From jamatos at fc.up.pt  Thu Nov  8 21:56:36 2007
From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (=?iso-8859-1?q?Jos=E9_Matos?=)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:56:36 +0000
Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] R-patched in Fedora (feedback from R-devel)
Message-ID: <200711082156.36123.jamatos@fc.up.pt>

Hi,
	while reading the Rdevel list I found this quote from Peter Dalgaard:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2007-November/047366.html

"(Fedora incorporated patches in their RPM updates for a while, which I
was beginning to believe was a good idea, all things considered, but
they haven't done it (yet?) for 2.6.0.)"

	Funny. :-)
-- 
Jos? Ab?lio



From jamatos at fc.up.pt  Mon Nov 19 10:09:23 2007
From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (=?iso-8859-1?q?Jos=E9_Matos?=)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:09:23 +0000
Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] [Idea]: pre 2.6.1 in updates-testing?
Message-ID: <200711191009.24826.jamatos@fc.up.pt>

There are release candidates for R 2.6.1 that is expected to be release next 
Monday (26).

Those daily release candidates are placed here 
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/

I think that we could push those release candidates to updates-testing to 
detect earlier problems. In any case we have to deal in the first push of the 
new version with the dependency of rpy.

Regards,

-- 
Jos? Ab?lio



From tcallawa at redhat.com  Tue Nov 20 19:41:34 2007
From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:41:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] [Idea]: pre 2.6.1 in updates-testing?
In-Reply-To: <200711191009.24826.jamatos@fc.up.pt>
References: <200711191009.24826.jamatos@fc.up.pt>
Message-ID: <1195587694.27963.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>


On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 10:09 +0000, Jos? Matos wrote:
> There are release candidates for R 2.6.1 that is expected to be release next 
> Monday (26).
> 
> Those daily release candidates are placed here 
> http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/
> 
> I think that we could push those release candidates to updates-testing to 
> detect earlier problems. In any case we have to deal in the first push of the 
> new version with the dependency of rpy.

I think, given the holidays, we're not going to see any additional
testing. I'll just bump to 2.6.1 when it releases, and handle rpy at the
same time.

~spot



From jamatos at fc.up.pt  Wed Nov 21 13:22:46 2007
From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (=?utf-8?q?Jos=C3=A9_Matos?=)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:22:46 +0000
Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] [Idea]: pre 2.6.1 in updates-testing?
In-Reply-To: <1195587694.27963.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <200711191009.24826.jamatos@fc.up.pt>
	<1195587694.27963.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <200711211322.47637.jamatos@fc.up.pt>

On Tuesday 20 November 2007 19:41:34 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> I think, given the holidays, we're not going to see any additional
> testing. I'll just bump to 2.6.1 when it releases, and handle rpy at the
> same time.

  That is fair. Enjoy the holidays. :-)

  I will take the change to update the rpy version, to 1.0.0, released 
yesterday (for F8+) but this is orthogonal to the new R version.

> ~spot

-- 
Jos? Ab?lio