Should Yum and up2date understand SELinux roles

[Daniel J Walsh]

Tom Mitchell wrote:

>On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 09:09:39AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  
>
>>Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:09:39 -0500
>>From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>
>>To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com>
>>Subject: Re: Should Yum and up2date understand SELinux roles
>>Reply-To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com>
>>
>>Tom Mitchell wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Should yum check "id" for sysadm_r role?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>....
>  
>
>>No if unlimitedUsers tunable is set the following rule needs to be added 
>>to rpm.te
>>
>>ifdef(`unlimitedUsers', `
>>domain_auto_trans(staff_t, rpm_exec_t, rpm_t)
>>')
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Thank you unlimitedUsers was set (will make the change and retest soon).
>Will your  small snip of policy be in a future version of rpm.te?
>
>
>  
>
Yes it is in policy-1.9.1-2.

Yum update should grab it.