ntp

Russell Coker russell at coker.com.au
Fri Jun 18 04:27:17 UTC 2004


On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:03, "Jason Hooper" <jhooper at tlcontact.com> wrote:
> Yeah it seems like it should just work...yet it doesn't...wierd.   I have
> two machines trying to sync ( well, three, but the third one works and is
> not selinux )
>
> I get this avc on both :
>
> Machine1 :
>
> Jan  3 02:11:03 doh1 kernel: audit(1041581463.810:0): avc:  denied  { write
> } for  pid=1694 exe=/usr/sbin/ntpdate path=/ dev=hda3 ino=3367
> scontext=root:system_r:ntpd_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:root_t
> tclass=chr_file
>
> Machine2 has an ntpd.te file while machine1 does not.   Does that matter in
> this case?  I can send it if its needed.

To be pedantic, you would not have a domain of "ntpd_t" unless there was 
ntpd.te installed.  Machine1 may have installed a binary policy, or the 
source policy may have been changed, but ntpd.te was certainly used.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page



More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list