From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Thu May 15 18:48:30 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 20:48:30 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Re: EPEL Branches In-Reply-To: <21430.198.175.55.5.1210857371.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> References: <21430.198.175.55.5.1210857371.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> Message-ID: <482C857E.8010909@FamilleCollet.com> Jon Ciesla a ?crit : > Remi, > > In order to solve some broken deps for roundcubemail in EPEL-4, I need > branches and builds of php-pear-Net-SMTP, php-pear-Auth-SASL, and > php-pear-Net-Socket. If you like, I can maintain those branches and do > the builds once you request the branches and they are created. > Net_SMTP, Net_Socket, DB, HTTP and Mail : this extensions are bundled with php until 5.1.x (but not provided for dependencies). $ rpm -qlp /tmp/php-pear-4.3.9-3.22.9.i386.rpm ... /usr/share/pear/Net /usr/share/pear/Net/SMTP.php /usr/share/pear/Net/Socket.php ... For other extensions, i don't push the one i maintain to EPEL-4 because the very old pear version implied to use a very specific spec file (the Fedora / EPEL-5 cannot be used : requires pear >= 1.4.9). I'm not sure that install/post/postun scriptlet will work with this version, this must be fully tested. I think we need a EPEL 4 template for pear extension, and i must confess i don't find yet the motivation for this. fedora-php-devel-list at redhat.com is probably the best place to propose/discuss/improve/validate it. And i agree to work on this. After this, we can branch the missing dependencies you need. Regards. > Thanks! > > Jon Ciesla > > > From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Sun May 18 06:57:26 2008 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 08:57:26 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Re: "cfg" role in /etc? : update to 1.7.2 In-Reply-To: <47D70911.10105@timj.co.uk> References: <47C71A89.8090104@timj.co.uk> <20080229111212.GA22615@redhat.com> <47D70911.10105@timj.co.uk> Message-ID: <482FD356.7040509@FamilleCollet.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim Jackson a ?crit : | Joe Orton wrote: | |> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:33:13PM +0000, Tim Jackson wrote: | |>> Anyway, as it stands in rawhide, cfg_dir defaults to |>> /usr/share/pear/cfg but I think it really should be /etc/pear . (Then |>> you would get config files installed like so: |>> /etc/pear/Some_Package/foo.ini) |> |> Seems reasonable, though /etc/pearkeys is used too, so maybe it would |> be better to do: |> |> cfg_dir => /etc/pear/conf |> sig_keydir => /etc/pear/keys |> |> What do you think? | | I agree 100% that that would be cleaner. However, that would also be | backwards-incompatible... :/ I suggest that if we do it, we do it for F10. | | In the meantime I have built a 1.7.1-2 in rawhide which sets cfg_dir to | /etc/pear. It also adds the missing pear_cfgdir and pear_wwwdir macros | that should have been set in the 1.7.0 package. I've pushed PEAR 1.7.2 to rawhide. First I've used latest install-pear.php version 1.32 (http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13257) but it breaks your patch to set cfg_dir (http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13375). Option -d overwrite value set by option -c :( So I revert to 1.31. Version 1.31 set www_dir to /usr/share/pear/www Version 1.32 set www_dir to /usr/share/pear/htdocs What must be this ? Should it be under /var/www ? (we probably need a new option to set this value) I don't change path under /etc to be able to push this as an update to F-9, and make change only on rawhide. Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkgv01YACgkQYUppBSnxahh7nQCgkdP1a7msa2kvTaJXJGEn040l 7x0AoLMKqnGx5iGtsoTjLYVI4LqhFCL5 =DCRu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From lists at timj.co.uk Sun May 18 10:16:03 2008 From: lists at timj.co.uk (Tim Jackson) Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 11:16:03 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Re: "cfg" role in /etc? : update to 1.7.2 In-Reply-To: <482FD356.7040509@FamilleCollet.com> References: <47C71A89.8090104@timj.co.uk> <20080229111212.GA22615@redhat.com> <47D70911.10105@timj.co.uk> <482FD356.7040509@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <483001E3.6080506@timj.co.uk> Remi Collet wrote: > Version 1.31 set www_dir to /usr/share/pear/www Well, it didn't, it didn't set it to anything, it's just that the first time you used PEAR it "guessed" [prefix]/www as www_dir > Version 1.32 set www_dir to /usr/share/pear/htdocs I think this was the "intended" default upstream... > What must be this ? Should it be under /var/www ? For Fedora it should be whatever we are using for webapps generally. I had a quick look on the wiki and couldn't see if we had a standard. phpMyAdmin and Squirrelmail use /usr/share/[pkgname]/[something] which doesn't really fit! I think the only sensible default is probably /var/www/html > (we probably need a new option to set this value) I've implemented that in the latest version upstream. Tim From rcovarru at alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl Tue May 20 22:47:17 2008 From: rcovarru at alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl (Renato Covarrubias Romero) Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 18:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] php and sqlite Message-ID: <200805201847.17566.rcovarru@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl> Hello, I'm a neebie in the list and I have a small question. Why php is compiled with the option '--without-sqlite'? I need the sqlite_* functions and don't exists. (php-sqlite rpm does not exist in Fedora 9) -- Renato Covarrubias Romero - counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl http://rnt.bla.cl Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM. From icon at fedoraproject.org Wed May 21 00:09:31 2008 From: icon at fedoraproject.org (Konstantin Ryabitsev) Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 20:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] php and sqlite In-Reply-To: <200805201847.17566.rcovarru@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl> References: <200805201847.17566.rcovarru@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl> Message-ID: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Renato Covarrubias Romero wrote: > Hello, I'm a neebie in the list and I have a small question. > > Why php is compiled with the option '--without-sqlite'? > > I need the sqlite_* functions and don't exists. > (php-sqlite rpm does not exist in Fedora 9) SQLite support in PHP is available via PDO. Please install php-pdo. Regards, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Montr?al, Qu?bec From fedora at theholbrooks.org Wed May 21 15:03:45 2008 From: fedora at theholbrooks.org (Brandon Holbrook) Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-php-devel-list] php and sqlite In-Reply-To: <200805201847.17566.rcovarru@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl> References: <200805201847.17566.rcovarru@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl> Message-ID: <483439D1.7090907@theholbrooks.org> Hey Renato, php-sqlite has gone away in favor of php-pdo-sqlite, which is included in Fedora. The pdo sqlite driver is the only driver that works against sqlite 3. The standalone sqlite_*() functions still only work with sqlite 2. Read over the PDO docs here: http://us.php.net/pdo -Brandon Renato Covarrubias Romero wrote: > Hello, I'm a neebie in the list and I have a small question. > > Why php is compiled with the option '--without-sqlite'? > > I need the sqlite_* functions and don't exists. > (php-sqlite rpm does not exist in Fedora 9) > >