ON_DEV usage (was: Fwd: Who moved my bug?)

[Marcela Maslanova]

Chris Weyl wrote:
> This seems like a good idea -- everything seems to be working pretty
> smoothly right now, but it seems like a step in the right direction as
> we have more and more "SIG maintained" perl bits (the stuff formerly
> belonging to JPO comes to mind).  Should we adopt it as our policy
> also; that is, when working on a bug for a perl package we toggle the
> state to ON_DEV?
> 
>                        -Chris
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at>
> Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Who moved my bug?
> To: fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> 
> 
> Till Maas <opensource <at> till.name> writes:
>> ASSIGNED means, that the bug has been triaged, i.e. it is assigned to the
>> rigth component and all necessary information is provided[1]. A member of the
>> Fedora Triage Team probably did the changes to your bugs.
> 
> I'll also add that if you work in a team and need a status to set when you're
> actively working on fixing something (so you don't duplicate work in the team),
> you can use the ON_DEV status for that purpose. (KDE SIG and a few other teams
> use this.) Note that this is not required, it's only a convention followed by
> some team-maintained packages.
> 
>        Kevin Kofler
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> 
> 
ON_DEV looks fine.

-- 
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno