Pakaging enthought tool suite

Gael Varoquaux gael.varoquaux at normalesup.org
Thu Apr 10 15:52:10 UTC 2008


On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:32:07AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 16:53 +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > I agree that packaging the whole Enthought Tool Suite would be very nice,
> > and much better than shipping it in a coarse-grained set of packages, as
> > Debian and Ubuntu have been doing. Making 15 or so packages is more work
> > than making 4, but it is more value.

> Is there a dependency tree/graph anywhere we can look at to decide which
> pieces to tackle first?

We are using setuptools to declare dependencies. I don't see an obious
way of generating a dependency graph from setuptools. We also have all
the interproject dependencies listed in
https://svn.enthought.com/enthought/browser/project_map.ini, using a
home-made dependency-inspection tool.

I am having a look at seeing how this tool can be used to generate such
graph. I will post the result on the list (don't hold your breath, I am
also working on some day work).

Cheers,

Gaël




More information about the Fedora-python-devel-list mailing list