for memory leaks and circular memory references * perl-Test-Pod (COMAINT) -- Perl module for checking for POD errors in files * perl-Test-Pod-Coverage (COMAINT) -- Check for pod coverage in your distribution * ?perl-TeX-Hyphen -- Hyphenate words using TeX's patterns Robin Norwood (rnorwood) * perl-Compress-Bzip2 -- Interface to Bzip2 compression library * perl-DBD-CSV -- DBI driver for CSV files * perl-DBD-SQLite -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver? * perl-FreezeThaw -- Convert Perl structures to strings and back * perl-Log-Log4perl -- Log4j implementation for Perl * perl-Pod-Coverage -- Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive * perl-Pod-Escapes -- Perl module for resolving POD escape sequences * perl-Pod-Simple -- Framework for parsing POD documentation * perl-Pod-Spell -- A formatter for spellchecking Pod * perl-Pod-Strip -- Remove POD from Perl code * perl-SQL-Statement -- SQL parsing and processing engine * perl-Test-Pod -- Perl module for checking for POD errors in files * perl-Test-Pod-Coverage -- Check for pod coverage in your distribution * perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Comma-separated values manipulation routines From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 23:03:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 401941] New: EPEL Branch Request Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401941 Summary: EPEL Branch Request Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Digest-MD4 AssignedTo: jpo at di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Digest-MD4 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 This package pre-dates bugzilla review tickets and has no other associated tickets, hence the new ticket for this branch request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 23:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 401941] EPEL Branch Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711272304.lARN4W0V028480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: EPEL Branch Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401941 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpo at di.uminho.pt |paul at city-fan.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 27 23:03:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 401941] EPEL Branch Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711272303.lARN3pDr022048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: EPEL Branch Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401941 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 02:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 401941] EPEL Branch Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711280247.lAS2loug027318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: EPEL Branch Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401941 jwboyer at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Nov 28 02:58:39 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:58:39 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 14:57 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 10:04 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:00 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:00 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > > > > > > orphaned" > > > > > > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > > > > > > who > > > > > > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) > > > > > > > IMO, this doesn't encourage "perl-sig seniors" to work on these > > packages, because it doesn't make the difference between "collectively > > maintained" packages and packages being maintained by "individuals who > > will shoot" when touching your packages apparent. > > I'm not actually sure how to accomplish "collective" maintainership, in > the sense that you want it. What I had in mind was to let one of * perl-sig or * an "alias" (whatever this would be) to a group of people to own a package. or * an explicit list of "perl seniors" to own the package. I thought, at minimum the latter was technically possible. > Nor do I really want to lock them down via > ACLs so only perl-sig elites can touch them. > > I think the packages still need a primary maintainer, and then can have > as many co-maintainers as desired. Seems to me, as if Fedora doesn't support collective maintainership :// Ralf From jpazdziora at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 08:15:15 2007 From: jpazdziora at redhat.com (Jan Pazdziora) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:15:15 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196201809.3054.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711271326n43dd03e7m68340bb4bf38c3e2@mail.gmail.com> <1196201809.3054.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20071128081515.GA17340@redhat.com> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:16:49PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > Tom Callaway (aka, no one asked for it explicitly) > > * perl-Alien-wxWidgets -- Building, finding and using wxWidgets > binaries > * perl-AppConfig -- Perl module for reading configuration files > * perl-Array-Compare -- Perl extension for comparing arrays > * perl-Cairo -- Perl interface to the cairo library > * perl-Carp-Assert -- Executable comments > * perl-Carp-Assert-More -- Convenience wrappers around > Carp::Assert > * ?perl-Config-IniFiles -- A module for reading .ini-style > configuration files > * perl-Data-Compare -- Compare perl data structures > * perl-DBD-XBase -- Perl module for reading and writing the dbf > files Ummm -- I've asked for perl-DBD-XBase ... -- Jan Pazdziora Satellite Engineering, Red Hat From tcallawa at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 12:40:15 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:40:15 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <7dd7ab490711240934g21c1508fhe5d1f01992be2c9@mail.gmail.com> <1195927388.15604.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711241116r6d5e698ckdddf87c244c038d2@mail.gmail.com> <1196093898.15604.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 03:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Seems to me, as if Fedora doesn't support collective maintainership :// Its a technicality. There is no difference in rights or permissions between primary maintainers and comaintainers, except that the packagedb requires there be a primary. ~spot From pertusus at free.fr Wed Nov 28 13:05:47 2007 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:05:47 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:40:15AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 03:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Seems to me, as if Fedora doesn't support collective maintainership :// > > Its a technicality. There is no difference in rights or permissions > between primary maintainers and comaintainers, except that the packagedb > requires there be a primary. I think that Ralf point is not about having many comaintainers, but group comaintainers. Looks like the packagedb doesn't allow that. -- Pat From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Nov 28 13:26:38 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:26:38 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> References: <1196111302.3229.