From alexl at users.sourceforge.net Fri Jan 2 23:45:32 2009 From: alexl at users.sourceforge.net (Alex Lancaster) Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:45:32 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: useR! 2008 In-Reply-To: <48A0226C.6010303@pingoured.fr> (Pierre-Yves's message of "Mon\, 11 Aug 2008 13\:28\:44 +0200") References: <200808111038.49187.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <48A0226C.6010303@pingoured.fr> Message-ID: >>>>> "P" == Pierre-Yves writes: [...] P> Jos? Matos wrote: >> I will also take the opportunity to hear feedback from several >> types of users regarding the state of R in Fedora. If there is >> anything relevant I will report back to this list. P> I would like to know how the think on the difference between P> suggests and depends dependences of a library. (I still have in my P> mind the Bioconductor issue). Do they install both ? Do they care P> about the suggests ? Do they want them ? Hi Jos?, Just curious if you got any feedback at userR! from R developers regarding Fedora packaging (e.g. Bioconductor etc.) Alex From tcallawa at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 14:37:37 2009 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 09:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <49609EA6.5010006@biostat.ku.dk> References: <1229980888.4528.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49500BA6.6010200@biostat.ku.dk> <1229983083.4528.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49609EA6.5010006@biostat.ku.dk> Message-ID: <1231079857.3132.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 12:33 +0100, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Finally got around to testing it (sorry, but it didn't reach testing > till the 24th, and we have this thing call Christmas around here...). > > However, it now seems that I cannot update the karma system. Yesterday, > I got an "internal error" or some such when submitting, and now I can > submit, but only the text comes through, not my email addr. nor the > "works for me". So there's now two "anonymous tester" entries with a > bland smiley icon. Hmm, they came through to my inbox with your name/email. Very odd. :) ~spot From pingou at pingoured.fr Sun Jan 4 16:06:56 2009 From: pingou at pingoured.fr (Pierre-Yves) Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:06:56 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] How to predict the files installed ? Message-ID: <4960DEA0.4050304@pingoured.fr> Dear list(s), Several people are actually really interested to package the CRAN or Bioconductor in RPM using R2spec. One of the features that R2spec should handle is the %file section of the spec file, to handle it I would like to be able to predict which files are installed while running the `R CMD INSTALL package_name` command from the tarball directly. I could always make R2spec compiling the spec files but I would prefer not to. I have started to look at it but I have not find my way to do it yet, so I am asking here if anyone has an idea how I could do this. How I could from the tarball predict the file that are installed and thus that should be listed in the %file section. Thanks in advance for your help, Best regards, Pierre PS: I am emailing the lists fedora-r-devel-list and r-sig-fedora, feel free to remove one of the two while replying, I follow both. From tcallawa at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:09:29 2009 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1231155085.2945.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1229980888.4528.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49500BA6.6010200@biostat.ku.dk> <1229983083.4528.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49609EA6.5010006@biostat.ku.dk> <1231079857.3132.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4960CCFE.8010704@biostat.ku.dk> <1231155085.2945.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1231168169.18570.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 12:31 +0100, Martyn Plummer wrote: > I think we need to add pango-devel as a build requirement, so that the > cairo graphics device uses the pango layout engine. > > If you want to test this, I have rebuilt the RPMS with mock, after > adding pango-devel to BuildRequires, and put them here: > http://calvin.iarc.fr/~martyn/R-2.8.1/ > > I don't get the same "missing mu" bug, but I have some commercial fonts > installed. I do get error messages about missing font metrics, however, > which would be due to the lack of pango. > > > I also noticed that libRmath-devel does not pull in the right release of > libRmath. The requirements for libRmath-devel are currently: > > Requires: libRmath = %{version}, pkgconfig > > but should be: > > Requires: libRmath = %{version}-%{release}, pkgconfig See, this is why testing the updates is such a good thing. :) Thanks Martyn and Peter for figuring this out, I'll do new builds right now. ~spot From tcallawa at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 19:04:42 2009 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:04:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1231168169.18570.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1229980888.4528.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49500BA6.6010200@biostat.ku.dk> <1229983083.4528.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49609EA6.5010006@biostat.ku.dk> <1231079857.3132.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4960CCFE.8010704@biostat.ku.dk> <1231155085.2945.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1231168169.18570.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1231182282.3428.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:09 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 12:31 +0100, Martyn Plummer wrote: > > > I think we need to add pango-devel as a build requirement, so that the > > cairo graphics device uses the pango layout engine. > > > > If you want to test this, I have rebuilt the RPMS with mock, after > > adding pango-devel to BuildRequires, and put them here: > > http://calvin.iarc.fr/~martyn/R-2.8.1/ > > > > I don't get the same "missing mu" bug, but I have some commercial fonts > > installed. I do get error messages about missing font metrics, however, > > which would be due to the lack of pango. > > > > > > I also noticed that libRmath-devel does not pull in the right release of > > libRmath. The requirements for libRmath-devel are currently: > > > > Requires: libRmath = %{version}, pkgconfig > > > > but should be: > > > > Requires: libRmath = %{version}-%{release}, pkgconfig > > See, this is why testing the updates is such a good thing. :) > > Thanks Martyn and Peter for figuring this out, I'll do new builds right > now. It has not pushed to testing yet, but here are the URLs for the updated builds: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-2.8.1-2.fc9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-2.8.1-2.fc10 ~spot From jamatos at fc.up.pt Mon Jan 5 19:57:58 2009 From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (=?iso-8859-1?q?Jos=E9_Matos?=) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:57:58 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: useR! 2008 In-Reply-To: References: <200808111038.49187.jamatos@fc.up.pt> <48A0226C.6010303@pingoured.fr> Message-ID: <200901051957.59666.jamatos@fc.up.pt> On Friday 02 January 2009 23:45:32 Alex Lancaster wrote: > Hi Jos?, > > Just curious if you got any feedback at userR! from R developers > regarding Fedora packaging (e.g. Bioconductor etc.) Nope. I met and talked with Martyn, Peter Dalgaard and Marc Schwartz that are also subscribers from r-sig-fedora at r-project.org. > Alex -- Jos? Ab?lio From tcallawa at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 21:32:13 2009 From: tcallawa at redhat.com (Tom "spot" Callaway) Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <49627545.1040908@biostat.ku.dk> References: <1229980888.4528.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49500BA6.6010200@biostat.ku.dk> <1229983083.4528.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49609EA6.5010006@biostat.ku.dk> <1231079857.3132.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4960CCFE.8010704@biostat.ku.dk> <1231155085.2945.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1231168169.18570.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1231182282.3428.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49627545.1040908@biostat.ku.dk> Message-ID: <1231191133.3428.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 22:01 +0100, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Package R-devel-2.8.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm is not signed > > Is this to be expected? Yes. Packages are signed as part of the updates push process, and this update hasn't been pushed yet. ~spot