C2 or B1

[Russell Coker]

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 06:52, Lawrence Bowie <thesource at ldb-jab.org> wrote:
> At this point SELinux does not have official "Orange Book"
> classification, right?

Classification applies to complete OS installations.  SE Linux is not an OS, 
it is a security enhancement for Linux, and therefore it is not eligible for 
certification on it's own.  It is expected that Linux distributions 
incorporating SE Linux technology will do well in certification tests.  AFAIK 
no-one has done such tests yet, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 when it's 
released next year is likely to be the first Linux distribution to go through 
the certification process with SE Linux enabled.

Also I believe that classifications such as "C2" and "B1" are obsolete and 
have been for years.

http://csrc.nist.gov/cc/
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/public/developer/index.php?menu=1
Above is a link to information on the Common Criteria (replacement for the 
"Orange Book").  Computer systems are evaluated against a "Protection 
Profile" (PP).  Conformance to that PP is evaluated according to an 
"Evaluation Assurance Level" (EAL) which is a numerical rating that indicates 
how well you achieved the goals of the PP.  A higher EAL number does not 
necessarily mean a more secure system, a lower EAL number for a different PP 
may be more difficult to achieve.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page