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> Message-ID: <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:05 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:40:15AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 03:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > Seems to me, as if Fedora doesn't support collective maintainership :// > > > > Its a technicality. There is no difference in rights or permissions > > between primary maintainers and comaintainers, except that the packagedb > > requires there be a primary. > > I think that Ralf point is not about having many comaintainers, but > group comaintainers. Looks like the packagedb doesn't allow that. Almost. What I wanted to find is how Fedora supports and destinguishes: a) a "principal" w/ several co-maintainers under his directions b) "free for a specific group with changing members" e.g. free for perl-sig, free for FPG, free for "sponsors". c) "free for anybody" (free for any Fedora all CLA-signors) d) "orphaned" My understanding of what Spot wrote is: Fedora doesn't support b) and c). He can't avoid folding them into a). IMO, this lets appear "collective maintainership" as a "closed group/intriguing circle", because doesn't let appear such packages as "open for interested volunteers", but implies explicit "appointment" and explict knowledge about how somebody made it into such a "circle". Or differently: one year ahead, nobody will remember these packages are open, because they can't be distinguished from the usual "closed circles" maintaining packages otherwise. Ralf From pertusus at free.fr Wed Nov 28 13:35:34 2007 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:35:34 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:26:38PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > What I wanted to find is how Fedora supports and destinguishes: > > a) a "principal" w/ several co-maintainers under his directions > b) "free for a specific group with changing members" > e.g. free for perl-sig, free for FPG, free for "sponsors". > c) "free for anybody" (free for any Fedora all CLA-signors) > d) "orphaned" > > My understanding of what Spot wrote is: Fedora doesn't support b) and > c). He can't avoid folding them into a). c) is technicaly possible, it corresponds with 'group members can commit?' selected. However, in general, having this selected doesn't mean that the maintainer is really willing to let everybody touch the package. > Or differently: one year ahead, nobody will remember these packages are > open, because they can't be distinguished from the usual "closed > circles" maintaining packages otherwise. Right. Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? and select 'group members can commit?'. -- Pat From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Nov 28 13:46:50 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:46:50 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> Message-ID: <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the > pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? > and select 'group members can commit?'. IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as owner ;) Ralf From tcallawa at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 14:25:04 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:25:04 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the > > pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? > > and select 'group members can commit?'. > > IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an > "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as > owner ;) Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. You should talk to Toshio about this. ~spot From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Nov 28 14:41:21 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:41:21 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196260881.12310.745.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:25 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > > > > Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the > > > pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? > > > and select 'group members can commit?'. > > > > IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an > > "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as > > owner ;) > > Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. > > You should talk to Toshio about this. Me? I don't have a problem when the packagedb stuff denotes you to maintain all these packages all alone, because nobody can distinguish them from "true Spot" packages nor when these packages doen't receive cpancheck from because of this. This is solely your problem - Sooner or later. Ralf From tcallawa at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 14:46:32 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:46:32 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196260881.12310.745.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196172050.3229.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196175614.12310.529.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196175878.3229.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196260881.12310.745.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1196261192.3054.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 15:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:25 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the > > > > pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? > > > > and select 'group members can commit?'. > > > > > > IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an > > > "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as > > > owner ;) > > > > Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. > > > > You should talk to Toshio about this. > Me? I don't have a problem when the packagedb stuff denotes you to > maintain all these packages all alone, because nobody can distinguish > them from "true Spot" packages nor when these packages doen't receive > cpancheck from because of this. > > This is solely your problem - Sooner or later. I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up over technical limitations. ~spot From steve at silug.org Wed Nov 28 15:22:42 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:22:42 -0600 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196261192.3054.