From lists at timj.co.uk  Tue Mar 11 22:34:57 2008
From: lists at timj.co.uk (Tim Jackson)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:34:57 +0000
Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Re: "cfg" role in /etc?
In-Reply-To: <20080229111212.GA22615@redhat.com>
References: <47C71A89.8090104@timj.co.uk> <20080229111212.GA22615@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <47D70911.10105@timj.co.uk>

Joe Orton wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:33:13PM +0000, Tim Jackson wrote:

>> Anyway, as it stands in rawhide, cfg_dir defaults to /usr/share/pear/cfg 
>> but I think it really should be /etc/pear . (Then you would get config 
>> files installed like so: /etc/pear/Some_Package/foo.ini)
> 
> Seems reasonable, though /etc/pearkeys is used too, so maybe it would be 
> better to do:
> 
>    cfg_dir => /etc/pear/conf
>    sig_keydir => /etc/pear/keys
> 
> What do you think?

I agree 100% that that would be cleaner. However, that would also be 
backwards-incompatible... :/ I suggest that if we do it, we do it for F10.

In the meantime I have built a 1.7.1-2 in rawhide which sets cfg_dir to 
/etc/pear. It also adds the missing pear_cfgdir and pear_wwwdir macros 
that should have been set in the 1.7.0 package.

Tim



From jorton at redhat.com  Wed Mar 12 11:17:06 2008
From: jorton at redhat.com (Joe Orton)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:17:06 +0000
Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Re: "cfg" role in /etc?
In-Reply-To: <47D70911.10105@timj.co.uk>
References: <47C71A89.8090104@timj.co.uk> <20080229111212.GA22615@redhat.com>
	<47D70911.10105@timj.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20080312111706.GA5462@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:34:57PM +0000, Tim Jackson wrote:
> In the meantime I have built a 1.7.1-2 in rawhide which sets cfg_dir to 
> /etc/pear. It also adds the missing pear_cfgdir and pear_wwwdir macros that 
> should have been set in the 1.7.0 package.

Looks good, thanks.

Out of interest, did you get a CVS diff mailed to you, or did you get an 
error when committing?  I didn't see anything here.

joe