New FE vulnerabilities

Dennis Gilmore dennis at royalpublishing.com
Thu Mar 9 20:40:00 UTC 2006


On Thursday 09 March 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 22:14 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > Why is that?  I would MUCH prefer if discussions would be kept on-list.
> > Apologies if this was explained earlier, I missed the first few posts
> > here.
>
> I guess it depends on how we use this list.  We may want to ping for
> somebody to help with a given package, but not want to have a public
> record of the discussion of sensitive matter until such time as updates
> are prepared.  I don't want to see this list become a place for hackers
> to listen in on what packages are known to be flawed.
We definetly do not want this. a private list is probably needed for such 
things  perhaps  becoming public after 30 -60 days


> It took me VERY little time to get used to <ctrl>l to reply list.  I am
> on a LOT of lists and not all are configured the same.  Remembering
> <ctrl>l for every list will always do the right thing wrt replying to
> the list.  There are other RFE matters against munging the reply-to
> headers, but that's an exercise for the bored.  I've voiced my opinion,
> others can do the same.
kmail  you just hit l to reply to list

Dennis




More information about the Fedora-security-list mailing list