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196260881.12310.745.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196261192.3054.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20071128152242.GA23543@osiris.silug.org> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as > packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up > over technical limitations. And where would one find this cpancheck that knows how to check the packagedb? :-) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Nov 28 15:53:16 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:53:16 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <20071128152242.GA23543@osiris.silug.org> References: <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196260881.12310.745.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196261192.3054.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128152242.GA23543@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <1196265196.12310.757.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:22 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as > > packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up > > over technical limitations. > > And where would one find this cpancheck that knows how to check the > packagedb? :-) Yet another individual facing this regression? Am using a script to restore a local owners.list from the packagedb and than run a slight modified derivative of a very early version of your script. #!/bin/sh owners=$(HOME)/src/fedora/local lftp -c get "https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugzilla?tg_format=plain" \ -o $owners/owners.list.raw cat $owners/owners.list.raw | grep '^Fedora|' > $owners/owners.fedora.list As my local cpancheck only checks for packages being maintained by me, ... it will not check spots packages. So be it - He receives what he wants. Collective maintainership has failed due to infrastructural defects - period. Ralf From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Wed Nov 28 16:09:09 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:09:09 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711280809t130ec1f1u38e97be56ae7b8de@mail.gmail.com> On Nov 28, 2007 6:25 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the > > > pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? > > > and select 'group members can commit?'. > > > > IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an > > "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as > > owner ;) > > Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. > > You should talk to Toshio about this. I'm unfamiliar with the limitations of the accounts/grouping/packagedb system, but if we can have the accounts system enforce a requirement that members of one group must be a subset of another group (e.g. perl-sig group members must be members of the cla-done group), would this satisfy the requirement that all package owners have signed CLA's? Can we have a group own a package? I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is another variant of "dirty hacks". Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work together here :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From tcallawa at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 16:58:52 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:58:52 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490711280809t130ec1f1u38e97be56ae7b8de@mail.gmail.com> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711280809t130ec1f1u38e97be56ae7b8de@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1196269132.27540.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:09 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is > another variant of "dirty hacks". > > Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work > together here :) The perl-SIG is not a user, hence it cannot own packages. Reference: "Note: You may be asked to CC fedora-perl-devel-list on a perl package. This can be done with the username "perl-sig". This is presently a user, not a group so it cannot be used as an owner or comaintainer, only for CC." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSPrivate Any more than that, I do not know, and you should be talking to Toshio about making possible improvements. Please do not shoot the messenger. :) ~spot From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 17:14:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 401941] EPEL Branch Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711281714.lASHEgur027418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: EPEL Branch Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401941 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-11-28 12:14 EST ------- Branched and built successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Nov 28 17:44:36 2007 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:44:36 +0100 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196269132.27540.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711280809t130ec1f1u38e97be56ae7b8de@mail.gmail.com> <1196269132.27540.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1196271877.12310.785.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:58 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:09 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective > > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is > > another variant of "dirty hacks". > > > > Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work > > together here :) > > The perl-SIG is not a user, And what prevents you from making it one, or creating email alias you could use, instead? > Reference: > > "Note: You may be asked to CC fedora-perl-devel-list on a perl package. > This can be done with the username "perl-sig". This is presently a user, > not a group so it cannot be used as an owner or comaintainer, only for > CC." > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSPrivate > > Any more than that, I do not know, and you should be talking to Toshio > about making possible improvements. Please do not shoot the > messenger. :) Yes, it the appropriate target isn't you. All I can add, provided the limitations of current implementation, I'd suggest you to put everybody having volunteered explicitly into InitialCC list or directly into the Owner field (AFAICT, multiple owners are possible). This would allow scripted update checks (cpancheck) without accidentally interfering with those packages you have acls in effect (e.g. the main perl package) Also it would be appropriate to contact FESCO (ain't you a FESCO member?) to have Toshio implement this missing feature. Ralf From tcallawa at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 18:05:45 2007 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:05:45 -0500 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <20071128152242.GA23543@osiris.silug.org> References: <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196260881.12310.745.