From mlbright at gmail.com Thu Aug 20 20:54:51 2009 From: mlbright at gmail.com (Martin-Louis Bright) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:54:51 -0400 Subject: python 2.5 or 2.6 Message-ID: <3055c0a0908201354y35767cf6x8bd23f334b534832@mail.gmail.com> Hi! Does anyone know if/when python 2.5 or 2.6 will be included in RHEL? python 2.4 is certainly solid, but I'm trying to run fabric and it requires at least 2.5 -martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.badger at gmail.com Thu Aug 20 21:42:24 2009 From: a.badger at gmail.com (Toshio Kuratomi) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:42:24 -0700 Subject: python 2.5 or 2.6 In-Reply-To: <3055c0a0908201354y35767cf6x8bd23f334b534832@mail.gmail.com> References: <3055c0a0908201354y35767cf6x8bd23f334b534832@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4A8DC340.3090309@gmail.com> On 08/20/2009 01:54 PM, Martin-Louis Bright wrote: > Hi! > Does anyone know if/when python 2.5 or 2.6 will be included in RHEL? python > 2.4 is certainly solid, but I'm trying to run fabric and it requires at > least 2.5 Nope. But at a guess, RHEL5.x will stick to python-2.4 and RHEL6 will have python-2.6. This is because RHEL is based off of Fedora and we've had python-2.6 in Fedora for a while now. This is just a guess just like speculating when RHEL6 will be out would just be a guess. -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From kylev at kylev.com Tue Aug 25 00:04:28 2009 From: kylev at kylev.com (Kyle VanderBeek) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:04:28 -0700 Subject: python 2.5 or 2.6 In-Reply-To: <3055c0a0908201354y35767cf6x8bd23f334b534832@mail.gmail.com> References: <3055c0a0908201354y35767cf6x8bd23f334b534832@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Martin-Louis Bright wrote: > Hi! > Does anyone know if/when python 2.5 or 2.6 will be included in RHEL? python > 2.4 is certainly solid, but I'm trying to run fabric and it requires at > least 2.5 > In general, you're not going to see that major of an upgrade in RHEL. Every python related package would have to be upgraded at the same time, and that'd go against RHEL's stability goals. I'd encourage you to lean on the fabric folks to support 2.4 (which is really quite easy for the most part, other than the new try/except/finally that showed up in 2.5). -- kylev at kylev.com Some people have a way with words, while others... erm... thingy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ndbecker2 at gmail.com Wed Aug 26 13:38:42 2009 From: ndbecker2 at gmail.com (Neal Becker) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519377] scidavis segfaults on kde4.3 In-Reply-To: <200908261237.n7QCbqkM015389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> References: <200908261237.n7QCbqkM015389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200908260938.43323.ndbecker2@gmail.com> On Wednesday 26 August 2009, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional > comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519377 > > > Kevin Kofler changed: > > What |Removed |Added > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org > > > > > --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-08-26 > 08:37:51 EDT --- So should I just rebuild it and push the rebuild for > stable? I would have said it might be my local problem, but I have a 2nd fc11 x86_64 box that has the same issue - and that one is a lot more 'stock fc11' than the 1st one - so I'm really puzzled as to why others are not seeing this.