login default ... changed?

Stephen Smalley sds at epoch.ncsc.mil
Thu Apr 15 21:29:22 UTC 2004


On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 17:21, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> IIRC, it used to be that if I logged in from gdm as a sysadm_r user (staff_r 
> and sysadm_r) as defined in users, I would be logged in with sysadm_r.  This 
> appears to have changed (or my memory is faulty).  The default for a sysadm_r 
> user is to get staff_r and must use newrole -r sysadm_r to get that.  Good!  
> That is the way I think it should work.

Yes, I think that this was wrong earlier in default_contexts and
subsequently changed.  console login might still default to sysadm_r.

> The same is true for root.  As far as selinux is concerned, root is just 
> another sysadm_r user and the default role logging in from gdm is staff_r.  
> Is this what should be done.  This will certainly be a change for most users. 
> When I login as root from gdm, I do not expect that I will be prompted for 
> root's password when I invoke system-config-users from the menu.

You can create a /root/.default_contexts file that will take precedence
over /etc/security/default_contexts for root logins.  So you can still
have 'root' default to sysadm_r if desired.

> I also notice that doing an "su -" to root or another sysadm_r user will 
> default to sysadm_r role for that user.  if it is from another sysadm_r user, 
> then I get a choice of sysadm_r (default) or staff_r.  If it is from a user_r 
> user, then no choice, I just get sysadm_r.

This has to do with the allowed role transitions in the policy.  The
standard policy didn't allow user_r -> sysadm_r at all; the
user_canbe_sysadm tunable introduced a user_r -> sysadm_r transition,
but did not include a user_r -> staff_r transition.
No real reason to omit it in that case.

-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds at epoch.ncsc.mil>
National Security Agency




More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list