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196261192.3054.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128152242.GA23543@osiris.silug.org> Message-ID: <1196273145.27540.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:22 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as > > packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up > > over technical limitations. > > And where would one find this cpancheck that knows how to check the > packagedb? :-) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsefulScripts That cpancheck seems fully capable of checking the packagedb. ~spot From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 18:15:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711281815.lASIFNst010409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-11-28 13:15 EST ------- jpo has been marked as AWOL. Please see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-November/msg02343.html for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Wed Nov 28 18:39:30 2007 From: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu (Chris Weyl) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:39:30 -0800 Subject: Fwd: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <474DA392.5000504@gmail.com> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711280809t130ec1f1u38e97be56ae7b8de@mail.gmail.com> <474DA392.5000504@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7dd7ab490711281039q2a3de95bw6df011e47e4e84ba@mail.gmail.com> Looks like this didn't make it :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Toshio Kuratomi Date: Nov 28, 2007 9:21 AM Subject: Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? To: Chris Weyl , fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Chris, if this bounces from the list, feel free to forward it there. Chris Weyl wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 6:25 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: >>>> Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the >>>> pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? >>>> and select 'group members can commit?'. >>> IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an >>> "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as >>> owner ;) >> Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. >> >> You should talk to Toshio about this. > > I'm unfamiliar with the limitations of the accounts/grouping/packagedb > system, but if we can have the accounts system enforce a requirement > that members of one group must be a subset of another group (e.g. > perl-sig group members must be members of the cla-done group), would > this satisfy the requirement that all package owners have signed > CLA's? Yes, this part is currently possible. We're changing over to an LDAP backend and better web frontend in a few months, though, so I don't know the limitations and abilities of that system. One other thing is that people would need to be a member of cvsextras as well as cla_done in order to login to the cvs server. > Can we have a group own a package? > Not currently. Pseudo groups like the current perl-sig can own a package but a real group cannot. This requires a bit of recoding in order to change. OTOH, letting a group be comaintainer (equivalent rights to owner) of a package is fairly complete (there are a few places where we are currently checking for cvsextras explicitly, but we can change those to list other groups without much difficulty. The biggest area where group ownership won't work precisely right at this time is in the webUI. cvsextras is our only current group and we aren't showing all the acls for it, just the commit acl. For the perl-sig, I imagine that you'll want to have at least commit, watchbugzilla, and watchcommits set. I can code this into the commandline tool admins are using to set permissions but doing the same for the webUI will require some rethinking of what it should look like and how complex it should be. > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is > another variant of "dirty hacks". > Agreed. If you want to move forward with getting this working in the packagedb you should open a ticket[1]_, we can try and record all the changes we need in the packagedb and account system to enable the change. Then I can talk to the FAS2 author to be sure it won't cause him any grief when we migrate and we can code something up. We're shooting to deploy FAS2 in February. So if there are interdependencies between FAS and pkgdb that should wait on that deployment we would do so after that. .. _[1]: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/packagedb/newticket -Toshio -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia From steve at silug.org Wed Nov 28 19:57:48 2007 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:57:48 -0600 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <1196273145.27540.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196260881.12310.745.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196261192.3054.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128152242.GA23543@osiris.silug.org> <1196273145.27540.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20071128195748.GA20275@osiris.silug.org> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:05:45PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsefulScripts > > That cpancheck seems fully capable of checking the packagedb. I'll be damned. So it does. Isn't collaborative development great? ;-) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 20:00:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711282000.lASK0hOa026784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpo at di.uminho.pt |steve at silug.