rpms/perl-Sort-Versions/devel perl-Sort-Versions.spec,1.9,1.10
Ralf Corsépius
corsepiu at fedoraproject.org
Thu Mar 19 14:09:02 UTC 2009
Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>>> for f in Changes Versions.pm; do
>>> - iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 <$f >${f}_ && mv ${f}_ $f
>>> + iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 <$f >${f}_ &&
>>> + touch -r $f ${f}_ &&
>>> + mv ${f}_ $f
>>> done
>>> %changelog
>>> +* Thu Mar 19 2009 Stepan Kasal <skasal at redhat.com> - 1.5-11
>>> +- fix timestamps of the recoded text files
>> Why this change? Adjusting timestamps on perl modules is painting bikesheds.
>
> OTOH, touching changelog during rpm build is not a good idea, so the
> recode command should preserve the timestamp.
Wrong.
a) These files exist only once => There is no bug you are fixing.
b) After you iconv'ed a file, it alread is different from the original file.
c) Perl files are being copied around when building.
d) Perl files are not multilib'ed.
> By fixing my recent commit, I made a note to self to do the
> iconv && touch && mv
> right next type I'll use it somewhere.
I am considering to revert your change.
> (Hopefully, this thread will alse help me to remember better.)
> I agree the importance of this change is close to 0, yet I think it
> was not a mistake to cmmit it.
You are underestimating the impact of such infantile changes.
* They drive off packagers - At least, I am close to orphaning this
package because of what you did.
Feel free to assign it to you.
* They fuel those kids, who believe in timestamp fixing.
Ralf
Ralf
More information about the Fedora-perl-devel-list
mailing list