From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Fri Feb 1 06:40:41 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:40:41 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Re: PEAR 1.7 In-Reply-To: <20080131120441.GA4123@redhat.com> References: <47A0B40C.40702@timj.co.uk> <20080131120441.GA4123@redhat.com> Message-ID: <47A2BEE9.80506@FamilleCollet.com> Joe Orton a ?crit : > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:29:48PM +0000, Tim Jackson wrote: >> FYI I have built PEAR 1.7.0RC2 locally and it seems to be OK, I've been >> using it for a while. >> >> PEAR 1.7.0 final should be out in the next few days so I think we should >> get that into F9 test 2 as it has some really important new features (esp. >> file roles www_dir, cfg_dir) > > Sounds good to me :) PEAR 1.7.0 is out. I've build (localy) the updated package : no problem. I will do a full test (building / installing / testing) some extensions (PEAR and PECL) and if all is ok, I will push it to rawhide (probably this week-end). Regards > > joe > > From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Fri Feb 1 18:26:47 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:26:47 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] PEAR 1.7.0 available In-Reply-To: <47A2BEE9.80506@FamilleCollet.com> References: <47A0B40C.40702@timj.co.uk> <20080131120441.GA4123@redhat.com> <47A2BEE9.80506@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <47A36467.7030401@FamilleCollet.com> > I will do a full test (building / installing / testing) some extensions > (PEAR and PECL) and if all is ok, I will push it to rawhide (probably > this week-end). Done. PEAR 1.7.0 is available in rawhide. I've build / install / uninstall / test some PECL and PEAR extensions without any problem. Please check you extension to verify if all is ok. Regards From lists at timj.co.uk Thu Feb 28 19:47:35 2008 From: lists at timj.co.uk (Tim Jackson) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:47:35 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Zend's PDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47C70FD7.6000305@timj.co.uk> Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > So... Does anyone feel brave enough to try packaging PDT? :) > http://zend.com/pdt/ Not right now but it would be *really* useful... There is already an eclipse-phpeclipse package (not the same thing) which might be useful as a model? I imagine the Eclipse packagers could help out too. There are some extra (Eclipse) deps that would have to be packaged too I think. Anyone up for it? I don't have time at the moment unfortunately. Tim From lists at timj.co.uk Thu Feb 28 20:33:13 2008 From: lists at timj.co.uk (Tim Jackson) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:33:13 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] "cfg" role in /etc? Message-ID: <47C71A89.8090104@timj.co.uk> PEAR 1.7.0 introduced a new "cfg" role, analagous to our RPM "%config" role. This was something I requested, since I always found it strange that PEAR didn't have such a thing when we find it useful in RPM land, and PEAR and RPM are comparable in their goals. Anyway, as it stands in rawhide, cfg_dir defaults to /usr/share/pear/cfg but I think it really should be /etc/pear . (Then you would get config files installed like so: /etc/pear/Some_Package/foo.ini) Any comments? Thanks Tim From lists at timj.co.uk Thu Feb 28 20:35:09 2008 From: lists at timj.co.uk (Tim Jackson) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:35:09 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Zend's PDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47C71AFD.5070401@timj.co.uk> Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > So... Does anyone feel brave enough to try packaging PDT? :) > http://zend.com/pdt/ Not right now but it would be *really* useful... There is already an eclipse-phpeclipse package (not the same thing) which might be useful as a model? I imagine the Eclipse packagers could help out too. There are some extra (Eclipse) deps that would have to be packaged too I think. Anyone up for it? I don't have time at the moment unfortunately. Tim From jorton at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:12:12 2008 From: jorton at redhat.com (Joe Orton) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:12:12 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Re: "cfg" role in /etc? In-Reply-To: <47C71A89.8090104@timj.co.uk> References: <47C71A89.8090104@timj.co.uk> Message-ID: <20080229111212.GA22615@redhat.com> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:33:13PM +0000, Tim Jackson wrote: > PEAR 1.7.0 introduced a new "cfg" role, analagous to our RPM "%config" > role. This was something I requested, since I always found it strange that > PEAR didn't have such a thing when we find it useful in RPM land, and PEAR > and RPM are comparable in their goals. > > Anyway, as it stands in rawhide, cfg_dir defaults to /usr/share/pear/cfg > but I think it really should be /etc/pear . (Then you would get config > files installed like so: /etc/pear/Some_Package/foo.ini) Seems reasonable, though /etc/pearkeys is used too, so maybe it would be better to do: cfg_dir => /etc/pear/conf sig_keydir => /etc/pear/keys What do you think? joe