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 22:10:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711282210.lASMA3J8006394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-11-28 17:10 EST ------- So someone has already built this, and we can close the ticket, correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 28 23:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711282303.lASN3mUg022747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-11-28 18:03 EST ------- I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. I don't see any build yet for epel-4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:32:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392341] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290132.lAT1WAl7005018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392341 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.104-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:33:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392321] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290133.lAT1XBms005254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392321 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.18-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392321] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290133.lAT1XA9O013187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392321 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-28 20:33 EST ------- perl-Class-Inspector-1.18-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:32:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392341] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290132.lAT1W99Q012978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392341 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-28 20:32 EST ------- perl-Algorithm-Dependency-1.104-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:35:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389741] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290135.lAT1ZOdQ006355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389741 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-28 20:35 EST ------- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:40:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290140.lAT1eAbB007873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-11-28 20:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. > > I don't see any build yet for epel-4. Weird. I don't know what I thought I saw. I've updated the spec to match the devel branch and fired off EL-4 and EL-5 builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:44:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392331] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290144.lAT1iFif015926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392331 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.29-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 01:44:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:44:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392331] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290144.lAT1iEol008869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392331 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-11-28 20:44 EST ------- perl-Class-Autouse-1.29-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:10:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392301] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290410.lAT4AEB0032680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392301 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.31-2 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-11-28 23:10 EST ------- updates pushed for FC-7, FC-8 and rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:08:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398451] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290408.lAT48imN032124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398451 Bug 398451 depends on bug 392291, which changed state. Bug 392291 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:08:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392311] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290408.lAT48gxP032084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392311 Bug 392311 depends on bug 392291, which changed state. Bug 392291 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:08:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392331] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290408.lAT48hxt032104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392331 Bug 392331 depends on bug 392291, which changed state. Bug 392291 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:08:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392321] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290408.lAT48l1N032187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392321 Bug 392321 depends on bug 392291, which changed state. Bug 392291 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392301] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290408.lAT48jRA032144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392301 Bug 392301 depends on bug 392291, which changed state. Bug 392291 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 392341] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290408.lAT48kAp032166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392341 Bug 392341 depends on bug 392291, which changed state. Bug 392291 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 237197] perl-File-Slurp: EL-4, EL-5 branches? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290443.lAT4haM8009192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-File-Slurp: EL-4, EL-5 branches? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237197 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-11-28 23:43 EST ------- Ping? Chris, please feel free to take over for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 04:39:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230689] Missing config.h In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711290439.lAT4dQ0p008607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing config.h https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230689 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-11-28 23:39 EST ------- Seems as if this bug did resolve automagically ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From a.badger at gmail.com Wed Nov 28 17:21:22 2007 From: a.badger at gmail.com (Toshio Kuratomi) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:21:22 -0800 Subject: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? In-Reply-To: <7dd7ab490711280809t130ec1f1u38e97be56ae7b8de@mail.gmail.com> References: <1196134833.12310.402.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196176398.12310.537.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196193432.3229.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1196218719.12310.583.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196253615.3054.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071128130547.GA2629@free.fr> <1196256398.12310.727.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20071128133534.GC2629@free.fr> <1196257610.12310.730.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1196259904.3054.