time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at freenet.de
Wed Nov 28 17:44:36 UTC 2007


On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:58 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:09 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
> > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective
> > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is
> > another variant of "dirty hacks".
> > 
> > Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work
> > together here :)
> 
> The perl-SIG is not a user, 

And what prevents you from making it one, or creating email alias you
could use, instead?

> Reference:
> 
> "Note: You may be asked to CC fedora-perl-devel-list on a perl package.
> This can be done with the username "perl-sig". This is presently a user,
> not a group so it cannot be used as an owner or comaintainer, only for
> CC."
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSPrivate
> 
> Any more than that, I do not know, and you should be talking to Toshio
> about making possible improvements. Please do not shoot the
> messenger. :)
Yes, it the appropriate target isn't you.

All I can add, provided the limitations of current implementation, I'd
suggest you to put everybody having volunteered explicitly into
InitialCC list or directly into the Owner field (AFAICT, multiple owners
are possible).

This would allow scripted update checks (cpancheck) without accidentally
interfering with those packages you have acls in effect (e.g. the main
perl package)

Also it would be appropriate to contact FESCO (ain't you a FESCO
member?) to have Toshio implement this missing feature.

Ralf





More information about the Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list