From limb at jcomserv.net Mon Jul 14 19:42:46 2008 From: limb at jcomserv.net (Jon Ciesla) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:42:46 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13]] Message-ID: <32467.198.175.55.5.1216064566.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> Any suggestions, anyone? Am I better off just pulling roundcubemail from EL-4? ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13] From: "Joe Orton" Date: Mon, July 14, 2008 1:40 pm To: "Jon Ciesla" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:30:35AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > php-pear is a subpackage of php in (base) RHEL4. Not sure what your exact question is, so I can't tell whether that's the right answer :) > > > > joe > > > Essentially, when I try to build php-pear-Mail-Mime in EPEL-4, mock fails with: > ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for php-pear >= 1:1.4.11-1.el4s1.1. Exiting. > > php-pear is at least 4.3.9. Why would this happen? 4.3.9 at epoch 0 is less than 1.4.11 at epoch 1. I've no idea whether the Fedora-style PEAR packages will work with the RHEL4 php-pear, in any case. I'd suggest you bring this up on fedora-php-devel-list. joe -- novus ordo absurdum -- novus ordo absurdum From steven.moix at axianet.ch Tue Jul 15 06:56:38 2008 From: steven.moix at axianet.ch (Steven Moix) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:56:38 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13]] In-Reply-To: <32467.198.175.55.5.1216064566.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> References: <32467.198.175.55.5.1216064566.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> Message-ID: <1216104998.2603.5.camel@hp6710.axianet.ch> It has nothing to do with your specific question, but there may be another reason to pull roundcubemail from EPEL-4: it requires PHP5 since version 0.2. I didn't have a look at the packages, but here you go... Steven On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 14:42 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Any suggestions, anyone? Am I better off just pulling roundcubemail from > EL-4? > > ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- > Subject: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13] > From: "Joe Orton" > Date: Mon, July 14, 2008 1:40 pm > To: "Jon Ciesla" > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:30:35AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > > > php-pear is a subpackage of php in (base) RHEL4. Not sure what your > exact question is, so I can't tell whether that's the right answer :) > > > > > > joe > > > > > Essentially, when I try to build php-pear-Mail-Mime in EPEL-4, mock > fails with: > > ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for php-pear >= > 1:1.4.11-1.el4s1.1. Exiting. > > > > php-pear is at least 4.3.9. Why would this happen? > > 4.3.9 at epoch 0 is less than 1.4.11 at epoch 1. > > I've no idea whether the Fedora-style PEAR packages will work with the > RHEL4 php-pear, in any case. I'd suggest you bring this up on > fedora-php-devel-list. > > joe > > > -- > novus ordo absurdum > > > From limb at jcomserv.net Tue Jul 15 12:01:44 2008 From: limb at jcomserv.net (Jon Ciesla) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:01:44 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13]] In-Reply-To: <1216104998.2603.5.camel@hp6710.axianet.ch> References: <32467.198.175.55.5.1216064566.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> <1216104998.2603.5.camel@hp6710.axianet.ch> Message-ID: <22976.198.175.55.5.1216123304.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> > It has nothing to do with your specific question, but there may be > another reason to pull roundcubemail from EPEL-4: it requires PHP5 since > version 0.2. > > I didn't have a look at the packages, but here you go... Given that 0.2 fixes some XSS issues, I think that's wise. Thanks! > Steven > > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 14:42 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Any suggestions, anyone? Am I better off just pulling roundcubemail >> from >> EL-4? >> >> ---------------------------- Original Message >> ---------------------------- >> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13] >> From: "Joe Orton" >> Date: Mon, July 14, 2008 1:40 pm >> To: "Jon Ciesla" >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:30:35AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > >> > > php-pear is a subpackage of php in (base) RHEL4. Not sure what your >> exact question is, so I can't tell whether that's the right answer :) >> > > >> > > joe >> > > >> > Essentially, when I try to build php-pear-Mail-Mime in EPEL-4, mock >> fails with: >> > ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for php-pear >= >> 1:1.4.11-1.el4s1.1. Exiting. >> > >> > php-pear is at least 4.3.9. Why would this happen? >> >> 4.3.9 at epoch 0 is less than 1.4.11 at epoch 1. >> >> I've no idea whether the Fedora-style PEAR packages will work with the >> RHEL4 php-pear, in any case. I'd suggest you bring this up on >> fedora-php-devel-list. >> >> joe >> >> >> -- >> novus ordo absurdum >> >> >> > -- novus ordo absurdum From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Sat Jul 19 08:06:32 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:06:32 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] PHP 5.3.0-dev - first work Message-ID: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> Hi, Some have perhaps already read http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2008/07/18/PHP-530-dev I start working on this major release and I hope upstream will be ready for Fedora 10... (Joe, any idea/goal about this ?) or Fedora 11. First comments : - ncurses extension is no more part of main php and will need to be packaged as php-pecl-ncurses (package is ready) See : http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=14369 - phar is now part of main php, so php-phar (or php-common ?) will have to obsolete php-pecl-phar - gd/t1lib : what about enabling this option as dependency is available in Fedora ? (we could have done this for a while, i don't find any discussion about this in the archive). - XML extensions (dom, xmlreader, xmlwriter) doesn't load. See : http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45557 - pgsql extension doesn't load, seems to be another visibility issue with regfree/php_regfree function. Need some work. - make test : all test fails. Need some work. - pear 1.7.2 is required to build extension : not a problem, already in Rawhide. Regards. Remi. From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Sat Jul 19 13:42:09 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:42:09 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] PHP 5.3.0-dev - first work In-Reply-To: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> References: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <4881EF31.5070500@FamilleCollet.com> Remi Collet a ?crit : > - pgsql extension doesn't load, seems to be another visibility issue > with regfree/php_regfree function. Need some work. See : http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45564 To be continued... From jorton at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 20:26:21 2008 From: jorton at redhat.com (Joe Orton) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:26:21 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] PHP 5.3.0-dev - first work In-Reply-To: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> References: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <20080719202621.GA12712@redhat.com> Hi Remi! On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:06:32AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > Some have perhaps already read > http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2008/07/18/PHP-530-dev > > I start working on this major release and I hope upstream will be ready > for Fedora 10... (Joe, any idea/goal about this ?) or Fedora 11. Awesome work, thanks a lot! Last I checked upstream said the aim was for 5.3 to be out in September/October timescale. The F10 feature freeze is August 19th, so this is probably going to be a F11 thing. > - phar is now part of main php, so php-phar (or php-common ?) will have > to obsolete php-pecl-phar I think php-common will be appropriate for phar unless it's a really huge binary. > - gd/t1lib : what about enabling this option as dependency is available > in Fedora ? (we could have done this for a while, i don't find any > discussion about this in the archive). I hadn't see that; yeah, no reason why not to enable in in Fedora right now. Feel free to commit the necessary changes :) > - make test : all test fails. Need some work. Are there ABI changes in 5.3? ABI changes will break "make test" if the patch to force use of "php -n" throughout the test suite is not complete (which it usually isn't), and old 5.2.x system .so files get loaded. > - pear 1.7.2 is required to build extension : not a problem, already in > Rawhide. And thanks for doing that too ;) Regards, joe From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Sun Jul 20 06:56:15 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:56:15 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] PHP 5.3.0-dev - first work In-Reply-To: <20080719202621.GA12712@redhat.com> References: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> <20080719202621.GA12712@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4882E18F.9030703@FamilleCollet.com> Joe Orton a ?crit : > Are there ABI changes in 5.3? ABI changes will break "make test" if the > patch to force use of "php -n" throughout the test suite is not complete > (which it usually isn't), and old 5.2.x system .so files get loaded. > Yes, you're right. php -n is there and doesn't load /etc/php.ini but still load /etc/php.d/*.ini... So test suite run fine in mock only : ===================================================================== TEST RESULT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Exts skipped : 48 Exts tested : 32 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tests : 7314 4523 Tests skipped : 2791 ( 38.2%) -------- Tests warned : 5 ( 0.1%) ( 0.1%) Tests failed : 14 ( 0.2%) ( 0.3%) Expected fail : 3 ( 0.0%) ( 0.1%) Tests passed : 4501 ( 61.5%) ( 99.5%) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Time taken : 189 seconds ===================================================================== Remi. From limb at jcomserv.net Thu Jul 24 15:49:01 2008 From: limb at jcomserv.net (Jon Ciesla) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:49:01 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Review swapsies: Drupal modules Message-ID: <52894.65.195.245.6.1216914541.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> Anyone interested in reviewing these?: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359921 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359961 They're Drupal modules, some dependant on each other. I'll happily review a package or two in exchange for each of these. They should be fairly straightforward. Thanks in advance, Jon -- novus ordo absurdum From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Sun Jul 27 08:22:51 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:22:51 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] PHP 5.3.0-dev - first work In-Reply-To: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> References: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <488C305B.4090802@FamilleCollet.com> Some news Bug closed (visibility issues) : http://bugs.php.net/45557 http://bugs.php.net/45564 http://bugs.php.net/45572 Fileinfo is now enabled by default (v 1.0.5 bundled) as part of php. So will osbolete php-pecl-Fileinfo But : http://bugs.php.net/45636 A new SQLite3 extension available. But, if build as shared, doesn't load (again, visibility issue) Need work / bug report. Remi. From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Sun Jul 27 16:02:53 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:02:53 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] PHP 5.3.0-dev - first work In-Reply-To: <488C305B.4090802@FamilleCollet.com> References: <4881A088.7030704@FamilleCollet.com> <488C305B.4090802@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <488C9C2D.1070609@FamilleCollet.com> Remi Collet a ?crit : > A new SQLite3 extension available. > But, if build as shared, doesn't load (again, visibility issue) > Need work / bug report. No a bug. This extension requires Sqlite >= 3.5.9 (available in rawhide)