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7dd7ab490711280809t130ec1f1u38e97be56ae7b8de@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <474DA392.5000504@gmail.com> Chris, if this bounces from the list, feel free to forward it there. Chris Weyl wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 6:25 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: >>>> Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the >>>> pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? >>>> and select 'group members can commit?'. >>> IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an >>> "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as >>> owner ;) >> Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. >> >> You should talk to Toshio about this. > > I'm unfamiliar with the limitations of the accounts/grouping/packagedb > system, but if we can have the accounts system enforce a requirement > that members of one group must be a subset of another group (e.g. > perl-sig group members must be members of the cla-done group), would > this satisfy the requirement that all package owners have signed > CLA's? Yes, this part is currently possible. We're changing over to an LDAP backend and better web frontend in a few months, though, so I don't know the limitations and abilities of that system. One other thing is that people would need to be a member of cvsextras as well as cla_done in order to login to the cvs server. > Can we have a group own a package? > Not currently. Pseudo groups like the current perl-sig can own a package but a real group cannot. This requires a bit of recoding in order to change. OTOH, letting a group be comaintainer (equivalent rights to owner) of a package is fairly complete (there are a few places where we are currently checking for cvsextras explicitly, but we can change those to list other groups without much difficulty. The biggest area where group ownership won't work precisely right at this time is in the webUI. cvsextras is our only current group and we aren't showing all the acls for it, just the commit acl. For the perl-sig, I imagine that you'll want to have at least commit, watchbugzilla, and watchcommits set. I can code this into the commandline tool admins are using to set permissions but doing the same for the webUI will require some rethinking of what it should look like and how complex it should be. > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is > another variant of "dirty hacks". > Agreed. If you want to move forward with getting this working in the packagedb you should open a ticket[1]_, we can try and record all the changes we need in the packagedb and account system to enable the change. Then I can talk to the FAS2 author to be sure it won't cause him any grief when we migrate and we can code something up. We're shooting to deploy FAS2 in February. So if there are interdependencies between FAS and pkgdb that should wait on that deployment we would do so after that. .. _[1]: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/packagedb/newticket -Toshio From steve at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 29 18:17:52 2007 From: steve at fedoraproject.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:17:52 -0500 Subject: rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-5 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 perl-BerkeleyDB.spec, 1.14, 1.15 sources, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <200711291817.lATIHqPI022875@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22842 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-BerkeleyDB.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.32. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- .cvsignore 16 Oct 2006 23:33:26 -0000 1.8 +++ .cvsignore 29 Nov 2007 18:17:19 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -BerkeleyDB-0.31.tar.gz +BerkeleyDB-0.32.tar.gz Index: perl-BerkeleyDB.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-5/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 --- perl-BerkeleyDB.spec 16 Oct 2006 23:48:37 -0000 1.14 +++ perl-BerkeleyDB.spec 29 Nov 2007 18:17:19 -0000 1.15 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-BerkeleyDB -Version: 0.31 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 0.32 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Perl extension for Berkeley DB version 2, 3 or 4 License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -8,8 +8,10 @@ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PM/PMQS/BerkeleyDB-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: db4-devel +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) # For "make test". -BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod), perl(MLDBM) +BuildRequires: perl(MLDBM) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description @@ -56,6 +58,12 @@ %{_bindir}/* %changelog +* Fri Jul 13 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.32-1 +- Update to 0.32. + +* Tue Apr 17 2007 Steven Pritchard 0.31-3 +- BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. + * Mon Oct 16 2006 Steven Pritchard 0.31-2 - Rebuild. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 16 Oct 2006 23:33:26 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 29 Nov 2007 18:17:19 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -48e2cf29d37f457a35eedc3104c41eac BerkeleyDB-0.31.tar.gz +df74b8d381d08b17ada69185b45e06a6 BerkeleyDB-0.32.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 18:42:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711291842.lATIgKUQ013123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-11-29 13:42 EST ------- OK, it is definitely in testing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 29 19:57:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711291957.lATJvUB4025818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-11-29 14:57 EST ------- Clearing the cvs flag here as no cvsadmin attention seems needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 30 18:43:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711301843.lAUIhxxO008090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-11-30 13:43 EST ------- I'm afraid I've lost interest and time. If someone else could take over, that would be great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 30 19:53:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 237197] perl-File-Slurp: EL-4, EL-5 branches? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711301953.lAUJrsMG022866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-File-Slurp: EL-4, EL-5 branches? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237197 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew.| |edu) | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-11-30 14:53 EST ------- No longer needed at $work :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 30 23:39:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200711302339.lAUNdQhn011140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.