Installing new policy?

Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at redhat.com
Tue Mar 9 14:56:43 UTC 2004


Russell Coker wrote:

>On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:53, Tom Mitchell <mitch48 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>If you're pushing new policy that actually fixes bugs will it break site
>>policy? I would be unhappy if my co-lo box had this line changed. ;-)
>>   # uncomment to allow ssh logins as sysadm_r:sysadm_t
>>   define(`ssh_sysadm_login')
>>    
>>
>
>This is a difficult issue.  For Debian I have it ask a heap of questions at 
>policy upgrade time about replacing policy files, but lots of people seem to 
>dislike that.
>
>One possibility is to replace files that have not been changed.  However that 
>means that if a macro changes without the calling code changing then it could 
>break policy compiles.
>  
>

RPM should leave the tunable.te file and create a tunable.te.rpmnew file.




More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list