From jamatos at fc.up.pt Tue Apr 22 16:28:55 2008 From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (=?iso-8859-1?q?Jos=E9_Matos?=) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:28:55 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Plans for R-2.7.0? Message-ID: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> Hi Tom, what are your plans for R-2.7.0 that was released today? FWIW I am asking just for curiosity. :-) Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio From tcallawa at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:37:40 2008 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Plans for R-2.7.0? In-Reply-To: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> References: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> Message-ID: <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:28 +0100, Jos? Matos wrote: > Hi Tom, > what are your plans for R-2.7.0 that was released today? FWIW I am asking > just for curiosity. :-) I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine whether it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions welcome. ~spot From pertusus at free.fr Tue Apr 22 17:43:29 2008 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:43:29 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Plans for R-2.7.0? In-Reply-To: <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20080422174329.GH24590@free.fr> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:37:40PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:28 +0100, Jos? Matos wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > what are your plans for R-2.7.0 that was released today? FWIW I am asking > > just for curiosity. :-) > > I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine whether > it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions welcome. I don't know about this particular case, but unless it fixes a known bug, I don't like last minute tags, I think the rawhide testing should not be bypassed. Only my opinion, and since I only run rawhide, no need to weigth it too much. -- Pat From jamatos at fc.up.pt Wed Apr 23 09:30:29 2008 From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (=?utf-8?q?Jos=C3=A9_Matos?=) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:30:29 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Plans for R-2.7.0? In-Reply-To: <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <200804231030.29353.jamatos@fc.up.pt> On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:37:40 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine whether > it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions welcome. AFAIK there is nothing so serious that can't wait for F-9 release. Also all modules need to be recompiled, this can be done best after F-9. Since the release schedule of R is 6 months I think that we should continue the policy, that has been followed, to release the new version as soon as feasible for all releases. This is different from the procedure used in perl, python, tcl but I think that in this case it is justified. Just my 2 ? (euro) on this issue. :-) > ~spot -- Jos? Ab?lio From pingou at pingoured.fr Wed Apr 23 09:44:38 2008 From: pingou at pingoured.fr (pingou) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:44:38 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Plans for R-2.7.0? In-Reply-To: <200804231030.29353.jamatos@fc.up.pt> References: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200804231030.29353.jamatos@fc.up.pt> Message-ID: <480F0506.80907@pingoured.fr> Jos? Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:37:40 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine whether >> it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions welcome. > > AFAIK there is nothing so serious that can't wait for F-9 release. Also all > modules need to be recompiled, this can be done best after F-9. > I need to recompile rkward against the new R, but this can be done via devel and the testing done via the testing repo. Fine for me :) Pierre From alexl at users.sourceforge.net Wed Apr 23 09:56:47 2008 From: alexl at users.sourceforge.net (Alex Lancaster) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:56:47 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: Plans for R-2.7.0? In-Reply-To: <200804231030.29353.jamatos@fc.up.pt> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Jos?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9?= Matos"'s message of "Wed\, 23 Apr 2008 10\:30\:29 +0100") References: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200804231030.29353.jamatos@fc.up.pt> Message-ID: >>>>> "JM" == Jos? Matos writes: JM> On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:37:40 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine >> whether it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions >> welcome. JM> AFAIK there is nothing so serious that can't wait for F-9 JM> release. Also all modules need to be recompiled, this can be done JM> best after F-9. I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing, have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding, including (but probably not limited to) rpy. Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing to shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable after F-9 is released. Alex From tcallawa at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 13:31:16 2008 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: Plans for R-2.7.0? In-Reply-To: References: <200804221728.56026.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <1208885860.12717.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200804231030.29353.jamatos@fc.up.pt> Message-ID: <1208957476.12717.151.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 02:56 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: > I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing, > have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding, > including (but probably not limited to) rpy. > > Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing to > shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable after F-9 > is released. Ehhh, i don't want to break the upgrade path. We'll just sit on this until after F-9. ~spot