Progress! .532 boots! -- but dbus/hotplug/udev problems remain?

[Stephen Smalley]

On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 07:33, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> These permissions shouldn't be granted directly to the user domains.  We
> need per-userdomain dbusd domains defined via a macro for the
> per-session message bus.  

BTW, note that in the rawhide policy, Dan (or someone) has added a
domain_auto_trans(userdomain, dbusd_exec_t, dbusd_t) to dbusd.te as a
workaround so that the per-session bus daemons also run in dbusd_t, but
that isn't truly what we want in the long term.

-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds at epoch.ncsc.mil>
National Security Agency